ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03487484Updated Apr 10, 2020

Quality of Life in Patients With Rectal Cancer Receiving Total Mesorectal Excision With or Without Stoma

An observational study in Rectal Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Terminated at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-10.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Observational

Why this study was terminated
insufficient recruitment
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal is to evaluate whether the renunciation of a diverting stoma in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy leads to a better quality of life without increasing morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

In most cases it is recommended that patients after low anterior resection with TME and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer need a temporarily diverting stoma. Recent evidence suggests that this is not always necessary. The decision for or against a stoma is made by the surgeon in charge and is based on an algorithm of risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Many patients receive an adjuvant chemotherapy postoperative. This may influence the quality of life e.a. due to mucositis and urge incontinency or the stoma itself.The objective of this pilot study is to establish the basis for a randomized controlled trial. The long-term goal is to evaluate whether the renunciation of a diverting stoma in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy after low anterior resection with TME and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy leads to a better quality of life without increasing morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer. All patients scheduled for low anterior resection of the rectum for rectal carcinoma will be invited to participate and prospectively enrolled into the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

1,804 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 520 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 156 across 421 observational studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 989 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age older than 18,
  • low anterior resection and TME due to rectum carcinoma after standardized neoadjuvant combined chemo- and radiotherapy and receiving adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy,
  • German speaking patient who is capable to fill in the questionnaire,
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age younger than 18,
  • preoperative stoma,
  • not German speaking
  • inability to fill in the questionnaire,
  • no standardized chemo- and radiotherapy
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • With protective stoma

    Patients in which intraoperatively the decision was made to add a protective stoma (following a risk algorithm) to total mesorectal excision. In patients quality of life, the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire for gastrointestinal tract and Faecal Incontinence Score will be applied.

    Behavioral: Quality of Life Questionnaire for gastrointestinal tract · Behavioral: Quality of Life Questionnaire · Behavioral: Faecal Incontinence Score

  • No stoma

    Patients in which intraoperatively the decision was made to refrain from adding a protective stoma (following a risk algorithm) to total mesorectal excision. In patients quality of life, the GIQLI questionnaire (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index), Quality of Life Questionnaire for gastrointestinal tract and Faecal Incontinence Score will be applied.

    Behavioral: Quality of Life Questionnaire for gastrointestinal tract · Behavioral: Quality of Life Questionnaire · Behavioral: Faecal Incontinence Score

Interventions

  • BehavioralQuality of Life Questionnaire for gastrointestinal tract

    To assess quality of life, the GIQLI questionnaire (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index) will be applied

    Also known as: GIQLI questionnaire

  • BehavioralQuality of Life Questionnaire

    To assess quality of life, the SF-36 questionnaire will be applied

    Also known as: SF-36 questionnaire

  • BehavioralFaecal Incontinence Score

    To assess faecal incontinence, the Vaizey Wexner questionnaire will be applied

    Also known as: Vaizey Wexner questionnaire

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life specific for the gastrointestinal tract

    GIQLI Score

    Time frame: at Baseline and up to 12 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life

    Short Form (SF) 36

    Time frame: at Baseline and up to 12 months after surgery

  2. Change in faecal Incontinence

    Vaizey Wexner Score

    Time frame: at Baseline and up to 12 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St Claraspital
    Basel, 4058, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2020, 24 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 26, 2018
First posted
Apr 4, 2018
StartActual
Mar 22, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 22, 2020
CompletionActual
Mar 22, 2020
Last update
Apr 10, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03487484
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 4, 2018
Start date
Mar 22, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 22, 2020
Completion
Mar 22, 2020
Last update
Apr 10, 2020

Study contacts

Susanne Drews, MD
principal investigator · Claraspital Basel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion