ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03487471ElastoUpdated May 8, 2024

Comparison of Real-time and Shear Wave Elastography

An interventional study of Real-time elastography and Shear wave elastography in Breast Diseases, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-08.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Tissue elasticity is being increasingly used as diagnostic parameter, since at the macroscopic level benign breast lesions tend to be stiffer than normal breast tissue but softer than breast cancers. Ultrasound elastography allows to probe the elasticity of breast lesions in clinics. Real time elastography (RTE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) are the two most widely used elastography modalities.

Assessment of breast lesions by either RTE or SWE improve the diagnostic performance of standard B-mode ultrasound (US) and have the potential to assist the decision about whether to perform a breast biopsy or not.

Read the detailed description

Tissue elasticity is being increasingly used as diagnostic parameter, since at the macroscopic level benign breast lesions tend to be stiffer than normal breast tissue but softer than breast cancers. Ultrasound elastography allows to probe the elasticity of breast lesions in clinics. Real time elastography (RTE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) are the two most widely used elastography modalities.

Assessment of breast lesions by either RTE or SWE improve the diagnostic performance of standard B-mode ultrasound (US) and have the potential to assist the decision about whether to perform a breast biopsy or not. However, employing RTE and SWE using the same equipment to directly compare elasticity measurements of a breast lesion has not been done. Investigators propose to prospectively investigate inter-observer agreement of each modality.

The study will investigate and compare the accuracy and reproducibility of SWE and RTE in the characterization of breast lesions. Furthermore, we plan to establish learning curves for RTE and SWE.

In this project, investigators will compare RTE and SWE concerning their potential to discriminate benign breast lesions from breast cancer. Investigators aim is to identify which modality will allow clinicians the best possible patient care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Diseases

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Diseases

153 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Diseases; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is below the median of 120 across 95 interventional studies indexed under Breast Diseases.

Browse Breast Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 989 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients at least 18 years of age with a known breast lesion
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male
  • Younger than 18 years of age
  • Pregnant or lactating women
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Real-time elastography

    98 patients with breast lesion will a receive breast ultrasound (real time elastography)

    Diagnostic Test: Real-time elastography

  • Active comparator
    Shear Wave

    98 patients with breast lesion will a receive breast ultrasound (shear wave elastography)

    Diagnostic Test: Shear wave elastography

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testReal-time elastography

    Breast ultrasound with real-time elastography

  • Diagnostic testShear wave elastography

    Breast ultrasound with shear wave elastography

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. assessment of dignity of breast lesion by use of real-time elastography

    variability in breast lesion diagnostics by use of real-time elastography versus shear wave elastography

    Time frame: at baseline

  2. assessment of dignity of breast lesion by use of shear wave elastography

    variability in breast lesion diagnostics by use of real-time elastography versus shear wave elastography

    Time frame: at baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Examinators learning curve

    Establish learning curves for real-time elastography and shear wave elastography

    Time frame: baseline until year 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St Claraspital
    Basel, 4016, Switzerland
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 45 months.

Of 29 interventional studies with no phase under Breast Diseases, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 65. This study's 45 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2018
First posted
Apr 4, 2018
StartActual
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2021
CompletionActual
Dec 18, 2023
Last update
May 8, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03487471
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 4, 2018
Start date
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021
Completion
Dec 18, 2023
Last update
May 8, 2024

Study contacts

Rosanna Zanetti
principal investigator · St Claraspital Basel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion