ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03435458BIGWUpdated May 15, 2023

Balloon to Induce Labor in Generous Women.

A Phase 3 interventional study of Balloon catheter + oral misoprostol and Oral misoprostol alone in Maternal Obesity, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Terminated at 18 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-15.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Phase 3, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
interim analyses

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
429
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The rate of obesity increases continuously in France as in many developing countries.The risk of cesarean delivery is increased in obese compared to normal-weight women and postpartum complications as infections, thromboembolic events and related maternal death, are more common among obese women who deliver by cesarean than both normal-weight women with caesarean deliveries and obese women with vaginal deliveries. Unfortunately, obesity is associated with a higher rate of failed induction requiring a cesarean delivery and especially in nulliparous.

Methods of induction for obese women have to be improved to decrease the c-section rate but investigators should also be cautious on the type and dose of PG not to affect the neonatal wellbeing associated with uterine hyperstimulation.

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of the association of mechanical and pharmacological cervical ripening (balloon catheter plus 50 µg oral prostaglandin E1) versus pharmacological cervical ripening alone (50 µg oral prostaglandin E1) to reduce the rate of caesarean sections in nulliparous obese women.

Read the detailed description

The rate of obesity increases continuously in France as in many developing countries. In 2012, in the US, one third of all pregnant women were obese. The risk of cesarean delivery is increased in obese compared to normal-weight women and postpartum complications as infections, thromboembolic events and related maternal death, are more common among obese women who deliver by cesarean than both normal-weight women with caesarean deliveries and obese women with vaginal deliveries.

Prevalence of post-term is increased in obese pregnant women and the rate of induction of labor is twice the rate of normal-weight women, 42% versus 23% in the 2010 French National Survey.

Unfortunately, obesity is associated with a higher rate of failed induction requiring a cesarean delivery and especially in nulliparous.

Methods of induction for obese women have to be improved to decrease the c-section rate but investigators should also be cautious on the type and dose of PG not to affect the neonatal wellbeing associated with uterine hyperstimulation.

In a recent randomized clinical trial (RCT), the rate of c-section after labor induction in obese women was not increased in obese women compared to normal-weight women with balloon catheter but it was also increased with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and moreover with higher rate of uterine hyperstimulation. Recently, low dose of oral misoprostol (PGE1) has been showed to be the drug with the lowest rate of c-section after induction of labor in all women and balloon catheter to be associated with the lowest rate of hyperstimulation. Because safety of these two specific methods for induction of labor, a comparison 1 to 1 were done recently for induction of labor in singletons with comparable results.

Very few studies have focused on induction of labor in obese women even if the rate of maternal and neonatal complications are higher.

The efficacy of combining these two methods with different mechanism of induction have been showed recently but no study has been published today on obese women. Recently a trial have showed a shorter induction-delivery time with the combination (misoprostol-foley) for induction of labor in the whole population with less need of oxytocin during labor without more complications neither for the mother nor for the baby.An induction will be considered "failed" if at least 12 hours have elapsed since both rupture of membranes and use of a uterine stimulant and the patient remains in latent labor.

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of the association of mechanical and pharmacological cervical ripening (balloon catheter plus 50 µg oral prostaglandin E1) versus pharmacological cervical ripening alone (50 µg oral prostaglandin E1) to reduce the rate of caesarean sections in nulliparous obese women.

02

Conditions studied

  • Maternal Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Induced labor
  • Maternal obesity
03

In context

Pregnancy in Obesity

60 studies on the registry are indexed under Pregnancy in Obesity; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 429 is above the median of 160 across 33 interventional studies indexed under Pregnancy in Obesity.

Browse Pregnancy in Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Toulouse is the lead sponsor of 807 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • female
  • pregestational ≥ 30 kg/m2 (weight/height2)
  • singleton pregnancy with cephalic presentation
  • nulliparous
  • ≥ 36 weeks gestational age
  • decision of induction of labor
  • bishop score ≤ 5
  • ≤ 3 uterine contractions / 10 min
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • personally signed and dated document
  • ability to comply with the requirement of the study
  • insurance coverage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • deceleration on Fetal Heart Rate (FHR)
  • placenta praevia
  • bleeding
  • premature rupture of membrane
  • chorioamnionitis
  • allergy to prostaglandins
  • to ballon
  • active genital herpes infection
  • infection
  • fetal serious congenital anomaly
  • patient subject to a legal protection order
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
429 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Balloon catheter + oral misoprostol

    Combination Product: Balloon catheter + oral misoprostol

  • Active comparator
    Oral misoprostol alone

    Drug: Oral misoprostol alone

Interventions

  • Combination productBalloon catheter + oral misoprostol

    The pharmacological cervical ripening will be administered just after the balloon catheter insertion (after coming back in her room) and will consist of misoprostol 25 micrograms given orally (oral prostaglandin E1). The same dose will be given every 2 hours until beginning of labor with a maximum of 8 administrations.

  • Patients will receive a pharmacological cervical ripening alone that consist of Misoprostol 25 micrograms given orally (oral prostaglandin E1). The same dose will be given every 2 hours until beginning of labor with a maximum of 8 administrations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of the association of mechanical and low dose oral misoprostol compared to oral misoprostol alone, to reduce the rate of caesarean section of all indications in obese women.

    Assessed by the caesarean section occurrence whatever the indication (binary endpoint).

    Time frame: Day 0 to day 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness criteria.

    Effectiveness criteria chosen for the cost-effectiveness analysis will be the caesarean section rate for all indications.

    Time frame: Day 0 to day 2

  2. Cost analysis.

    Cost estimates, for the construction of ICER, will be performed from the health insurance perspective. Costs taken into account will be those related to the management of obese pregnant women during inpatient stays for the delivery in both arms (i.e. combining method vs. oral prostaglandin alone). They include the costs of initial hospitalization for delivery. The expenses incurred in the management of patients in each arm will be recorded over a the study follow-up.

    Time frame: Day 0 to day 2

  3. Resources consumption collection.

    Resource consumption will be gathered prospectively in each arm, during the follow-up period using a bottom-up approach. Data will be collected from the Medical Information Departments of each center participating in the study for hospitalization costs.

    Time frame: Day 0 to day 2

  4. Costs valuation.

    Hospital stays will be valued from the French framework of pricing, the hospital Activity "Tarification à l'activité" (T2A). Hospital stays linked to the patient's care in each strategy will be valued from the French Diagnosis Related Group (DRGs).

    Time frame: Day 0 to day 2

  5. Cost-effectiveness analysis.

    A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from the health insurance perspective. An Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) will be calculate to establish a link between costs and medical consequences, expressed in terms of rate of caesarian section rate, between the two strategies for labor induction.

    Time frame: Day 0 to day 2

07

Study locations

18 sites
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand
    Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 63000, France
  • CHU St Etienne
    Saint-Étienne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 42055, France
  • CHU Tours
    Tours, Centre-Val De Loire 37044, France
  • CHRU Lille
    Lille, Hauts-de-France 59020, France
  • CHU Antoine Beclère
    Clamart, Ile-de-France 92140, France
  • CHU Kremlin Bicêtre
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Ile-de-France 94270, France
  • Centre hospitalier St Joseph
    Paris, Ile-de-France 75014, France
  • CHI Poissy
    Poissy, Ile-de-France 78300, France
  • CHU Saint Denis de la Reunion
    Saint-Denis, La Réunion 97400, France
  • CHU St Pierre de la Reunion
    Saint-Pierre, La Réunion 97448, France
  • CHU de Toulouse
    Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées 31059, France
  • CHU Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, Nouvelle Aquitaine 33076, France
  • CHU Nimes
    Nîmes, Occitanie 30900, France
  • Hôpital St Joseph
    Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 13008, France
  • CHU Montpellier
    Montpellier, 34070, France
  • CHU Nantes
    Nantes, 44093, France
  • CHU Poitiers
    Poitiers, France
  • CHU Fort de France
    Fort de France, Martinique
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Battarbee AN, Palatnik A, Peress DA, Grobman WA. Association of Early Amniotomy After Foley Balloon Catheter Ripening and Duration of Nulliparous Labor Induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):592-597. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001563. PubMed 27500341 ↗
  • Connolly KA, Kohari KS, Rekawek P, Smilen BS, Miller MR, Moshier E, Factor SH, Stone JL, Bianco AT. A randomized trial of Foley balloon induction of labor trial in nulliparas (FIAT-N). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):392.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.034. Epub 2016 Mar 24. PubMed 27018464 ↗
  • McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):539-551. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002. PubMed 26244535 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2020 to primary completion in Feb 2023, 31 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2018
First posted
Feb 19, 2018
StartActual
Jun 26, 2020
Primary completionActual
Feb 2, 2023
CompletionActual
Feb 2, 2023
Last update
May 15, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03435458
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 19, 2018
Start date
Jun 26, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2023
Completion
Feb 2, 2023
Last update
May 15, 2023

Study contacts

Christophe Vayssiere, Pr
principal investigator · CHU Toulouse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion