ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03426397Updated Jul 29, 2020

"Wait-and-see" Policy for Complete Responders After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

An observational study in Rectal Neoplasms, sponsored by The Netherlands Cancer Institute. Recruiting at 14 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-29.

Sponsored by The Netherlands Cancer Institute · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2021, 5 years 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2017; still recruiting 9 years 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
220
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this prospective observational cohort study is to provide short and long term oncological and functional outcome data on organ preserving treatment in good responders after a standard indication for neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation for rectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

Standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer consists of a long course of (CRT) followed by surgical resection. Although the aim of neoadjuvant treatment in these patients is not organ preservation, but rather to provide improved local control, in the tumour disappears completely. Studies from Maastricht, the UK and Brazil have shown that in selected patients with a clinical complete response after CRT, a "wait-and-see" policy without any surgery could be a safe alternative with comparable long-term outcome and better functional outcome compared to patients who had surgery.

The main objective of the study is to provide short and long term oncological and functional outcome data on organ preserving treatment in good responders after a standard indication for neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation. Additional aims are: to set up a national network with expertise centres in the 'wait-and-see' treatment of rectal cancer; to set up a national registry for organ preservation treatment that will generate more evidence on the management and oncological outcome of patients evaluated and treated with organ preservation and [3] to offer through this network to all patients who are considered good candidates this 'wait-and-see' approach using the most up to date tools for selection and follow-up.

Study design: multicenter prospective observational cohort study and implementation study. Study population: The population will consist of patients, aged 18 years or older, with rectal cancer who after a long course of CRT or a short course of radiation with a long waiting interval have a clinical complete response (ycT0N0).

The main study endpoint is 2-year non-regrowth disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints are [1] the number of fully operational centres who can deliver high quality organ preserving care in rectal cancer in the Netherlands, [2] 2-year regrowth rate, [3] 2-year local control, [4] 2-year overall survival, [5] determination of the optimal follow-up schedule and [6] quality of life.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In the majority of patients who participate in the study, major surgery and the associated morbidity can be avoided. Although scientific proof shows "wait-and-see" only comes with a small risk with adequate selection and follow up, the exact risk is not yet well established and needs to be confirmed by this study. The benefit-risk ratio for this study is regarded as favourable.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Complete response
  • Organ preservation
  • Wait-and-See
  • Watch-and-Wait
  • Watchful Waiting
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

2,400 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 587 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 220 is above the median of 161 across 498 observational studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The Netherlands Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 231 studies on the registry; 67 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The population will consist of patients, aged 18 years or older, with rectal cancer who after a long course of CRT or a short course of radiation with a long waiting interval have a clinical complete response (ycT0N0), as determined by MRI (including DWI) and digital rectal examination + endoscopy. Only patients who fulfill the predefined list of criteria for a clinical complete response will be considered eligible for inclusion in the study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Primary rectal cancer ( confirmed)
  • Treated with (chemo)radiotherapy
  • Clinical complete response (ycT0N0) to neoadjuvant treatment, as determined clinically (digital rectal examination, endoscopy) and radiologically (diffusion weighted imaging-MRI).
  • and capability of giving informed consent; before informed consent is obtained the patient will be extensively informed about the fact that 'wait-and-see' instead of conventional surgery is not accepted yet by most physicians and that the risks and benefits from these strategies have not been fully determined yet. These issues will be discussed in the patient information form as well.
  • Comprehension of the alternative strategies and risks are clear to the patient (in other words that the patient understands the experimental base of the study).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent rectal cancer
  • for MRI. If MRI is not possible because of contra-indications (e.g. pacemaker) patients will be excluded. MRI is crucial for response evaluation and follow-up and cannot be omitted in patients that follow the 'wait-and-see policy'.
  • Unable to understand or read Dutch
  • Unable or unwilling to comply to the intensive follow-up schedule
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
220 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Study population
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 2-year non-regrowth disease-free survival

    Absence of non-regrowth local or distant recurrence or death within 2 years of follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of fully operational centres

    Number of operational centres who can deliver high quality organ preserving care in rectal cancer in the Netherlands

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  2. 2-year local regrowth rate

    The proportion of local regrowth

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  3. 2-year local control

    Absence of local recurrence(unresectable regrowth, resected with R1, or requiring more extensive than TME surgery) or death

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  4. 2-year overall survival

    Absence of death

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  5. Determination of the optimal follow-up schedule

    A balance between early detection of recurrence and compliance to follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  6. Quality of life

    Quality of life (general health, disease specific and functional outcomes)

    Time frame: At 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after the start of wait-and-see protocol

07

Study locations

7 of 14 sites recruiting
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
    Antwerp, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Niels Koomen, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
    Amsterdam, 1066CX, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Marit van der Sande, MD · Contactm.vd.sande@nki.nl
    • Geerard Beets, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Regina Beets-Tan, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Monique Maas, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Doenja Lambregts, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Marit van der Sande, MD · Sub investigator
  • VU Medisch Centrum
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Jurriaan Tuynman, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Amphia Ziekenhuis
    Breda, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Rogier Crolla, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Deventer Ziekenhuis
    Deventer, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Koen Talsma, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Westfriesgasthuis
    Hoorn, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Erik Sonneveld, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Leeuwarden Medisch Centrum
    Leeuwarden, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Christiaan Hoff, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Leiden University Medical Center
    Leiden, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Koen Peeters, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre
    Maastricht, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Stephanie Breukink, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Radboud UMC
    Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Hans de Wilt, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis
    Tilburg, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • David Zimmerman, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Diakonessenhuis
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Apollo Pronk, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Martijn Intven, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Isala Klinieken
    Zwolle, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Erik van Westreenen, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2021, 48 months after the start.

Of 213 non-industry observational studies under Rectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 116. This study's planned 48 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 228 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 116.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 21, 2017
First posted
Feb 8, 2018
StartActual
May 10, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2021
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Last update
Jul 29, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03426397
Collaborators
Dutch Cancer Society
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2018
Start date
May 10, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2020

Study contacts

Marit van der Sande, MD
Contact
m.vd.sande@nki.nl
0031205129111
Geerard Beets, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute
Regina Beets -Tan, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion