ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03443336Updated Jun 3, 2021

Azole-resistance in Aspergillus

An observational study in Pulmonary Aspergillosis, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-03.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prospective multi-center surveillance study on the prevalence of azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. in clinical isolates of patients with pulmonary colonization or invasive infections in Switzerland

Read the detailed description

Azole-resistance in Aspergillus (A.) fumigatus has emerged as a global health problem. Even more, it has been associated with high mortality rates in patients with invasive aspergillosis.

Generally, two routes of resistance development are distinguished either in patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis under long-term azole therapy or in agriculture by the use of azoles as fungicides.

The primary mechanisms of resistance that have been described in clinical strains include different point mutations in the cyp51A gene, which encodes the enzyme responsible for converting lanosterol to ergosterol via demethylation. Some resistant isolates also contain a tandem repeat in the promoter region of this gene that causes increased expression. These mutations, including TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A have been identified in the environment and have been demonstrated to cause resistance to azole fungicides used in agriculture. These mutations were also recently identified in haematological patients suffering from invasive aspergillosis and were associated with a mortality rate of 88%.

Studies on the frequency of azole resistance in Aspergillus culture collections report the first resistant isolates up to 20 years earlier than clinical and environmental studies. Since then, microbiological resistance to azoles and clinical failures associated with this resistance have been reported in several countries in Europe and elsewhere. The United Kingdom and the Netherlands have reported increases in azole-resistant A. fumigatus. In the United Kingdom, a statistically significant increase in azole resistance was noted between 2004 and 2009, with rates of 5 to 7% in 2004 to 2006 increasing to up to 20% in 2009. These isolates were collected primarily in patients who received long-term azole therapy for the treatment of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. The observation has increased the awareness of azole resistance in this patient population. Surveillance studies and case series over the last years suggest the global presence of azole resistance in A. fumigatus, including in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Australia and, most recently, North and South America.

Moreover, some cryptic species of Aspergillus section Fumigati (e.g. A. lentulus, A. udagawae), which cannot be reliably distinguished from A. fumigatus by standard diagnostic methods, account for 3-5% of all A. fumigatus sensu lato clinical isolates and exhibit some level of intrinsic azole resistance. The proportion of these cryptic species in other Aspergillus sections (e.g. Flavi, Nigri, Terrei) is relatively unexplored. In addition, some rare Aspergillus species with intrinsic azole resistance, such as Aspergillus calidoustus (section Usti) are emerging as opportunistic pathogens in patients receiving azole prophylaxis. These cryptic or rare Aspergillus spp. are often misidentified because of the lack of discrimination by standard microbiological methods. Thus, their actual clinical relevance is unknown.

In Switzerland, comprehensive data on azole resistance in A. fumigatus are lacking. The major reason for this is the lack of routine testing of in vitro susceptibility of A. fumigatus isolates in most microbiology laboratories.

The Fungal Infections Network of Switzerland (FUNGINOS) offers an optimal platform to comprehensively assess the epidemiology of azole-resistance in A. fumigates and other Aspergillus spp. Only recently invasive Candida infections (candidemia) have been prospectively monitored by FUNGINOS over ten years from 2004 to 2013 in all Swiss University clinics and 20 University-affiliated hospitals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Aspergillosis
03

In context

Pulmonary Aspergillosis

20 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Aspergillosis; 5 are open to participants now.

Browse Pulmonary Aspergillosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 990 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All patients with a respiratory sample growing Aspergillus spp., will be included

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Available respiratory sample growing Aspergillus spp.
  • Available clinical data

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to sign the general consent
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Azole-resistance in Aspergillus (A.) fumigatus

    Distribution of antifungal susceptibility profile of all tracheal and urinary samples in clinical Aspergillus isolates

    Time frame: start of study until end of study (July 2017 until December 2018)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology
    Basel, 4031, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2017 to primary completion in Jun 2019, 24 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2018
First posted
Feb 23, 2018
StartActual
Jun 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2019
CompletionActual
Jun 2, 2021
Last update
Jun 3, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03443336
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2018
Start date
Jun 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2019
Completion
Jun 2, 2021
Last update
Jun 3, 2021

Study contacts

Nina Khanna, Prof MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion