ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03458871HomeTTNSUpdated Oct 29, 2021Results posted

Home Neuromodulation of the Neurogenic Bladder in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury With Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation

An interventional study of 4-week TTNS home-based protocol in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury and Neurogenic Bowel, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-29.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 18 studies in Neurogenic Bowel with a site in United States — 6 open to participants now, 7 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Neurogenic Bowel · United States.

Enrollment
7th of 17
16 · median 13
Started
2018
with 2 others
No phase
10 of 18
5 open now
Registered
7th of 18
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 18
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Among the 18 studies in Neurogenic Bowel with a site in United States, this one is the 7th largest by enrollment of the 17 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 7th registered.

Neurogenic Bowel

35 studies on the registry are indexed under Neurogenic Bowel; 13 are open to participants now.

Browse Neurogenic Bowel studies →

Open to participants now

6 of the 18 studies in Neurogenic Bowel with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

All 6 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 10 Neurogenic Bowel studies recruiting now, 7 (70%) set no upper age limit and 3 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 1 take children under 18; 0 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 18 studies in Neurogenic Bowel with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Determine the safety, feasibility, compliance, and efficacy of a daily home TTNS protocol in chronic SCI provided by self or caregiver for 4 weeks.

Read the detailed description

In Specific Aim 1, we will monitor for safety, feasibility, and compliance of a home TTNS program for bladder management. In Specific Aim 2, the efficacy of home TTNS will be compared to baseline Incontinence- Quality of Life questionnaire. A bladder diary will also capture important information such as frequency and volume of catheterization, incontinence episodes, and other related observations.

03

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
  • Neurogenic Bowel

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • electric stimulation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-65 years old
  • Neurologically stable SCI for ≥ 6 months
  • Intermittent catheterization to empty bladder
  • Stable bladder medications for ≥ 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple medications for the bladder
  • Other diagnoses to explain incontinence (ex: UTI, bladder stones, multiple sclerosis, etc.)
  • 2+ pitting edema that does not resolve
  • Known peripheral neuropathy or injury to the path of the tibial nerve
  • Demand-type cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator
  • Cancer in the tibial nerve path and/or bladder
  • Inability to elicit toe/plantar flexion with electric stimulation during the clinic visit.
  • Inability to understand directions
  • Non-English speaking
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    4-week TTNS home based protocol

    Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS) applied to subjects for 4-week protocol.

    Device: 4-week TTNS home-based protocol

Interventions

  • Device4-week TTNS home-based protocol

    4-week TTNS home-based protocol. Electrodes 2 inch by 2 inch will be placed according to anatomic landmarks, with the negative electrode behind the internal malleolus and the positive electrode 10cm superior to the negative electrode, verified with rhythmic flexion of the toes secondary to stimulation of the flexor digitorum and hallicus brevis. The intensity level will be set to the amperage immediately under the threshold for motor contraction. If there is not contraction seen, maximal tolerable intensity will be used. In addition, if the patient perceives pain, the intensity will be lowered until comfortable. Stimulation frequency of 10 Hz and pulse width of 200ms in continuous mode will be used.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary

    Noted on bladder diary will be description of observed changes including but not limited to pain, fatigue, vision changes, mental status, bowel program changes, and sexual function changes. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 1

  2. Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary

    Noted on bladder diary will be description of observed changes, including but not limited to pain, fatigue, vision changes, mental status, bowel program changes, and sexual function changes. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 2

  3. Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary

    Noted on bladder diary will be description of observed changes, including but not limited to pain, fatigue, vision changes, mental status, bowel program changes, and sexual function changes. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 3

  4. Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary

    Noted on bladder diary will be description of observed changes, including but not limited to pain, fatigue, vision changes, mental status, bowel program changes, and sexual function changes. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 4

  5. Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary

    The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 1

  6. Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary

    The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 2

  7. Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary

    The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 3

  8. Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary

    The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 4

  9. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home

    The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 1

  10. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home

    The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 2

  11. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home

    The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 3

  12. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Was Easy to Use"

    The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: week 4

  13. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "It Was Not Embarrassing to Use TTNS"

    The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: week 4

  14. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "It Was Easy to Remember to Use TTNS"

    The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: week 4

  15. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Did Not Irritate my Skin"

    The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: week 4

  16. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Was Not Painful"

    The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: week 4

  17. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Improved my Quality of Life"

    The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: week 4

  18. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "I Enjoyed Using TTNS"

    The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: week 4

  19. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "If TTNS Works as Well as Medications, I Would Switch to TTNS"

    The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: week 4

  20. Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "Overall, I Would Recommend TTNS for Those With Neurogenic Bladder"

    The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey

    Total score on the I-QOL survey is reported. The total score ranges from 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (maximum quality of life), with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

    Time frame: week 0

  2. Quality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey

    Total score on the I-QOL survey is reported. The total score ranges from 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (maximum quality of life), with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Week 2

  3. Quality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey

    Total score on the I-QOL survey is reported. The total score ranges from 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (maximum quality of life), with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

    Time frame: week 4

  4. Number of Catheterizations Per Day

    Frequency of catheterization after TTNS. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4

  5. Volume of Catheterization

    The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

    Time frame: week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4

  6. Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity as Assessed by an Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity of Symptom Questionnaire

    Items on the anticholinergic side effect severity of symptom questionnaire is scored as 0 (None), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), or 3 (Severe), with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: week 0

  7. Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity as Assessed by an Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity of Symptom Questionnaire

    Items on the anticholinergic side effect severity of symptom questionnaire is scored as 0 (None), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), or 3 (Severe), with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: week 4

07

Results

Posted Mar 4, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Started16
Completed16
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimarySafety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary

Noted on bladder diary will be description of observed changes including but not limited to pain, fatigue, vision changes, mental status, bowel program changes, and sexual function changes. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 1
Reported as:
Number · adverse events
Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary
adverse events4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary0
PrimarySafety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary

Noted on bladder diary will be description of observed changes, including but not limited to pain, fatigue, vision changes, mental status, bowel program changes, and sexual function changes. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 2
Reported as:
Number · adverse events
Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary
adverse events4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary0
PrimarySafety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary

Noted on bladder diary will be description of observed changes, including but not limited to pain, fatigue, vision changes, mental status, bowel program changes, and sexual function changes. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 3
Reported as:
Number · adverse events
Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary
adverse events4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary1
PrimarySafety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary

Noted on bladder diary will be description of observed changes, including but not limited to pain, fatigue, vision changes, mental status, bowel program changes, and sexual function changes. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Number · adverse events
Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary
adverse events4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Safety of Using TTNS at Home Daily as Indicated by Number of Adverse Events Recorded in Bladder Diary1
PrimaryCompliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary

The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 1
Reported as:
Mean · days
Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary
days4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary6.9 ± 0.5
PrimaryCompliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary

The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 2
Reported as:
Mean · days
Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary
days4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary7 ± 0
PrimaryCompliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary

The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 3
Reported as:
Mean · days
Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary
days4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary7 ± 0
PrimaryCompliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary

The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · days
Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary
days4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Compliance as Assessed by Number of Days Per Week TTNS Was Used, as Recorded at Home Daily in Bladder Diary6.6 ± 1.3
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home

The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 1

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home

The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 2

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home

The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 3

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Was Easy to Use"

The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Was Easy to Use"
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Was Easy to Use"9.4 ± 1.7
SecondaryQuality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey

Total score on the I-QOL survey is reported. The total score ranges from 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (maximum quality of life), with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame:
week 0
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Quality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey55.6 ± 4.67
SecondaryQuality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey

Total score on the I-QOL survey is reported. The total score ranges from 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (maximum quality of life), with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame:
Week 2
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Quality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey70.2 ± 17.0
SecondaryQuality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey

Total score on the I-QOL survey is reported. The total score ranges from 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (maximum quality of life), with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Quality of Life as Assessed by Score on Incontinence of Quality of Life (I-QOL) Survey59.1 ± 3.51
SecondaryNumber of Catheterizations Per Day

Frequency of catheterization after TTNS. The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4
Reported as:
Mean · catherizations per day
Number of Catheterizations Per Day
catherizations per day4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
week 15.2 ± 1.7
week 25.1 ± 1.8
week 35.4 ± 1.8
week 45.4 ± 2
SecondaryVolume of Catheterization

The research assistant will call weekly to capture the written data and monitor progress with the protocol.

Time frame:
week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4
Reported as:
Mean · milliliters
Volume of Catheterization
milliliters4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
week 1366 ± 131.4
week 2332 ± 129.6
week 3340.1 ± 140.2
week 4342.6 ± 138.9
SecondaryAnticholinergic Side Effect Severity as Assessed by an Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity of Symptom Questionnaire

Items on the anticholinergic side effect severity of symptom questionnaire is scored as 0 (None), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), or 3 (Severe), with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
week 0
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity as Assessed by an Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity of Symptom Questionnaire
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Dry Mouth1.00 ± 1.15
Constipation0.50 ± 0.97
Hard Stool0.75 ± 0.77
Sleepy1.06 ± 0.93
Decreased Cognition0.25 ± 0.58
SecondaryAnticholinergic Side Effect Severity as Assessed by an Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity of Symptom Questionnaire

Items on the anticholinergic side effect severity of symptom questionnaire is scored as 0 (None), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), or 3 (Severe), with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity as Assessed by an Anticholinergic Side Effect Severity of Symptom Questionnaire
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Dry Mouth0.38 ± 0.62
Constipation0.44 ± 0.81
Hard Stool0.38 ± 0.72
Sleepy0.56 ± 0.81
Decreased Cognition0.19 ± 0.54
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "It Was Not Embarrassing to Use TTNS"

The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "It Was Not Embarrassing to Use TTNS"
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "It Was Not Embarrassing to Use TTNS"9.375 ± 2.420
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "It Was Easy to Remember to Use TTNS"

The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "It Was Easy to Remember to Use TTNS"
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "It Was Easy to Remember to Use TTNS"9.875 ± 0.484
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Did Not Irritate my Skin"

The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Did Not Irritate my Skin"
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Did Not Irritate my Skin"9.375 ± 2.420
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Was Not Painful"

The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Was Not Painful"
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Was Not Painful"10 ± 0
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Improved my Quality of Life"

The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Improved my Quality of Life"
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "TTNS Improved my Quality of Life"5.6 ± 3.9
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "I Enjoyed Using TTNS"

The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "I Enjoyed Using TTNS"
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "I Enjoyed Using TTNS"8.3 ± 3.5
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "If TTNS Works as Well as Medications, I Would Switch to TTNS"

The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "If TTNS Works as Well as Medications, I Would Switch to TTNS"
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "If TTNS Works as Well as Medications, I Would Switch to TTNS"8.4 ± 3.5
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "Overall, I Would Recommend TTNS for Those With Neurogenic Bladder"

The TTNS satisfaction survey ranges from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "Overall, I Would Recommend TTNS for Those With Neurogenic Bladder"
score on a scale4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Overall Satisfaction of Daily Use of TTNS at Home as Assessed by a TTNS Satisfaction Survey - Item "Overall, I Would Recommend TTNS for Those With Neurogenic Bladder"9.7 ± 1.3

Adverse events

Collected over 4 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)2/16 (12.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
Event4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Urinary Tract InfectionRenal and urinary disorders2/16

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Mean38.9 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Female3
Male13
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Asian2
Black2
Hispanic6
White6
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
United States16
Years of injury
Years of injury(years)4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Median8.75 (3.1 to 19.4)
Number of participants on bladder medication
Number of participants on bladder medication(Participants)4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
Count of participants14
American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Level
American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Level(Participants)4-week TTNS Home Based Protocol
A11
B2
C2
D1
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Feb 2019, 10 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2020, 1 year after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 26, 2018
First posted
Mar 8, 2018
StartActual
Mar 13, 2018
Primary completionActual
Feb 6, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 6, 2019
Results first posted
Mar 4, 2020
Last update
Oct 29, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03458871
Responsible party
Argyrios Stampas, MD (Assistant Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 8, 2018
Start date
Mar 13, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2019
Completion
Feb 6, 2019
Results posted
Mar 4, 2020
Last update
Oct 29, 2021

Study contacts

Argyrios Stampas, MD
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion