ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03452176Updated May 5, 2020Results posted

Scrambler Trial for Pain in NMOSD

An interventional study of Scrambler and Scrambler Sham Control in Neuromyelitis Optica, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-05.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 52 studies in Neuromyelitis Optica with a site in United States — 16 open to participants now, 21 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Neuromyelitis Optica · United States.

Enrollment
19th of 37
22 · median 22
Started
2018
with 1 other
No phase
7 of 52
4 open now
Registered
23rd of 52
by date
Lead sponsor
4 of 52
Johns Hopkins University

Among the 52 studies in Neuromyelitis Optica with a site in United States, this one is the 19th largest by enrollment of the 37 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2018, is one of 7 with no phase, and was the 23rd registered.

Neuromyelitis Optica

178 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuromyelitis Optica; 78 are open to participants now.

Browse Neuromyelitis Optica studies →

Open to participants now

16 of the 52 studies in Neuromyelitis Optica with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

11 more — sign in →

All 16 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 50 Neuromyelitis Optica studies recruiting now, 29 (58%) set no upper age limit and 16 (32%) stop at 75 or younger; 11 take children under 18; 9 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 52 studies in Neuromyelitis Optica with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

A novel technology called Scrambler Therapy is a non-invasive pain modifying technique that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of C fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. This neuromodulatory therapy has been investigated for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in several conditions including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia and post-surgical neuropathic pain with promising results. Patients report sustained relief after undergoing daily treatment sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays. This study is a randomized single blinded, sham-controlled trial of patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder who have central neuropathic pain using Scrambler Therapy added to standardized empiric medications using patient reported outcomes to determine if Scrambler Therapy is a feasible and effective add-on treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.

This trial will recruit twenty-two adult patients diagnosed with NMOSD who have chronic neuropathic pain despite empiric treatment with an anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid and/or an NSAID medication. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo Scrambler Therapy or blinded sham daily for 10 days. The primary outcomes will be acceptability and feasibility. The secondary outcome will be efficacy measured as a change in pain scores of more than two points recorded daily by the patient using an 11-point visual analog scale; quality of life (QoL), neurologic function, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and pain will also be evaluated at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 4 \& 8 weeks following completion of treatment. Investigators hypothesize that Scrambler Therapy will be an acceptable, feasible and efficacious intervention that significantly reduces pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Read the detailed description

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that disproportionately affects non-Caucasians and females,1,2 and has a worldwide prevalence estimated to be 0.52 to 4.4/100,000.3 NMOSD preferentially causes recurrent inflammatory attacks in the optic nerves and spinal cord, leading to blindness, paralysis and death. Despite these devastating consequences of the disease, patients have reported that pain is among the most prevalent and debilitating symptom, and impacts mood, mobility and quality of life (QoL). In particular, central neuropathic pain (CNP) is pervasive, severe, intractable to treatment, and affects 62-91% of patients with NMOSD. CNP is described as agonizing burning, stabbing, shooting, tingling or squeezing sensation that is distressing, persistent and incapacitating.13,14 The presence of CNP in NMOSD is a direct consequence of targeted immune-mediated destruction of the spinal cord and may be influenced by lesion span and location: NMOSD lesions are generally transverse, involving both the central gray matter and dorsal horns. The dorsal horns are innervated by primary ascending fibers that convey sensory information to the brain. Damage to the central gray matter in NMOSD leads to astrocytic damage and tissue necrosis, thus disrupting sensory pain tracts going to and from the brain. As a consequence of ongoing spontaneous activity arising in the periphery, surviving neurons develop increased background activity and increased responses to ascending nerve impulses, including normally harmless tactile stimulation. An additional mechanism of CNP involves peripheral sensitization of non-myelinated ascending C fibers interpreted by the brain as persistent pain, a characteristic sign of an inflammatory process in the spinal cord.

Spinal CNP typically presents weeks to months after the cord damage has occurred, long after the acute injury, and may be the result of secondary changes due to reorganization of damaged circuits of the somatosensory system. CNP occurs at and below the spinal cord lesion level, and can persist for years, decades or throughout the patient's life. As with neuropathic pain from other etiologies, the most frequently-used medications for its treatment in NMOSD are anti-epileptics, antidepressants and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Descriptive studies in NMOSD recognized the inadequate effect of these medications, resulting in frequent breakthrough opioid use. Furthermore, side effects from these medications, particularly at higher doses, are independently associated with fatigue.

Scrambler is a type of transcutaneous electrostimulation (TENS) that uses peripheral nerve stimulation to modify ascending sensory responses in the spinal cord. Electrical impulses are transmitted via surface electrodes placed surrounding the pain area. Traditional TENS units take advantage of the Gate Control Theory in which stimulation of surrounding A-delta fibers dampens incoming pain signals. Scrambler therapy provides additional stimulation of ascending sensory C fibers that imitate normal nerve action potentials with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. The theory behind Scrambler treatment is that "scrambled" waveforms - instead of repetitive identical waveforms in traditional TENS - are dynamically assembled into strings of information that are interpreted by the brain to replace pain with "no-pain" information. In contrast to traditional TENS therapy that provides only short term pain relief, studies with Scrambler therapy in peripheral neuropathy suggest that patients can have significantly reduced pain or be pain-free for up to 3 months following a series of treatments, and that follow-up treatments may require fewer sessions for continued relief.

This study is a randomized single blinded, sham-controlled trial of patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder who have central neuropathic pain using Scrambler Therapy added to standardized empiric medications using patient reported outcomes to determine if Scrambler Therapy is a feasible and effective add-on treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.

This trial will recruit twenty-two adult patients diagnosed with NMOSD who have chronic neuropathic pain despite empiric treatment with an anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid and/or an NSAID medication. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo Scrambler Therapy or blinded sham daily for 10 days. The primary outcomes will be acceptability and feasibility. The secondary outcome will be efficacy measured as a change in pain scores of more than two points recorded daily by the patient using an 11-point visual analog scale; quality of life (QoL), neurologic function, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and pain will also be evaluated at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 4 \& 8 weeks following completion of treatment. Investigators hypothesize that Scrambler Therapy will be an acceptable, feasible and efficacious intervention that significantly reduces pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

03

Conditions studied

  • Neuromyelitis Optica

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be 18 years of age or older
  • Have the presence of persistent CNP rated at a level of 4 or higher on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS); persistent pain is defined as presence for >3 months
  • Patients must be stable in their disease, such that they have had no spinal cord relapses with the last 6 months
  • Patients may use any combination of standard of care medications for pain treatment, to include anti-epileptic, antidepressant, opioid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, with no adjustments to the regimen within 30 days of enrollment.
  • Aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-antibody positive or negative, or untested, but otherwise meeting criteria for diagnosis of NMOSD.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A concomitant diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy
  • An ongoing concomitant central neurologic disorder
  • Pain that is referable to a spinal cord lesion that starts above the 4th vertebral disc of the cervical spinal cord because FDA device clearance allows for treatment below the neck
  • Use of an agent for pain control within 30 days of enrollment
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Those with cognitive or mental incompetency
  • Patients with implantable devices
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Scrambler

    This arm will receive the Scrambler intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days.

    Device: Scrambler

  • Sham comparator
    Sham-Control

    This arm will receive the Sham-Control intervention for 1 hour daily x10 days.

    Device: Scrambler Sham Control

Interventions

  • DeviceScrambler

    Scrambler is a non-invasive pain modifying technique that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of nociceptive fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways which has been investigated for treatment of peripheral neuropathy.

    Also known as: CALMARE

  • DeviceScrambler Sham Control

    Sham control should be indistinguishable to the participants from experimental Scrambler therapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question

    Will be determined by how many participants say "yes" to the following question, "Would you want to continue the treatment if it were available?"

    Time frame: 10 days

  2. Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits

    Adherence to visit schedule will be determined by the number of participants that completed the 10 treatment visits.

    Time frame: 10 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Level

    Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, 10 days

  2. Change in Pain Level

    Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days

  3. Change in Pain Level

    Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, 60 days

07

Results

Posted Apr 17, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneScramblerSham-Control
Started1111
Completed1111
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryAcceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question

Will be determined by how many participants say "yes" to the following question, "Would you want to continue the treatment if it were available?"

Time frame:
10 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question
ParticipantsScramblerSham-Control
Acceptability as Assessed by the Number of Participants Responding Yes to a Question75
PrimaryFeasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits

Adherence to visit schedule will be determined by the number of participants that completed the 10 treatment visits.

Time frame:
10 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits
ParticipantsScramblerSham-Control
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants That Completed Treatment Visits119
SecondaryChange in Pain Level

Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline, 10 days
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change in Pain Level
score on a scaleScrambler PreScrambler PostSham PreSham Post
Change in Pain Level5.0 (4.25 to 7.0)1.5 (0 to 2.75)5.0 (4.0 to 7.25)4.0 (3.5 to 4.75)
SecondaryChange in Pain Level

Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline, 30 days
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change in Pain Level
score on a scaleScrambler 30-day PostSham 30-day Post
Change in Pain Level4.5 (3.375 to 5.125)5.0 (4.25 to 6.0)
SecondaryChange in Pain Level

Change in NRS pain score (score ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 being "No pain" and 10 being "Worst pain") will be calculated by subtracting the patient's Day 10 pain score (end of treatment) from his or her baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline, 60 days
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change in Pain Level
score on a scaleScrambler 60-day PostSham 60-day Post
Change in Pain Level4.5 (2.5 to 5.75)5.0 (4.5 to 6.5)

Adverse events

Collected over 60 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Scrambler0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)3/11 (27.3%)
Sham-Control0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)3/11 (27.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventScramblerSham-Control
Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders0/112/11
Charles Bonnet SyndromeNervous system disorders1/110/11
InsomniaNervous system disorders1/110/11
Skin sensitivity to electrodesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/110/11
BacteremiaInfections and infestations0/111/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ScramblerSham-ControlTotal
Mean56.2 ± 7.257.5 ± 13.856.9 ± 0.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ScramblerSham-ControlTotal
Female101020
Male112
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ScramblerSham-ControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American6713
White347
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported202
Aquaporin-4 Antibody Seropositive
Aquaporin-4 Antibody Seropositive(participants)ScramblerSham-ControlTotal
Number111122
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mealy MA, Kozachik SL, Cook LJ, Totonis L, Salazar RA, Allen JK, Nolan MT, Smith TJ, Levy M. Scrambler therapy improves pain in neuromyelitis optica: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2020 May 5;94(18):e1900-e1907. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009370. Epub 2020 Apr 8. PubMed 32269109 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Aug 2019, 18 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2020, 7 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 22, 2018
First posted
Mar 2, 2018
StartActual
Feb 21, 2018
Primary completionActual
Aug 29, 2019
CompletionActual
Aug 29, 2019
Results first posted
Apr 17, 2020
Last update
May 5, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03452176
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 2, 2018
Start date
Feb 21, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2019
Completion
Aug 29, 2019
Results posted
Apr 17, 2020
Last update
May 5, 2020

Study contacts

Michael Levy, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University
Maureen A Mealy, RN
study director · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion