CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03440073Updated Oct 23, 2018

Intervention for Pregnancy Related Pain

An interventional study of Mulligan Concept Intervention and Sham Mulligan Concept Treatment in Other Specified Pregnancy-Related Conditions, sponsored by University of Idaho. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-23.

Sponsored by University of Idaho · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Women in rural communities receive less access to prenatal care, and experience slightly higher rates of complications during pregnancy. A very prevalent pregnancy related complication is Pregnancy Related Pelvic Girdle Pain (PPGP), effecting up to 76% of all pregnant women. Historically, PPGP has been thought to originate from hormonal changes associated with pregnancy, but its cause is more likely due to loss of motor control and/or malpositioning of the pelvic bones. Despite growing interest and clinical awareness of the condition, treatment outcomes of PPGP are inconsistent and intervention studies are lacking. The goal of this proposal is to investigate a treatment modality with minimal risks and potential to be self-administered. The Mulligan Concept manual therapy technique aims to restore mechanical function of the lumbopelvic region and has yet to be measured in women with PPGP.

Read the detailed description

The long-term goal of this project is to develop an effective conservative treatment protocol that is easily accessible. The objective of this application is to determine if patients who are treated with Mulligan Concept manual therapy experience immediate and significant changes in pain and function. Our specific aims are: In women with PPGP, 1.) Determine if Mulligan Concept treatment produces immediate changes in pain and function, 2.) Determine whether the Mulligan Concept immediately restores or alters dysfunctional gait characteristics and pelvic girdle motor control, and 3.) Identify factors that mathematically predict treatment outcome. Our central hypothesis is that restoration of lumbopelvic positioning will result in immediate decrease in pain, increase in function, and improved gait mechanics.

Volunteers in the 20th-34th week of pregnancy, ages 20-45 years, who are experiencing PPGP will be screened and randomly assigned into treatment or placebo group based on age, weight, height, gestational week and number of pregnancies. All participants will undergo a standardized examination, complete patient reported outcome measures, and perform a walking gait, sit to stand, and active straight leg raise tasks. Kinematic, kinetic, and EMG recordings will be taken during performance of the tasks. The participants of the treatment group will receive a Mulligan Concept evaluation and treatment. Participants in the placebo group will receive only the Mulligan Concept evaluation. Participants will then repeat the same tasks and measures. The study will be conducted under a randomized triple blinded placebo trial design; the patients, researchers, and treating clinician will be blinded to group assignment. Independent sample t-tests will be conducted to determine if significant differences exist between the intervention and placebo group across several dependent variables. Regression analysis will be conducted in order to determine if intake factors mathematically predict treatment outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Other Specified Pregnancy-Related Conditions

Keywords

  • pregnancy
  • pain
  • pelvis
  • spine
  • manual therapy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • reported pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • orthopaedic or neurological problems with walking
  • prior surgery of the lumbar spine, pelvis, hip, or knee
  • fracture
  • known malignancy
  • active inflammation in the lumbar spine or pelvis
  • ankylosing spondylitis, Scheuermann's kyphosis, active polyarthritis, or severe osteoporosis
  • any pulmonary, cardiac, visual, auditory, or cognitive disorders
  • any other multi/co-morbidities that limit the volunteers ability to complete a gait and sit-to-stand task
  • does not receive consent from their maternity care provider
  • pain is associated with something other than pregnancy, or is experienced outside of pregnancy prior to the first pregnancy
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mulligan Concept Intervention

    Mulligan Concept Intervention, including Mobilizations with Movement intervention is administered. Up to 30 minutes total treatment time.

    Other: Mulligan Concept Intervention

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Mulligan Concept Treatment

    Assessment procedures of the Mulligan Concept are followed, but no manual pressure is applied to the participant during treatment to provide a sham Mulligan Concept Treatment.

    Other: Sham Mulligan Concept Treatment

Interventions

  • OtherMulligan Concept Intervention

    The concept is a manual therapy paradigm that includes a clinician applying joint mobilizations and having the patient perform concurrent active, pain free, movement.

  • OtherSham Mulligan Concept Treatment

    The treating clinician will ask the participant to perform the movements associated with the Mulligan Concept technique. The clinician will have her hands on the participant during the movement but will not apply any pressure or force.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 3-D motion Analysis- sit to stand

    Kinematic data is collected during sit to stand task

    Time frame: Change from pre to post intervention (immediate, 30 minutes)

  2. 3-D Motion Analysis- gait

    Kinematic data is collected during gait task

    Time frame: Change from pre to post intervention (immediate, 30 minutes)

  3. 3-D Motion Analysis- active straight leg raise

    Kinematic data is collected during active straight leg raise task

    Time frame: Change from pre to post intervention (immediate, 30 minutes)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Electromyography- Sit to Stand

    EMG data will be collected during the sit to stand task

    Time frame: Change from pre and post intervention (Immediate, 30 minutes)

  2. Electromyography- Gait

    EMG data will be collected during gait task

    Time frame: Change from pre and post intervention (Immediate, 30 minutes)

  3. Electromyography- Straight Leg Raise

    EMG data will be collected during the sit to stand, gait, and active single leg raise tasks.

    Time frame: Change from pre and post intervention (Immediate, 30 minutes)

  4. Visual Analog Pain Scale

    Patient Reported Outcome Measure, pain

    Time frame: Change from pre and post intervention (Immediate, 30 minutes)

  5. Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire

    Patient Reported Outcome Measure, region specific disablement

    Time frame: Change from pre and post intervention (Immediate, 30 minutes)

  6. Assessment of Disablement Questionnaire

    Patient Reported Outcome Measure, global disablement

    Time frame: Change from pre and post intervention (Immediate, 30 minutes)

  7. Short Stress State Questionnaire

    Patient Reported Outcome Measure, stress

    Time frame: Change from pre and post intervention (Immediate, 30 minutes)

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Integrated Sport Medicine and Rehabilitative Therapy Clinic
    Moscow, Idaho 83844, United States
07

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 1, 2018
  • Informed consent form · Feb 1, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will only be known to the PI. Other researchers working on the project are blinded to IPD. The PI will maintain records on a secure computer, with secure server connection, located in a locked office. Data will be shared in aggregate without identifying information.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03440073
Lead sponsor
University of Idaho
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 20, 2018
Start date
Jan 10, 2018
Primary completion
May 30, 2018
Completion
May 30, 2018
Last update
Oct 23, 2018

Study contacts

Lindsay Larkins, DAT
principal investigator · University of Idaho

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion