CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03448575SUAYUpdated Oct 31, 2024Results posted

Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth

An interventional study of Control - Provider Medication Alert Only and Intervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access in Child Behavior Disorders, sponsored by Kaiser Permanente. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 17 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-31.

Sponsored by Kaiser Permanente · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
733
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study tests the effectiveness of an intervention treatment algorithm vs. usual care control in a practical clinical trial. Control arm providers will receive a standard medication alert in the electronic medical record (EMR) when initiating an antipsychotic prescription for an eligible patient. Intervention arm prescribers will receive an interactive medication alert in the EMR when prescribing for eligible patients and the patient and provider will enter the treatment algorithm (provider - medication alert plus clinical review by a child psychiatrist; patient - offer of personalized behavioral health navigation plus bridging therapy when appropriate). The study aims to recruit 800 eligible patients in 4 health systems.

Read the detailed description

SUAY is a practical clinical trial designed to test the effectiveness of an intervention aiming to improve the targeted and safer use of antipsychotic medications by guiding clinician-prescribing behavior of antipsychotics for children aged ≥ 3 and \< 18 years and encouraging psychosocial therapy for eligible youth. The intervention includes a medication best practice alert in Epic, consultation with a child and adolescent psychiatrist, and extra support for patients and families to improve behavioral health service access. The trial will be conducted in 4 non-academic health systems. Each health system will randomize prescribers to one of two study arms, intervention and control. During patient encounters, entering an antipsychotic for a potentially eligible patient will cause either the control or intervention medication alert to fire in the electronic medical record. The control arm medication alert will point prescribing clinicians to relevant Choosing Wisely® recommendations. The intervention arm medication alert will inform prescribers that:

  1. Antipsychotics are not recommended 1st line treatment for non-psychotic disorders;
  2. A child and adolescent psychiatrist (CAP) will review antipsychotic usage by youth;
  3. Expedited access to bridging therapy, behavior health navigation, and/or a proactive consultation with a CAP may be ordered.

The intervention medication alert will point prescribing clinicians to both Choosing Wisely® recommendations and to SUAY clinical prescribing guidelines. SUAY guidelines were developed by a national expert consensus panel in a prior phase of the study.

Analytic data will be collected from automated data sources at the health systems. The primary outcomes are percent of children ordered an antipsychotic medication at 6 months of follow up, and total person-months of antipsychotic orders placed for participants during the study period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Child Behavior Disorders

Keywords

  • Youth
  • Mental Health
  • Psychotropic
  • Medication Safety
  • Quality Improvement
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is ≥ 3 and \< 18 years of age at the time of the encounter at which the study alert fired (index date);
  • Patient is initiating a new episode of outpatient treatment with an antipsychotic medication. (New episodes are defined by no record of an antipsychotic medication being ordered within the health system as part of an outpatient care plan in the prior 180 days);
  • Study service (BH navigation, bridging therapy, CAP consult) ordered in Epic for the patient; (e.g., provider removed antipsychotic order and still ordered study services);

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a diagnosed psychotic disorder, mania, autism spectrum disorder, or intellectual disability;
  • Patient was enrolled in the SUAY pilot study;
  • The antipsychotic entered is prochlorperazine (Comazol®);
  • An outpatient antipsychotic order is entered by a temporary provider in the health system (e.g., "doc of the day"). Orders placed by temporary providers do not count towards the 180 day medication free period for defining a new episode of care.
  • The antipsychotic order was placed within an urgent care, emergency department, or inpatient setting (to avoid intervening during a crisis). Orders placed in these settings do not count towards the 180 day medication free period for defining a new episode of care.
  • Primary language is not English
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
733 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Control - Medication Alert Only

    The control arm medication alert is a simple text pop-up in the EMR that will inform the prescriber of Choosing Wisely® recommendations developed the American Psychiatric Association regarding antipsychotic medication use in children and adolescents.

    Other: Control - Provider Medication Alert Only

  • Experimental
    Intervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access

    The intervention alert prompts the prescriber to keep/remove the antipsychotic order, and/or order any study services: behavioral health navigation, expedited psychotherapy access, virtual consult with a child and adolescent psychiatrist (CAP). Passive case review by the study CAP will occur for all intervention arm cases. A virtual consult will be scheduled if the prescriber ordered it or the CAP needs to discuss the case. The CAP will provide the prescriber with a written summary of his/her review. Following review by the CAP, a navigator reaches out to the eligible intervention arm patient/family to offer extra support. The navigator's role is to (a) provide extra support to facilitate access and engagement in appropriate psychosocial therapies; (b) coordinate short-duration bridging therapy sessions for teens/families not engaged in psychotherapy, when appropriate; and (c) keep the prescriber informed of any clinically relevant updates.

    Other: Intervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access

Interventions

  • OtherControl - Provider Medication Alert Only

    Simple text medication alert referencing Choosing Wisely guidelines.

  • OtherIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access

    Interactive medication alert referencing SUAY Clinical Guidelines and offering options to keep/remove orders for the antipsychotic, virtual CAP consult, BH navigation for the patient, and access to bridging therapy for the patient.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Youths With Antipsychotic Orders at 6 Months

    Measured by medication orders placed within the health system

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

  2. Days' Supply of Antipsychotics Ordered for Youth

    Average days' supply of antipsychotic medication (values fell between 1 and 180 days), as measured by the intended days' supply on the medication orders for each participant. Only orders placed within the health system were accounted for.

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent of Youths Using Antipsychotics at 6 Months

    Measured by medication fill data available to the health system

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

  2. Days' Supply of Antipsychotic Use by Youth

    Average days' supply of antipsychotic medication (values fell between 1 and 180 days), as measured by medication fill data available to the health system for each participant. Only pharmacy claims captured by the health system were accounted for.

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

  3. Emergency Department/Urgent Care Visit Frequency

    Measured by utilization data; both for psychiatric crises and for all other reasons

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

  4. Baseline and Follow-up Safety Assessments - BMI

    Percentage of patients with BMI measurements completed at baseline and 3 months

    Time frame: index date to 180 days post-index date

  5. Change to Psychotropic Medication Treatment Plan

    Percentage of patients with change to psychotropic medication treatment plan following exposure to study algorithm

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

  6. Behavioral Health (BH) Navigation Acceptance

    Percent of intervention arm patients that agree to BH navigation

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

  7. Use of Usual Care Therapy

    Percentage of patients attending two or more system-provided therapy sessions

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

  8. Use of Bridging Therapy

    Percentage of patients attending two or more study-provided bridging therapy sessions

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

  9. Use of Usual Care Therapy Following Bridging Therapy

    Of patients in study therapy, percentage who subsequently attend two or more system-provided therapy sessions

    Time frame: 180 day period following index date

  10. Baseline and Follow-up Safety Assessments - Safety Lab Tests

    Percentage of patients with safety lab tests ordered and completed at baseline and 3 months

    Time frame: index date to 180 days post-index date

06

Results

Posted Oct 31, 2024
Limitations and caveats
While inclusion/exclusion criteria were manually confirmed by chart review, \~7% of patients enrolled with an exclusion diagnosis. We obtained this information via administrative claims data at study end. External claims data were unavailable in real time when the BPA fired. EHR functionality cannot differentiate a de novo prescription order from a "historical medication". Some new patients had initial prescriptions written elsewhere; the BPA fired when study clinicians continued treatment.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Started385348
Completed385348
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent of Youths With Antipsychotic Orders at 6 Months

Measured by medication orders placed within the health system

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Number · percentage of youths
Percent of Youths With Antipsychotic Orders at 6 Months
percentage of youthsControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Percent of Youths With Antipsychotic Orders at 6 Months54.647.6
PrimaryDays' Supply of Antipsychotics Ordered for Youth

Average days' supply of antipsychotic medication (values fell between 1 and 180 days), as measured by the intended days' supply on the medication orders for each participant. Only orders placed within the health system were accounted for.

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Mean · days
Days' Supply of Antipsychotics Ordered for Youth
daysControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Days' Supply of Antipsychotics Ordered for Youth128.2 ± 57.9118.5 ± 61.6
SecondaryPercent of Youths Using Antipsychotics at 6 Months

Measured by medication fill data available to the health system

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Number · percent of youths
Percent of Youths Using Antipsychotics at 6 Months
percent of youthsControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Percent of Youths Using Antipsychotics at 6 Months39.135.5
SecondaryDays' Supply of Antipsychotic Use by Youth

Average days' supply of antipsychotic medication (values fell between 1 and 180 days), as measured by medication fill data available to the health system for each participant. Only pharmacy claims captured by the health system were accounted for.

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Mean · days
Days' Supply of Antipsychotic Use by Youth
daysControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Days' Supply of Antipsychotic Use by Youth95.2 ± 62.087.7 ± 60.5
SecondaryEmergency Department/Urgent Care Visit Frequency

Measured by utilization data; both for psychiatric crises and for all other reasons

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Mean · number of visits
Emergency Department/Urgent Care Visit Frequency
number of visitsControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Emergency Department/Urgent Care Visit Frequency0.43 ± 0.980.36 ± 0.99
SecondaryBaseline and Follow-up Safety Assessments - BMI

Percentage of patients with BMI measurements completed at baseline and 3 months

Time frame:
index date to 180 days post-index date
Reported as:
Number · percent of patients
Baseline and Follow-up Safety Assessments - BMI
percent of patientsControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Baseline and Follow-up Safety Assessments - BMI65.554.9
SecondaryChange to Psychotropic Medication Treatment Plan

Percentage of patients with change to psychotropic medication treatment plan following exposure to study algorithm

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Number · percent of patients
Change to Psychotropic Medication Treatment Plan
percent of patientsControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Change to Psychotropic Medication Treatment Plan42.340.8
SecondaryBehavioral Health (BH) Navigation Acceptance

Percent of intervention arm patients that agree to BH navigation

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Number · percent of patients
Behavioral Health (BH) Navigation Acceptance
percent of patientsControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Behavioral Health (BH) Navigation Acceptance—55.5
SecondaryUse of Usual Care Therapy

Percentage of patients attending two or more system-provided therapy sessions

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Use of Usual Care Therapy
percentage of patientsControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Use of Usual Care Therapy47.353.5
SecondaryUse of Bridging Therapy

Percentage of patients attending two or more study-provided bridging therapy sessions

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Number · percent of patients
Use of Bridging Therapy
percent of patientsControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Use of Bridging Therapy—1.4
SecondaryUse of Usual Care Therapy Following Bridging Therapy

Of patients in study therapy, percentage who subsequently attend two or more system-provided therapy sessions

Time frame:
180 day period following index date
Reported as:
Number · percent of patients
Use of Usual Care Therapy Following Bridging Therapy
percent of patientsControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Use of Usual Care Therapy Following Bridging Therapy—1.437
SecondaryBaseline and Follow-up Safety Assessments - Safety Lab Tests

Percentage of patients with safety lab tests ordered and completed at baseline and 3 months

Time frame:
index date to 180 days post-index date
Reported as:
Number · percent
Baseline and Follow-up Safety Assessments - Safety Lab Tests
percentControl - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access
Baseline and Follow-up Safety Assessments - Safety Lab Tests32.528.2

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months per individual over a 2.5 year study period. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control - Medication Alert Only0/385 (0%)0/385 (0%)0/385 (0%)
Intervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH Access0/348 (0%)0/348 (0%)0/348 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Control - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH AccessTotal
<=18 years385348733
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH AccessTotal
Female183183366
Male202165367
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Control - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH AccessTotal
Hispanic or Latino182240
Not Hispanic or Latino324283607
Unknown or Not Reported434386
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Control - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH AccessTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native123
Asian347
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American352964
White282265547
More than one race332356
Unknown or Not Reported302555
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Control - Medication Alert OnlyIntervention - Alert + CAP Review AND Enhanced BH AccessTotal
United States385348733
07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research
    Aurora, Colorado 80014, United States
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital / Partners for Kids
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research - Northwest
    Portland, Oregon 97227, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute
    Seattle, Washington 98115, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Penfold RB, Thompson EE, Hilt RJ, Schwartz N, Robb AS, Correll CU, Newton D, Rogalski K, Earls MF, Kowatch RA, Beck A, Yarborough BJH, Crystal S, Vitiello B, Kelleher KJ, Simon GE. Development of a Symptom-Focused Model to Guide the Prescribing of Antipsychotics in Children and Adolescents: Results of the First Phase of the Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY) Clinical Trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;61(1):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 May 4. PubMed 34256967 ↗
  • Chavez LJ, Kelleher KJ, Beck A, Clarke GN, Penfold RB. Trends Over Time in Antipsychotic Initiation at a Large Children's Health Care System. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021 Jun;31(5):381-386. doi: 10.1089/cap.2020.0190. PubMed 34143677 ↗
  • Penfold RB, Thompson EE, Hilt RJ, Kelleher KJ, Schwartz N, Beck A, Clarke GN, Ralston JD, Hartzler AL, Coley RY, Akosile M, Vitiello B, Simon GE. Safer use of antipsychotics in youth (SUAY) pragmatic trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;99:106184. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106184. Epub 2020 Oct 20. PubMed 33091587 ↗
  • Schoenfelder Gonzalez E, Myers K, Thompson EE, King DA, Glass AM, Penfold RB. Developing home-based telemental health services for youth: Practices from the SUAY Study. J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Feb;27(2):110-115. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19863208. Epub 2019 Jul 25. PubMed 31342851 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 20, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 17, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing plan is incorporated by reference into the contract governing the project. Any changes to the plan must be pre-approved by the NIH Contracting Officer. A de-identified database will be delivered to the NIH, along with a statistical report. Any datasets for public distribution (including to the National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Illness) will be de-identified in compliance with HIPAA standard for de-identification.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03448575
Lead sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Collaborators
Nationwide Children's Hospital, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 28, 2018
Start date
Mar 29, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020
Completion
Dec 24, 2021
Results posted
Oct 31, 2024
Last update
Oct 31, 2024

Study contacts

Robert B Penfold, PhD
principal investigator · Kaiser Permanente

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion