CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03422978Dexmed-PRSUpdated Apr 22, 2024

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Intravenous Anesthetic Requirements for Children Undergoing Dental Procedures

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexmedetomidine and Normal saline in Anesthetic Sparing, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-22.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators propose to determine the propofol and remifentanil sparing effects of a single dose of dexmedetomidine in the dental population. The investigators plan to do this by performing a blinded study with 4 test groups (3 experimental and 1 control), using BIS monitoring to titrate TIVA infusion to an acceptable depth of anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

Purpose:

To determine an optimal dose of dexmedetomidine for its anesthetic sparing effect, without extending post-operative stay.

Hypothesis:

The investigators hypothesize that dexmedetomidine will cause a clinically significant reduction of 30% in the amount of propofol and remifentanil required to maintain adequate depth of anesthesia, as monitored through the Bispectral Index.

Justification:

The dose-sparing effect of dexmedetomidine on TIVA requirements and the dose-response relationship between dexmedetomidine and TIVA dosing regimens has not been explored in young children. This study will have many relevant applications to many areas of pediatric anesthesia practice, such as craniofacial and neurosurgery, sedation techniques in diagnostic and interventional radiology, out of OR sedation, and in all young children in whom minimizing anesthesia exposure is increasingly sought given possible concerns over the long term neurocognitive effects of surgery and anesthesia in early life.

Objectives:

To investigate the dose-sparing effect on a propofol/remifentanil infusion of bolus doses of dexmedetomidine and to characterize the dose-response relationship between dexmedetomidine doses and TIVA dose reduction.

Research Design:

The investigators propose a randomized, 4-group comparative study to characterize the effects of different bolus doses of dexmedetomidine on the infusion requirements of propofol and remifentanil. The study-specific interventions will include a bolus of dexmedetomidine (or placebo) at induction of anesthesia, and maintenance of anesthesia, titrated to a Bispectral index of 50-60, with propofol and remifentanil infusions.

Statistical Analysis:

Standard statistical analysis will be undertaken using R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Summary data will be tabulated and presented as median (IQR). Mean infusion rates of propofol and remifentanil will be compared between groups using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with 95% confidence intervals obtained by the Hodges-Lehmann estimator. Dose (in mcg/kg) of additional opioids given in PACU will be tabulated and compared using Fisher's exact test. Bonferroni corrections will be applied as appropriate whenever multiple comparisons are performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthetic Sparing

Keywords

  • Dexmedetomidine
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA 1-2
  • Elective dental surgery
  • Planned general anesthesia with TIVA
  • Age 2-10 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • General anesthesia with inhalation induction
  • Documented seizure disorder
  • Cardiac disease
  • Cardiac rhythm abnormalities
  • Chronic hypertension
  • Weight \< 5th centile or > 95th centile for age
  • Pre-operative administration of anxiolytics (such as benzodiazepines or opioid analgesics)
  • Hypersensitivity to dexmedetomidine or any other study medication
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Saline bolus

    10mL normal saline solution administered intravenously over 60 seconds starting after intubation.

    Drug: Normal saline

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine 0.25 mcg/kg

    0.25 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine diluted with normal saline to a 10mL volume, administered intravenously over 60 seconds starting after intubation.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine 0.50 mcg/kg

    0.50 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine diluted with normal saline to a 10mL volume, administered intravenously over 60 seconds starting after intubation.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine 1.00 mcg/kg

    1.00 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine diluted with normal saline to a 10mL volume, administered intravenously over 60 seconds starting after intubation.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

  • DrugDexmedetomidine

    Single dose dexmedetomidine administered over 60 seconds post-induction.

    Also known as: Precedex

  • DrugNormal saline

    Single dose normal saline administered over 60 seconds post-induction.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Propofol and remifentanil sparing

    Propofol and remifentanil sparing as measured by time-averaged, total administered doses of propofol (mg/kg) and remifentanil (mcg/kg) compared to the placebo group.

    Time frame: Through length of procedure, an average of 1.5 hours

  2. Propofol and remifentanil infusion rate reduction

    Change in infusion rates of propofol and remifentanil (in micrograms/kg/min), measured over time compared to the placebo group.

    Time frame: Through length of procedure, an average of 1.5 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. PACU sedation

    Sedation will be scored from 0 (alert) to 4 (unarousable) using the University of Michigan sedation score (UMSS) at 10, 20, and 30 minutes post discontinuation of the infusions.

    Time frame: 30min post-procedure

  2. PACU pain scores

    Pain will be scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain), using the FLACC pain scale for ages 2-7 and the FACES pain scale for ages 8-10, and total fentanyl doses in mcg/kg given in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit will be recorded.

    Time frame: 30min post-procedure

06

Study locations

1 site
  • BC Children's Hospital - Department of Anesthesia
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4V4, Canada
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03422978
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Responsible party
Simon Whyte (Principal Investigator, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 6, 2018
Start date
Mar 14, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2021
Completion
Apr 1, 2021
Last update
Apr 22, 2024

Study contacts

Simon Whyte, MBBS, FRCA
principal investigator · BC Children's Hospital, Department of Anesthesia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion