An interventional study of Integrated Care Pathway and Treatment As Usual in ICP1, Depression and Adolescent Behavior, sponsored by Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Status unknown at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-09.
Sponsored by Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Major Depressive Disorder in adolescence is prevalent and debilitating. Our group aims to improve treatment response through the use of an Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) based on a high quality Clinical Practice Guideline and measurement-based care (MBC; where periodic symptom scale scores are used to make treatment decisions). We propose a controlled clinical trial comparing ICP to treatment-as-usual (TAU) across two sites.
Background: There is a gap between what is known from the evidence about the treatment of adolescent depression and what is practiced. Moreover, while there is evidence that measurement-based care can improve outcomes for adults with various mental health conditions, there is limited information on this framework in adolescent depression.
Objective: Our study aims to enhance the implementation of evidence-based care (using the NICE Clinical Practice Guidelines as a template) combined wtih measurement-based care through the use of an Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) in adolescents with depression.
Hypothesis: As this is a pilot study, our hypotheses centre around feasibility. We hypothesize that: (1) we will recruit at least 30 participants to the ICP treatment arm and 30 participants at the "treatment-as-usual" arm at a different site (2) that baseline measures will be fully completed by 95% of adolescents recruited, (3) that baseline measures will take 2 hours to complete for adolescents and 1 hour to complete for caregivers, (4) that a mean of 90% of the key aspects of the treatment protocol are followed in the ICP group (5) that 80% of participants recruited will complete measures at the end of the 20-week interval and that (6) 90% of the youth, caregivers and clinicians who partake int eh study will attend a focus group to provide qualitative feedback on their experience.
Design: This is a non-randomized controlled clinical trial. Randomizing at the individual level is not possible - the intervention is implemented at the clinic level; so the effect of the intervention on one youth within a clinic would influence the care of other youth at the clinic.
Sampling: Participants are recruited from psychiatric clinics at 2 sites. Each site will recruit to their respective treatment arm.
8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.
Browse Depression studies →Centre for Addiction and Mental Health is the lead sponsor of 339 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The intervention is an Integrated Care Pathway with 3 key components. 1. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) recommendations: The initial template of the treatment protocol was based on the NICE CPGs for Depression in Children and Young People. 2. Provider engagement: The clinicians at CAMH reviewed the template and collaboratively developed a flow chart defining the treatment protocol. 3. Measurement-based care: Feedback measures are taken every four weeks and the results are provided to the clinician, patient and family to inform treatment decisions. The feedback measures are the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, the Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS) and the General Functioning Domain of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (MFAD).
Behavioral: Integrated Care Pathway
Treatment As Usual : Participants at SHSC will receive treatment at could include a psychiatric evaluation, possible medication management and various types of psychotherapy, including cognitive-behavioural therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy and family therapy. There is no structured protocol and no systematic Measurement Based Care. A research assistant will record the interventions received in either group via chart review.
Behavioral: Treatment As Usual
The intervention is a integrated care pathway based on the NICE Clinical Practice Guidelines and measurement-based care in the form of a flow chart. Each decision point on the pathway is guided by results of self-report measures for depression (the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire), functional impairment (Columbia Impairment Scales) and family functioning (the McMaster Family Assessment Device). The results of these scales and protocol recommendations are fed back to the patients, families and clinicians in order to make further treatment decisions
Treatment As Usual represents what clinicians would typically do when presented with an adolescent with depression. There is no algorithm provided to guide clinical decision-making and no systematic measurement-based care.
Change in Childhood Depression Rating Scale-Revised scores
The CDRS-R is a 17-item measure rated by an evaluator after a semi-structured interview with the adolescent relating to symptoms of depression over the past 2 weeks. Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of over 55 interpreted as a moderate to severe rating. Lower values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Change in WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Children And Youth
Change in function as reported by participant The sum of scores of the items across all domains constitutes a statistic that is sufficient to describe the degree of functional limitations. Lower values represent a decrease in their subjective depression rating over the previous 2 weeks.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Change in Childhood Behaviour Checklist
Change in overall psychopathology as reported by caregiver.Total scores may be computed for Social Competence, Behavior Problems, Internalizing Problems, and Externalizing Problems, plus scores for each of the 8 syndrome scales. Raw scores are converted to age-standardized scores (T-Scores). T scores less than 67 are considered in the normal range, T scores ranging from 67-70 are considered to be borderline clinical, and T scores above 70 are in the clinical range.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Started Mar 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2019, 17 months after the start.
Of 3,468 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 17 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 3,566 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health →