CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03426397Updated Jul 29, 2020

"Wait-and-see" Policy for Complete Responders After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

An observational study in Rectal Neoplasms, sponsored by The Netherlands Cancer Institute. Recruiting at 14 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-29.

Sponsored by The Netherlands Cancer Institute · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
220
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this prospective observational cohort study is to provide short and long term oncological and functional outcome data on organ preserving treatment in good responders after a standard indication for neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation for rectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

Standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer consists of a long course of (CRT) followed by surgical resection. Although the aim of neoadjuvant treatment in these patients is not organ preservation, but rather to provide improved local control, in the tumour disappears completely. Studies from Maastricht, the UK and Brazil have shown that in selected patients with a clinical complete response after CRT, a "wait-and-see" policy without any surgery could be a safe alternative with comparable long-term outcome and better functional outcome compared to patients who had surgery.

The main objective of the study is to provide short and long term oncological and functional outcome data on organ preserving treatment in good responders after a standard indication for neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation. Additional aims are: to set up a national network with expertise centres in the 'wait-and-see' treatment of rectal cancer; to set up a national registry for organ preservation treatment that will generate more evidence on the management and oncological outcome of patients evaluated and treated with organ preservation and [3] to offer through this network to all patients who are considered good candidates this 'wait-and-see' approach using the most up to date tools for selection and follow-up.

Study design: multicenter prospective observational cohort study and implementation study. Study population: The population will consist of patients, aged 18 years or older, with rectal cancer who after a long course of CRT or a short course of radiation with a long waiting interval have a clinical complete response (ycT0N0).

The main study endpoint is 2-year non-regrowth disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints are [1] the number of fully operational centres who can deliver high quality organ preserving care in rectal cancer in the Netherlands, [2] 2-year regrowth rate, [3] 2-year local control, [4] 2-year overall survival, [5] determination of the optimal follow-up schedule and [6] quality of life.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In the majority of patients who participate in the study, major surgery and the associated morbidity can be avoided. Although scientific proof shows "wait-and-see" only comes with a small risk with adequate selection and follow up, the exact risk is not yet well established and needs to be confirmed by this study. The benefit-risk ratio for this study is regarded as favourable.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Neoplasms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Complete response
  • Organ preservation
  • Wait-and-See
  • Watch-and-Wait
  • Watchful Waiting
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The population will consist of patients, aged 18 years or older, with rectal cancer who after a long course of CRT or a short course of radiation with a long waiting interval have a clinical complete response (ycT0N0), as determined by MRI (including DWI) and digital rectal examination + endoscopy. Only patients who fulfill the predefined list of criteria for a clinical complete response will be considered eligible for inclusion in the study.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Primary rectal cancer (pathologically confirmed)
  • Treated with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy
  • Clinical complete response (ycT0N0) to neoadjuvant treatment, as determined clinically (digital rectal examination, endoscopy) and radiologically (diffusion weighted imaging-MRI).
  • Informed consent and capability of giving informed consent; before informed consent is obtained the patient will be extensively informed about the fact that 'wait-and-see' instead of conventional surgery is not accepted yet by most physicians and that the risks and benefits from these strategies have not been fully determined yet. These issues will be discussed in the patient information form as well.
  • Comprehension of the alternative strategies and risks are clear to the patient (in other words that the patient understands the experimental base of the study).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent rectal cancer
  • Contra-indications for MRI. If MRI is not possible because of contra-indications (e.g. pacemaker) patients will be excluded. MRI is crucial for response evaluation and follow-up and cannot be omitted in patients that follow the 'wait-and-see policy'.
  • Unable to understand or read Dutch
  • Unable or unwilling to comply to the intensive follow-up schedule
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
220 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Study population
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 2-year non-regrowth disease-free survival

    Absence of non-regrowth local or distant recurrence or death within 2 years of follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of fully operational centres

    Number of operational centres who can deliver high quality organ preserving care in rectal cancer in the Netherlands

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  2. 2-year local regrowth rate

    The proportion of local regrowth

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  3. 2-year local control

    Absence of local recurrence(unresectable regrowth, resected with R1, or requiring more extensive than TME surgery) or death

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  4. 2-year overall survival

    Absence of death

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  5. Determination of the optimal follow-up schedule

    A balance between early detection of recurrence and compliance to follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years after start of wait-and-see protocol

  6. Quality of life

    Quality of life (general health, disease specific and functional outcomes)

    Time frame: At 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after the start of wait-and-see protocol

06

Study locations

7 of 14 sites recruiting
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
    Antwerp, Belgium
    • Niels Koomen, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
    Amsterdam, 1066CX, Netherlands
    • Marit van der Sande, MD · Contact · m.vd.sande@nki.nl
    • Geerard Beets, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Regina Beets-Tan, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Monique Maas, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Doenja Lambregts, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Marit van der Sande, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • VU Medisch Centrum
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    • Jurriaan Tuynman, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Amphia Ziekenhuis
    Breda, Netherlands
    • Rogier Crolla, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Deventer Ziekenhuis
    Deventer, Netherlands
    • Koen Talsma, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Westfriesgasthuis
    Hoorn, Netherlands
    • Erik Sonneveld, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Leeuwarden Medisch Centrum
    Leeuwarden, Netherlands
    • Christiaan Hoff, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Leiden University Medical Center
    Leiden, Netherlands
    • Koen Peeters, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre
    Maastricht, Netherlands
    • Stephanie Breukink, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Radboud UMC
    Nijmegen, Netherlands
    • Hans de Wilt, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis
    Tilburg, Netherlands
    • David Zimmerman, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Diakonessenhuis
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    • Apollo Pronk, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    • Martijn Intven, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Isala Klinieken
    Zwolle, Netherlands
    • Erik van Westreenen, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03426397
Lead sponsor
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Collaborators
Dutch Cancer Society
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2018
Start date
May 10, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2020

Study contacts

Marit van der Sande, MD
Contact
m.vd.sande@nki.nl
0031205129111
Geerard Beets, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute
Regina Beets -Tan, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion