An interventional study of Control group and Intervention group in Knee Injuries, sponsored by Keller Army Community Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-20.
Sponsored by Keller Army Community Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 94 studies in Knee Injuries with a site in United States — 16 open to participants now, 24 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Knee Injuries · United States.
Among the 94 studies in Knee Injuries with a site in United States, this one is the 46th largest by enrollment of the 75 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 8 that started in 2018, is one of 57 with no phase, and was the 39th registered.
267 studies on the registry are indexed under Knee Injuries; 59 are open to participants now.
Browse Knee Injuries studies →16 of the 94 studies in Knee Injuries with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
University of Central Florida · Sites in United States
Ages 18–30 · Healthy volunteers
Stryker Endoscopy · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Sites in United States
Ages 16–35
Connecticut Children's Medical Center · Sites in United States
Ages 12–18
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 42 Knee Injuries studies recruiting now, 12 (29%) set no upper age limit and 27 (64%) stop at 75 or younger; 12 take children under 18; 9 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years to 55 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
94 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 4 · Phase 2 5 · Phase 3 10 · Phase 4 2
First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 8 started in 2018.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 49 across 178 interventional studies indexed under Knee Injuries.
Median enrollment 40 across the 75 interventional studies, 170 across the 19 observational. Of the 59 that completed or were terminated, 26 (44%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
18 of 94 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Keller Army Community Hospital is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Keller Army Community Hospital has 3 studies filed under Knee Injuries — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
12 of the studies in Knee Injuries with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT05652270Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterMaximizing Patient Goal Attainment | 2026-11-30 |
| NCT05824676Hartford HospitalDePuy Synthes Variable Angle LCP Patella Plating System Study | 2026-12 |
| NCT04109638Stanford UniversityPulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Therapy for Post-operative Pain Following Orthopedic Surgery | 2027-02 |
| NCT06916728Smith & Nephew, Inc.A Post Approval Multicenter 10 Year Follow-up Observational Trial of Marketed Product - MP01 vs. Surgical Standard of Care (SSOC) Used for the Treatment of Joint Surface Lesions of the Knee | 2027-02-05 |
| NCT03543098University of PittsburghSTaR Trial: Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries | 2027-06 |
Among the 94 studies in Knee Injuries with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of telehealth via video feedback to transition rear foot strike runners to non-heel strike runner following a lower extremity injury. Telehealth re-education gait training is much cheaper than in-clinic retraining sessions with a medical provider and could be much more widely used by both consumers and researchers as a training aid, a way to help alter running form, prevent running injuries and be used as a tool for use in the rehabilitation of running related injuries.
A convenience sample of 30 runners from the United States Military Academy (USMA) at West Point, New York (NY) who are recovering from a lower-extremity injury and are interested in participating in a return to run program. Acceptable lower-extremity injuries can include stress fractures proximal to the ankle, anterior chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS), patella-femoral pain syndrome, osteoarthritis of the lower-extremity, iliotibial band syndrome, chronic lower-extremity pain and or any participant that may benefit from the following; shorter stride, increased step rate, reduced knee loading, and reduced ground reaction force average vertical loading rates (AVLR). All participants will be screened via questionnaire and physical assessment for inclusion / exclusion from the study. Upon enrollment runners will be randomized into two groups. Regardless of group, all runners will have their running form and foot strike pattern analyzed using an instrumented treadmill and high-speed motion capture initially and at week 10. Kinetic and kinematic data including AVLR, impulse, foot strike pattern (FSP), contact time, step length, and step rate will be recorded at these time points. Additionally, all runners will receive the same graduated return to run intervals and 4-week home exercise program. Runners randomized to the intervention group will receive additional video tele-health instruction on how to transition to a non-rearfoot strike (NRFS) running pattern. Runners in the intervention group will have additional tele-health follow-ups at weeks 1, 2, 4,6, 8, and 10 using a tele-conferencing program and the Hudl Technique application. At each tele-health video follow-up participants will be emailed a questionnaire assessing their progress and function. At month 6 a final data collection session to include video analysis will be performed.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The experimental group will have no in person education by researchers. All education and running modification will be performed via video. Education on running form, a home exercise program, and a 4 week return to run program will be provided to the subjects through e-mail. They will also receive the same in person video analysis performed at weeks 0 (initial), 10 and 6 months to assess running kinematics.
Other: Intervention group
This group will have the same 4 week return to run program, home exercise program, and video analysis performed at weeks 0 (initial), 10 and 6 months to assess running kinematics.
Other: Control group
Control group runners will receive the same graduated return to run intervals and 4-week home exercise program. However, they will receive no video education during the initial 10 weeks.
Runners randomized to the intervention group will receive additional video tele-health instruction on how to transition to a non-rearfoot strike (NRFS) running pattern. Runners in the intervention group will have additional tele-health follow-ups at weeks 1, 2, 4,6, 8, and 10 using a tele-conferencing program and the Hudl Technique application. At each tele-health video follow-up participants will be emailed a questionnaire assessing their progress and function. At month 6 a final data collection session to include video analysis will be performed.
Foot Strike Pattern
Analyzed through slow motion camera on an instrumented treadmill.
Time frame: 6 months
Perceived running pain
Subjects will self evaluate running ease and efficiency through the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation.
Time frame: 6 months
Perceived running effort
Subjects will self evaluate running ease and efficiency through the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index.
Time frame: 6 months
Perceived effort of running
Subjects will self evaluate running ease and efficiency through the Patient Specific Functional Scale.
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: No — The principal investigator will keep your research records. These records may be looked at by staff from the Keller Army Community Hospital Department of Clinical Investigation, the Keller Army Community Hospital (KACH) Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Army Clinical Investigation Regulatory Office (CIRO), the Department of Defense (DoD) Higher Level Review, and other government agencies as part of their duties. These duties include making sure that the research participants are protected. Your research records may be disclosed outside of the hospital, but in this case, you will be identified only by a unique code number. Information about the code will be kept in a secure location and access limited to authorized research study personnel. This research study meets the confidentiality requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Oct 2018 to primary completion in May 2019, 7 months.
Of 94 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Knee Injuries, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 51. This study's 7 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 99 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 51.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Keller Army Community Hospital