An interventional study of Syndactyly and Reduction and inmobilization in Metacarpal Fracture, sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-27.
Sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study aims to compare the functional results of two different therapeutic approaches in patients that present with a 5th metacarpal neck fracture. Patients will be randomly assigned to be treated with either syndactyly or closed reduction plus inmovilization.
Syndactyly, although limiting the activity of the patient, allows a quick mobilization and recovery, as well as a better management in daily activities compared with immobilization with splint. In addition, follow-up of these fractures is difficult due to poor compliance, since patient profile is young people who give little relevance to their pathology in the hand.
The purpose of our study is to carry out a randomized clinical trial of good methodological quality to assess whether immobilization with syndactyly for 3 weeks does not imply loss of functionality or residual symptoms, avoiding rigidity, postinflammation arthritis or loss of grip strength, demonstrating that early mobilization of fractures of the fifth metacarpal provides clinically satisfactory results compared to prolonged immobilization provided that the volar fracture angle does not exceed 70 ° nor does it produce digital movement disruption.
Syndactyly
Procedure: Syndactyly
Closed reduction and splint inmobilization
Procedure: Reduction and inmobilization
Syndactyly
Closed reduction and inmobilization with splint
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score
Comparison of DASH score at 9 weeks of emergency care in both treatment groups. Score range is from 0 to 100
Time frame: 9 weeks
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score
Comparison of DASH score at 3,6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year of emergency care in both treatment groups.
Time frame: 3 weeks, 1 year
Time to go back to job and sports
Comparison of the time to incorporation into the work and sports activity between both groups.
Time frame: 1 year
Angulation,
Comparison of angulation between both groups
Time frame: 3 weeks, 9 weeks
Range of mobility
Comparison of range of mobility between both groups
Time frame: 3 weeks, 9 weeks
Grip strength
Comparison of grip strength between both groups
Time frame: 3 weeks, 9 weeks
Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) for Pain score
Comparison of VAS score
Time frame: 3 weeks, 9 weeks, 1 year
Complication rate
Frequency of complications
Time frame: 1 year
Patient satisfaction (Modified Cooney Scale)
Satisfaction with the assigned treatment and its result between groups, measured by the modified cooney scale that ranges from 0 to 100
Time frame: 1 year
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Syndactyly
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz