An interventional study of Ligasure device and Articulating Enseal in Task Performance, sponsored by Antalya Training and Research Hospital. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-15.
Sponsored by Antalya Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The effect of two different bipolar instruments were compared in terms of operative time, total operative time, intra-operative blood loss and intra-operative and postoperative complications. Devices included the LigaSure™ Maryland Jaw 5 mm laparoscopic instrument (LigaSure; LF 1737, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) and ENSEAL™ G2 Articulating Straight 5mm Tissue Sealer (ENSEAL; NSLG2S35A, Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC).
This study is a single-center, single-blinded, randomized control trial that was conducted at the University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital.
The study was single-blinded in that the patient was not informed of their group assignment; it is impossible to blind the surgeon using the devices.
Methods and Procedures:
Patients were recruited from outpatient clinics and informed about the study before enrollment. Women aged over 18 years scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications between June 2016 and November 2017 were included in the study after obtaining written consent.
Women who had given consent were randomized one day before surgery to one of two groups:
Group 1: The Ligasure device used during the hysterectomy. Group 2: The articulating Enseal device used during the hysterectomy.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Surgical technique:
All laparoscopic procedures were performed under general anesthesia. An experienced surgeon, who has an experience of over 100 cases of TLH with both LigaSure and Enseal, performed all the procedures. Because both devices have long been used in the operations, they are always ready for use in our operation rooms. During the study, the first assistant was always a second or a third year assistant surgeon and the second assistant holding the uterine manipulator was a first year assistant surgeon. Operative time was recorded in minutes with a digital watch by a first year resident by dictation of the primary surgeon of the start and stop times.
After positioning the patient in lithotomy position and placement of a Foley catheter, a Rumi II (CooperSurgical, Inc, Trumbull, CT, USA) uterine manipulator with Koh cup (Bard Medical, Covington, GA, USA) of appropriate size was placed. The first assistant stood on the right side of the patient and held the camera. The second assistant held the uterine manipulator. The abdominal cavity was entered by direct trocar insertion. The site of insertion varied, being the umbilicus or Lee-Huang point, according to the size of the uterus. After pneumoperitoneum was obtained, the patient was positioned in the Trendelenburg position and three additional trocars, all 5 mm in size, were inserted from both inguinal regions and suprapubic region. Following exploration of the abdominal cavity, adhesiolysis was performed where necessary. The round ligaments were sealed and transected, the bladder peritoneum was opened, the utero-ovarian ligaments were sealed and cut, the bladder peritoneum was dissected from the vagina, the uterine vessels were skeletonized, sealed and dissected followed by sacro-uterine ligament dissection and finally the vaginal wall on the rim of the vaginal part of the uterine manipulator was cut by Harmonic AceTM. The uterus was removed vaginally in all operations but in case of large uteri, either a Chardonnen's morcellation knife (Karl Storz GmBH, Tuttlingen, Germany) or a power morcellator was used for uterine section before retrieval. The vaginal cuff was closed by laparoscopic stitching with number 1 Vicryl suture. In cases where bilateral or unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was also indicated, the procedure was performed after removal of the uterus in order to prevent interference with operative time which was our primary outcome measure. To seal and transect uterine attachments, the LigaSure™ Maryland Jaw 5 mm laparoscopic instrument (LigaSure; LF 1737, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA), using the ForceTriadTM Energy Platform (Covidien, Boulder, CO, USA) was used in one group and ENSEAL™ G2 Articulating Straight 5mm Tissue Sealer (ENSEAL; NSLG2S35A, Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC) using the Ethicon GEN11TM generator (Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC) was used in the other group.
Follow-up was performed on postoperative day 7, and then at 1 month.Patients were also seen at our clinic if they developed symptoms between follow-up visits and complications recorded.
Exclusion Criteria:
This group of women undergoing hysterectomy were randomized to the Ligasure energy device
Device: Ligasure device
This group of women undergoing hysterectomy were randomized to the articulating Enseal energy device
Device: Articulating Enseal
Vessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy
Vessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy
Operative time
Defined as time from start of sealing and transection of the round ligament until start of colpotomy, was the primary endpoint.
Time frame: 16 months
Total operative time
Time from placement of the first trocar until removal of all trocars
Time frame: 16 months
Intra-operative estimated blood loss
Calculated by subtracting total volume of irrigated fluid from the amount measured in the aspiration bag after positioning the patient in reverse Trendelenburg position at the end of the operation
Time frame: 16 months
Intra-operative complications
Visceral or vascular injury, hemorrhage, conversion to laparotomy, mechanical or functional device failure
Time frame: 16 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Antalya Training and Research Hospital