ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03424460DM1-VTEUpdated Sep 12, 2025

Venous Thromboembolism in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1

An interventional study of Haemostasis tests and Monocytes and megacaryocytes culture and RNA extraction in Myotonic Dystrophy 1, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-12.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 30 studies in Myotonic Dystrophy with a site in France — 10 open to participants now, 13 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Myotonic Dystrophy · France.

Enrollment
6th of 20
130 · median 76
Started
2018
the only one that year
No phase
8 of 30
2 open now
Registered
9th of 30
by date
Lead sponsor
4 of 30
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Among the 30 studies in Myotonic Dystrophy with a site in France, this one is the 6th largest by enrollment of the 20 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2018, is one of 8 with no phase, and was the 9th registered.

Myotonic Dystrophy

126 studies on the registry are indexed under Myotonic Dystrophy; 50 are open to participants now.

Browse Myotonic Dystrophy studies →

Open to participants now

10 of the 30 studies in Myotonic Dystrophy with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

5 more — sign in →

All 10 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 35 Myotonic Dystrophy studies recruiting now, 15 (43%) set no upper age limit and 18 (51%) stop at 75 or younger; 22 take children under 18; 8 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 30 studies in Myotonic Dystrophy with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Investigators identified a high risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients presenting myotonic dystrophy type 1 treated in our hospital, 10 times higher than general population matched on age and sex. These venous thromboembolic events were frequently severe and lethal.

Investigators suspect that this high risk of venous thromboembolism is due to coagulation abnormalities specific to myotonic dystrophy type 1.

The purpose of this study is to determine: 1/ if there is a hypercoagulable state in myotonic dystrophy type 1 by testing patient's coagulation, and 2/ if genes encoding factors involved in coagulation have modified expression resulting in this hypercoagulable state.

Understanding the pathophysiology will help preventing venous thromboembolism in these patients.

It is the first study to describe this specific issue.

Read the detailed description

Investigators have identified in the cohort of 1084 patients presenting myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) a 10% prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and a 7‰ annual incidence, which is 10-fold higher than in the general population and 3-fold compared to patients with other myopathies.

Patients' clinical presentations were very similar to those observed in patients with severe hypercoagulable states caused by mutations in genes encoding factors involved in coagulation, fibrinolysis or their regulation and represented a frequent cause of death.

To Investigator's knowledge, this association between VTE and DM1 has never been reported to date and no competing project has been initiated on this topic by any other team.

Investigators hypothesize that VTE in DM1 may be related to a hypercoagulable state resulting from an imbalance between coagulation processes and fibrinolysis properties. Because the expression of pathogenic CTG repeats in DM1 leads to a RNA gain-of-function mechanism, Investigators propose these abnormalities may be the consequence of alternative splicing misregulation and/or abnormal gene expression of coagulation, fibrinolysis factors or other factors involved in their regulation.

Investigators applied a candidate gene strategy to screen splicing profiles of 33 genes coding for haemostasis factors in a DM1 context. Using expression large-scale datasets of DM1 tissue samples from skeletal muscle and heart, Investigators identified splicing defects in 4 genes involved in haemostasis, in particular 3 involved in the fibrinolytic system: PLAT, PLAU and SERPINE1. These preliminary analyses were however not performed on liver samples whereas genes coding for haemostasis factors are synthesized and mainly expressed in liver. Analysis of liver and monocytes/megacaryotes RNA samples appears to be an essential step.

The objectives are to (i) study haemostatic properties of a cohort of patients with DM1 with and without personal history of VTE, in order to determine whether a hypercoagulable state may be associated with DM1 and whether it may be correlated to the occurrence of VTE, and (ii) to perform a global transcriptomic approach using massive parallel sequencing (RNAseq) on liver and monocytes/megacaryotes. RNA samples obtained from DM1 patients will help identify candidate genes with altered expression or alternative splicing misregulation that may underlie VTE in DM1.

The study will include two complementary parts in DM1 patients with and without personal history of VTE and healthy volunteers: haemostasis tests, and transcriptomic analysis on RNA samples isolated from liver biopsies and blood monocytes/megacaryocytes samples.Three teams will be involved in the study: Team 1 (clinical study), Team 2 (haematology) and Team 3 (transcriptomic analysis).

Haemostasis tests will be performed by Team 1 and analysed by Team 2 in (i) 100 patients prospectively enrolled in Investigator's Institution by Team 1, aged >18 years, with genetically proven DM1, after providing written informed consent, without any current antithrombotic treatment, including 80 without and 20 with personal history of VTE and (ii) 30 healthy volunteers matched on age and sex. RNAseq will be performed on (i) liver tissue issued from 3 patients with DM1 and 6 controls and (ii) monocytes/megacaryocytes isolated from the blood of 15 patients with DM1 (7 with and 8 without VTE) and 15 controls prospectively enrolled in the study. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be similar to those of patients included in the study of haemostasis properties.

Liver tissues are already available in a tissue bank. Blood will be prospectively collected in DM1 patients and controls by Team 1. Monocytes and megacaryocytes will be isolated and cultured by Team 2.

Team 3 will extract total RNA from liver samples, monocytes and megacaryocytes to the Centre National de Génotypage for RNA sequencing and perform the analysis of the data and the validation of the newly identified candidates.

The estimated study duration is 72 months, including (i) 66 months for patient inclusions, coagulation testsand monocytes/megacaryocytes isolations, and (ii) 6 months for fibrinolysis tests, RNA extraction and sequencing, data analysis, validation.

Investigators believe the study will have important implications for the clinical management of patients with DM1. Specific strategies will be proposed for the prevention of VTE with potentially larger indications for prophylactic anticoagulant treatments and longer duration after a first episode of VTE.

Regarding the high mortality associated with VTE and the identification in the registry of pulmonary embolism as a frequent cause of death, sudden and non-sudden, in DM1 patients, the modification of these treatment strategies may be associated with an important clinical benefit.The identification of haemostasis abnormalities by coagulation and fibrinolysis tests could be useful for risk stratification in patients with DM1 and could allow targeted treatments.

03

Conditions studied

  • Myotonic Dystrophy 1

Keywords

  • Myotonic dystrophy 1
  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Deep vein thrombosis
  • Hypercoagulability
  • Thrombophilia
  • RNA alternative splicing
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Population N°1

    • Age over 18 years
    • Patient living in France and with medical insurance
    • Patient having given his informed and written consent
    • DM1 groups: genetically proven DM1
    • VTE groups: at least 1 history of VTE (PE and/or DVT)
    • Healthy volunteers: patient without any medical history (no DM1, no VTE, no thrombophilia), and without taking any anti-thrombotic medication
  2. Population N°2

    • Liver tissue of patients with genetically proven DM1 (tissue bank)
    • Liver tissue of patients without DM1 or any history of VTE (tissue bank)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient opposed to data collection and analysis

    1. Population N°1

  • Genetically proven thrombophilia
  • Anti-thrombotic medication
  • levels \< 7 g/dL
  • Hemoglobin levels \< 9 g/dL in case of cardiac of respiratory condition

    2. Population N°2

  • Liver tissue quality insufficient for RNA extraction and analysis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
130 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    population 1-A1 : DM1 with VTE

    Myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism and/or deep vein thrombosis)

    Biological: Haemostasis tests · Biological: Monocytes and megacaryocytes culture and RNA extraction

  • Active comparator
    population 1-B1 : DM1 without VTE

    Myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients without a history of venous thromboembolism

    Biological: Haemostasis tests · Biological: Monocytes and megacaryocytes culture and RNA extraction

  • Active comparator
    population 1-C1 : Healthy volunteers

    Healthy volunteers without any medical history or treatment

    Biological: Haemostasis tests · Biological: Monocytes and megacaryocytes culture and RNA extraction

  • Experimental
    population 2-A2 : DM1 liver samples

    Liver samples of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

    Genetic: RNA extraction

  • Active comparator
    population 2-B2 : Healthy liver samples

    Liver samples from patients without any medical history

    Genetic: RNA extraction

Interventions

  • BiologicalHaemostasis tests

    Venipuncture of 30 milliliters of blood. The following tests will be performed: thromboelastography (TEG®), standard tests of coagulation, genetic thrombophilia, lupus anticoagulant, fibrinolysis markers (Alpha-2-antiplasmin, amidolytic activity, plasmin anti-plasmin complexes, Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) antigen, plasminogen amydolytic activity), and a global test of fibrinolytic activity.

  • BiologicalMonocytes and megacaryocytes culture and RNA extraction

    Venipuncture of 60 milliliters of blood. Monocytes and megacaryocytes culture. RNA extraction from monocytes and megacaryocytes.

  • GeneticRNA extraction

    RNA extraction from liver tissue

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Results of thromboelastography in the 3 arms of population n°1

    Results given in thromboelastography traces

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Results of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APPT) in the 3 arms of population n°1

    Results given in seconds

    Time frame: 30 months

  2. Results of plasma fibrinogen levels in the 3 arms of population n°1

    Results given in grams per liter

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Results of thrombophilia testing in the 3 arms of population n°1

    Testing for: * Antithrombin III mutation * C protein mutation * S protein mutaiton * Activated C protein resistance mutation * Factor II G20210 mutation * Lupus anticoagulant. Results given in: presence or absence (yes or no)

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Results of the following fibrinolytic markers: alpha-2-antiplasmine, amidolytic activity, PAI-1 antigen, plasminogen amydolytic activity in the 3 arms of population n°1

    Results given in International Units per milliliters

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Results of levels of plasmin anti-plasmin complexes

    Results given in picograms per milliliters

    Time frame: 24 months

  6. Results of global test of fibrinolytic activity by the method of von Kaulla

    Results given in hours

    Time frame: 24 months

  7. Evaluation of coagulation and/or fibrinolysis genes' expression and alternative splicing in the 3 arms of population n°1 and in the 2 arms of population n°2

    Bioanalysis of the patients' transcriptomes after global RNA sequencing, focusing on expression or alternative splicing misregulation of coagulation and/or fibrinolysis genes. Results given in : gene name(s) and description

    Time frame: 30 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Service de Cardiologie - Hôpital Cochin
    Paris, Île-de-France Region 75014, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Udd B, Krahe R. The myotonic dystrophies: molecular, clinical, and therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2012 Oct;11(10):891-905. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70204-1. PubMed 22995693 ↗
  • Mathieu J, De Braekeleer M, Prevost C. Genealogical reconstruction of myotonic dystrophy in the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean area (Quebec, Canada). Neurology. 1990 May;40(5):839-42. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.5.839. PubMed 2330114 ↗
  • Fu YH, Pizzuti A, Fenwick RG Jr, King J, Rajnarayan S, Dunne PW, Dubel J, Nasser GA, Ashizawa T, de Jong P, et al. An unstable triplet repeat in a gene related to myotonic muscular dystrophy. Science. 1992 Mar 6;255(5049):1256-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1546326. PubMed 1546326 ↗
  • Mahadevan M, Tsilfidis C, Sabourin L, Shutler G, Amemiya C, Jansen G, Neville C, Narang M, Barcelo J, O'Hoy K, et al. Myotonic dystrophy mutation: an unstable CTG repeat in the 3' untranslated region of the gene. Science. 1992 Mar 6;255(5049):1253-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1546325. PubMed 1546325 ↗
  • Brook JD, McCurrach ME, Harley HG, Buckler AJ, Church D, Aburatani H, Hunter K, Stanton VP, Thirion JP, Hudson T, et al. Molecular basis of myotonic dystrophy: expansion of a trinucleotide (CTG) repeat at the 3' end of a transcript encoding a protein kinase family member. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):799-808. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90154-5. PubMed 1310900 ↗
  • Day JW, Ranum LP. RNA pathogenesis of the myotonic dystrophies. Neuromuscul Disord. 2005 Jan;15(1):5-16. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2004.09.012. Epub 2004 Nov 26. PubMed 15639115 ↗
  • Mankodi A, Logigian E, Callahan L, McClain C, White R, Henderson D, Krym M, Thornton CA. Myotonic dystrophy in transgenic mice expressing an expanded CUG repeat. Science. 2000 Sep 8;289(5485):1769-73. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1769. PubMed 10976074 ↗
  • Tian B, White RJ, Xia T, Welle S, Turner DH, Mathews MB, Thornton CA. Expanded CUG repeat RNAs form hairpins that activate the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. RNA. 2000 Jan;6(1):79-87. doi: 10.1017/s1355838200991544. PubMed 10668800 ↗
  • Charizanis K, Lee KY, Batra R, Goodwin M, Zhang C, Yuan Y, Shiue L, Cline M, Scotti MM, Xia G, Kumar A, Ashizawa T, Clark HB, Kimura T, Takahashi MP, Fujimura H, Jinnai K, Yoshikawa H, Gomes-Pereira M, Gourdon G, Sakai N, Nishino S, Foster TC, Ares M Jr, Darnell RB, Swanson MS. Muscleblind-like 2-mediated alternative splicing in the developing brain and dysregulation in myotonic dystrophy. Neuron. 2012 Aug 9;75(3):437-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.029. PubMed 22884328 ↗
  • Nakamori M, Sobczak K, Puwanant A, Welle S, Eichinger K, Pandya S, Dekdebrun J, Heatwole CR, McDermott MP, Chen T, Cline M, Tawil R, Osborne RJ, Wheeler TM, Swanson MS, Moxley RT 3rd, Thornton CA. Splicing biomarkers of disease severity in myotonic dystrophy. Ann Neurol. 2013 Dec;74(6):862-72. doi: 10.1002/ana.23992. PubMed 23929620 ↗
  • Mankodi A, Takahashi MP, Jiang H, Beck CL, Bowers WJ, Moxley RT, Cannon SC, Thornton CA. Expanded CUG repeats trigger aberrant splicing of ClC-1 chloride channel pre-mRNA and hyperexcitability of skeletal muscle in myotonic dystrophy. Mol Cell. 2002 Jul;10(1):35-44. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00563-4. PubMed 12150905 ↗
  • Fugier C, Klein AF, Hammer C, Vassilopoulos S, Ivarsson Y, Toussaint A, Tosch V, Vignaud A, Ferry A, Messaddeq N, Kokunai Y, Tsuburaya R, de la Grange P, Dembele D, Francois V, Precigout G, Boulade-Ladame C, Hummel MC, Lopez de Munain A, Sergeant N, Laquerriere A, Thibault C, Deryckere F, Auboeuf D, Garcia L, Zimmermann P, Udd B, Schoser B, Takahashi MP, Nishino I, Bassez G, Laporte J, Furling D, Charlet-Berguerand N. Misregulated alternative splicing of BIN1 is associated with T tubule alterations and muscle weakness in myotonic dystrophy. Nat Med. 2011 Jun;17(6):720-5. doi: 10.1038/nm.2374. Epub 2011 May 29. PubMed 21623381 ↗
  • Rau F, Laine J, Ramanoudjame L, Ferry A, Arandel L, Delalande O, Jollet A, Dingli F, Lee KY, Peccate C, Lorain S, Kabashi E, Athanasopoulos T, Koo T, Loew D, Swanson MS, Le Rumeur E, Dickson G, Allamand V, Marie J, Furling D. Abnormal splicing switch of DMD's penultimate exon compromises muscle fibre maintenance in myotonic dystrophy. Nat Commun. 2015 May 28;6:7205. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8205. PubMed 26018658 ↗
  • Savkur RS, Philips AV, Cooper TA. Aberrant regulation of insulin receptor alternative splicing is associated with insulin resistance in myotonic dystrophy. Nat Genet. 2001 Sep;29(1):40-7. doi: 10.1038/ng704. PubMed 11528389 ↗
  • Yadava RS, Frenzel-McCardell CD, Yu Q, Srinivasan V, Tucker AL, Puymirat J, Thornton CA, Prall OW, Harvey RP, Mahadevan MS. RNA toxicity in myotonic muscular dystrophy induces NKX2-5 expression. Nat Genet. 2008 Jan;40(1):61-8. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.28. Epub 2007 Dec 16. PubMed 18084293 ↗
  • Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23 Suppl 1):I22-30. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078464.82671.78. PubMed 12814982 ↗
  • Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galie N, Pruszczyk P, Bengel F, Brady AJ, Ferreira D, Janssens U, Klepetko W, Mayer E, Remy-Jardin M, Bassand JP; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2008 Sep;29(18):2276-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn310. Epub 2008 Aug 30. PubMed 18757870 ↗
  • Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet. 1999 Apr 24;353(9162):1386-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07534-5. PubMed 10227218 ↗
  • Karwinski B, Svendsen E. Comparison of clinical and postmortem diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Feb;42(2):135-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.2.135. PubMed 2921354 ↗
  • Dalen JE. Pulmonary embolism: what have we learned since Virchow? Natural history, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Chest. 2002 Oct;122(4):1440-56. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.4.1440. No abstract available. PubMed 12377877 ↗
  • Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23 Suppl 1):I9-16. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078469.07362.E6. PubMed 12814980 ↗
  • Goldhaber SZ. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 29;56(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.057. PubMed 20620709 ↗
  • Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost. 2000 May;83(5):657-60. PubMed 10823257 ↗
  • Achiron A, Barak Y, Magal N, Shohat M, Cohen M, Barar R, Gadoth N. Abnormal liver test results in myotonic dystrophy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;26(4):292-5. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199806000-00016. PubMed 9649014 ↗
  • Wang ET, Cody NA, Jog S, Biancolella M, Wang TT, Treacy DJ, Luo S, Schroth GP, Housman DE, Reddy S, Lecuyer E, Burge CB. Transcriptome-wide regulation of pre-mRNA splicing and mRNA localization by muscleblind proteins. Cell. 2012 Aug 17;150(4):710-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.041. PubMed 22901804 ↗
  • Batra R, Charizanis K, Manchanda M, Mohan A, Li M, Finn DJ, Goodwin M, Zhang C, Sobczak K, Thornton CA, Swanson MS. Loss of MBNL leads to disruption of developmentally regulated alternative polyadenylation in RNA-mediated disease. Mol Cell. 2014 Oct 23;56(2):311-322. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Sep 25. PubMed 25263597 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2023, 57 months.

Of 25 interventional studies with no phase under Myotonic Dystrophy, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 57. This study's 57 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 7, 2017
First posted
Feb 7, 2018
StartActual
Jun 11, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 15, 2023
CompletionActual
Mar 15, 2023
Last update
Sep 12, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03424460
Collaborators
AFM-Téléthon (Funding), Recherche Clinique Paris Descartes Necker Cochin Sainte Anne, URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 7, 2018
Start date
Jun 11, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2023
Completion
Mar 15, 2023
Last update
Sep 12, 2025

Study contacts

Karim Wahbi, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
Denis Duboc, MD, PhD
study director · Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
Michaela Fontenay, MD, PhD
study chair · Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
Denis Furling, Md, PhD
principal investigator · Université Paris 6 Pierre et Marie Curie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion