ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03469778Updated Mar 19, 2018

Assessment of a Upper Limb Robotic Device in Stroke Patients

An interventional study of Robotic Therapy in Stroke, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-19.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2017), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
40 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 16 studies in Stroke by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital — none open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Stroke · University of Sao Paulo General Hospital.

Planned enrollment
11th of 13
10 · median 32
Started
2018
the only one that year
No phase
10 of 16
none open now
Registered
15th of 16
by date

Among the 16 studies in Stroke by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital, this one is the 11th largest by planned enrollment of the 13 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2018, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 15th registered.

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

Browse Stroke studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 16 studies in Stroke by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is open now.

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 1,415 Stroke studies recruiting now, 697 (49%) set no upper age limit and 280 (20%) stop at 75 or younger; 77 take children under 18; 196 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 40 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 16 studies in Stroke by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital as a file.
02

Study summary

The objectives of this phase II clinical study are: evaluate the efficacy, safety, patient adeherence and clinical applicability of a new robotic device for patients with stroke at a physical rehabilitation institution (Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo - IMREA HCFMUSP - Rede de Reabilitação Lucy Montoro, unidade Vila Mariana). Methods: 10 patients with stroke diagnosis and Fugl-Meyer score ranging from 34 to 55 will be selected to be included in the study. After signing the informed consent form and being assessed by the baseline evaluations, they will undertake 18 sessions of robotic therapy, which in its turn will be prescribed three times a week. After this period, the patients will be evaluated for future comparison of both the pre-treatment and final assessments.

03

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Keywords

  • stroke
  • rehabilitation
  • upper limb
  • motor activity
  • robotic
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inlcusion Criteria:

  1. Between 40 and 65 years.
  2. Both genders.
  3. Clinical and radiological diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the vascular territory of the middle cerebral artery or anterior cerebral artery.
  4. Clinical assessment of disability with diagnosis of right or left hemiparesis.
  5. Onset between 24 and 36 months.
  6. Clinical stability verified in medical evaluation.
  7. Spasticity less than or equal to 2 in Modified Ashworth Scale.
  8. Moderate motor impairment in upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb score (34 to 55 points).
  9. To remain seated in a backrest chair during the intervention period (about 55 minutes).
  10. Acceptance of form to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Joint, muscle or tendinous lesions and/or pain that can occur during the intervention and make it difficult or impossible to perform robotic tasks.
  2. Progressive worsening of spasticity.
  3. Withdrawal of the informed consent form.
  4. New episode of stroke.
  5. Comorbidities that may occur during interventions such as hypertension, seizures, diabetes, among other uncontrolled clinical issues.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Robotic Therapy

    After consent, 10 participants will be included in a training program, as described below: 1º session will be robotic calibration and assessment; the following 18 sessions will be conducted the robotic therapy for upper limbs, three times a week. Each session will have a total duration of 55 minutes, including initial patient positioning and adjusting and after a sequence of game tasks.

    Device: Robotic Therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceRobotic Therapy

    Robotic Therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl Meyer Assessment Upper Limb (FMA-UL)

    FMA-UL evaluates the recovery of the hemiplegic patient after stroke. It includes the measurement of reflex activity, movement with and without synergy, voluntary movements and coordination of shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand.

    Time frame: Mean change from baseline at six weeks (19 sessions of robotic therapy).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)

    WMFT evaluates time performance and functional ability in 17 unimanual tasks.

    Time frame: Mean change from baseline at six weeks (19 sessions of robotic therapy).

  2. Dynamometry - Grasp and Pinch

    Instrument to measure palmar and lateral grip (strength in kgf).

    Time frame: Mean change from baseline at six weeks (19 sessions of robotic therapy).

  3. Patients safety

    Adverse effects questionnaire applied in each session.

    Time frame: Adverse effects reported during 6 weeks treatment.

  4. Treatment adherence

    Number of patients withdrawing from treatment without justification (drop outs).

    Time frame: Drop outs reported during 6 weeks treatment.

Other outcomes

  1. Clinical feasibility

    Time necessary to adjust the device; patients satisfaction questionnaire.

    Time frame: Reported during 6 weeks treatment, in each session.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centro de Pesquisa Clínica - Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação
    São Paulo, 04116-040, Brazil
    • Thais Tavares Terranova · Contactthais.terranova@gmail.com · 5180-7800
    • Artur César Aquino dos Santos · Contactartur.santos@hc.fm.usp.br · 5180-7800
    • Linamara Rizzo Battistella, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Thais Tavares Terranova, Master of Science · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2018; primary completion for Jul 2018, 2 months later.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 12, 2018
First posted
Mar 19, 2018
StartEst.
May 2, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2018
CompletionEst.
Sep 2018
Last update
Mar 19, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 19, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03469778
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 19, 2018
Start date
May 2, 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 19, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion