CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03445429IDOSPUpdated Mar 3, 2020

Influence of 3D- vs. 4K-display System on Surgical Performance

An interventional study of 3D-display system and 4K-display system in Surgical Performance, sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Köln. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-03.

Sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Köln · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
133
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Modern display technique seems to optimize visualization in minimal-invasive surgery. Many systems are available right now with a fundamental difference between the passive polarizing 3-dimensional (3D) and 2-dimensional (2D) technique. Data seems to show a benefit for the 3D technique in the visualization of the operative field. This could lead to more precision in minimal-invasive surgery. 2D-systems with high resolution of 4.096 x 2.180 pixels (4K) could be a promising alternative. This study wants to evaluate if 3D- or 4K- display technique could optimize surgeons´ view and improve the performance during minimal-invasive surgery. Therefore medical students and surgeons of different experience levels will perform surgical tasks on a minimal-invasive training system.They will be randomized to use first the 3D- or the 4K-display system in the training set-up. After completing the tasks with one system the minimal-invasive training set-up will be repeated with the other display system. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) task load index is evaluated after each round. The ability for stereoscopic vision is tested after finishing the complete training set-up with both systems. The primary outcome parameter surgical performance will be evaluated in this study defined as the performance time and the number of defined mistakes made during each task.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Performance
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • medical student
  • medical doctor
  • informed consent signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known deficit of stereoscopic view
  • experience with the tasks of the minimal-invasive training set-up
  • not able to use both hands for minimal-invasive training set-up
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
133 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    3D-display system

    Subjects in this arm will perform the tasks on the minimal-invasive training set-up first with the 3D-display system. Then they will do the NASA task load index questionnaire. After that they will perform the tasks with the 4 K-display system. After that again a NASA Task load index questionnaire is performed.

    Other: 3D-display system

  • Experimental
    4K-display system

    Subjects in this arm will perform the tasks on the minimal-invasive training set-up first with the 4K-display system. Then they will do the NASA task load index questionnaire. After that they will perform the tasks with the 3D-display system. After that again a NASA Task load index questionnaire is performed.

    Other: 4K-display system

Interventions

  • Other3D-display system

    The subjects will perform tasks on a minimal-invasive/laparoscopic training set-up. They will perform the tasks with a 3D-display system or a 4K-display system. The intervention type 3D-display system means that the training-set up is performed first with 3D-display system an after that with the 4K-display system.

  • Other4K-display system

    The subjects will perform tasks on a minimal-invasive/laparoscopic training set-up. They will perform the tasks with a 3D-display system or a 4K-display system. The intervention type 4K-display system means that the training-set up is performed first with 4K-display system and after that with the 3D-display system.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical Performance Time

    The surgical performance time is defined as time needed to complete the tasks at the minimal-invasive trainer. the time is measured in seconds

    Time frame: immediately after tasks are performed, Day 1

  2. Surgical Performance Errors

    it is measured once directly after completing the task with the 3D performance time and the number of errors: the surgical performance errors are defined as the number of defined errors made during the performance of the tasks at the minimal invasive trainer surgical performance errors = number of errors

    Time frame: immediately after tasks are performed, Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Task Load

    task load felt by the subjects evaluated by NASA task load index, after tasks with 3 D- and 4 K- systems are completed NASA task load index is evaluated once

    Time frame: immediately after tasks are performed, Day 1

  2. Learning curve

    Learning curve after the completeness of the tasks

    Time frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1

  3. Stereoscopic view Bagolini

    Qualitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units : positive /negative/diplopia

    Time frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1

  4. Stereoscopic view Lang I/II

    Semi-quantitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units : arc seconds

    Time frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1

  5. Stereoscopic view Titmus

    Semi-quantitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units : arc seconds (fly at 3550 arc seconds, animals at 400, 200, 100 arc seconds,rings at 800, 400, 200, 140, 100, 80, 60, 50, 40 arc seconds)

    Time frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1

  6. Stereoscopic view TNO

    Semi-quantitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units: arc seconds (480, 240, 120, 60, 30, 15)

    Time frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1

  7. Stereoscopic view Cover

    qualitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units: phoria/tropia

    Time frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1

06

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery
    Cologne, 50931, Germany
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Gietzelt C, Datta R, Busshoff J, Bruns T, Wahba R, Hedergott A. The influence of stereoscopic vision on surgical performance in minimal invasive surgery-a substudy of the IDOSP-Study (Influence of 3D- vs. 4 K-Display Systems on Surgical Performance in minimal invasive surgery). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):3069-3078. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02608-3. Epub 2022 Jul 22. PubMed 35869334 ↗
  • Wahba R, Datta RR, Hedergott A, Busshoff J, Bruns T, Kleinert R, Dieplinger G, Fuchs H, Gietzelt C, Moller D, Hellmich M, Bruns CJ, Stippel DL. 3D vs. 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique On Surgical Performance (IDOSP-Study) in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for a randomized cross-over trial. Trials. 2019 May 28;20(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3330-7. Erratum In: Trials. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4173-y. PubMed 31138290 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03445429
Lead sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Responsible party
Roger Wahba, MD, PhD (Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Roger Wahba, Universitätsklinikum Köln) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2018
Start date
Feb 28, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 4, 2019
Completion
Feb 24, 2020
Last update
Mar 3, 2020

Study contacts

Roger Wahba, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Universitätsklinikum Köln

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion