ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03472859Updated Sep 13, 2018

Treatment of Dilated Blood Vessels on the Cheeks With a New Yellow Laser and a Traditional Green Laser

An interventional study of PHOTOLASE and KTP in Telangiectasia and Rosacea, sponsored by Tampere University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-13.

Sponsored by Tampere University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2017, registered Feb 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal is to compare a novel yellow laser, based on semiconductor technology, with traditional green laser, in the treatment of cheek telangiectasias. The trial design is randomized split-face double-blinded study with 20-30 volunteers. The improvement will be assessed using a 7-point Telangiectasia Grading Scale.

Read the detailed description

Trial design: The study is a comparative randomized split-face double-blinded study without a control group. It enables a comparison between two lasers; namely the KTP laser and the investigational PHOTOLASE laser. The split-face design eliminates the individual biases and the randomization eliminates the possible small variations in the symmetry of the telangiectasias on the face. The double-blinded assessment eliminates the physicians' and the subjects' subjective and objective bias.

Methods: The subjects will be treated with a 532-nm green KTP laser and a 585-nm yellow PHOTOLASE laser; different laser on each side of a face. A total of one or two treatments will be given based on the response of the first treatment. The improvement of subjects' telangiectasia will be graded after the final treatment according to a 7-point Telangiectasia Grading Scale (TGS) by a blinded physician using images taken with Visia imaging system. The usability, reliability and treatment characteristics of PHOTOLASE laser will be qualitatively assessed by the treating physicians (not blinded).

Objectives: The primary objective is to assess how the PHOTOLASE laser compares to the KTP laser in the treatment of facial telangiectasia in terms of the treatment outcomes. The secondary objective is to assess the usability, reliability and treatment characteristics of the PHOTOLASE laser from the perspective of the user.

02

Conditions studied

  • Telangiectasia
  • Rosacea

Keywords

  • laser
  • lasers
  • KTP
  • semiconductor
  • tgs
  • rosacea
  • telangiectasia
03

In context

Telangiectasis

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Telangiectasis; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 30 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Telangiectasis.

Browse Telangiectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Tampere University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subjects are required to be Finnish speaking adults with symmetrical facial telangiectasia, volunteering to participate in the clinical trial.
  • The subjects have to have a Fitzpatrick skin phototype I-IV.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • hemophilic condition
  • Fitzpatrick skin phototype V-VI
  • drug or alcohol abuse
  • subjects who are under guardianship
  • subjects with significant tanning less than 6 weeks prior to the treatment day.
  • unbalanced basic diseases, such as diabetes, heart disease, cancer etc.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Split-face group 1

    In group 1 the left side of the face will be treated with KTP and right side with PHOTOLASE.

    Device: PHOTOLASE · Device: KTP

  • Experimental
    Split-face group 2

    In group 2 the right side of the face will be treated with KTP and left side with PHOTOLASE.

    Device: PHOTOLASE · Device: KTP

Interventions

  • DevicePHOTOLASE

    This is the investigational yellow laser (PHOTOLASE)

    Also known as: yellow laser

  • DeviceKTP

    This is the traditional green laser (KTP)

    Also known as: green laser

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. TGS change

    Telangiectasia grading scale will be used to assess improvement of telangiectasia and erythema. The range of TGS is -1 to 5, where -1 means worsening of the condition, 0 means no change, 1 means 0-25% improvement, 2 means 25-50% improvement, 3 means 50-75% improvement, 4 means 75-100% improvement and 5 means total clearance.

    Time frame: Before treatment and 1-2 months after the intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. VAS pain measurement

    Visual Analogue Scale will be used to measure the amount of pain after the intervention. The range is 0.0 - 10.0, where 0 means no pain and 10 means worst imaginable pain. The results will be reported as a mean value and range for yellow laser and green laser separately.

    Time frame: Immediately after intervention.

  2. Amount of treatment-related adverse effects using a 4-point scale.

    The amount of erythema, crusting, edema, purpura and blisters will be assessed separately on both sides of the face. The measurement range is 0-3, where 0 means no symptoms, 1 means mild symptoms, 2 means moderate symptoms and 3 means severe symptoms. The results will be reported as a mean value for yellow laser and green laser separately.

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment and 2-3 days after treatment.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Epilaser Oy
    Lempäälä, Pirkanmaa 33880, Finland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Jun 2018, 8 months.

Of 14 interventional studies with no phase under Telangiectasis, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 27. This study's 8 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 26, 2018
First posted
Mar 21, 2018
StartActual
Oct 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 9, 2018
CompletionActual
Jun 9, 2018
Last update
Sep 13, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03472859
Collaborators
Tampere University of Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 21, 2018
Start date
Oct 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 9, 2018
Completion
Jun 9, 2018
Last update
Sep 13, 2018

Study contacts

Mircea Guina, Prof
study director · Tampere University of Technology, ORC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion