ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03471429CANINEUpdated Sep 21, 2018

Canine-assisted ANxiety Reduction IN Emergency

An observational study in Anxiety, sponsored by Indiana University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-21.

Primary conditionAnxiety Disorders(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Indiana University · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to see if dogs can reduce the anxiety level of patients in the emergency department.

Read the detailed description

Patients will score their pain, anxiety, and depression. A dog will then come into the patient's room for approximately 15 minutes after which the patient will score his/her pain, anxiety, and depression again.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Dog
  • Canine
  • Therapy
  • Depression
  • Pain
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders Unverified

7,207 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is below the median of 168 across 978 observational studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Indiana University is the lead sponsor of 986 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 148 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (80%) have results posted.

Compared within Anxiety Disorders, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients enrolled from Emergency Department that are 18 or older with moderate or greater anxiety, per physician Gestalt.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Research staff will screen for inclusion criterion by asking the care providers if they agree with this statement, "I believe this patient is experiencing moderate or greater anxiety".

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extreme intoxication, agitation that precludes conversation with the patient, fear of dogs, dog bite, allergy to dogs.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Dog

    Patient sees therapy dog for 15 minutes, which is standard of care at this hospital.

  • No Dog

    Patient receives standard of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anxiety reduction from Scale

    reduction in anxiety score (0-10). 0=balanced mood (least anxiety) 2= slight fear and worry 4=mild fear and worry 6= moderate worry, physical agitation 8=Feeling really bad, at the edge 10=out of control behavior, self-harm (worst anxiety)

    Time frame: 30 mins

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain reduction from Wong Baker faces scale

    reduction in pain score (0-10). 0=no hurt (least pain) 2= Hurts little bit 4= Hurts little more 6= Hurts even more 8= Hurts whole lot 10=out of control behavior, self-harm (hurts worst)

    Time frame: 30 mins

  2. Depression reduction from scale

    reduction in depression score (0-10). 0= Balanced mood (least depressed) 2= Slightly depressed 4= Mildly depressed 6= Definite malaise 8= Feeling reall bad, at the edge 10=Despair, suicidal feelings (worst depressed)

    Time frame: 30 mins

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Indiana University
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kline JA, Fisher MA, Pettit KL, Linville CT, Beck AM. Controlled clinical trial of canine therapy versus usual care to reduce patient anxiety in the emergency department. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0209232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209232. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30625184 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Apr 2018, 3 months.

Of 411 non-industry observational studies under Anxiety Disorders, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 49. This study's 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 439 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 20, 2018
First posted
Mar 20, 2018
StartActual
Dec 21, 2017
Primary completionActual
Apr 4, 2018
CompletionActual
Apr 4, 2018
Last update
Sep 21, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03471429
Lead sponsor
Indiana University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 20, 2018
Start date
Dec 21, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 4, 2018
Completion
Apr 4, 2018
Last update
Sep 21, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion