ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03422341Updated May 4, 2021

Validation of the GenePOC Strep A, C/G Assay for Detecting Group A, C and G β-hemolytic Streptococcus From Throat Swabs.

An interventional study of Comparison between GenePOC CR and Reference Method in Pharyngitis, Infective, sponsored by Meridian Bioscience, Inc.. Completed at 8 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 25 Months and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-04.

Sponsored by Meridian Bioscience, Inc. (part of SD Biosensor) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jul 2018, 8 years 4 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
497
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
25 Months and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary purpose of this clinical investigation is to establish the performance of the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay on the revogene. This will be achieved by comparing the test to a conventional method for detection of Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus (GAS) and pyogenic Group C and G β-hemolytic Streptococcus (GCS/GGS) in throat swab samples.

Read the detailed description

The GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay will be performed using the revogene™ instrument. The revogene instrument, used in conjunction with appropriate reagents, is capable of automated cell lysis, dilution of nucleic acids from multiple sample types as well as automated amplification and detection of target nucleic acid sequences.

A dual swab sample is collected when ICF is signed by patient. One of the swab will be tested on the revogene™, and the second swab will be tested with standard microbiology method at a Reference Center.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pharyngitis, Infective

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pharyngitis

226 studies on the registry are indexed under Pharyngitis; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 497 is above the median of 144 across 188 interventional studies indexed under Pharyngitis.

Browse Pharyngitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Meridian Bioscience, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Meridian Bioscience, Inc. became part of SD Biosensor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Months and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Samples from patients suspected of having signs and symptoms of a pharyngitis infection
  • Patient that signed the approved Form (if applicable)
  • Patient older than 2 years of age
  • Only one (1) compliant sample per patient is allowed
  • Use of dual swab with either liquid Stuart or liquid Amies transport Medium

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient/sample not meeting inclusion criteria above
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
497 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GenePOC testing

    The swab will be used for the testing on the revogene using the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay. Intervention will be the Comparison between GenePOC CR and Reference Method.

    Device: Comparison between GenePOC CR and Reference Method

  • Active comparator
    Reference Method

    The swab will be used to detect the presence or absence of Strep A, C/G using standard microbiology method. Intervention will be the Comparison between GenePOC CR and Reference Method.

    Device: Comparison between GenePOC CR and Reference Method

Interventions

  • DeviceComparison between GenePOC CR and Reference Method

    The collected swab will be tested with both the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay and the Reference Method defined as standard microbiology culture and strain identification using a MALDI TOF.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance characteristics of the GenePOC Streap A, C/G assay

    To establish the performance characteristics of the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay for its use in determining the presence of Strep A, C/G in throat swab samples obtained from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis infection. * Sensitivity will be estimated as the proportion of positives that are correctly identified by the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay when compared to the Reference Method. * Specificity will be established as the proportion of negatives that are correctly identified by the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay when compared to the Reference Method.

    Time frame: Up to 14 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positive and Negative Predictive Values (PPV and NPV)

    To establish the Positive and Negative Predictive Values (PPV and NPV) of the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay. PPV will be calculated as the proportion of positive results with the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay that are true positive results when compared to the Reference Method. NPV will be calculated as the proportion of negative results with the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay that are true negative results when compared to the Reference Method.

    Time frame: Up to 14 months

  2. Unresolved sample results

    To establish the rate of unresolved results for the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay due to sample processing control failure (unresolved sample results).

    Time frame: Up to 14 months

  3. Indeterminate sample results

    To establish the rate of indeterminate results for the GenePOC Strep A, C/G assay due to an instrument failure (indeterminate results).

    Time frame: Up to 14 months

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Valley Children's Hospital
    Madera, California 93636, United States
  • Wishard Health Services
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Detroit Medical Center University Laboratories
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Children's Mercy Hospital
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • BC Children's and Women's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3N1, Canada
  • Mount Sinai Services
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
  • Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
    Québec, Quebec G1W 4R4, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03422341
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
Start date
Feb 14, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 11, 2018
Completion
Jul 11, 2018
Last update
May 4, 2021

Study contacts

Patrice Allibert
study director · Meridian Bioscience, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion