An interventional study of Scrambler and Scrambler Sham Control in Neuromyelitis Optica, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-05.
Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 52 studies in Neuromyelitis Optica with a site in United States — 16 open to participants now, 21 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Neuromyelitis Optica · United States.
Among the 52 studies in Neuromyelitis Optica with a site in United States, this one is the 19th largest by enrollment of the 37 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2018, is one of 7 with no phase, and was the 23rd registered.
178 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuromyelitis Optica; 78 are open to participants now.
Browse Neuromyelitis Optica studies →16 of the 52 studies in Neuromyelitis Optica with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Amgen · Sites in United States
Ages 15+ · Women only
Hoffmann-La Roche · Sites in United States, Argentina, China and 6 more countries
Ages 2–11
Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPH · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
TG Therapeutics, Inc. · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 50 Neuromyelitis Optica studies recruiting now, 29 (58%) set no upper age limit and 16 (32%) stop at 75 or younger; 11 take children under 18; 9 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
52 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 9 · Phase 2 14 · Phase 3 11 · Phase 4 3
First in 2001; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2018.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 29 across 108 interventional studies indexed under Neuromyelitis Optica.
Median enrollment 22 across the 37 interventional studies, 112 across the 15 observational. Of the 26 that completed or were terminated, 19 (73%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
21 of 52 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 314 are open to participants now.
Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.
Johns Hopkins University has 4 studies filed under Neuromyelitis Optica — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
5 of the studies in Neuromyelitis Optica with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 1 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT05199688Phase 3Hoffmann-La RocheA Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamics of Satralizumab in Pediatric Patients With Aquaporin-4 Antibody Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) | 2027-03-31 |
| NCT06680037TG Therapeutics, Inc.A Study to Assess the Safety and Clinical Activity of Azer-cel in Participants With B-cell Mediated Autoimmune Disorders | 2026-12-01 |
| NCT05549258AmgenStudy of Inebilizumab in Pediatric Subjects With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder | 2027-04-13 |
| NCT06453694Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPHEfgartigimod for the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis | 2027-06 |
| NCT03011541MD Stem CellsStem Cell Ophthalmology Treatment Study II | 2027-07-31 |
Add all 5 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 52 studies in Neuromyelitis Optica with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
A novel technology called Scrambler Therapy is a non-invasive pain modifying technique that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of C fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. This neuromodulatory therapy has been investigated for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in several conditions including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia and post-surgical neuropathic pain with promising results. Patients report sustained relief after undergoing daily treatment sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays. This study is a randomized single blinded, sham-controlled trial of patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder who have central neuropathic pain using Scrambler Therapy added to standardized empiric medications using patient reported outcomes to determine if Scrambler Therapy is a feasible and effective add-on treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.
This trial will recruit twenty-two adult patients diagnosed with NMOSD who have chronic neuropathic pain despite empiric treatment with an anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid and/or an NSAID medication. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo Scrambler Therapy or blinded sham daily for 10 days. The primary outcomes will be acceptability and feasibility. The secondary outcome will be efficacy measured as a change in pain scores of more than two points recorded daily by the patient using an 11-point visual analog scale; quality of life (QoL), neurologic function, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and pain will also be evaluated at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 4 \& 8 weeks following completion of treatment. Investigators hypothesize that Scrambler Therapy will be an acceptable, feasible and efficacious intervention that significantly reduces pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that disproportionately affects non-Caucasians and females,1,2 and has a worldwide prevalence estimated to be 0.52 to 4.4/100,000.3 NMOSD preferentially causes recurrent inflammatory attacks in the optic nerves and spinal cord, leading to blindness, paralysis and death. Despite these devastating consequences of the disease, patients have reported that pain is among the most prevalent and debilitating symptom, and impacts mood, mobility and quality of life (QoL). In particular, central neuropathic pain (CNP) is pervasive, severe, intractable to treatment, and affects 62-91% of patients with NMOSD. CNP is described as agonizing burning, stabbing, shooting, tingling or squeezing sensation that is distressing, persistent and incapacitating.13,14 The presence of CNP in NMOSD is a direct consequence of targeted immune-mediated destruction of the spinal cord and may be influenced by lesion span and location: NMOSD lesions are generally transverse, involving both the central gray matter and dorsal horns. The dorsal horns are innervated by primary ascending fibers that convey sensory information to the brain. Damage to the central gray matter in NMOSD leads to astrocytic damage and tissue necrosis, thus disrupting sensory pain tracts going to and from the brain. As a consequence of ongoing spontaneous activity arising in the periphery, surviving neurons develop increased background activity and increased responses to ascending nerve impulses, including normally harmless tactile stimulation. An additional mechanism of CNP involves peripheral sensitization of non-myelinated ascending C fibers interpreted by the brain as persistent pain, a characteristic sign of an inflammatory process in the spinal cord.
Spinal CNP typically presents weeks to months after the cord damage has occurred, long after the acute injury, and may be the result of secondary changes due to reorganization of damaged circuits of the somatosensory system. CNP occurs at and below the spinal cord lesion level, and can persist for years, decades or throughout the patient's life. As with neuropathic pain from other etiologies, the most frequently-used medications for its treatment in NMOSD are anti-epileptics, antidepressants and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Descriptive studies in NMOSD recognized the inadequate effect of these medications, resulting in frequent breakthrough opioid use. Furthermore, side effects from these medications, particularly at higher doses, are independently associated with fatigue.
Scrambler is a type of transcutaneous electrostimulation (TENS) that uses peripheral nerve stimulation to modify ascending sensory responses in the spinal cord. Electrical impulses are transmitted via surface electrodes placed surrounding the pain area. Traditional TENS units take advantage of the Gate Control Theory in which stimulation of surrounding A-delta fibers dampens incoming pain signals. Scrambler therapy provides additional stimulation of ascending sensory C fibers that imitate normal nerve action potentials with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. The theory behind Scrambler treatment is that "scrambled" waveforms - instead of repetitive identical waveforms in traditional TENS - are dynamically assembled into strings of information that are interpreted by the brain to replace pain with "no-pain" information. In contrast to traditional TENS therapy that provides only short term pain relief, studies with Scrambler therapy in peripheral neuropathy suggest that patients can have significantly reduced pain or be pain-free for up to 3 months following a series of treatments, and that follow-up treatments may require fewer sessions for continued relief.
This study is a randomized single blinded, sham-controlled trial of patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder who have central neuropathic pain using Scrambler Therapy added to standardized empiric medications using patient reported outcomes to determine if Scrambler Therapy is a feasible and effective add-on treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.
This trial will recruit twenty-two adult patients diagnosed with NMOSD who have chronic neuropathic pain despite empiric treatment with an anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid and/or an NSAID medication. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo Scrambler Therapy or blinded sham daily for 10 days. The primary outcomes will be acceptability and feasibility. The secondary outcome will be efficacy measured as a change in pain scores of more than two points recorded daily by the patient using an 11-point visual analog scale; quality of life (QoL), neurologic function, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and pain will also be evaluated at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 4 \& 8 weeks following completion of treatment. Investigators hypothesize that Scrambler Therapy will be an acceptable, feasible and efficacious intervention that significantly reduces pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
This arm will receive the Scrambler intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days.
Device: Scrambler
This arm will receive the Sham-Control intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days.
Device: Scrambler Sham Control
Scrambler is a non-invasive pain modifying technique that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of nociceptive fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways which has been investigated for treatment of peripheral neuropathy.
Also known as: CALMARE
Sham control should be indistinguishable to the participants from experimental Scrambler therapy.
Acceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question
Will be determined by how many participants say "yes" to the following question, "Would you want to continue the treatment if it were available?"
Time frame: 10 days
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits
Adherence to visit schedule will be determined by the number of participants that completed the 10 treatment visits.
Time frame: 10 days
Change in Pain Level
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline, 10 days
Change in Pain Level
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline, 30 days
Change in Pain Level
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline, 60 days
| Milestone | Scrambler | Sham-Control |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 11 | 11 |
| Completed | 11 | 11 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Will be determined by how many participants say "yes" to the following question, "Would you want to continue the treatment if it were available?"
| Participants | Scrambler | Sham-Control |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question | 7 | 5 |
Adherence to visit schedule will be determined by the number of participants that completed the 10 treatment visits.
| Participants | Scrambler | Sham-Control |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits | 11 | 9 |
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
| score on a scale | Scrambler Pre | Scrambler Post | Sham Pre | Sham Post |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in Pain Level | 5.0 (4.25 to 7.0) | 1.5 (0 to 2.75) | 5.0 (4.0 to 7.25) | 4.0 (3.5 to 4.75) |
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
| score on a scale | Scrambler 30-day Post | Sham 30-day Post |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Pain Level | 4.5 (3.375 to 5.125) | 5.0 (4.25 to 6.0) |
Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.
| score on a scale | Scrambler 60-day Post | Sham 60-day Post |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Pain Level | 4.5 (2.5 to 5.75) | 5.0 (4.5 to 6.5) |
Collected over 60 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scrambler | 0/11 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) | 3/11 (27.3%) |
| Sham-Control | 0/11 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) | 3/11 (27.3%) |
| Event | Scrambler | Sham-Control |
|---|---|---|
| Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders | 0/11 | 2/11 |
| Charles Bonnet SyndromeNervous system disorders | 1/11 | 0/11 |
| InsomniaNervous system disorders | 1/11 | 0/11 |
| Skin sensitivity to electrodesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/11 | 0/11 |
| BacteremiaInfections and infestations | 0/11 | 1/11 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Scrambler | Sham-Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 56.2 ± 7.2 | 57.5 ± 13.8 | 56.9 ± 0.9 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Scrambler | Sham-Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| Male | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Scrambler | Sham-Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| White | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Aquaporin-4 Antibody Seropositive(participants) | Scrambler | Sham-Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 11 | 11 | 22 |
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: Undecided
Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Aug 2019, 18 months.
Results were first posted in Apr 2020, 7 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.