CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03453112FORTUNEUpdated Aug 10, 2026Results posted

Foster 100/6 mg NEXThaler Versus Foster 100/6mg Pressurized Metered-dose Inhaler (pMDI) in Patients With Controlled Asthma.

A Phase 3 interventional study of Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler and Foster 100/6µg pMDI in Asthma, sponsored by Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.. Completed at 51 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
494
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective

To demonstrate the non-inferiority of Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg versus (vs.) Foster® pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) 100/6 µg in terms of pulmonary function (change from baseline to the entire treatment period in average pre-dose morning peak expiratory flow [PEF]) in asthmatic patients.

Secondary Objectives

To evaluate the effect of the test treatments in terms of additional lung function parameters and clinical outcome measures, and to assess the safety and tolerability.

Read the detailed description

This was a phase III, multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, 2-arm parallel group study designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg (400/24 µg/day) versus Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg (400/24 µg/day) in patients with controlled asthma.

The study included the following phases:

  • Pre-Screening Phase (Visit 0): Conducted within a maximum of 7 days before the screening visit (Visit 1), this phase provided patients with study details, obtained informed consent, and outlined medication restrictions.
  • Screening and Run-in Phase (Visit 1, Week -4 to Visit 2, Week -2): Patients underwent eligibility assessments and transitioned into a 4-week open-label run-in period with Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg (400/24 µg/day) to establish baseline parameters.
  • Randomisation Phase (Visit 3, Week 0): Eligible patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg 2 inhalations bid (for a total daily dose of 400/24 µg/day) or Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg, 2 puffs bid (for a total daily dose of 400/24 µg/day) for 12 weeks. The allocation was managed via an Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) to ensure balanced treatment groups.
  • Investigational Phase (Treatment Period: Weeks 0-12): Patients attended scheduled visits at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 to monitor efficacy and safety.

Daily, patients recorded pre-dose morning and evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF), rescue medication use, and asthma symptoms using an electronic peak flow meter and e-diary. At each visit, lung function (FEV1, FVC, and PEF), asthma symptom scores, and rescue medication use were assessed. Vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure) and safety outcomes (adverse events, serious adverse events, and laboratory assessments) were monitored.

  • Follow-Up Phase: A safety follow-up phone call was conducted 7-10 days after the final visit (Week 12) or early termination to assess any unresolved adverse events (AEs) or new concomitant medications.

The total study duration per participant was 16 weeks, including the 4-week run-in period, 12-week treatment phase, and 1-week follow-up. This design ensured a standardized baseline before randomisation and provided sufficient time to assess both primary and secondary endpoints.

Salbutamol (purchased locally and provided by the Investigator site to the patient) was used as a rescue medication.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Peek Expiratory Flow (PEF) Lung function tests
  • Foster® NEXThaler®
  • Foster® pMDI
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female outpatients, Chinese ethnicity aged ≥18 years, who signed an ICF prior to initiation of any study-related procedure;
  2. Clinical diagnosis of asthma for a minimum of 6 months prior to V1 (Week -4) confirmed by a chest physician according to international guidelines updated 2018 (GINA) [1]. The evidence of asthma had to be confirmed through a documented positive response (in the last 24 months) either to a bronchial provocation test/challenge test or a reversibility test. In case the patient did not have any documented reversibility test or provocation/challenge test, a salbutamol reversibility test was performed at V1 (Week -4) within 10 to 30 minutes after administration of 400 µg of salbutamol pMDI [17]. Test response was positive if ΔFEV1 ≥12% and ≥200 mL over baseline.

    Note: In case the reversibility threshold was not met at V1 (Week -4), the test could have been repeated once before V2 or at V2 (Week -2);

  3. FEV1 >80% of the predicted normal value after appropriate washout from bronchodilators (checked at V1 [Week -4] and at the randomisation visit [V3, Week 0]);

    Note: If this criterion was not met:

    • At V1 (Week -4), the test could have been repeated once before V2 or at V2 (Week -2);
    • At randomisation visit (V3, Week 0), the test could have been repeated once within 2 days after this visit;
  4. ACQ-6 score \<0.75 (checked at V1 [Week -4] and at the randomisation visit [V3, Week 0]);
  5. Patients on previous regular treatment at a stable dose for at least 1 month prior to the screening visit (V1, Week -4) with either medium daily dose of ICS monotherapy (e.g. BDP-chlorofluorocarbons [CFC] >500-1000 µg/day or equivalent dose) or high daily dose of ICS monotherapy (e.g. BDP-CFC >1000 µg/day or equivalent dose) or low daily dose of ICS (e.g. BDP-CFC ≥200-500 µg/day or equivalent dose)/LABA free/fixed combination or medium daily dose of ICS (e.g. BDP-CFC >500-1000 µg/day or equivalent dose)/LABA free/fixed combination;
  6. A cooperative attitude and ability to be trained to the proper use of DPI and pMDI inhalers and an electronic peak flow meter (checked at the screening visit [V1, Week -4] and at the randomisation visit [V3, Week 0]);
  7. At least seven valid pre-dose morning PEF measurements in the last 14 days of the run-in period were necessary (checked at the randomisation visit [V3, Week 0]).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating women and all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant (i.e. women of childbearing potential) unless they were using one or more of the following highly effective contraceptive measures:

    • Placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine hormone-releasing system;
    • Combined (oestrogen and progesterone containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal);
    • Progesterone-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable);
    • Bilateral tubal occlusion;
    • Vasectomised partner;
    • Sexual abstinence; Reliable contraception had to be maintained throughout the study. Any postmenopausal women (physiologic menopause defined as "12 consecutive months of amenorrhoea without an alternative medical cause") or women permanently sterilised (e.g. bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy or bilateral salpingectomy) could be enrolled in the study.

    Pregnancy testing was carried out during the course of the study in all women of childbearing potential: serum pregnancy test was performed at screening (V1, Week -4) and end of treatment (V9, Week 12), urine pregnancy test was performed at all visits except V0 (Week -5) and V9 (Week 12);

  2. Intermittent asthma or asthma occurring only during episodic exposure to an allergen or a chemical sensitiser;
  3. History of near fatal asthma (e.g. brittle asthma, hospitalisation for asthma exacerbation in an intensive care unit);
  4. Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as defined by the current global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guidelines updated 2016 [18];
  5. Current smokers or ex-smokers with total cumulative exposure equal or more than 10 pack-years or having stopped smoking 1 year or less prior to screening (V1, Week -4);
  6. Severe asthma exacerbation leading to intake of systemic corticosteroids (≥10 days) within 1 month prior to inclusion or moderate/severe asthma exacerbation (according to international guidelines updated 2018 [GINA] [1]) during the run-in period (checked at the screening visit [V1, Week -4] and at the randomisation visit [V3, Week 0]);
  7. Lower respiratory tract infections (e.g. pneumonia) affecting the patient's asthma within 1 month prior to inclusion;
  8. History of cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis or alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, or any other significant lung disease;
  9. Diagnosis of restrictive lung disease;
  10. Patients treated with oral or parenteral corticosteroids in the previous 2 months before V1 (Week -4; 3 months for parenteral depot corticosteroids);
  11. Intolerance or contra-indication to treatment with β2-agonists and/or ICS or allergy to any component of the study treatments;
  12. Having received an investigational medication within 2 months before screening (V1, Week -4);
  13. Patients who had a clinical or functional uncontrolled respiratory, haematological, immunologic, renal, neurologic, hepatic, endocrinal or other disease, or any condition (e.g. major surgery) that might have, in the judgment of the Investigator, represented for the patients an undue risk or that could have compromised the results or interpretation of the study;
  14. History or current evidence of uncontrolled heart failure, clinically relevant coronary artery disease, recent myocardial infarction, severe hypertension, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias;
  15. Clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities such as (but not limited to) hypokalaemia (\<3.5 mEq/L), that might have compromised patient's safety or compliance, interfered with evaluation, or precluded completion of the study, in the judgment of the Investigator. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes including patients with a history of fasting plasma glucose levels consistently out of the normal range (>140 mg/dL) or HbA1C >8%;
  16. Patients who had an abnormal 12-lead ECG (i.e. QRS interval [QRS] >120 ms and/or PR interval [PR] >210 ms and/or HR \<45 beats per minute [bpm] and/or HR >110 bpm and/or Fridericia-corrected QT interval [QTcF] >450 ms for males or QTcF >470 ms for females) or 12-lead ECG evaluated as abnormal clinically significant (CS) by the Investigator, at screening (V1, Week -4);
  17. Patients who had a concomitant disease of poor prognosis (e.g. cancer);
  18. Patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (e.g. anti-immunoglobulin E [anti-IgE] antibodies);
  19. Patients treated with non-potassium sparing diuretics (unless administered at a fixed dose combination with a potassium conserving medication), non-selective β1-blocking medications, quinidine, quinidine-like antiarrhythmics or any medication with a corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation potential, or a history of QTc prolongation;
  20. Patients treated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and tricyclic antidepressants, unless already taken at stable doses in the month before screening (V1, Week -4) and without any safety concern;
  21. Patients who were receiving therapy that could interact with steroids, such as enzyme inhibitors (macrolides, antifungal therapy [not topical]) or inducers (anticonvulsants, rifampicin);
  22. Inability to comply with study procedures or with study treatment intake.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
494 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler

    Patients in this arm received Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg, a fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100 µg and formoterol fumarate (FF) 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a breath-actuated dry powder inhaler (DPI). Treatment Details: * Dosage: 2 inhalations twice daily (b.i.d.), totaling 400/24 µg BDP/FF daily. * Duration: 12 weeks. * Administration: First dose under medical supervision at randomization (Week 0). Blinding \& Control Treatment: * A double-dummy design was used. Patients also received a placebo pMDI (matching active pMDI), administered as 2 puffs b.i.d. to maintain blinding. Background Therapy: * Salbutamol was provided as rescue medication. Patient Training \& Compliance: * Inhaler use was assessed at visits, with retraining as needed; patients used an AeroChamber Plus™ spacer if necessary, and each inhaler was labeled with "sun" (morning) and "moon" (evening) stickers.

    Drug: Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler

  • Active comparator
    Foster 100/6µg pMDI

    Patients in this arm received Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg, a fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100 µg and formoterol fumarate (FF) 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Treatment Details: * Dosage: 2 puffs twice daily (b.i.d.), totaling 400/24 µg BDP/FF daily. * Duration: 12 weeks. * Administration: First dose under medical supervision at randomization (Week 0). Blinding \& Control Treatment: * A double-dummy design was used. Patients also received a placebo DPI (matching active DPI), administered as 2 inhalations b.i.d. to maintain blinding. Background Therapy: * Salbutamol was provided as rescue medication. Patient Training \& Compliance: * Inhaler use was assessed at visits, with retraining as needed; patients used an AeroChamber Plus™ spacer if necessary, and each inhaler was labeled with "sun" (morning) and "moon" (evening) stickers.

    Drug: Foster 100/6µg pMDI

Interventions

  • DrugFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler

    A fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate 100 µg and formoterol fumarate 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a breath-actuated dry powder inhaler (DPI).

    Also known as: beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100 µg / formoterol fumarate (FF) 6 µg NEXThealer

  • DrugFoster 100/6µg pMDI

    A fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate 100 µg and formoterol fumarate 6 µg per actuation, delivered via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with HFA\_134a propellant.

    Also known as: beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) 100µg / formoterol fumarate (FF) 6µg pMDI

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)

    PEF= peak expiratory flow. The peak expiratory flow (also known as a peak flow or peak flow rate) is the maximal rate that a person can exhale during a short maximal expiratory effort after a full inspiration. In this study PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded. * Baseline pre-dose morning PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * The average pre-dose morning PEF over the entire treatment period was computed as: ∑Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values (treatment period) / Number of days with available data * Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0, Visit 3) and Week 12 (EoT)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peek Expiratory Flow (PEF)

    PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded. * Baseline pre-dose morning PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * The average pre-dose morning PEF for each inter-visit period was computed as: ∑all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values / number of days with available data * Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

  2. Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Evening PEF

    PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded. * Baseline pre-dose evening PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * The average pre-dose evening PEF for each inter-visit period was computed as: ∑all valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values / number of days with available data * Valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks.

  3. Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Daily PEF Variability

    PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded. * Baseline average daily PEF variability was calculated as the mean of all daily PEF variability values recorded in the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * The average daily PEF variability for each inter-visit period was computed as: ∑all daily PEF variability values / number of days with available data * Daily PEF variability was calculated only for days where both pre-dose morning Best PEF and pre-dose evening Best PEF values were available. * Valid Best PEF values were defined as the highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

  4. Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Use of Rescue Medication (Number of Puffs/Day)

    Rescue medication use was recorded daily in an electronic diary, with puffs taken during the day recorded in the evening session and puffs taken at night recorded the next morning. * Baseline rescue medication use was the mean daily use over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * Average daily use of rescue medication was calculated as: * all puffs per day / number of days with available data * It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the entire treatment period (from the evening of the first treatment day to the morning of the last). * At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days

    Rescue medication use was recorded daily in an electronic diary, with puffs taken during the day recorded in the evening session and puffs taken at night recorded the next morning. * Baseline percentage of rescue medication-free days was calculated over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * Percentage of rescue medication-free days was calculated as: (Number of days with no rescue medication use / Total number of days with available data)×100 * It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the entire treatment period (from the evening of the first treatment day to the morning of the last). * At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

  6. Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Morning Asthma Symptom Score

    Asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness) were scored, always before PEF measurements, twice daily - daytime and nighttime - as follows: Daytime asthma symptom score (ranging 0-3, where the lower the score the better the outcome): 0 No symptom 1. Mild: symptoms not causing awakening 2. Moderate: discomfort causing awakenings 3. Severe: causing awakenings for most of the night / don't allow to sleep at all The average score of each symptom is the mean value of all measurements (recorded in the evening session, as per study methodology). Total average Daily Asthma Symptoms score daytime = Σ(Cough daytime score + Wheeze daytime score + Chest Tightness daytime score + Breathlessness daytime score)/ Number of days with available data. The average of daytime asthma symptoms is the mean value of all daytime measurements, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximum severity). The lower the score, the better the symptom.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

  7. Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Evening Asthma Symptom Scores

    Asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness) were scored, always before PEF measurements, twice daily - daytime and nighttime - as follows: Nighttime asthma symptom score (ranging 0-3, where the lower the score the better the outcome): 0 No symptom 1. Mild: symptoms not causing awakening 2. Moderate: discomfort causing awakenings 3. Severe: causing awakenings for most of the night / don't allow to sleep at all The average score of each symptom is the mean value of all measurements (Recorded in the morning session of the next day). Total average Daily Asthma Symptoms score nighttime = Σ(Cough nighttime score + Wheeze nighttime score + Chest Tightness nighttime score + Breathlessness nighttime score)/ Number of days with available data. The average of nighttime asthma symptoms is the mean value of all nighttime measurements, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximum severity). The lower the score, the better the symptom.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

  8. Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days

    An asthma symptom-free day was defined as a day with both total morning and total evening asthma symptom scores = 0. Only days with both scores available were included. * Baseline percentage of symptom-free days was the mean percentage over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * Percentage of asthma symptom-free days was calculated as: (Number of symptom-free days / Total number of days with available data)×100 * It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the 12-week treatment period (from the evening of treatment start to the morning of treatment end). * At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

  9. Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Control Days

    An asthma control day was defined as a day without rescue medication use and with both total morning and total evening asthma symptom scores = 0. Only days with both scores available were included in the calculation. * Baseline percentage of asthma control days was the mean percentage over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * Percentage of asthma control days was calculated as: (Number of asthma control days / Total number of days with available data)×100 * It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the 12-week treatment period (from the evening of treatment start to the morning of treatment end). * At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks

  10. Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FEV1 at Each Clinic Visit

    Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured pre-dose in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) at each clinic visit using spirometry, following standardized procedures. Baseline FEV1 was recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and changes were assessed at each visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12). Patients performed spirometry in a seated position, using the same calibrated spirometer across all visits. They inhaled deeply to total lung capacity and exhaled forcefully and completely. At least three acceptable maneuvers were required, with the highest valid measurement recorded. FEV1 was expressed in liters (L), and a higher value indicated better lung function.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

  11. Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FVC at Each Clinic Visit

    Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the maximum capacity of air that a patient can exhale after a maximum inspiration. It measures the volume of air exhaled in a spirometer, after a maximal inspiration. FVC was measured pre-dose in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) at each clinic visit using spirometry, following standardized procedures. Baseline FVC was recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and changes were assessed at each visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12). Patients performed spirometry in a seated position, ensuring consistency across visits. They were instructed to inhale deeply to full lung capacity and exhale forcefully and completely into the spirometer. At least three acceptable maneuvers were required per session, with the highest valid measurement recorded. The higher the capacity, measured in liters, the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

  12. Change From Baseline to Last Visit in ACQ-6 Score

    The ACQ-6 was a validated questionnaire assessing asthma control, consisting of six items: five on asthma symptoms (nighttime waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing) and one on rescue medication use, all self-administered. Each item was scored from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment), and the ACQ-6 total score was the mean of all six items, ranging from 0 (totally controlled asthma) to 6 (severely uncontrolled asthma). Hence, the higher the score, the worse the outcome. Baseline ACQ-6 was assessed at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and the final score was recorded at Visit 9 (Week 12, EOT). The change from baseline was calculated as the difference between these values .

    Time frame: Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)

  13. Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (TEAE) or Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as "any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study patient administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment". An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was defined as an "untoward and unintended response to an investigational medicinal product related to any dose administered". An SAE/serious ADR was defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose Resulted in death, Was life-threatening, Required hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, Resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, Was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, Was a medically significant AE.

    Time frame: From Week 0 (Visit 3, Randomization) to Week 12 (Visit 9, EoT)

06

Results

Posted Aug 10, 2026

Participant flow

The trial began Oct 2017 and completed in Dec 2021, including the period COVID19 pandemic occurred in China. Enrollment in the 46 active sites was paused from Feb 2020, resuming from March 2020 in 8 sites and by 15 June 2020 in 38 sites. Of the patients screened, 494 entered a 4-week run-in period (V1, week -4) and afterward were enrolled and randomized (V3, week 0) into the two treatment groups: * Foster® NEXThaler® 100/6 µg Arm (n=252) * Foster® pMDI 100/6 µg Arm (n=242)

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFoster 100/6µg NEXThalerFoster 100/6µg pMDI
Started252242
Safety (saf) population252242
Intention-to-treat (itt) population251242
Per protocol (pp) population236223
Completed223215
Not completed2927
Withdrew: Other reason1715
Withdrew: Adverse event84
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject24
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy22
Withdrew: Protocol violation02

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)

PEF= peak expiratory flow. The peak expiratory flow (also known as a peak flow or peak flow rate) is the maximal rate that a person can exhale during a short maximal expiratory effort after a full inspiration. In this study PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded. * Baseline pre-dose morning PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * The average pre-dose morning PEF over the entire treatment period was computed as: ∑Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values (treatment period) / Number of days with available data * Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0, Visit 3) and Week 12 (EoT)
Reported as:
Mean · L/min
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
L/minFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)7.05 ± 34.451.42 ± 34.80
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · ANCOVA · p = 0.077 (The primary efficacy variable was analysed using an ANCOVA model including treatment, region and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value as covariate.) · Adjusted mean difference: 5.25 · 95% CI -0.56 to 11.06
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peek Expiratory Flow (PEF)

PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded. * Baseline pre-dose morning PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * The average pre-dose morning PEF for each inter-visit period was computed as: ∑all valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values / number of days with available data * Valid pre-dose morning Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Reported as:
Mean · L/min
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Morning Peek Expiratory Flow (PEF)
L/minFoster 100/6mg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
V3, Week 0 - V4, Week 24.96 ± 28.671.82 ± 27.85
V4, Week 2 - V5, Week 47.12 ± 39.77-0.17 ± 36.95
V5, Week 4 - V6, Week 67.63 ± 39.441.70 ± 39.98
V6, Week 6 - V7, Week 86.97 ± 41.695.08 ± 41.10
V7, Week 8 - V8, Week 109.73 ± 45.601.05 ± 43.81
V8, Week 10 - V9, Week 1210.15 ± 44.941.40 ± 46.72
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.257 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 2.79 · 95% CI -2.04 to 7.63
  • Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.061 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 6.43 · 95% CI -0.30 to 13.15
  • Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.132 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 5.35 · 95% CI -1.62 to 12.31
  • Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.526 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 2.35 · 95% CI -4.93 to 9.62
  • Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.049 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 7.87 · 95% CI 0.03 to 15.72
  • Foster 100/6mg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.038 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 8.57 · 95% CI 0.47 to 16.67
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Evening PEF

PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded. * Baseline pre-dose evening PEF was calculated as the mean of all valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values from the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * The average pre-dose evening PEF for each inter-visit period was computed as: ∑all valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values / number of days with available data * Valid pre-dose evening Best PEF values = Highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · L/min
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Pre-dose Evening PEF
L/minFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
V3, Week 0 - V4, Week 23.70 ± 28.390.79 ± 28.67
V4, Week 2 - V5, Week 44.69 ± 40.36-2.91 ± 36.75
V5, Week 4 - V6, Week 65.40 ± 39.12-0.56 ± 38.97
V6, Week 6 - V7, Week 83.36 ± 39.982.36 ± 38.75
V7, Week 8 - V8, Week 107.13 ± 45.15-1.69 ± 42.28
V8, Week 10 - V9, Week 126.59 ± 45.30-3.51 ± 44.80
Entire Treatment Period (Week 0 - Week 12)4.55 ± 33.86-1.64 ± 34.13
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.319 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 2.47 · 95% CI -2.39 to 7.32
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.054 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 6.66 · 95% CI -0.11 to 13.43
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.079 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 6.12 · 95% CI -0.71 to 12.96
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.538 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 2.18 · 95% CI -4.77 to 9.13
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.024 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 8.89 · 95% CI 1.18 to 16.60
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.011 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 10.32 · 95% CI 2.36 to 18.28
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.038 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 6.11 · 95% CI 0.35 to 11.86
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Daily PEF Variability

PEF (L/min) was monitored twice daily using a portable electronic peak flow meter before medication intake: morning (7:00-9:00 am) and evening (7:00-9:00 pm). Each session required at least two blows, with the highest valid value recorded. * Baseline average daily PEF variability was calculated as the mean of all daily PEF variability values recorded in the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * The average daily PEF variability for each inter-visit period was computed as: ∑all daily PEF variability values / number of days with available data * Daily PEF variability was calculated only for days where both pre-dose morning Best PEF and pre-dose evening Best PEF values were available. * Valid Best PEF values were defined as the highest value recorded from at least two PEF measurements per session, within the range 50-900 L/min.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · L/min
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Daily PEF Variability
L/minFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Visit 3 (Week 0) - Visit 4 (Week 2)-0.40 ± 5.44-0.62 ± 5.20
Visit 4 (Week 2) - Visit 5 (Week 4)-0.87 ± 6.02-1.02 ± 5.98
Visit 5 (Week 4) - Visit 6 (Week 6)-0.65 ± 5.77-0.71 ± 5.58
Visit 6 (Week 6) - Visit 7 (Week 8)-1.10 ± 6.00-0.75 ± 5.48
Visit 7 (Week 8)- Visit 8 (Week 10)-0.96 ± 5.85-0.90 ± 6.17
Visit 8 (Week 10) - Visit 9 (Week 12)-0.99 ± 5.65-1.55 ± 6.88
Entire Treatment Period (Week 0 - Week 12)-0.79 ± 4.58-1.03 ± 4.74
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.808 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.10 · 95% CI -0.74 to 0.94
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.944 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.94 to 0.87
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.974 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.86 to 0.83
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.767 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.13 · 95% CI -1.03 to 0.76
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.937 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -1.00 to 0.92
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.173 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.69 · 95% CI -0.31 to 1.70
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.766 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.10 · 95% CI -0.54 to 0.73
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Use of Rescue Medication (Number of Puffs/Day)

Rescue medication use was recorded daily in an electronic diary, with puffs taken during the day recorded in the evening session and puffs taken at night recorded the next morning. * Baseline rescue medication use was the mean daily use over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * Average daily use of rescue medication was calculated as: * all puffs per day / number of days with available data * It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the entire treatment period (from the evening of the first treatment day to the morning of the last). * At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · puffs/day
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Use of Rescue Medication (Number of Puffs/Day)
puffs/dayFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Visit 3 (Week 0) - Visit 4 (Week 2)-0.005 ± 0.083-0.009 ± 0.266
Visit 4 (Week 2) - Visit 5 (Week 4)0.017 ± 0.201-0.033 ± 0.266
Visit 5 (Week 4) - Visit 6 (Week 6)-0.004 ± 0.112-0.036 ± 0.264
Visit 6 (Week 6) - Visit 7 (Week 8)-0.002 ± 0.126-0.026 ± 0.313
Visit 7 (Week 8) - Visit 8 (Week 10)-0.002 ± 0.117-0.031 ± 0.329
Visit 8 (Week 10) - Visit 9 (Week 12)0.007 ± 0.158-0.024 ± 0.301
Entire Treatment Period (Week 0 - Week 12)0.002 ± 0.107-0.025 ± 0.260
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.365 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.013 · 95% CI -0.041 to 0.015
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.085 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.027 · 95% CI -0.004 to 0.057
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.414 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.010 · 95% CI -0.013 to 0.033
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.947 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.001 · 95% CI -0.028 to 0.030
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.969 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.001 · 95% CI -0.027 to 0.026
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.524 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.010 · 95% CI -0.021 to 0.041
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.615 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.014 · 95% CI -0.030 to 0.001
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days

Rescue medication use was recorded daily in an electronic diary, with puffs taken during the day recorded in the evening session and puffs taken at night recorded the next morning. * Baseline percentage of rescue medication-free days was calculated over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * Percentage of rescue medication-free days was calculated as: (Number of days with no rescue medication use / Total number of days with available data)×100 * It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the entire treatment period (from the evening of the first treatment day to the morning of the last). * At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of days
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days
Percentage of daysFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Visit 3 (Week 0) - Visit 4 (Week 2)0.23 ± 4.640.24 ± 8.59
Visit 4 (Week 2) - Visit 5 (Week 4)-0.62 ± 7.611.03 ± 8.79
Visit 5 (Week 4) - Visit 6 (Week 6)0.32 ± 5.471.32 ± 8.95
Visit 6 (Week 6) - Visit 7 (Week 8)0.23 ± 5.930.83 ± 11.27
Visit 7 (Week 8) - Visit 8 (Week 10)0.18 ± 5.760.90 ± 11.24
Visit 8 (Week 10) - Visit 9 (Week 12)-0.22 ± 7.591.02 ± 11.27
Entire Treatment Period (Week 0 - Week 12)0.02 ± 5.050.82 ± 8.61
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.318 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.51 · 95% CI -0.49 to 1.52
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.066 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -1.14 · 95% CI -2.35 to 0.07
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.401 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.43 · 95% CI -1.44 to 0.58
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.874 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.11 · 95% CI -1.46 to 1.24
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.903 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.08 · 95% CI -1.43 to 1.26
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.522 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.48 · 95% CI -1.94 to 0.99
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.566 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.29 · 95% CI -1.27 to 0.70
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Morning Asthma Symptom Score

Asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness) were scored, always before PEF measurements, twice daily - daytime and nighttime - as follows: Daytime asthma symptom score (ranging 0-3, where the lower the score the better the outcome): 0 No symptom 1. Mild: symptoms not causing awakening 2. Moderate: discomfort causing awakenings 3. Severe: causing awakenings for most of the night / don't allow to sleep at all The average score of each symptom is the mean value of all measurements (recorded in the evening session, as per study methodology). Total average Daily Asthma Symptoms score daytime = Σ(Cough daytime score + Wheeze daytime score + Chest Tightness daytime score + Breathlessness daytime score)/ Number of days with available data. The average of daytime asthma symptoms is the mean value of all daytime measurements, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximum severity). The lower the score, the better the symptom.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Morning Asthma Symptom Score
score on a scaleFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Visit 3 (Week 0) - Visit 4 (Week 2)-0.07 ± 0.32-0.07 ± 0.38
Visit 4 (Week 2) - Visit 5 (Week 4)-0.10 ± 0.38-0.12 ± 0.52
Visit 5 (Week 4) - Visit 6 (Week 6)-0.12 ± 0.40-0.16 ± 0.53
Visit 6 (Week 6) - Visit 7 (Week 8)-0.11 ± 0.37-0.15 ± 0.54
Visit 7 (Week 8) - Visit 8 (Week 10)-0.14 ± 0.38-0.13 ± 0.54
Visit 8 (Week 10) - Visit 9 (Week 12)-0.15 ± 0.38-0.15 ± 0.57
Entire Treatment Period (Week 0 - Week 12)-0.11 ± 0.35-0.13 ± 0.48
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.505 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.03
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.892 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.06 to 0.07
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.716 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.08
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.701 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.08
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.570 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.09 to 0.05
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.459 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.09 to 0.04
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.843 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.06 to 0.05
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Evening Asthma Symptom Scores

Asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness) were scored, always before PEF measurements, twice daily - daytime and nighttime - as follows: Nighttime asthma symptom score (ranging 0-3, where the lower the score the better the outcome): 0 No symptom 1. Mild: symptoms not causing awakening 2. Moderate: discomfort causing awakenings 3. Severe: causing awakenings for most of the night / don't allow to sleep at all The average score of each symptom is the mean value of all measurements (Recorded in the morning session of the next day). Total average Daily Asthma Symptoms score nighttime = Σ(Cough nighttime score + Wheeze nighttime score + Chest Tightness nighttime score + Breathlessness nighttime score)/ Number of days with available data. The average of nighttime asthma symptoms is the mean value of all nighttime measurements, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximum severity). The lower the score, the better the symptom.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Average Total Evening Asthma Symptom Scores
score on a scaleFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Visit 3 (Week 0) - Visit 4 (Week 2)-0.07 ± 0.29-0.04 ± 0.29
Visit 4 (Week 2) - Visit 5 (Week 4)-0.10 ± 0.31-0.08 ± 0.44
Visit 5 (Week 4) - Visit 6 (Week 6)-0.10 ± 0.35-0.09 ± 0.48
Visit 6 (Week 6) - Visit 7 (Week 8)-0.10 ± 0.36-0.09 ± 0.49
Visit 7 (Week 8) - Visit 8 (Week 10)-0.13 ± 0.37-0.10 ± 0.53
Visit 8 (Week 10) - Visit 9 (Week 12)-0.13 ± 0.38-0.09 ± 0.52
Entire Treatment Period (Week 0 - Week 12)-0.10 ± 0.32-0.08 ± 0.42
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.257 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.02
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.712 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.05
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.689 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.08 to 0.05
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.804 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.05
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.420 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.09 to 0.04
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.239 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.11 to 0.03
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.442 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.03
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days

An asthma symptom-free day was defined as a day with both total morning and total evening asthma symptom scores = 0. Only days with both scores available were included. * Baseline percentage of symptom-free days was the mean percentage over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * Percentage of asthma symptom-free days was calculated as: (Number of symptom-free days / Total number of days with available data)×100 * It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the 12-week treatment period (from the evening of treatment start to the morning of treatment end). * At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of days
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days
Percentage of daysFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Visit 3 (Week 0) - Visit 4 (Week 2)4.44 ± 18.213.69 ± 18.82
Visit 4 (Week 2) - Visit 5 (Week 4)6.96 ± 24.277.28 ± 26.58
Visit 5 (Week 4) - Visit 6 (Week 6)9.23 ± 26.109.84 ± 26.04
Visit 6 (Week 6) - Visit 7 (Week 8)9.25 ± 25.738.98 ± 25.98
Visit 7 (Week 8) - Visit 8 (Week 10)11.61 ± 28.459.64 ± 26.08
Visit 8 (Week 10) - Visit 9 (Week 12)12.22 ± 27.759.14 ± 28.08
Entire Treatment Period (Week 0 - Week 12)8.44 ± 22.587.91 ± 23.04
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.615 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.77 · 95% CI -2.25 to 3.79
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.928 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.18 · 95% CI -4.09 to 3.73
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.940 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.15 · 95% CI -4.03 to 3.73
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.851 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.38 · 95% CI -3.61 to 4.37
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.591 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 1.13 · 95% CI -3.01 to 5.27
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.254 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 2.46 · 95% CI -1.77 to 6.69
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.657 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.74 · 95% CI -2.51 to 3.98
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Control Days

An asthma control day was defined as a day without rescue medication use and with both total morning and total evening asthma symptom scores = 0. Only days with both scores available were included in the calculation. * Baseline percentage of asthma control days was the mean percentage over the last 14 days before randomization (Week 0, Visit 3). * Percentage of asthma control days was calculated as: (Number of asthma control days / Total number of days with available data)×100 * It was assessed for each inter-visit period (from the evening of the clinic visit to the morning of the next visit) and over the 12-week treatment period (from the evening of treatment start to the morning of treatment end). * At least 7 valid days were required per period, with at least one evaluable inter-visit period needed for full analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT) and across the 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of days
Change From Baseline to Each 2-week (Inter-visit) Treatment Period and to the Entire Treatment Period in Percentage of Asthma Control Days
Percentage of daysFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Visit 3 (Week 0) - Visit 4 (Week 2)4.61 ± 18.603.07 ± 18.71
Visit 4 (Week 2) - Visit 5 (Week 4)6.40 ± 25.337.17 ± 26.56
Visit 5 (Week 4) - Visit 6 (Week 6)9.51 ± 26.059.88 ± 26.08
Visit 6 (Week 6) - Visit 7 (Week 8)9.49 ± 26.029.12 ± 25.96
Visit 7 (Week 8) - Visit 8 (Week 10)11.79 ± 28.439.58 ± 26.15
Visit 8 (Week 10) - Visit 9 (Week 12)12.11 ± 28.249.29 ± 28.24
Entire Treatment Period (Week 0 - Week 12)8.44 ± 22.797.78 ± 22.90
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.293 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 1.63 · 95% CI -1.42 to 4.68
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.770 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.60 · 95% CI -4.59 to 3.40
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.949 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.13 · 95% CI -3.76 to 4.01
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.819 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.47 · 95% CI -3.54 to 4.47
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.482 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 1.49 · 95% CI -2.67 to 5.64
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.280 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 2.36 · 95% CI -1.92 to 6.63
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.582 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.91 · 95% CI -2.35 to 4.17
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FEV1 at Each Clinic Visit

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured pre-dose in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) at each clinic visit using spirometry, following standardized procedures. Baseline FEV1 was recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and changes were assessed at each visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12). Patients performed spirometry in a seated position, using the same calibrated spirometer across all visits. They inhaled deeply to total lung capacity and exhaled forcefully and completely. At least three acceptable maneuvers were required, with the highest valid measurement recorded. FEV1 was expressed in liters (L), and a higher value indicated better lung function.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Reported as:
Mean · liters
Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FEV1 at Each Clinic Visit
litersFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Visit 4 (Week 2)-0.040 ± 0.199-0.036 ± 0.233
Visit 5 (Week 4)-0.028 ± 0.248-0.033 ± 0.207
Visit 6 (Week 6)-0.037 ± 0.259-0.046 ± 0.221
Visit 7 (Week 8)-0.050 ± 0.257-0.040 ± 0.222
Visit 8 (Week 10)-0.039 ± 0.261-0.063 ± 0.232
Visit 9 (Week 12)-0.034 ± 0.246-0.044 ± 0.230
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.996 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.000 · 95% CI -0.038 to 0.038
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.747 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.007 · 95% CI -0.034 to 0.048
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.855 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.004 · 95% CI -0.040 to 0.049
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.562 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.013 · 95% CI -0.058 to 0.032
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.262 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.026 · 95% CI -0.019 to 0.070
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.875 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.004 · 95% CI -0.048 to 0.041
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FVC at Each Clinic Visit

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the maximum capacity of air that a patient can exhale after a maximum inspiration. It measures the volume of air exhaled in a spirometer, after a maximal inspiration. FVC was measured pre-dose in the morning (7:00-9:00 am) at each clinic visit using spirometry, following standardized procedures. Baseline FVC was recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and changes were assessed at each visit (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12). Patients performed spirometry in a seated position, ensuring consistency across visits. They were instructed to inhale deeply to full lung capacity and exhale forcefully and completely into the spirometer. At least three acceptable maneuvers were required per session, with the highest valid measurement recorded. The higher the capacity, measured in liters, the better the outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 3, Week 0, Randomization), Week 2 (Visit 4), Week 4 (Visit 5), Week 6 (Visit 6), Week 8 (Visit 7), Week 10 (Visit 8), Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Reported as:
Mean · liters
Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Morning FVC at Each Clinic Visit
litersFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Visit 4 (Week 2)-0.023 ± 0.176-0.033 ± 0.193
Visit 5 (Week 4)-0.027 ± 0.237-0.047 ± 0.207
Visit 6 (Week 6)-0.020 ± 0.270-0.056 ± 0.221
Visit 7 (Week 8)-0.026 ± 0.270-0.056 ± 0.211
Visit 8 (Week 10)-0.037 ± 0.256-0.076 ± 0.218
Visit 9 (Week 12)-0.039 ± 0.258-0.050 ± 0.216
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.443 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.013 · 95% CI -0.020 to 0.045
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.291 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.021 · 95% CI -0.018 to 0.061
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.228 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.028 · 95% CI -0.018 to 0.074
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.372 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.020 · 95% CI -0.025 to 0.065
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.075 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.039 · 95% CI -0.004 to 0.083
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.953 (The MMRM analysis evaluated the change from baseline to each inter-visit period as the dependent variable, with treatment, period, their interaction, region, and sex as fixed effects, and baseline value and its interaction with period as covariates.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.001 · 95% CI -0.043 to 0.046
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Last Visit in ACQ-6 Score

The ACQ-6 was a validated questionnaire assessing asthma control, consisting of six items: five on asthma symptoms (nighttime waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing) and one on rescue medication use, all self-administered. Each item was scored from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment), and the ACQ-6 total score was the mean of all six items, ranging from 0 (totally controlled asthma) to 6 (severely uncontrolled asthma). Hence, the higher the score, the worse the outcome. Baseline ACQ-6 was assessed at Visit 3 (Week 0, randomization), and the final score was recorded at Visit 9 (Week 12, EOT). The change from baseline was calculated as the difference between these values .

Time frame:
Week 12 (Visit 9, End of Treatment - EOT)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Last Visit in ACQ-6 Score
score on a scaleFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT
Change From Baseline to Last Visit in ACQ-6 Score-0.006 ± 0.196-0.019 ± 0.208
Statistical analysis
  • Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITT vs Foster 100/6µg pMDI - ITT · ANCOVA · p = 0.813 (Analysis was based on an ANCOVA model with change from baseline to the end of treatment (Week 12) as dependent variable, treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline as a covariate.) · Adjusted mean difference: 0.004 · 95% CI -0.030 to 0.039
SecondaryNumber of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (TEAE) or Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as "any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study patient administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment". An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was defined as an "untoward and unintended response to an investigational medicinal product related to any dose administered". An SAE/serious ADR was defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose Resulted in death, Was life-threatening, Required hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, Resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, Was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, Was a medically significant AE.

Time frame:
From Week 0 (Visit 3, Randomization) to Week 12 (Visit 9, EoT)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (TEAE) or Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)
ParticipantsFoster 100/6µg NEXThaler - SAF PopulationFoster 100/6µg pMDI - SAF Population
TEAEs122120
Serious TEAEs35
ADRs1411
Serious ADRs00
Severe TEAEs44
TEAEs leading to discontinuation from study treatment74
TEAEs leading to death00

Adverse events

Collected over AEs were collected from screening (V1, week -2) to End of Treatment (V9, week 12 OR before if patients withdrew) and at follow-up (7-10 days max after last study drug intake - Day 91-94). AEs and overall mortality presented represent the safety set (i.e. all patients receiving any amount of study drug, including both run-ins and randomized patients). As per planned analysis, AEs were collected in a combined manner: i.e. data on the run-in phase were combined with the ones of the reported arms.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Run-in and Randomized Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler (SAF Population)0/252 (0%)3/252 (1.2%)122/252 (48.4%)
Run-in and Randomized Foster 100/6µg pMDI (SAF Population)0/242 (0%)5/242 (2.1%)120/242 (49.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventRun-in and Randomized Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler (SAF Population)Run-in and Randomized Foster 100/6µg pMDI (SAF Population)
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/2521/242
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/2521/242
Lumbar spinal stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/2521/242
Still's diseaseMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/2521/242
Nephritis allergicRenal and urinary disorders0/2521/242
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/2521/242
Pulmonary massRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/2521/242
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/2520/242
Chronic hepatitis BInfections and infestations1/2520/242
Thyroid neoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/2520/242
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 182
Most frequent other events
EventRun-in and Randomized Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler (SAF Population)Run-in and Randomized Foster 100/6µg pMDI (SAF Population)
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations42/25227/242
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations12/25212/242
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/25212/242
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders12/25210/242
PharyngitisInfections and infestations5/2529/242
Rhinitis allergicRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders8/2523/242
BronchitisInfections and infestations4/2525/242
HypertensionVascular disorders1/2524/242
Chronic gastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/2523/242
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/2523/242

Baseline characteristics

Intention-to-treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy after baseline

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITTTotal
Mean41.6 ± 12.041.7 ± 11.741.6 ± 11.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITTTotal
Female153152305
Male9890188
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITTTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian251242493
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Foster 100/6µg NEXThaler - ITTFoster 100/6µg pMDI - ITTTotal
China251242493
07

Study locations

51 sites
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15641
    Hefei, Anhui, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15682
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100000, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15663
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 101100, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15662
    Foshan, Guangdong, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15671
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 5100150, China
  • Chiesi clinical Trial Site 15610
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China
  • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15656
    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15668
    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15677
    Huizhou, Guangdong 516001, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15683
    Shenzhen, Guangdong 518052, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15608
    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15607
    Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524001, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15610
    Guangzhou, Guangzhou 511400, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15673
    Haikou, Hainan 570208, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15678
    Qiqihar, Heilongjiang 161002, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15681
    Xinxiang, Henan 453000, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15679
    Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15614
    Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15661
    Wuhan, Hubei, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15675
    Hengyang, Hunan 421000, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15643
    Changzhou, Jiangsu 213164, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15674
    Pingxiang, Jiangxi 337055, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15676
    Jilin City, Jilin 132011, China
  • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15621
    Shenyang, Liaoning, China
  • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15619
    Nanchang, Nanchang 330006, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15650
    Hohhot, Neimenggu 010017, China
  • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15659
    Hohhot, Neimenggu, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15630
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200025, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15664
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200050, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15654
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 201100, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15630
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15631
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15665
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15625
    Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15611
    Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15633
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15680
    Chongqing, Sichuan 408499, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15642
    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality 300052, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15634
    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality 300350, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15626
    Xi'an, Xian 710061, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15672
    Beijing, 100144, China
  • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15636
    Beijing, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15638
    Chongqing, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15670
    Guizhou, China
  • Chiesi clinical Trial Site 15611
    Hebei, China
  • Chiesi Clinical trial site 15660
    Jilin City, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15628
    Shanghai, China
  • Chiesi clinical trial site 15637
    Shanghai, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15666
    Shenzhen, China
  • Chiesi clinical Trial site 15633
    Sichuan, China
  • Chiesi Clinical Trial site 15669
    Ürümqi, 830054, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zheng J, Zhang J, Fu X, Lin C, Zhang X, Mei X, Corradi M, Cappellini G, Calabro E, Zhu C, Topole E. Comparison of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler and pressurized metered-dose inhaler in Chinese patients with asthma: the FORTUNE study. J Asthma. 2024 Apr;61(4):360-367. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2272816. Epub 2023 Nov 1. PubMed 37878325 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 31, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 10, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03453112
Lead sponsor
Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 5, 2018
Start date
Oct 9, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 28, 2021
Completion
Dec 28, 2021
Results posted
Aug 10, 2026
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Jinping MD Zheng
principal investigator · The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion