ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03480516Updated Aug 6, 2019

Comparison of Caries Arrested & Prevented Among SDF, NaF Varnish and Combination in Children

An interventional study of SDF and Fluoride varnish in Dental Caries in Children, Satisfaction and Cost Effectiveness, sponsored by Khon Kaen University. Completed at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 7 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-06.

Sponsored by Khon Kaen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2017, registered Mar 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Tooth decay is one of the most common chronic infectious disease found in children worldwide and if left untreated, is rapidly progress. Severe tooth decay in children is not only affect child's health and school performance, but also has impact on the family well-being. Oral rehabilitation in children requires time, resources and effort of dental specialists, the child and parents. Caries is a destructive condition of organic and inorganic components of the tooth structures but reversible and most importantly, preventable. Topical fluoride therapy, delivered by dentists has been effectively used to speed up the repair process as well as to strengthen the surface of intact tooth structure. Topical fluoride is available in various preparations. Regular application of sodium fluoride varnish is every three months, by far, considered as effective method in preventing new caries, particularly in the high-risk children. It has the advantage of containing therapeutic concentration of fluoride and ability to flow over and stick to the tooth surface. Whereas silver ion and relatively higher fluoride concentration in Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) has been shown to be the most effective in harden the decay, stop the caries progress and eliminate pathogenic bacteria. It can be hypothesize that when use in combination in school children, both reagents might have synergistic effect on arresting existing caries as well as preventing new caries.

Read the detailed description

Fluoride varnish is a good choice to consider. For caries prevention in young children, It has high efficacy in caries prevention.

Fluoride varnish has a high F concentration and prolong contact time with enamel, So it can prevent new caries and remineralize initial enamel caries. Silver diamine fluoride solution is effective in arresting dentine caries. Silver diamine fluoride has high fluoride concentration and contain silver ion. when apply dentine caries or cavitated caries can increase hardness of dentine and arresting caries.

When use in combination, it might enhance, the Efficacy in Arresting and Preventing Dental Caries in children

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Caries in Children
  • Satisfaction
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Oral Health
  • Quality of Life

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Silver Diamine Fluoride
  • Sodium Fluoride Varnish
  • Arrest caries
  • Caries prevention
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Oral Health
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Personal Satisfaction

541 studies on the registry are indexed under Personal Satisfaction; 93 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 300 is above the median of 93 across 416 interventional studies indexed under Personal Satisfaction.

Browse Personal Satisfaction studies →

Lead sponsor

Khon Kaen University is the lead sponsor of 161 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • School children aged 6- 7 years old.
  • Have at least one or more active dentin caries lesions in primary canine/molar.
  • Parents give consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncooperative child
  • Allergic reaction to silver or materials containing adhesive.
  • Received topical fluoride 3 months prior to enrollment.
  • Primary carers are unable to response to questionnaire.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
300 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SDF arm

    SDF arm is application of 38% silver diamine fluoride solution (SDF) on cavitated caries in primary molar, , cavities in anterior teeth will be applied only on additional consent obtained.

    Device: SDF

  • Experimental
    Fluoride varnish arm

    Fluoride varnish arm is application of 5% sodium fluoride varnish on all surface of every tooth.

    Device: Fluoride varnish

  • Experimental
    Combination arm

    Combination arm is application of 38% silver diamine fluoride solution(SDF) on cavitated caries in primary molar, , cavities in anterior teeth will be applied only on additional consent obtained and then apply of 5% sodium fluoride varnish on all surface of every tooth.

    Device: SDF · Device: Fluoride varnish

Interventions

  • DeviceSDF

    38% silver diamine fluoride solution

    Also known as: Silver diamine fluoride

  • DeviceFluoride varnish

    5% sodium fluoride varnish

    Also known as: Sodium fluoride varnish

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of arrested caries lesion changed from baseline

    Number of arrested caries lesion changed from baseline. The arresting dentine caries lesion was evaluated at 18 months after first application. Evaluation criteria included the condition of the hardness and discoloration of carious lesion. The carious lesion was re-categorized as a binary outcome: Dental caries (active/inactive)

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Increasing number of new caries lesion from baseline

    The dental caries status was evaluated at 6 months after fluoride application. Evaluation criteria included decay(d), missing(m), filling(f) index

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Increasing number of new caries lesion from baseline

    The dental caries status was evaluated at 12 months after fluoride application. Evaluation criteria included decay(d), missing(m), filling(f) index

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Increasing number of new caries lesion from baseline

    The dental caries status was evaluated at 18 months after fluoride application. Evaluation criteria included decay(d), missing(m), filling(f) index

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Parental satisfaction

    parental satisfaction will be collected, by a seft-administered questionnaire, at 2 weeks.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  5. Parental satisfaction

    parental satisfaction will be collected, by a seft-administered questionnaire, at 18 months

    Time frame: 18 months

  6. Child satisfaction

    Child satisfaction will be collected after fluoride application by interview. at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Child satisfaction

    Child satisfaction will be collected after fluoride application by interview. at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Child satisfaction

    Child satisfaction will be collected after fluoride application by interview. at 18 months

    Time frame: 18 months

  9. Cost Effectiveness

    Cost effectiveness analysis of arrested caries lesion and new caries lesion at 18 months

    Time frame: 18 months

  10. Oral Health-Related Quality of life

    Oral health related quality of life in children is being measured using the Child-Oral Impacts on Daily Performance Index (Child-OIDP) at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry , Khon Kaen University
    Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 6, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03480516
Responsible party
Kemporn Kitsahawong (Associate Professor, Khon Kaen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2019
Completion
Jul 31, 2019
Last update
Aug 6, 2019

Study contacts

Kemporn Kitsahawong, DDS., MSc.
principal investigator · Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion