CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03448263PEPUpdated Feb 28, 2018

Reduction of Post-endodontic Pain After RCT When Intracanal Cryotherapy is Used.

An interventional study of Balanced Force technique and WaveOne technique in Post Operative Pain, sponsored by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-28.

Sponsored by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
216
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this research was to relate the occurrence of post-endodontic pain after single-visit RCT using Balanced Force technique and two reciprocating system when cryotherapy is used. Methodology: All 216 patients had upper or lower molar, premolar or anterior teeth selected for conventional RCT for prosthetic reasons detected with only vital pulps. Of the sample of 216 teeth, were selected to the 3 instrumentation methods. For hand instrumentation, Balanced Force were used. All canals were clean and shaped with hand Flex-R files (fMoyco/Union Broach, York PA, USA). For mechanical shaping, all instruments were used with a micro motor (VDW, Munich Germany). WaveOne and Reciproc instruments. Final irrigation with cold (6oC) 17% EDTA served as a lubricant.

Read the detailed description

Patient selection Two hundred and sixteen of 245 patients (119 women and 97 men) aged 18-65 years were incorporated in this research while 29 were excluded as not meeting the inclusion criteria. (Fig. 1). Sample size estimate was achieved according with a method for this specific purpose (Cochran's method, 1986). Therefore, the 56 teeth allocated to each group were adequate to confirm an essential sample size.

For hand instrumentation, the Balanced Force technique was used. All root canals were shaped with hand Flex-R files (Moyco/Union Broach, York PA, USA). Gates-Glidden drills (Dentsply Maillefer) sizes #2 and #3 were used at the orifice of the root canals. For mechanical preparations, all instruments were used with a micro motor (VDW Silver Motor, VDW, Munich Germany). Torque and rotation were preset for each Reciproc or WaveOne instrument. Rotary Ni-Ti instruments were used in continuous brushing rotary motion and reciprocating mode respectively.

Dentinal debris was eliminated from the file with a gauze, instantaneously to the instrument change (WaveOne) or after 2-3 in-and-out (pecking) movements (Reciproc) following the manufacturers' recommendations. Each root canal was irrigated with 2.5mL 2.6% NaOCl. Irrigation was performed using a 24-gauge needle (Max-I-Probe; Tulsa Dental, York, PA) and a 31-G NaviTip needle (Ultradent Products Inc, South Jordan, UT) when reaching the WL after each instrument insertion.

Group BF. For the Balanced Force group, the root canals were shaped and shaped using a #40 instrument for thin or curved canals and a #55 file for wide canals.

Group WON. For the WaveOne group, a file size 25/.08 was used to prepare narrow, straight and curved canals, and a file size 40/.08 was used for large and wide canals.

Three in-and-out pecking motions were used with an amplitude of not more than 3 mm until reaching the estimated working length.

Group REC. The R25 (size 25/ .08) instrument was used in thin and curved root canals, and R40 files (40/ .06) were used in wide root canals. Three in-and-out pecking motions were used with an amplitude of not more than 3 mm until reaching the estimated working length.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Operative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pain
  • post endodontic pain
  • root canal treatment
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

The principal inclusion parameters were:

  • absence of radiographic sign of apical periodontitis and a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis (IP) established by affirmative response to hot and cold examinations.
  • Thermal pulp examination was achieved by the corresponding author, and radiographic analysis was established by 3 certified endodontists.
  • Clinical requirements were established on the next conditions: 1) The purposes and necessities of the research were spontaneously accepted. 2) Clinical Management was pointed to patients in physical and mental well-being. 3) All teeth had vital pulps and absence of apical periodontitis. 4) Positive thermal stimulation with EndoIce (Hygenic Corp, Akron, OH). 5) Teeth with enough coronal structure for rubber dam isolation. 6) No RCT done before the research. 7) No painkillers or antibiotics used 7 days' prior the clinical events started

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion parameters were:

  • the necessity for retreatment
  • gravidity
  • impossibility to obtain patient's approval
  • patients who didn't complete inclusion necessities
  • a history of medication for chronic pain or those compromising the immune response
  • patients younger than 18 years and the existence of mishaps or difficulties during RCT (calcified canals, impracticality of achieving AP in any canal).
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
216 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group BF

    The root canals were cleaned and shaped using a #40 instrument for thin or curved canals and a #55 file for widespread canals.

    Procedure: Balanced Force technique · Procedure: WaveOne technique · Procedure: Reciproc technique

  • Experimental
    Group WON

    WaveOne files was used to prepare narrow, straight and curved canals, and a file (40.08) was used for large and wide canals.

    Procedure: Balanced Force technique · Procedure: WaveOne technique · Procedure: Reciproc technique

  • Experimental
    Reciproc instruments

    Reciproc instrument was used in thin and curved RC, and R40 files (40.06) were used in wide canals.

    Procedure: Balanced Force technique · Procedure: WaveOne technique · Procedure: Reciproc technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureBalanced Force technique

    Flex-R files sizes 15-45 taper .02 were used according to the technique on each tooth

  • ProcedureWaveOne technique

    WaveOne instrument was used to prepare narrow, straight and curved canals, and file (40.08) was used for large canals. Three in-and-out motions were used with lengths not beyond 3 mm in the three thirds of the canal until reaching the estimated WL.

  • ProcedureReciproc technique

    Reciproc files were used in wide canals. Three in-and-out motions were used with lengths not beyond 3 mm in the three thirds of the canal until reaching the estimated WL.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the post-endodontic pain after single-visit After the root canal treatment with Balanced Force technique and two reciprocating system.

    Post-endodontic pain was evaluated when the RCT developed with hand and rotary instruments

    Time frame: 24 hrs

Secondary outcomes

  1. Use of intracanal cryotherapy on post-endodontic pain after single-visit RC

    A final irrigation after root canal treatment was made with cold 3cc of (6oC) 17% EDTA gently delivered to the WL using a cold (6oC) sterile metallic micro cannula.

    Time frame: 24 hrs

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Jose Clemente Orozco
    Tijuana, BC 22000, Mexico
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Paredes-Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ. Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 26. PubMed 22892729 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03448263
Lead sponsor
Universidad Autonoma de Baja California
Responsible party
Jorge Paredes Vieyra (JORGE PAREDES VIEYRA D.D.S., MsC, PhD, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 28, 2018
Start date
Jan 4, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 5, 2018
Completion
Feb 6, 2018
Last update
Feb 28, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion