CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03477149EASYX-1Updated Oct 9, 2020

EASYX-1 : A Multicenter Study on Safety and Efficacy of Easyx Liquid Embolization Agent Used in Five Separate Indications

An interventional study of Easyx in Varicocele, Endoleak and Portal Vein Thrombosis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-09.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The EASYX™ Liquid Embolic is a new injectable, precipitating polymeric agent for the obliteration of vascular spaces through direct puncture or catheter access performed under X-ray guidance. The embolic liquid is an iodinized Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Polymer ether. Iodine groups are covalently grafted to the PVA polymer backbone, whereby a stable nondegradable polymer with the desired features is created. The resulting polymer is dissolved in Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO). EASYX™ is CE-marked since December 2016 and has been used in humans a few time for type II endoleaks, portal vein and varicocele (\<10 cases at the date of submission). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EASYX™ embolization liquid for the percutaneous treatment of vascular lesions, i.e. embolization of varicocele, type II endoleaks, portal vein before surgery, active peripheral bleeding or angiomyolipoma (AML).

02

Conditions studied

  • Varicocele
  • Endoleak
  • Portal Vein Thrombosis
  • Bleeding
  • Angiomyolipoma

Keywords

  • liquid embolics
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient presenting with indication of varicocele, type II endoleaks, portal vein, AML or active embolization with a liquid agent
  • Aged ≥ 18 years
  • Affiliated to a French health insurance system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity to Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Polymer
  • Hypersensitivity to DMSO solvent
  • Patient unable or unwilling to provide a written informed consent
  • Patient participating in another interventional study
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Prisoners
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Embolization with Easyx

    Patients requiring embolization of varicocele, portal vein before ablation, type 2 endoleak, angiomyolipoma or active bleeding will be treated with the liquid embolic agent Easyx during index procedure.

    Device: Easyx

Interventions

  • DeviceEasyx

    Embolization will be done with Easyx liquid agent.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety:Total number of per-procedure Serious Adverse Events (SAE) for the safety

    Expected and unexpected per-procedure (SAE) related to the EASYX™ use (imputability "certain" or "probable")

    Time frame: one day

  2. Efficacy for type 2 endoleaks embolization

    Percentage of clinical success. The clinical success of type II endoleaks embolization is defined as the stability or reduction of aneurysm's both anterioposterior and transverse diameters assessed on CT-scan at 6 months compared to baseline (4mm threshold).

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Efficacy for portal vein embolization

    Percentage of clinical success before ablation for portal vein embolization. The clinical success of portal vein embolization is defined as the growth ≥15 % of the remnant liver assessed on presurgical CT-scan compared to baseline

    Time frame: Before ablation

  4. Efficacy for varicocele embolization

    Percentage of clinical success for varicocele embolization The clinical success of varicocele embolization is defined as the absence of reflux on ultrasound Doppler at one month follow-up.

    Time frame: 1 month

  5. Efficacy for angiomyolipoma embolization

    Percentage of clinical success for angiomyolipoma embolization. The clinical success of angiomyolipoma embolization is defined as the reduction \>10% of at least one diameter on MRI or CT-scan at 3 months follow-up compared to baseline

    Time frame: 3 month

  6. Efficacy for active bleeding embolization

    Percentage of clinical success for active bleeding embolization The clinical success of active bleeding embolization is defined as the complete occlusion of the target vessel assessed by angiography during the index procedure

    Time frame: Through embolization completion

Secondary outcomes

  1. SAE

    Total number of SAE

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  2. AE

    Total number of AE

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  3. untargeted embolization

    Total number of untargeted embolization

    Time frame: during procedure

  4. unanticipated ischemia of the target organ

    Total number of unanticipated ischemia of the target organ

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  5. orchi-epididymitis

    Total number of secondary post-embolization orchi-epididymitis (varicocele embolization)

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  6. neural route lesion

    Total number of neural root lesion (type II endoleaks)

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  7. aneurysm rupture

    Total number of aneurysm rupture (type II endoleaks)

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  8. tumor rupture

    Total number of tumor rupture (angiomyolipoma)

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  9. Survival

    Survival rates

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Pain

    Use of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to evaluate the pain at device injection (between 0: no pain to 10: intolerable pain)

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  11. Pain improvement

    Use of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to evaluate the painful varicocele (between 0: no pain to 10: intolerable pain)

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  12. unanticipated use of another liquid agent

    Total number of unanticipated use of another liquid agent for embolization

    Time frame: during procedure

  13. technical success

    Total number of procedures with immediate technical success

    Time frame: end of the procedure

  14. Easyx volume

    Mean volume of EASYX™ used during the index procedure

    Time frame: during procedure

  15. Occlusion

    Mean degree of occlusion of the target vessel(s)

    Time frame: during procedure

  16. Re-intervention

    Total number of re-intervention for study procedure

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  17. Interventional Radiologist (IR) satisfaction

    Immediate technical satisfaction questionnaire (as perceived by the Interventional Radiologist)

    Time frame: end of the procedure

  18. Clinical efficacy

    Total number of embolization clinical efficacy

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  19. Other liquid embolics

    Total number of procedures with a need to complete with another liquid embolic to achieve optimal result

    Time frame: end of the procedure

  20. Quality of life

    Patient's quality of life (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  21. Imaging

    Technical success at follow-up assessed on CT-scan for type II endoleaks defined as the ability for the physician to give a diagnosis (absence or minor artifacts) on imaging

    Time frame: 6 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • AP-HP - Hopital Europeen Georges-Pompidou Paris, France
    Paris, Ile-de-France 75908, France
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03477149
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
Antia Therapeutics AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2018
Start date
Mar 30, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 11, 2020
Completion
Mar 11, 2020
Last update
Oct 9, 2020

Study contacts

Marc SAPOVAL, MD, PhD
principal investigator · AP-HP - Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Romaric LOFFROY, MD, PhD
principal investigator · CHU de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterand
Vincent VIDAL, MD, PhD
principal investigator · AP-HM - La Timone

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion