An observational study in Acute Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by Collegium Medicum w Bydgoszczy. Completed at 2 sites in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-26.
Sponsored by Collegium Medicum w Bydgoszczy · Observational
The aim of this study is to compare circadian variability of antiplatelet effect of prasugrel and ticagrelor maintenance doses during the initial days after acute myocardial infarction.
Prasugrel and ticagrelor are two oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists recommended as a part of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Both drugs exert comparable antiplatelet effect following a loading dose. However, pharmacodynamic differences exist between these P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Prasugrel is a prodrug that requires hepatic activation and permanently binds to platelet P2Y12 receptors, whereas ticagrelor is an active drug and blocks P2Y12 receptors reversibly. Another important difference is that prasugrel maintenance dose is administered once daily, while ticagrelor requires next dosage every 12 hours. These fundamental distinctions may affect the degree of platelet inhibition on maintenance doses during the first days after acute myocardial infarction.
Patients with acute myocardial infarction treated invasively.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with myocardial infarction will receive prasugrel as a part of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin.
Drug: Prasugrel
Patients with myocardial infarction will receive ticagrelor as a part of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin.
Drug: Ticagrelor
Patients with myocardial infarction will receive a 60 mg prasugrel loading dose, followed by a maintenance dose of 10 mg once daily
Also known as: Efient
Patients with myocardial infarction will receive a 180 mg ticagrelor loading dose, followed by a maintenance dose of 90 mg twice daily
Also known as: Brilique
Circadian variability of platelet inhibition assessed with VASP
Platelet inhibition evaluated with VASP assay at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
Circadian variability of platelet inhibition assessed with Multiplate
Platelet inhibition evaluated with Multiplate at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
High platelet reactivity at 8:00 assessed with VASP
Number of patients with high platelet reactivity evaluated with VASP assay at 8:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
High platelet reactivity at 12:00 assessed with VASP
Number of patients with high platelet reactivity evaluated with VASP assay at 12:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
High platelet reactivity 16:00 assessed with VASP
Number of patients with high platelet reactivity evaluated with VASP assay at 16:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
High platelet reactivity 20:00 assessed with VASP
Number of patients with high platelet reactivity evaluated with VASP assay at 20:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
High platelet reactivity 08:00 assessed with Multiplate
Number of patients with high platelet reactivity evaluated with Multiplate at 08:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
High platelet reactivity 12:00 assessed with Multiplate
Number of patients with high platelet reactivity evaluated with Multiplate at 12:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
High platelet reactivity 16:00 assessed with Multiplate
Number of patients with high platelet reactivity evaluated with Multiplate at 16:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
High platelet reactivity 20:00 assessed with Multiplate
Number of patients with high platelet reactivity evaluated with Multiplate at 20:00
Time frame: Day 4 after acute myocardial infarction
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Collegium Medicum w Bydgoszczy