ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03440814Updated Sep 21, 2023Results posted

A Study of Diazoxide Choline in Patients With Prader-Willi Syndrome

A Phase 3 interventional study of DCCR and Placebo for DCCR in Prader-Willi Syndrome, sponsored by Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 29 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 4 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-21.

Sponsored by Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (part of Neurocrine Biosciences) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
127
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this is study is to evaluate the effects of DCCR (diazoxide choline controlled release tablets) in children and adults with Prader-Willi syndrome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prader-Willi Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • PWS
  • Prader-Willi Syndrome
03

In context

Prader-Willi Syndrome

144 studies on the registry are indexed under Prader-Willi Syndrome; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 127 is above the median of 30 across 100 interventional studies indexed under Prader-Willi Syndrome.

Browse Prader-Willi Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

First submitted before Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. became part of Neurocrine Biosciences.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide voluntary, written (parent(s) / legal guardian(s) of patient); provide voluntary, written assent (patients, as appropriate)
  • Genetically-confirmed Prader-Willi syndrome and hyperphagic
  • In a stable care setting for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1
  • Caregiver must have been caring for the patient for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have participated in an interventional clinical study (i.e., drug or device, approved drugs or device evaluated for unapproved use) within prior 3 months
  • Positive urine pregnancy test (in females of ) or females who are pregnant or breastfeeding, and/or plan to become pregnant or to breast-feed during or within 30 days after study participation
  • Any other known disease and/or condition, which would prevent, in the opinion of the Investigator, the patient from completing all study visits and assessments required by the protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
127 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DCCR

    75 - 450 mg DCCR

    Drug: DCCR

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    75 - 450 mg placebo for DCCR

    Drug: Placebo for DCCR

Interventions

  • DrugDCCR

    Once daily oral administration

  • DrugPlacebo for DCCR

    Once daily oral administration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ-CT) Change From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13)

    Hyperphagia-related behaviors were assessed by the validated hyperphagia questionnaire for clinical trials (HQ-CT), an instrument designed to measure symptoms of food related preoccupations and behaviors that was completed by the caregiver. The HQ-CT consists of nine items with responses ranging from 0-4 units each (possible total score range: 0-36). The HQ-CT was assessed at Screening, Baseline (Visit 2), and approximately every 4 weeks post-dose at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 13. A decrease in score from baseline represented improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to Visit 7 (Week 13)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Visit 7 (Week 13)

    The Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) is a single statement designed to assess the Investigator's overall perception of change in the subject's condition across the course of the clinical trial. The Investigator provided a response to "Compared to the subject's condition at enrollment, the subject's condition is:" by rating the subject's behavior using a 7-point response scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, and Very much worse. The Investigator only took into account the subject's PWS condition.

    Time frame: at Visit 7 (Week 13)

  2. Caregiver Global Impression of Change (GI-C) at Visit 7 (Week 13)

    The Caregiver Global Impression of Change (GI-C) is a single statement designed to assess the caregiver's overall perception of change in the subject across the course of the clinical trial. The caregiver provided a response to "Please choose the response below that best describes the overall change in the person's PWS since they started taking the study medication" using a 7-point graded response scale: Very much better, Moderately better, A little better, No change, A little worse, Moderately worse, and Very much worse.

    Time frame: at Visit 7 (Week 13)

  3. Change in Fat Mass (kg) From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13)

    Whole body scans were performed. Reports included a breakdown of the following regions: left arm, right arm, trunk, left leg, right leg, and head. Each region was evaluated for body fat mass (g).

    Time frame: Baseline to Visit 7 (Week 13)

07

Results

Posted Sep 21, 2023
Limitations and caveats
All subjects were enrolled and had baseline visits prior to the COVID-19 pandemic; however, there was a subset of subjects who needed to complete some of their visits after the onset of the pandemic. The pandemic forced numerous restrictions on normal activities and involved significant disruptions, which had a substantially adverse but inconsistent effect on the study conduct and results. For this reason, the ITT population - Pre-COVID analysis includes all data through March 1, 2020.

Participant flow

People with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) were recruited for this study. Those who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled / randomized. Caregivers of subjects were responsible for completing the protocol-specified caregiver questionnaires and were not enrolled in this study. The first site in US started recruiting subjects on 17May2018; the first site in UK started recruiting subjects on 26Jun2019; all sites were either hospitals or academic medical centers.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDCCRPlacebo for DCCR
Started8442
Randomized (may or may not have taken study drug)8542
Intent-to-treat (itt) population8242
Completed7941
Not completed51
Withdrew: Adverse event21
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up20
Withdrew: Consent withdrawn by parent/legal guardian10

Outcome measures

PrimaryHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ-CT) Change From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13)

Hyperphagia-related behaviors were assessed by the validated hyperphagia questionnaire for clinical trials (HQ-CT), an instrument designed to measure symptoms of food related preoccupations and behaviors that was completed by the caregiver. The HQ-CT consists of nine items with responses ranging from 0-4 units each (possible total score range: 0-36). The HQ-CT was assessed at Screening, Baseline (Visit 2), and approximately every 4 weeks post-dose at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 13. A decrease in score from baseline represented improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to Visit 7 (Week 13)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ-CT) Change From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13)
score on a scaleDCCRPlacebo for DCCR
Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ-CT) Change From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13)-5.94 ± 0.879-4.27 ± 1.145
Statistical analysis
  • DCCR vs Placebo for DCCR · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1983 · Mean difference (final values): -1.67 · 95% CI -4.24 to 0.89alpha=0.05 level of significance
SecondaryClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Visit 7 (Week 13)

The Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) is a single statement designed to assess the Investigator's overall perception of change in the subject's condition across the course of the clinical trial. The Investigator provided a response to "Compared to the subject's condition at enrollment, the subject's condition is:" by rating the subject's behavior using a 7-point response scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, and Very much worse. The Investigator only took into account the subject's PWS condition.

Time frame:
at Visit 7 (Week 13)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Visit 7 (Week 13)
ParticipantsDCCRPlacebo for DCCR
1 = Very Much Improved00
2 = Much improved50
3 = Minimally improved252
4 = No change4137
5 = Minimally worse113
6 = Much worse00
7 = Very much worse00
Statistical analysis
  • DCCR vs Placebo for DCCR · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0294Treatment groups were compared using CMH mean score test with modified ridit scores, stratified by the randomization stratification variables.
SecondaryCaregiver Global Impression of Change (GI-C) at Visit 7 (Week 13)

The Caregiver Global Impression of Change (GI-C) is a single statement designed to assess the caregiver's overall perception of change in the subject across the course of the clinical trial. The caregiver provided a response to "Please choose the response below that best describes the overall change in the person's PWS since they started taking the study medication" using a 7-point graded response scale: Very much better, Moderately better, A little better, No change, A little worse, Moderately worse, and Very much worse.

Time frame:
at Visit 7 (Week 13)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Caregiver Global Impression of Change (GI-C) at Visit 7 (Week 13)
ParticipantsDCCRPlacebo for DCCR
1 = Very Much Improved41
2 = Much improved63
3 = Minimally improved228
4 = No change3920
5 = Minimally worse65
6 = Much worse43
7 = Very much worse12
Statistical analysis
  • DCCR vs Placebo for DCCR · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4089Treatment groups were compared using CMH mean score test with modified ridit scores, stratified by the randomization stratification variables.
SecondaryChange in Fat Mass (kg) From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13)

Whole body scans were performed. Reports included a breakdown of the following regions: left arm, right arm, trunk, left leg, right leg, and head. Each region was evaluated for body fat mass (g).

Time frame:
Baseline to Visit 7 (Week 13)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kg
Change in Fat Mass (kg) From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13)
kgDCCRPlacebo for DCCR
Change in Fat Mass (kg) From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13)-0.80 ± 0.3560.25 ± 0.444
Statistical analysis
  • DCCR vs Placebo for DCCR · ANCOVA · p = 0.0225 · Mean difference (final values): -1.05 · 95% CI -1.95 to -0.15ANCOVA adjusted for baseline body fat mass value as a covariate, and randomization stratification variables (as randomized) as factors.
Post-hocHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ-CT) Change From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13) - Pre-COVID Analysis

Hyperphagia-related behaviors were assessed by the validated hyperphagia questionnaire for clinical trials (HQ-CT), an instrument designed to measure symptoms of food related preoccupations and behaviors that was completed by the caregiver. The HQ-CT consists of nine items with responses ranging from 0-4 units each (possible total score range: 0-36). The HQ-CT was assessed at Screening, Baseline (Visit 2), and approximately every 4 weeks post-dose at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 13. A decrease in score from baseline represented improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to Visit 7 (Week 13)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ-CT) Change From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13) - Pre-COVID Analysis
score on a scaleDCCRPlacebo for DCCR
Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ-CT) Change From Baseline at Visit 7 (Week 13) - Pre-COVID Analysis-6.64 ± 1.001-3.51 ± 1.278
Statistical analysis
  • DCCR vs Placebo for DCCR · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0369 · Mean difference (final values): -3.13 · 95% CI -6.06 to -0.19alpha=0.05 level of significance

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline to Visit 7 (Week 13). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DCCR0/84 (0%)6/84 (7.1%)69/84 (82.1%)
Placebo for DCCR0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)31/42 (73.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDCCRPlacebo for DCCR
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/840/42
Lower respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/840/42
Staphylococcal infectionInfections and infestations1/840/42
Abnormal behaviourPsychiatric disorders1/840/42
AggressionPsychiatric disorders1/840/42
Pulmonary oedemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/840/42
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/840/42
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders1/840/42
Erythema multiformeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/840/42
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDCCRPlacebo for DCCR
HypertrichosisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders30/846/42
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders16/844/42
HeadacheNervous system disorders5/846/42
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations9/845/42
HyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders10/840/42
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/844/42
HirsutismSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/843/42
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/843/42
PyrexiaGeneral disorders5/840/42
Blood glucose increasedInvestigations5/842/42

Baseline characteristics

Safety population includes all randomized subjects who receive any amount of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DCCRPlacebo for DCCRTotal
Mean13.2 (4 to 40)13.6 (5 to 44)13.4 (4 to 44)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)DCCRPlacebo for DCCRTotal
<8 years18725
8 to <12 years211435
12 to <18 years301141
18 to <65 years151025
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DCCRPlacebo for DCCRTotal
Female472370
Male371956
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DCCRPlacebo for DCCRTotal
Hispanic or Latino6713
Not Hispanic or Latino7734111
Unknown or Not Reported112
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)DCCRPlacebo for DCCRTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander101
Black or African American426
White7234106
Multiple538
Other123
HQ-CT Total Score
HQ-CT Total Score(score on a scale)DCCRPlacebo for DCCRTotal
Mean23.0 ± 6.0121.9 ± 5.0822.7 ± 5.72
08

Study locations

29 sites
  • University of California, Irvine
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Stanford University
    Palo Alto, California 94305, United States
  • Rady Children's Hospital San Diego
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • University of Florida Gainesville
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Emory Children's Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Indiana University School of Medicine
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Kansas University Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • National Institutes of Health Hatfield Clinical Research Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
  • Boston Children's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Sparrow Clinical Research Institute
    Lansing, Michigan 48912, United States
  • Children's Minnesota
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102, United States
  • St. Joseph's University Medical Center
    Paterson, New Jersey 07503, United States
  • NYU Winthrop Hospital
    Mineola, New York 11501, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
  • Vanderbilt University
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Research Institute of Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84113, United States
  • Seattle Children's Hospital
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
  • The Queen Elizabeth University
    Glasgow, Scottland G51 4TF, United Kingdom
  • Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
    Hull, Yorkshire HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
  • Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital
    Birmingham, B4 6NH, United Kingdom
  • Fulbourn Hospital
    Cambridge, CB21 5ER, United Kingdom
  • Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    Liverpool, L12 2AP, United Kingdom
  • Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    Liverpool, L9 7AL, United Kingdom
  • Royal London Hospital
    London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
    London, SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
  • Hammersmith Hospital
    London, W12 OHS, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in May 2020, 23 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2023, 3 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 13, 2018
First posted
Feb 22, 2018
StartActual
May 9, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 1, 2020
CompletionActual
May 1, 2020
Results first posted
Sep 21, 2023
Last update
Sep 21, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03440814
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 22, 2018
Start date
May 9, 2018
Primary completion
May 1, 2020
Completion
May 1, 2020
Results posted
Sep 21, 2023
Last update
Sep 21, 2023

Study contacts

Evelien Gevers, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Queen Mary University of London, Barts Health NHS Trust
Jennifer L. Miller, MD
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Diazoxide choline

Start the discussion