ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03462030Updated Feb 4, 2025Results posted

Baked Milk Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy

A Phase 2 interventional study of Baked non-fat cow's milk powder and Placebo: Tapioca Powder in Cow's Milk Allergy, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-04.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether baked milk oral immunotherapy is safe in the treatment of cow's milk allergy.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed to assess the safety of baked milk oral immunotherapy among patients who are milk allergic and who do not pass a baked milk challenge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cow's Milk Allergy

Keywords

  • food allergy
  • oral immunotherapy
03

In context

Milk Hypersensitivity

147 studies on the registry are indexed under Milk Hypersensitivity; 26 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 68 across 95 interventional studies indexed under Milk Hypersensitivity.

Browse Milk Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for enrollment as study participants, including participants who:

    • Are age 3-18 years, either sex, any ethnicity or race
    • Provide signed by parent or legal guardian and informed assent if applicable
    • Have a history of symptomatic reactivity to cow's milk (i.e. eczema, urticarial, upper or lower respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal disturbances, rash, oral symptoms)
    • Have a skin prick test positive to milk (diameter of wheal 3 mm ≥ negative control) and serum milk-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) level >5 kilo Units (kU)/L within the past 6-12 months
    • Have a positive reaction to a cumulative dose of ≤444 mg of baked milk powder in the initial qualifying double blind placebo-controlled food challenge.
    • Use an effective method of by females of to prevent pregnancy and agree to continue to practice an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of their participation in the study.
    • Have self-injectable epinephrine available at all times

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who meet any of these criteria are not eligible for enrollment as study participants, including participants who:

    • Have a history of severe anaphylaxis resulting in hypotension, neurological compromise, or mechanical ventilation
    • Have a history of intubation related to asthma
    • Tolerate more than 444 mg of baked milk powder at the initial qualifying double blind placebo controlled food challenge.
    • Allergy to placebo ingredients or reacts to any dose of placebo during the qualifying oral food challenge.
    • Poor control of atopic dermatitis
    • Are unable to tolerate at least 3 mg of baked milk protein on dose escalation day
    • Are pregnant or lactating
    • Have severe asthma defined by 2007 National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Criteria Steps 5 or 6
    • Have severe or poorly controlled asthma defined by with any of the following criteria:

      1. (FEV1) \<80% of predicted
      2. Inhaled dosing dosing of >500 mcg daily of fluticasone (or equivalent inhaled corticosteroids based on NHLBI dosing chart) or
      3. ≥ 1 hospitalization in the past year for asthma or
      4. > 1 emergency department visit in the past 6 months for asthma
    • Use of steroid medications (oral steroids, such as prednisone or Medrol, steroid injections, such as Kenalog, or intravenous or oral corticosteroid burst) in the following manners: History of daily oral steroid dosing within 4 weeks prior to baseline visit or for > 1 month during the past year or >2 burst oral steroid courses in the past 6 months.
    • Are unable to discontinue antihistamines for 5 days for long acting and 3 days for short acting prior to skin testing or food challenges
    • Are receiving omalizumab, mepolizumab, beta- blocker, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, or tricyclic antidepressant therapy
    • Have used immunomodulatory therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year
    • Have participated in any interventional study for treatment of a food allergy in the past 6 months
    • Are on 'build up phase' of environmental allergen immunotherapy. Subjects tolerating maintenance allergen immunotherapy can be enrolled.
    • Have a history of eosinophilic esophagitis in the past 3 years
    • Have a chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis) requiring therapy (e.g., heart disease, diabetes)
    • Have used an drug within 90 days or plan to use an investigational drug during the study period
    • Severe reaction at initial double blind placebo controlled food challenge, defined as:

      • Life-threatening anaphylaxis
      • Requiring overnight hospitalization
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Baked Milk Immunotherapy

    Subjects will receive baked milk oral immunotherapy with baked non-fat cow's milk powder as the intervention. Subjects will undergo an initial dose escalation, build-up, and then a maintenance period.

    Drug: Baked non-fat cow's milk powder

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Subjects will receive oral immunotherapy with the placebo control (tapioca powder). Subjects will undergo an initial dose escalation, build-up, and then a maintenance period.

    Drug: Placebo: Tapioca Powder

Interventions

  • DrugBaked non-fat cow's milk powder

    Oral immunotherapy with increasing quantities of baked milk.

    Also known as: Investigational New Drug (IND) 17114

  • DrugPlacebo: Tapioca Powder

    Placebo control.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    Adverse events will be recorded per CTCAE version 4.0. Events per dose on baked milk oral immunotherapy will be compared to adverse events per dose on placebo. Data will be collected over the first year of treatment. Analysis of cumulative adverse reactions per dose of oral immunotherapy or placebo will be performed at the end of year 1.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Subjects Who Are Able to Tolerate 4 Grams of Baked Milk Protein After One Year of Treatment

    The investigators will perform baked milk challenges to 4044 mg of baked milk protein and calculate the proportion of subjects who tolerate 4 grams of baked milk protein after one year of baked milk oral immunotherapy. This measure reports the number of participants that were able to tolerate 4 grams of baked milk protein.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Number of Subjects Who Are Able to Tolerate 2 Grams of Unheated Milk Protein After 2 Years of Treatment

    The investigators will perform unheated milk challenges to up to 8000 mg of unheated milk protein and calculate the proportion of subjects who tolerate 2 grams of unheated milk protein after 2 years of treatment. This measure reports the number of participants that were able to tolerate 2 grams of unheated milk protein.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Change in Maximum Tolerated Dose of Baked Milk

    Change in maximum tolerated dose (milligrams) of baked milk from baseline to end of year 1 and end of year 2.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 year and 2 years

  4. Change in Milk-specific IgE Level

    Change in milk-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) level measured in kU/L.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to year 2

  5. Change in Milk-specific IgG4 Level

    Change in milk-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) level measured in mg/L.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to year 2

  6. Change in Milk Skin Prick Test Responses

    Change in milk skin prick test responses measured as a change in wheal size in millimeters.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to year 2

  7. Change in Quality of Life as Assessed by the Food Allergy Questionnaire

    The food allergy questionnaire has an overall score range of 0-6 with 6 indicating the worst quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to year 2

07

Results

Posted Dec 3, 2021

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from the Johns Hopkins (JH) Pediatric Allergy Clinic, Baltimore, MD from March 2018 to October 2019.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
Started1515
End of build-up1414
Month 12 food challenge1414
Completed1414
Not completed11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0

Adverse events will be recorded per CTCAE version 4.0. Events per dose on baked milk oral immunotherapy will be compared to adverse events per dose on placebo. Data will be collected over the first year of treatment. Analysis of cumulative adverse reactions per dose of oral immunotherapy or placebo will be performed at the end of year 1.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
ParticipantsBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.01511
SecondaryProportion of Subjects Who Are Able to Tolerate 4 Grams of Baked Milk Protein After One Year of Treatment

The investigators will perform baked milk challenges to 4044 mg of baked milk protein and calculate the proportion of subjects who tolerate 4 grams of baked milk protein after one year of baked milk oral immunotherapy. This measure reports the number of participants that were able to tolerate 4 grams of baked milk protein.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Subjects Who Are Able to Tolerate 4 Grams of Baked Milk Protein After One Year of Treatment
ParticipantsBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
Proportion of Subjects Who Are Able to Tolerate 4 Grams of Baked Milk Protein After One Year of Treatment110
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Who Are Able to Tolerate 2 Grams of Unheated Milk Protein After 2 Years of Treatment

The investigators will perform unheated milk challenges to up to 8000 mg of unheated milk protein and calculate the proportion of subjects who tolerate 2 grams of unheated milk protein after 2 years of treatment. This measure reports the number of participants that were able to tolerate 2 grams of unheated milk protein.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects Who Are Able to Tolerate 2 Grams of Unheated Milk Protein After 2 Years of Treatment
ParticipantsBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
Number of Subjects Who Are Able to Tolerate 2 Grams of Unheated Milk Protein After 2 Years of Treatment85
SecondaryChange in Maximum Tolerated Dose of Baked Milk

Change in maximum tolerated dose (milligrams) of baked milk from baseline to end of year 1 and end of year 2.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 year and 2 years
Reported as:
Median · miligrams
Change in Maximum Tolerated Dose of Baked Milk
miligramsBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
Change from baseline to 1 year3900 (2256 to 4025)0 (0 to 757)
Change from baseline to 2 years3900 (2371 to 4025)3900 (2031 to 3900)
SecondaryChange in Milk-specific IgE Level

Change in milk-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) level measured in kU/L.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to year 2
Reported as:
Median · KU/L
Change in Milk-specific IgE Level
KU/LBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
change from baseline to 1 year-21.35 (-40.08 to 6.67)-14.75 (-41.73 to 12.42)
change from baseline to 2 years-77.45 (-138.95 to -15.69)-46.65 (-109.47 to -14.60)
SecondaryChange in Milk-specific IgG4 Level

Change in milk-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) level measured in mg/L.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to year 2
Reported as:
Median · mg/L
Change in Milk-specific IgG4 Level
mg/LBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
change from baseline to 1 year8.88 (4.58 to 85.34)3.79 (2.69 to 4.26)
Change from baseline to 2 years5.5 (1.79 to 8.99)3.55 (2.45 to 11.26)
SecondaryChange in Milk Skin Prick Test Responses

Change in milk skin prick test responses measured as a change in wheal size in millimeters.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to year 2
Reported as:
Median · millimeters
Change in Milk Skin Prick Test Responses
millimetersBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
Change from baseline to year 1-2.5 (-10 to 3)3.5 (-2.16 to 14.99)
Change from baseline to 2 years-4 (-7.79 to 1.79)1.5 (-6.47 to 10)
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life as Assessed by the Food Allergy Questionnaire

The food allergy questionnaire has an overall score range of 0-6 with 6 indicating the worst quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to year 2
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life as Assessed by the Food Allergy Questionnaire
score on a scaleBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
change from baseline to 1 year0.04 ± 0.790.37 ± 1.08
change from baseline to 2 years-0.07 ± 0.94-0.3 ± 1.16

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Baked Milk Immunotherapy0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)15/15 (100%)
Placebo0/15 (0%)3/15 (20%)14/15 (93.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
Hospitalization - asthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/152/15
Hospitalization - mental healthPsychiatric disorders0/151/15
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBaked Milk ImmunotherapyPlacebo
Gastrointestinal symptomsGastrointestinal disorders15/1514/15
Oropharyngeal symptomsGeneral disorders14/158/15
Cutaneous symptomsSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders14/1512/15
Lower respiratory tract symptomsRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders12/1514/15

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Baked Milk ImmunotherapyPlaceboTotal
<=18 years121527
Between 18 and 65 years303
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Baked Milk ImmunotherapyPlaceboTotal
Median13 (4 to 18)7 (3 to 14)11 (3 to 18)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Baked Milk ImmunotherapyPlaceboTotal
Female8614
Male7916
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Baked Milk ImmunotherapyPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino011
Not Hispanic or Latino151429
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Baked Milk ImmunotherapyPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American224
White12921
More than one race022
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Baked Milk ImmunotherapyPlaceboTotal
United States151530
Cow's Milk IgE
Cow's Milk IgE(kU/L)Baked Milk ImmunotherapyPlaceboTotal
Median114 (7 to 1625)87 (22 to 772)88 (7 to 1625)
Age at Milk Allergy Diagnosis
Age at Milk Allergy Diagnosis(months)Baked Milk ImmunotherapyPlaceboTotal
Median8 (4 to 14)9 (4 to 24)8.5 (4 to 24)

8 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Boyce JA, Assa'ad A, Burks AW, Jones SM, Sampson HA, Wood RA, Plaut M, Cooper SF, Fenton MJ, Arshad SH, Bahna SL, Beck LA, Byrd-Bredbenner C, Camargo CA Jr, Eichenfield L, Furuta GT, Hanifin JM, Jones C, Kraft M, Levy BD, Lieberman P, Luccioli S, McCall KM, Schneider LC, Simon RA, Simons FE, Teach SJ, Yawn BP, Schwaninger JM. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: summary of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel report. Nutr Res. 2011 Jan;31(1):61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.01.001. No abstract available. PubMed 21310308 ↗
  • Gupta RS, Springston EE, Warrier MR, Smith B, Kumar R, Pongracic J, Holl JL. The prevalence, severity, and distribution of childhood food allergy in the United States. Pediatrics. 2011 Jul;128(1):e9-17. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0204. Epub 2011 Jun 20. PubMed 21690110 ↗
  • Chafen JJ, Newberry SJ, Riedl MA, Bravata DM, Maglione M, Suttorp MJ, Sundaram V, Paige NM, Towfigh A, Hulley BJ, Shekelle PG. Diagnosing and managing common food allergies: a systematic review. JAMA. 2010 May 12;303(18):1848-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.582. PubMed 20460624 ↗
  • Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb;133(2):291-307; quiz 308. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.020. Epub 2013 Dec 31. PubMed 24388012 ↗
  • Skripak JM, Matsui EC, Mudd K, Wood RA. The natural history of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5):1172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.023. Epub 2007 Nov 1. PubMed 17935766 ↗
  • Wood RA, Sicherer SH, Vickery BP, Jones SM, Liu AH, Fleischer DM, Henning AK, Mayer L, Burks AW, Grishin A, Stablein D, Sampson HA. The natural history of milk allergy in an observational cohort. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Mar;131(3):805-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.060. Epub 2012 Dec 28. PubMed 23273958 ↗
  • Kim J, Kwon J, Noh G, Lee SS. The effects of elimination diet on nutritional status in subjects with atopic dermatitis. Nutr Res Pract. 2013 Dec;7(6):488-94. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2013.7.6.488. Epub 2013 Nov 29. PubMed 24353835 ↗
  • Hobbs CB, Skinner AC, Burks AW, Vickery BP. Food allergies affect growth in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Jan-Feb;3(1):133-4.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 25. PubMed 25577638 ↗
  • Cummings AJ, Knibb RC, King RM, Lucas JS. The psychosocial impact of food allergy and food hypersensitivity in children, adolescents and their families: a review. Allergy. 2010 Aug;65(8):933-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02342.x. Epub 2010 Feb 22. PubMed 20180792 ↗
  • Flokstra-de Blok BM, Dubois AE, Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Oude Elberink JN, Raat H, DunnGalvin A, Hourihane JO, Duiverman EJ. Health-related quality of life of food allergic patients: comparison with the general population and other diseases. Allergy. 2010 Feb;65(2):238-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02121.x. Epub 2009 Oct 1. PubMed 19796214 ↗
  • Eigenmann PA, Caubet JC, Zamora SA. Continuing food-avoidance diets after negative food challenges. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006 Dec;17(8):601-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2006.00455.x. PubMed 17121588 ↗
  • Burbank AJ, Sood P, Vickery BP, Wood RA. Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2016 Feb;36(1):55-69. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2015.08.007. PubMed 26617227 ↗
  • Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Bloom KA, Sicherer SH, Shreffler WG, Noone S, Wanich N, Sampson HA. Tolerance to extensively heated milk in children with cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2):342-7, 347.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.043. Epub 2008 Jul 11. PubMed 18620743 ↗
  • Kim JS, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Sicherer SH, Noone S, Moshier EL, Sampson HA. Dietary baked milk accelerates the resolution of cow's milk allergy in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jul;128(1):125-131.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.04.036. Epub 2011 May 23. PubMed 21601913 ↗
  • Oppenheimer JJ, Nelson HS, Bock SA, Christensen F, Leung DY. Treatment of peanut allergy with rush immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992 Aug;90(2):256-62. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(92)90080-l. PubMed 1500630 ↗
  • Nelson HS, Lahr J, Rule R, Bock A, Leung D. Treatment of anaphylactic sensitivity to peanuts by immunotherapy with injections of aqueous peanut extract. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Jun;99(6 Pt 1):744-51. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)80006-1. PubMed 9215240 ↗
  • Hofmann AM, Scurlock AM, Jones SM, Palmer KP, Lokhnygina Y, Steele PH, Kamilaris J, Burks AW. Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):286-91, 291.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.045. Epub 2009 May 27. PubMed 19477496 ↗
  • Keet CA, Frischmeyer-Guerrerio PA, Thyagarajan A, Schroeder JT, Hamilton RG, Boden S, Steele P, Driggers S, Burks AW, Wood RA. The safety and efficacy of sublingual and oral immunotherapy for milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Feb;129(2):448-55, 455.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.10.023. Epub 2011 Nov 30. PubMed 22130425 ↗
  • Martorell A, De la Hoz B, Ibanez MD, Bone J, Terrados MS, Michavila A, Plaza AM, Alonso E, Garde J, Nevot S, Echeverria L, Santana C, Cerda JC, Escudero C, Guallar I, Piquer M, Zapatero L, Ferre L, Bracamonte T, Muriel A, Martinez MI, Felix R. Oral desensitization as a useful treatment in 2-year-old children with cow's milk allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Sep;41(9):1297-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03749.x. Epub 2011 Apr 11. PubMed 21481024 ↗
  • Meglio P, Bartone E, Plantamura M, Arabito E, Giampietro PG. A protocol for oral desensitization in children with IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy. Allergy. 2004 Sep;59(9):980-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00542.x. PubMed 15291907 ↗
  • Longo G, Barbi E, Berti I, Meneghetti R, Pittalis A, Ronfani L, Ventura A. Specific oral tolerance induction in children with very severe cow's milk-induced reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Feb;121(2):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.10.029. Epub 2007 Dec 26. PubMed 18158176 ↗
  • Skripak JM, Nash SD, Rowley H, Brereton NH, Oh S, Hamilton RG, Matsui EC, Burks AW, Wood RA. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of milk oral immunotherapy for cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;122(6):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.09.030. Epub 2008 Oct 25. PubMed 18951617 ↗
  • Narisety SD, Skripak JM, Steele P, Hamilton RG, Matsui EC, Burks AW, Wood RA. Open-label maintenance after milk oral immunotherapy for IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Sep;124(3):610-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.025. Epub 2009 Aug 8. PubMed 19665770 ↗
  • Pajno GB, Caminiti L, Ruggeri P, De Luca R, Vita D, La Rosa M, Passalacqua G. Oral immunotherapy for cow's milk allergy with a weekly up-dosing regimen: a randomized single-blind controlled study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010 Nov;105(5):376-81. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.03.015. Epub 2010 Jul 31. PubMed 21055664 ↗
  • Yeung JP, Kloda LA, McDevitt J, Ben-Shoshan M, Alizadehfar R. Oral immunotherapy for milk allergy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD009542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009542.pub2. PubMed 23152278 ↗
  • Wood RA. Food allergen immunotherapy: Current status and prospects for the future. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr;137(4):973-982. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.01.001. PubMed 27059725 ↗
  • Wood RA, Kim JS, Lindblad R, Nadeau K, Henning AK, Dawson P, Plaut M, Sampson HA. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of omalizumab combined with oral immunotherapy for the treatment of cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr;137(4):1103-1110.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 12. PubMed 26581915 ↗
  • Goldberg MR, Nachshon L, Appel MY, Elizur A, Levy MB, Eisenberg E, Sampson HA, Katz Y. Efficacy of baked milk oral immunotherapy in baked milk-reactive allergic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Dec;136(6):1601-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.05.040. Epub 2015 Jul 17. PubMed 26194541 ↗
  • Lin MS, Tanner E, Lynn J, Friday GA Jr. Nonfatal systemic allergic reactions induced by skin testing and immunotherapy. Ann Allergy. 1993 Dec;71(6):557-62. PubMed 8267250 ↗
  • Devenney I, Falth-Magnusson K. Skin prick tests may give generalized allergic reactions in infants. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000 Dec;85(6 Pt 1):457-60. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62571-9. PubMed 11152165 ↗
  • Valyasevi MA, Maddox DE, Li JT. Systemic reactions to allergy skin tests. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Aug;83(2):132-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62624-5. PubMed 10480586 ↗
  • Bernstein DI, Wanner M, Borish L, Liss GM; Immunotherapy Committee, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Twelve-year survey of fatal reactions to allergen injections and skin testing: 1990-2001. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jun;113(6):1129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.02.006. PubMed 15208595 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Jan 2021, 34 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2021, 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 28, 2018
First posted
Mar 12, 2018
StartActual
Mar 15, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jan 25, 2021
CompletionActual
Feb 19, 2024
Results first posted
Dec 3, 2021
Last update
Feb 4, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03462030
Collaborators
Myra Reinhardt Foundation, La Jolla Institute for Allergy & Immunology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 12, 2018
Start date
Mar 15, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 25, 2021
Completion
Feb 19, 2024
Results posted
Dec 3, 2021
Last update
Feb 4, 2025

Study contacts

Robert Wood, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion