An interventional study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Computer-based Cognitive Training in HIV-related Mild Neurocognitive Disorder, sponsored by Nova Southeastern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-18.
Sponsored by Nova Southeastern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study investigates the effectiveness of computer-based cognitive training with or without transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in improving the functioning of older individuals with HIV-related cognitive dysfunction.
In spite of advances in its treatment, persons with HIV continue to develop HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) over time. HAND may be an even more significant problem in older persons (age 50+) with HIV who may experience age-related changes in cognition in addition to HAND. Because of HAND's impact on patients' functioning and quality of life, treatments are needed. Pharmacologic treatments have, in general, been ineffective and investigators have argued that computer delivered cognitive training may be an effective alternative. While results of small studies have been encouraging, the effect size of cognitive training may be small and of unclear practical importance. The nature of cognitive training programs, often building on laboratory measures of cognition, may reduce how inherently interesting (i.e., fun) they are, limiting their uptake outside of paid research studies. Others have argued for the use of computer games targeting psychomotor speed, problem solving, and visuospatial skills to improve cognitive function in older adults. Data support the utility of this approach, but again effect sizes may be small.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may be an effective way to enhance the effects of cognitive training. It involves the application of a small electric current (1-2 mA) to the head, inducing small currents within the brain that enhance cognitive training. Multiple studies have shown that tDCS enhances cognition, including attention and psychomotor speed. The investigators previously completed a single-blind pilot study of individuals with HIV-related mild neurocognitive disorder using a high-interest car racing game with or without tDCS. Results were encouraging in showing moderate to large effect sizes consistent with tDCS enhancement of cognitive function after six 20-minute training sessions over two weeks. Participants' subjective reports of cognitive difficulties supported observed effects on objective measures, and their mood improved. The intervention was acceptable to participants, many of whom stated they enjoyed it. Everyone indicated a willingness to participate in a similar study in the future.
In this study the investigators will expand on a pilot-tested training intervention with 120 individuals randomly assigned to an attention control condition or game-based cognitive training with either sham or active tDCS. The investigators will employ a battery of cognitive measures as well as self-report measures of mood, cognitive difficulties, and everyday functioning in order to evaluate the effects of study interventions.
Participants will first be screened for eligibility by telephone, and then scheduled for a visit during which their eligibility will be further assessed. Those who are eligible based on inclusion and exclusion criteria will complete a battery of measures of their cognitive and functional status. They will then complete six training sessions over a period of three weeks, and then once again complete the battery of assessments. Participants will then be asked to return one month after the post-training assessment to evaluate the persistence of training effects.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants randomized to this arm will receive computer-based cognitive training using a car racing game with active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Procedure: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) · Behavioral: Computer-based Cognitive Training
Participants randomized to this arm will receive computer-based cognitive training using a car racing game with sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Behavioral: Computer-based Cognitive Training
Participants in this arm will watch educational videos as a comparator to computer training with the car racing game (watching educational videos).
Procedure: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) · Behavioral: Watching Educational Videos
Application of a small electrical current (1-2 mA) across the head.
Also known as: tDCS
Use of computer-delivered games or exercises with the goal of improving cognitive performance.
Also known as: Cognitive Training
Watching educational videos and answering questions about them
Psychomotor Speed
Ability of the participant to attend to and use complex stimuli while making a motor response. The Coding subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th ed. (WAIS-IV) asks that the person assessed insert small geometric drawings with pencil on paper according to a key at the top of the page. One figure corresponds to the numeral 1, another to 2, and so on. The persons is asked to work as quickly as they can, and given a specific period in which to complete the task. Raw scores are the number of boxes correctly filled in during the time allowed and can range from 0 to 155, with higher scores indicating a better performance.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Functional Status
Participant performance on observed tasks of daily living. Participants completed the University of California--San Diego Performance Based Skills Assessment, version B. The person assessed is asked to complete several functional tasks, including pretending to make a call on a telephone to change a medical appointment and paying an electric bill by filling out a check. Scores on the first task range form 0 to 9, and from 0 to 11 on the second. These raw scores are then converted to create a final combined score that ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better performance.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Participant Assessment of Own Functioning (PAOF)
Participant self-report of problems related to cognitive and sensory functioning on the Participant Assessment of Own Functioning (PAOF). This is a self-report measure of the frequency with which a person experiences difficulties with various mental and sensory tasks, such as remembering what is said to them, understanding or expressing themselves in language, and thinking about complex problems. The PAOF includes 33 items ranged from 0 to 5, allowing a total score from 0 to 165. A higher score on this measure means that the person is reporting greater frequency with some mental activities.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Participant self-report of mood. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D) is a self-report measure of symptoms of and related to depressed mood. It includes 20 items that are scored from 0 to 3 and summed for an overall score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores on this measure indicate that the person assessed is reporting a greater frequency or severity of depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 3 weeks
| Milestone | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 16 | 15 | 15 |
| Completed | 15 | 14 | 15 |
| Not completed | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Ability of the participant to attend to and use complex stimuli while making a motor response. The Coding subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th ed. (WAIS-IV) asks that the person assessed insert small geometric drawings with pencil on paper according to a key at the top of the page. One figure corresponds to the numeral 1, another to 2, and so on. The persons is asked to work as quickly as they can, and given a specific period in which to complete the task. Raw scores are the number of boxes correctly filled in during the time allowed and can range from 0 to 155, with higher scores indicating a better performance.
| score on a scale | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychomotor Speed | 54.2 (43.2 to 65.2) | 60.4 (49.4 to 71.4) | 53.4 (42.6 to 64.2) |
Participant performance on observed tasks of daily living. Participants completed the University of California--San Diego Performance Based Skills Assessment, version B. The person assessed is asked to complete several functional tasks, including pretending to make a call on a telephone to change a medical appointment and paying an electric bill by filling out a check. Scores on the first task range form 0 to 9, and from 0 to 11 on the second. These raw scores are then converted to create a final combined score that ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better performance.
| score on a scale | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Status | 84.6 (74.8 to 94.5) | 82.8 (72.9 to 92.6) | 84.4 (74.8 to 94.0) |
Participant self-report of problems related to cognitive and sensory functioning on the Participant Assessment of Own Functioning (PAOF). This is a self-report measure of the frequency with which a person experiences difficulties with various mental and sensory tasks, such as remembering what is said to them, understanding or expressing themselves in language, and thinking about complex problems. The PAOF includes 33 items ranged from 0 to 5, allowing a total score from 0 to 165. A higher score on this measure means that the person is reporting greater frequency with some mental activities.
| score on a scale | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participant Assessment of Own Functioning (PAOF) | 7.98 (6.27 to 9.69) | 7.73 (6.01 to 9.44) | 7.86 (6.19 to 9.52) |
Participant self-report of mood. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D) is a self-report measure of symptoms of and related to depressed mood. It includes 20 items that are scored from 0 to 3 and summed for an overall score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores on this measure indicate that the person assessed is reporting a greater frequency or severity of depressive symptoms.
| score on a scale | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | 16.5 (9.53 to 23.50) | 16.6 (9.59 to 23.70) | 16.3 (9.54 to 23.10) |
Collected over 7 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Training With Active tDCS | 0/16 (0%) | 0/16 (0%) | 1/16 (6.3%) |
| Computer Training With Sham tDCS | 0/15 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) | 1/15 (6.7%) |
| Computer Training With or Without tDCS | 0/15 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) |
| Event | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS |
|---|---|---|---|
| DizzinessNervous system disorders | 0/16 | 1/15 | 0/15 |
| Reactivation of traumatic memoriesNervous system disorders | 1/16 | 0/15 | 0/15 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 57.06 ± 4.99 | 58.80 ± 4.13 | 61.07 ± 6.29 | 58.93 ± 5.35 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Male | 13 | 13 | 11 | 37 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 13 | 12 | 15 | 40 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 11 | 8 | 10 | 29 |
| White | 5 | 7 | 5 | 17 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 15 | 15 | 46 |
| Psychomotor Speed(units on a scale) | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 48.94 ± 9.28 | 51.67 ± 13.70 | 46.07 ± 15.52 | 48.89 ± 12.93 |
| Functional Status(units on a scale) | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 79.75 ± 10.71 | 80.20 ± 19.39 | 76.73 ± 13.72 | 78.91 ± 13.52 |
| Participant Assessment of Own Functioning (PAOF)(units on a scale) | Computer Training With Active tDCS | Computer Training With Sham tDCS | Computer Training With or Without tDCS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 8.18 ± 2.34 | 7.65 ± 4.46 | 8.55 ± 2.49 | 8.13 ± 2.40 |
1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — After the conclusion of the study, de-identified study data will be shared by the study principal investigator with interested individuals.
Supporting information: Study protocol
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Nova Southeastern University