ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03434574ABPUpdated Sep 23, 2019

Aronia Berry Consumption on Blood Pressure

An interventional study of Placebo and Aronia extract in Prehypertension and Healthy, sponsored by King's College London. Completed at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-23.

Sponsored by King's College London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aronia berries are a native North American berry with high naturally occurring anthocyanins among other polyphenols. Based on their polyphenol composition, there is growing interest in the potential for Aronia berries to elicit health promoting cardio-metabolic effects. Specifically, Aronia berry extracts, which provide a concentrated source of polyphenols, may improve blood vessel function.

Thus, the primary focus of this project is to evaluate the effects of Aronia berry polyphenols on blood pressure and other biomarkers of cardiovascular disease risk such as endothelial function, arterial stiffness and blood lipids.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prehypertension
  • Healthy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • (Poly)phenols
  • Aronia berry
  • Blood pressure
  • Vascular function
03

In context

Prehypertension

158 studies on the registry are indexed under Prehypertension; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 102 is above the median of 66 across 138 interventional studies indexed under Prehypertension.

Browse Prehypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

King's College London is the lead sponsor of 520 studies on the registry; 126 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy men and women aged 40-70 years old
  • Blood pressure comprised between: SBP 120/139 mmHg or DBP 80/89 mmHg
  • Subjects are willing to maintain their normal eating/drinking habits and exercise habits to avoid changes in body weight over the duration of the study
  • Are able to understand the nature of the study
  • Able and willing to give signed written
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Manifest cardiovascular disease including coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral artery disease
  • Grade 1 hypertensive or above, as defined as SBP superior or equal to 140 mmHg or DBP superior or equal to 90 mmHg
  • Obese participants, defined as superior or equal to 30
  • Diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome
  • Acute inflammation
  • Chronic and acute disease
  • Terminal renal failure and other kidney abnormalities
  • Abnormal heart rhythm
  • Allergies to berries or other significant food allergy.
  • Subjects who require treatment for hypertension at any time (e.g. statins, aspirin, blood pressure lowering drugs)
  • Subjects who took food supplements, dietary supplement or herbal remedies within 1 month of study start
  • Subjects who have lost more than 10% of their weight in the past 6 months or are currently in a diet
  • Subjects who reported participant in another study within 1 month before the study start
  • Subjects who smoke an irregular amount of cigarettes per day
  • Subjects who require chronic antimicrobial or antiviral treatment
  • Subjects with unstable psychological condition
  • Subjects with history of cancer, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular incident
  • Unable to swallow the capsule
  • Pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant, as well as premenopausal women who do not have an adequate method of
  • Any reason or condition that in the judgment of the clinical investigator(s) may put the subject at unacceptable risk or that may preclude the subject from understanding or complying with the study's requirements.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Formulation containing inert artificially colored maltodextrin, once daily, in a 1-hard capsule regimen (500 mg)

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Aronia extract

    Formulation of an aronia extract ingredient in a 1-hard capsule regimen (500 mg)

    Dietary Supplement: Aronia extract

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo

    Identical formulation as the treatment consisting of colored maltodextrin using artificial colors.

  • Dietary supplementAronia extract

    Powdered extract obtained from aronia berries (Aronia melanocarpa).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline ambulatory blood pressure after 12-week consumption

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on ambulatory 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 12 weeks post consumption, compared to the baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Office blood pressure

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on office systolic and diastolic blood pressure, at 12 weeks post consumption

    Time frame: Baseline 0 and 2 hours and 12 weeks 0 and 2 hours

  2. Heart rate

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on heart rate, at 12 weeks post consumption

    Time frame: Baseline 0 and 2 hours and 12 weeks 0 and 2 hours

  3. Flow-mediated dilation

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on flow-mediated dilation at 12 weeks post consumption

    Time frame: Baseline 0 and 2 hours and 12 weeks 0 and 2 hours

  4. Blood flow velocity

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on blood flow velocity at 12 weeks post consumption

    Time frame: Baseline 0 and 2 hours and 12 weeks 0 and 2 hours

  5. Pulse wave velocity (PWV)

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on pulse wave velocity (PWV) using a Sphygmocor device, at 12 weeks post consumption

    Time frame: Baseline 0 and 2 hours and 12 weeks 0 and 2 hours

  6. Augmentation Index (AIx)

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on augmentation Index (AIx) using a Sphygmocor device, at 12 weeks post consumption

    Time frame: Baseline 0 and 2 hours and 12 weeks 0 and 2 hours

  7. Blood lipids

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on blood lipids (Total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides), at 12 weeks post consumption

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  8. Blood cortisol

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on blood cortisol levels, at 12 weeks post consumption

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  9. Number of volunteers with treatment-related adverse events

    The number of volunteers with treatment-related adverse events will be assessed by questionnaires and interviews.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  10. 24-hour heart rate

    Determine the effect of the Aronia extract vs Placebo on 24-hour heart rate, using a monitor, at 12 weeks post consumption

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Plasma aronia berry (poly)phenol metabolites

    Measured by liquid chromotography- mass spectrometry (LC/MS) 0 and 2 hours postconsumption at day 1 (baseline) and after 12 weeks.

    Time frame: Baseline 0 and 2 hours and 12 weeks 0 and 2 hours

  2. Microbiome analysis

    Stool sample collection (Omnigene gut collection kit)

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Department of Life Sciences and Medecine
    London, Central London SE1 9NH, United Kingdom
  • King's College London
    London, England SE1 9NH, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Le Sayec M, Xu Y, Laiola M, Gallego FA, Katsikioti D, Durbidge C, Kivisild U, Armes S, Lecomte M, Fanca-Berthon P, Fromentin E, Plaza Onate F, Cruickshank JK, Rodriguez-Mateos A. The effects of Aronia berry (poly)phenol supplementation on arterial function and the gut microbiome in middle aged men and women: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2022 Nov;41(11):2549-2561. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.08.024. Epub 2022 Sep 6. PubMed 36228567 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Sep 2019, 18 months.

Of 56 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Prehypertension, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 37. This study's 18 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 60 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 11, 2018
First posted
Feb 15, 2018
StartActual
Feb 20, 2018
Primary completionActual
Sep 12, 2019
CompletionActual
Sep 12, 2019
Last update
Sep 23, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03434574
Collaborators
Naturex-Dbs
Responsible party
Dr Ana Rodriguez-Mateos (Principal investigator, King's College London) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 15, 2018
Start date
Feb 20, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 12, 2019
Completion
Sep 12, 2019
Last update
Sep 23, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion