ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03477500RAM-MSUpdated Jun 25, 2025

Randomized Autologous heMatopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab for RRMS (RAM-MS)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cyclophosphamide and ATG and Alemtuzumab in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Haukeland University Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 8 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-25.

Sponsored by Haukeland University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a randomized multicentre, multinational, treatment interventional study of RRMS patients with breakthrough inflammatory disease activity in spite of ongoing standard immunomodulatory medication. The study has two treatment arms; arm A: HSCT (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and arm B: alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab. A pre-planned 3-year follow-up extension period will be performed depending on future funding.

The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness and side effects of a new treatment intervention in RRMS; HSCT, and, thereby, the value of HSCT in clinical practice. Data from recently published patient series indicate that HSCT may have a significantly higher treatment effect than currently registered RRMS immunomodulatory treatments. This study will determine the relative role of HSCT versus alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized study of autologous HSCT using a low intensity, non-ablative conditioning regimen with cyclophosphamide and ATG versus treatment with the currently presumed best available immunomodulatory medication (alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab) in RRMS patients with significant inflammatory disease activity in spite of ongoing immunomodulatory MS treatment.

Significant disease activity is defined as having one or more clinically reported multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse(s), AND 1 or more T1 Gd-enhanced lesion(s), OR three or more new or enlarging T2 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over the last year while being treated on immunomodulatory medication by standard national guidelines. The relapse(s) must have occurred 3 or more months after the onset of an immunomodulatory treatment, as immunomodulatory treatment in MS may reach full effect after 3 months or more.

Both the knowledge of the treatment effect of registered immunomodulatory therapies for RRMS, and the number of treatments approved for RRMS by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) are rapidly increasing. During the study period, there may thus appear new supplementing information on other MS immunomodulatory treatments that favour the use of a new comparator (replacing or supplementing the comparators). This will be evaluated by the PMC if applicable during the study period and the planned extension period.

If the treatment efficacy obtained by HSCT is better than the currently most efficacious standard, immunomodulatory treatment in randomized treatment trials, HSCT will likely be approved as a part of the standard treatment recommendations for a significant proportion of RRMS patients. A randomized study regarding with statistical power to evaluate the clinical outcome of autologous HSCT compared to a standard immunomodulatory treatment in MS has not yet been published. Except for Sweden, HSCT is currently not registered as a part of standard MS treatment in the public health services of Europe. The HSCT regimen for the study will be identical to the regimen used in similar patient populations in Sweden, Norway and Denmark.

Alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab have been chosen as the primary comparators, because they are the immunomodulatory medication currently authorised by the EMA for treatment of RRMS with the most favourable therapeutic effects. In a meta-analysis of immunomodulatory treatment effects in RRMS, thse medications had the most eminent reduction of annualized relapse rate and 3 month confirmed disability progression.

In this study, a health economic evaluation will be included. Accordingly, the proposed study should provide a robust basis for future official decisions regarding the role of HSCT in RRMS treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • multiple sclerosis,
  • HSCT
  • alemtuzumab
  • RCT
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,264 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 659 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 50 across 2,201 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Haukeland University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age between ≥18 to ≤50, both genders
  2. Women of * (WOCBP) and men in a sexual relation with WOCBP must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly.
  3. Diagnosis of RRMS using revised McDonald criteria of clinically definite MS1
  4. An EDSS score of 0 to 5.5
  5. Significant inflammatory disease activity in the last year despite treatment with standard disease modifying therapy (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, fingolimod, natalizumab)

    a. Significant inflammatory disease activity is defined by: i. One or more clinically reported multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse(s), ii. AND 1 or more T1 Gd-enhanced lesion(s), iii. OR three or more new or enlarging T2 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) The relapse(s) must have been treated with iv or oral high dose prescribed by a neurologist, and must have occurred 3 or more months after the onset of an immunomodulatory treatment, as MS immunomodulatory treatment may reach full effect after 3 months or more2.

  6. The patient is a RRMS-patient referred from neurological departments in Norway, Denmark, Sweden or possibly other European countries to an assigned study site.
  7. Signed and expected patient cooperation regarding the treatment schemes and procedures planned in the treatment and follow-up periods must be obtained and documented according to ICH GCP and national/local regulations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known or other known serious side effects for any of the study medications, including co-medications such as high-dose glucocorticosteroids
  2. Any illness or prior treatment that in the opinion of the investigators would jeopardize the ability of the patient to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy or high-dose glucocorticosteroids
  3. Any ongoing infection, including Tbc, CMV, EBV, HSV, VZV, hepatitis virus, toxoplasmosis, or syphilis infections, as well as heaptitis B surface antigen positivity and/or PCR positivity verified at Visit 1
  4. Patients without a history of chickenpox or without vaccination against varicella zoster virus (VZV), unless tested for antibodies to VZV. VZV negative patients can only be included if they receive vaccination against VZV at least 6 weeks prior to inclusion.
  5. Current or previous treatments with long-term effects that may influence the treatment effects or potential toxicities/side effects of the treatment arms. This includes, but is not restricted to previous treatment with rituximab, mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, cladribin and ocrelizumab
  6. patients, or patients currently reveiving immunosuppressive or myelosuppressive therapy
  7. Treatment with or ACTH within one month prior to start of study treatment
  8. Having experienced an MS relapse within one month prior to study inclusion
  9. Prior or current major depression
  10. Prior or current psychiatric illness, mental deficiency or cognitive dysfunction influencing the patient ability to make an or comply with the treatment and follow-up phases of this protocol.
  11. Prior or current alcohol or drug dependencies
  12. Cardiac insufficiency, cardiomyopathy, significant cardiac dysrhytmia, unstable or advanced ischemic heart disease ( III or IV)
  13. Significant hypertension: BP > 180/110
  14. Active , or prior history of malignancy except localized basal cell, squamous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
  15. Known untreated or unregulated thyroid disease
  16. Failure to willingly accept or comprehend risk of irreversible sterility as a side effect of therapy
  17. WBC \< 1,5 x 109/L if not caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication. If WBC \< 1,5 x 109/L is caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication the WBC count must be > 1,5 x 109/L before start of study treatment.
  18. (thrombocyte) count \< 100 x 109/L
  19. ALAT and/or ASAT more than 2 times the upper normal reference limit (UNL)
  20. Serum creatinine > 200 µmol/L
  21. Serum >
  22. Moderate or severely impaired kidney function (creatinine-clearance below 60 ml/min)
  23. Presence of metallic objects implanted in the body that would preclude the ability of the patient to safely have MRI exams
  24. Diagnosis of primary progressive MS
  25. Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS
  26. Treatment with natalizumab and fingolimod within the last 2 months, and treatment with dimetylfumurat within the last month (washout must be performed as specified in section 5.1) prior to start of study medication.
  27. Use of teriflunomide (Aubagio®) within the previous 2 years unless cleared from the body (plasma concentration \< 0.02 mcg/ml following elimination from the body with cholestyramine or activated powdered charcoal) as specified in section 5.1 prior to start of study medication.
  28. Any hereditary neurological disease such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease or Spinocerebellar ataxia
  29. Any disease that can influence the patient safety and compliance, or the evaluation of disability
  30. History of hypersensitivity reaction to rabbit
  31. Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or who plan to become pregnant within the timeframe of this study
  32. Currently enrolled in another device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational treatment(s). Patients participating in a purely observational trial will not be excluded.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(14)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HSCT (Cyclophosphamide and ATG)

    Day 1: Cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2 body surface area Days 5-10: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) 5 mcg/kg body weight/day sc. Day 11 and until apheresis is discontinued: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) 5 mcg/kg body weight x 2 sc/day. HSCT days -5 to -2: Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day. HSCT days -5 to -1: Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG-rabbit, Thymoglobuline®) 0.5 mg/kg body weight iv on day -5, 1.0 mg ATG-rabbit/kg will be given iv on day -4, and 1.5 mg ATG-rabbit /kg will be given iv on days -3,-2 and -1 over 10 hours. HSCT day 0: Reinfusion of a minimum of 3,0 x 106 CD 34+ cells/kg body weight.

    Drug: Cyclophosphamide and ATG

  • Active comparator
    Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab

    Alemtuzumab, Cladribine or Ocrelizumab administered after the label of the study drug.

    Drug: Alemtuzumab · Drug: Cladribine Pill · Drug: Ocrelizumab

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA, as defined per protocol).

    A protocol-defined disease activity event is the occurrence of at least one of the following: * A new T1 Gd-enhanced lesion on MRI of the brain and spinal cord * A new T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI of brain and spinal cord * A protocol-defined MS relapse (see below) * 24 week confirmed disability progression based on increases in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period with a 5 year (240 week) planned extension

Secondary outcomes

  1. NEDA-4

    Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity, including atrophy (NEDA 4), as per protocol defined disease activity events (as defined in section 2.2) plus atrophy (measured yearly atrophy above threshold of 0, 4 %)

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period

  2. Pre-planned study extension:

    Proportion of patients who have NEDA 4

    Time frame: 5 year (240 week) period.

  3. Time to first protocol-defined disease activity event

    Time to first sign of new disease activity, as measured as new relapses, EDSS-progression, MRI-activity or brain atrophy

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  4. Change in Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS) from baseline (Visit 4.1) to Weeks 96 and 240

    EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicate worse neurological function. Change was calculated by subtracting retreatment baseline (annual visit prior to the retreatment start date) value from EDSS scores at specified time points.

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  5. The proportion of patients who, at Week 96, have protocol-defined Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) , confirmed stable EDSS or Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) compared to baseline

    Disability progression, as measured with EDSS. EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicate worse neurological function. Change was calculated by subtracting retreatment baseline (annual visit prior to the retreatment start date) value from EDSS scores at specified time points.

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  6. Annualized rate of protocol-defined relapses during 96 weeks

    ARR

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  7. Time to onset of first protocol-defined relapse

    Time to first relapse

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  8. Change in MRI T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volume from baseline to weeks 96 (and 240)

    Change in T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volume

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  9. Change in MRI T1-weighted hypointense lesion volume from baseline to weeks 96 (and 240)

    Change in MRI T1-weighted hypointense lesion volume

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  10. Change in brain volume from baseline to week 96 (and week 240)

    Change in brain volume

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  11. Time to detection of a new MRI T2 lesion

    Time to New MRI T2-lesion

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  12. Total number of MRI T1-weighted Gd-enhanced lesions

    Number of Gd-lesions

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  13. Proportion of patients free from T1 Gd-enhancing lesions

    Proportion of patients free from T1 Gd-enhancing lesions

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  14. Change in Nine-hole-peg test (9-HPT) score from baseline to week 96 (and 240)

    The 9HPT is a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function. The participant picks up 9 pegs puts them in a block containing nine empty holes, and, once they are in the holes, removes them again as quickly as possible one at a time. The total time to complete the task is recorded. Two consecutive trials with the dominant hand are immediately followed by two consecutive trials with the non-dominant hand. The two trials for each hand are averaged

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  15. Change in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) score from baseline to week 48, 96 (and 240)

    The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The participant is directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and is instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible, but safely. The time is calculated from the initiation of the instruction to start and ends when the participant has reached the 25-foot mark. The task is immediately administered again by having the patient walk back the same distance. The score for the T25FW is the average of the 2 completed trials. The 95% CI of the percentage is based on normal approximation.

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  16. Change in The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) score from baseline to week 96 (and 240)

    BICAMS is a composite cognitive assessment tool comprising of the three components : Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) , California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) and Brief visuospatial memory test- Revised (BVMT-R)

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

Other outcomes

  1. Difference in patient reported quality of life based on the EuroQoL Health Related Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D 5L) scores

    EQ-5D 5L is a 5 item questionnaire (assessing - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and visual analogue scale (VAS) enables calculation of quality adjusted life years (QALY) to enable health economic analyses to be performed. Each dimension assessed has 5 response scales to select from: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  2. Overall survival rate

    Survival

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  3. Rate and nature of adverse events

    Rate and nature of adverse events

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  4. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    The FSS questionnaire contains nine statements that rate the severity of fatigue symptoms. A low value (e.g., 1); indicates strong disagreement with the statement, whereas a high value (e.g., 7); indicates strong agreement. A total score of 36 or more suggests presence of fatigue.

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  5. Change in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS) - 29

    Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 was comprised of 9 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Psychological Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 9 questions - 9/0.36. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  6. Severity of relapses (residual disability (EDSS) after relapses)

    EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that quantifies disability in participants with MS. It assesses the 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicate worse neurological function. Change was calculated by subtracting retreatment baseline (annual visit prior to the retreatment start date) value from EDSS scores at specified time points.

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

  7. Frequency of serious adverse events

    Frequency of serious adverse events

    Time frame: 2 year (96 week) period, with planned extension for 5 year (240 week) period

07

Study locations

8 sites
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data will be available within publication of the results.

Access criteria: Data access requests will be reviewed by the RAM-MS steering committee. Requestors will be required to sign a data access agreement.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 104 months after the start.

Of 96 phase 3 interventional studies under Multiple Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 63. This study's planned 104 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 13, 2018
First posted
Mar 26, 2018
StartActual
Mar 21, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Nov 21, 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 21, 2028
Last update
Jun 25, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03477500
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2018
Start date
Mar 21, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 21, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 21, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2025

Study contacts

Lars Bø, MD, Phd
study director · Haukeland University Hospital
Anne Kristine Lehmann, MD, PhD
study chair · Haukeland University Hospital
Astrid Kittang, MD, PhD
study chair · Haukeland University Hospital
Einar Kristoffersen, MD, PhD
study chair · Haukeland University Hospital
Øivind Torkildsen, MD, PhD
study chair · Haukeland University Hospital
Trygve Holmøy, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Akershus
Margitta Kampman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Tromsø University Hospital
Kathrine K Liane, MD
principal investigator · St. Olavs Hospital
Joachim Burman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala
Morten Blinkenberg, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Jan Lycke, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Cyclophosphamide · Antilymphocyte Serum

Start the discussion