ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03439618Updated Jun 2, 2020

Comparison of Time-restricted Feeding and Continuous Feeding in Critically Ill Patients

An interventional study of time-restricted feeding and continuous feeding in Feeding Behavior, sponsored by Qingdao University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-02.

Sponsored by Qingdao University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
380
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the nutrition guideline (A.S.P.E.N guideline), there was no recommendation about the feeding type in enteral feeding of critically ill patients. Continuous feeding is the most popular feeding type in ICU because of its less nursing burden and reducing the aspiration incidence theoretically. However, some previous studies demonstrated that there were no complications differences between continuous and time-restricted feedings(such as intermittent feedings).

In ICU, the disorder of protein synthesis is a universal problem and is associated with ICU acquired weakness. Time-restricted feeding is more physical than continuous feeding. In some animal researches, time-restricted feeding was proved to have a greater stimulatory effect on protein synthesis than continuous feeding. Besides of light, time-restricted feeding can may also adjust the biological rhythms. It is known that biological clocks could affect energy metabolism, emotion and so on. Until now, there are no enough clinical studies to prove the advantages in time-restricted feeding in ICU patients.So researchers designed the study to compare the time-restricted feeding and continuous feeding effect(especially protein synthesis) on ICU patients.

Read the detailed description

Enteral nutrition support can be administered by continuous administration or by time-restricted administration in ICU. Continuous feeding is the most popular feeding schedule because of its less nursing burden and reducing the aspiration prevalence theoretically. However, previous studies demonstrated that there was no complications (diarrhea, distension, Ventilator associated pneumonia-VAP incidence, and so on) difference between these two feeding schedule. So in the nutrition guideline (A.S.P.E.N guideline), there was no recommendation about the feeding schedule. However, time-restricted feeding is more physical than continuous feeding. In ICU, the disorder of protein synthesis is a universal problem and is associated with ICU acquired weakness. In some animal researches, time-restricted feeding was proved to have a greater stimulatory effect on protein synthesis than continuous feeding.

Besides of light, time-restricted feeding can adjust the biological rhythms. It is known that biological clocks could affect energy metabolism, emotion and so on. In the "zi wu liu zhu" theory of traditional chinese medicine, feeding time should be at 7:00-9:00, 11:00-13:00 and 17:00-19:00. So researchers designed the study to compare the time-restricted feeding according to traditional chinese medicine and continuous feeding effect(especially protein synthesis) on ICU patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Feeding Behavior

Browse trials for

03

In context

Feeding Behavior

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Feeding Behavior; 178 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 380 is above the median of 77 across 700 interventional studies indexed under Feeding Behavior.

Browse Feeding Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Qingdao University is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

ICU patients asking for enteral nutrition by gastric tube

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with gastrectomy; patients with enterectomy; patients with Gastrointestinal hemorrhage; patients with diabetes; patients with intestinal fistula

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
380 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    continuous feeding

    The total amount of every days' Enteral Nutritional Suspension was fed at constant speed for 24h

    Other: continuous feeding

  • Other
    time-restricted feeding

    The total amount of every days' Enteral Nutritional Suspension was fed at constant speed for 6h (7:00-9:00,11:00-13:00,17:00-19:00).

    Other: time-restricted feeding

Interventions

  • Othertime-restricted feeding

    At the beginning, all enrolled patients were fed by continuous feeding. When the amount calorie of feeding enteral nutritional suspension increased to 80% target calorie (target calorie: 25kilocalorie/kg.d), the patients was randomly into continuous feeding and time-restricted feeding group. In continuous feeding group, the enteral nutritional suspension was fed at constant speed for 24h.In the time restricted feeding, feeding time should be at 7:00-9:00, 11:00-13:00 and 17:00-19:00 at constant feeding speed.

  • Othercontinuous feeding

    At the beginning, all enrolled patients were fed by continuous feeding. When the amount calorie of feeding enteral nutritional suspension increased to 80% target calorie (target calorie: 25kilocalorie/kg.d), the patients was randomly into continuous feeding and time-restricted feeding group.In the continuous feeding, the total amount of every days' Enteral Nutritional Suspension was fed at constant speed for 24h.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. nitrogen balance

    it equal to Nitrogen intake minus Nitrogen output.Source of nitrogen intake is the enteral nutritional suspension, and the amount of nitrogen can be calculated according to the proportion of nitrogen in enteral nutritional suspension. Main nitrogen losses include urine and feces. The amount of nitrogen in urine and feces can be measured by clinical laboratory.

    Time frame: at the time point of 10th feeding day

Secondary outcomes

  1. delirium

    it is disorders of the mental state and medical condition. It can be evaluated by The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).

    Time frame: up to 10 days

  2. Gastric residual volume

    This index was to evaluate the feeding complications. Nurse can evaluate the volume by pumping the stomach tube with syringe to measure the gastric content amount.

    Time frame: up to 10 days

  3. diarrhea

    This index was to evaluate the feeding complications. It is the condition of having at least three loose or liquid bowel movements each day.

    Time frame: up to 10 days

  4. Incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia

    This index was to evaluate the feeding complications. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a type of lung infection that occurs in people who are on mechanical ventilation breathing machines for at least 48 hours. The diagnosis of VAP varies among hospitals and providers but usually requires a new infiltrate on chest x-ray plus two or more other factors. These factors include temperature of \>38 or \<36 °C, a white blood cell count of \>12 × 10\^9/ml, purulent secretions from the airways in the lung, and/or reduction in gas exchange.

    Time frame: up to 10 days

  5. glucose fluctuation

    This index was to evaluate the feeding complications. The glucose is measured at the 11:00, 15:00, 21:00, 1:00 and 5:00 five time points. The glucose fluctuation is the maximum glucose amount plus minimum glucose amount.

    Time frame: up to 10 days

  6. Albumin

    Serum albumin is the main protein of human blood plasma. It can be measured by clinical laboratory.

    Time frame: up to 10 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The affiliated hospital of qingdao university
    Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Patel JJ, Rosenthal MD, Heyland DK. Intermittent versus continuous feeding in critically ill adults. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018 Mar;21(2):116-120. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000447. PubMed 29232262 ↗
  • Sunderram J, Sofou S, Kamisoglu K, Karantza V, Androulakis IP. Time-restricted feeding and the realignment of biological rhythms: translational opportunities and challenges. J Transl Med. 2014 Mar 28;12:79. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-79. PubMed 24674294 ↗
  • McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, McCarthy MS, Davanos E, Rice TW, Cresci GA, Gervasio JM, Sacks GS, Roberts PR, Compher C; Society of Critical Care Medicine; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Feb;40(2):159-211. doi: 10.1177/0148607115621863. No abstract available. Erratum In: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Nov;40(8):1200. doi: 10.1177/0148607116670155. PubMed 26773077 ↗
  • Tavares de Araujo VM, Gomes PC, Caporossi C. Enteral nutrition in critical patients; should the administration be continuous or intermittent? Nutr Hosp. 2014 Mar 1;29(3):563-7. doi: 10.3305/nh.2014.29.3.7169. PubMed 24559000 ↗
  • Chen YC. Critical analysis of the factors associated with enteral feeding in preventing VAP: a systematic review. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009 Apr;72(4):171-8. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70049-8. PubMed 19372071 ↗
  • Marik PE. Feeding critically ill patients the right 'whey': thinking outside of the box. A personal view. Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0051-2. Epub 2015 May 28. PubMed 26055186 ↗
  • Wang HB, Loh DH, Whittaker DS, Cutler T, Howland D, Colwell CS. Time-Restricted Feeding Improves Circadian Dysfunction as well as Motor Symptoms in the Q175 Mouse Model of Huntington's Disease. eNeuro. 2018 Jan 3;5(1):ENEURO.0431-17.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0431-17.2017. eCollection 2018 Jan-Feb. PubMed 29302618 ↗
  • Ren CJ, Yao B, Tuo M, Lin H, Wan XY, Pang XF. Comparison of sequential feeding and continuous feeding on the blood glucose of critically ill patients: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Jul 20;134(14):1695-1700. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001684. PubMed 34397596 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2021, 35 months after the start.

Of 503 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Feeding Behavior, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 515 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 31, 2018
First posted
Feb 20, 2018
StartActual
May 9, 2018
Primary completionEst.
May 8, 2021
CompletionEst.
Aug 30, 2022
Last update
Jun 2, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03439618
Lead sponsor
Qingdao University
Responsible party
Bo Yao,phD (Clinician of intensive care unit, Principal Investigator, Qingdao University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2018
Start date
May 9, 2018
Primary completion
May 8, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 30, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2020

Study contacts

Bo Yao, PHD
Contact
icuyaobo@126.com
+86053282912221
BO Yao, PHD
principal investigator · The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion