ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03469401PERICANDUpdated Sep 4, 2025

Evaluation of BD Glucan in Peritoneal Fluid for the Diagnosis of Fungal Peritonitis

An observational study in Adult Patient (Over 18 Yr-old) Admitted to the ICU for Acute Peritonitis, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-04.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
126
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Invasive candidiasis has a high mortality rate, around 40%. Outcome remains tightly linked to the time of treatment administration. Routine microbiological techniques give results too lately to allow prompt antifungal therapy initiation (at least 48 hours). It is important to develop diagnostic tools to initiate antifungal therapy as early as possible.

The B D glucan detection, one of the major components of the candida cell wall, can be useful for a early diagnosis.

There are several techniques on the market for the detection of glucan. In Europe and America, the most used is Fungitell (Associated of Cape Cod, Inc).

There is several studies about the use of such kits for fungemia. A number of studies are reporting evidences of a early diagnosis.

But, in medical literature, there isn't study focused on the detection of B D glucan in peritoneal fluid for Candida peritonitis diagnosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adult Patient (Over 18 Yr-old) Admitted to the ICU for Acute Peritonitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Peritonitis

167 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritonitis; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 126 is close to the median of 137 across 55 observational studies indexed under Peritonitis.

Browse Peritonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,866 studies on the registry; 448 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patient (over 18 yr-old) admitted to the ICU for acute peritonitis

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥ 18 years old
  • written for inclusion in the study
  • stay in intensive care unit
  • diagnosed with a peritonitis
  • peritoneal fluid collected by a surgery or radiology procedure, analysed at bacteriology laboratory of l'institut des agents infectieux, l'hôpital de la Croix Rousse

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant woman
  • Moribund patient
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
126 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • intervention

    Adult patient (over 18 yr-old) admitted to the ICU for acute peritonitis with a peritoneal fl:uid sample obtained via surgery or radiological drainage

    Other: Intervention

Interventions

  • OtherIntervention

    Evaluation of sensibility, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of BD glucan in peritoneal fluid for diagnosis of fungal peritonitis, compared with fungal culture

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of sensibility, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of BD glucan in peritoneal fluid for diagnosis of fungal peritonitis, compared with fungal culture

    Evaluation of sensibility, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of BD glucan in peritoneal fluid for diagnosis of fungal peritonitis, compared with fungal culture

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
    Pierre-Bénite, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nourry E, Wallet F, Darien M, Menotti J, Dupont D, Allaouchiche B, Argaud L, Richard JC, Guichon C, Rimmele T, Bohe J, Thiollere F, Vassal O, Lepape A, Wallon M, Persat F, Friggeri A. Use of 1,3-Beta-D-Glucan concentration in peritoneal fluid for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal Candidiasis in Critically-ill patients. Med Mycol. 2023 Mar 20:myad029. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myad029. Online ahead of print. PubMed 36941133 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03469401
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 19, 2018
Start date
Jan 18, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 18, 2019
Completion
Feb 18, 2019
Last update
Sep 4, 2025

Study contacts

Florent WALLET, MD
principal investigator · Hospices Civils de Lyon

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion