ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03420820Updated Feb 5, 2018

Concentrating on Antisepsis: 5% vs. 10% Povidone-Iodine Prior to Intravitreal Injection

An interventional study of Bacterial Culture Swab in Endophthalmitis and Eye Infections, sponsored by Matthew Bolton. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-05.

Sponsored by Matthew Bolton · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2018), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized controlled single blind prospective study evaluating the efficacy of ocular surface sterilization between three different povidone-iodine preparation techniques prior to intravitreal injection. The primary end point is significant different between median colony-forming units pre- and post-sterilization and injection.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: An estimated 5.9 - 7.9 million intravitreal injections (IVI) were given in 2016. While the incidence of post-injection endophthalmitis is exceedingly low, it is a feared complication of the procedure. 96% of culture-positive post-injection endophthalmitis cases are caused by conjunctival commensals, emphasizing the importance of ocular surface sterilization prior to IVI. The most recently published guidelines for IVI state that "Povidone-Iodine (5-10%) should be the last agent applied to the intended injection site before the injection," a recommendation that is universally followed. However, there is no standard of care regarding the concentration of PI nor the field of sterilization (e.g, cleaning the eyelids and lashes), and technique varies widely in clinical practice. The literature reveals no direct comparison of 5% vs 10% PI in the context of intravitreal injection.

Methods: Single-center randomized prospective trial enrolling patients into three protocols: 5% P-I applied to ocular surface from bottle, 10% P-I swabstick applied to ocular surface, and 10% P-I swabstick applied to lids, lashes, and ocular surface. Pre-procedure cultures will be obtained from the ocular surface, and a second culture will be taken following antisepsis, injection, and irrigation. Standard microbiologic techniques will be used to collect, culture, identify, and quantify ocular surface bacteria counts. Kruskal Wallis test will be used to assess significant difference between median bacterial loads at baseline and post-cleaning, as well as median reduction from baseline. Chi-squared test will be used to assess significant difference between reduction in number of patients with specific bacteria. Following injection, a patient survey will be administered to compare patients' subjective symptoms of ocular surface irritation during the PI preparation phase of the procedure.

Conclusions: The investigators anticipate that no significant difference exists in decrease of median CFUs between the three protocols, and that lower concentration of P-I provides a more comfortable patient experience.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endophthalmitis
  • Eye Infections

Keywords

  • intravitreal injection
  • povidone-iodine
  • ocular surface flora
  • endophthalmitis
  • betadine
03

In context

Endophthalmitis

65 studies on the registry are indexed under Endophthalmitis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 111 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Endophthalmitis.

Browse Endophthalmitis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Matthew Bolton as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • enrollment will be open to men and women of all ethnic backgrounds between the ages of 18-100 who are offered intravitreal injections by Dr. Anthony Mazzulla at his Retina clinic at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation as a treatment for diabetic macular edema, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, age related exudative macular degeneration, or any other cause of choroidal neovascularization or cystoid macular edema.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current eye infection, actively treated blepharitis, current use of topical or systemic antimicrobial agents, current use of topical or systemic , allergy to iodine, pregnancy, children.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    5% Betadine, Ocular Surface only

    Use of 5% P-I from bottle dropper to sterilize the ocular surface only, prior to injection. Intervention: bacterial culture swab.

    Biological: Bacterial Culture Swab

  • Experimental
    10% Betadine, Ocular Surface only

    Use of 10% P-I swabstick to sterilize the ocular surface only, prior to injection. Intervention: bacterial culture swab.

    Biological: Bacterial Culture Swab

  • Experimental
    10% Betadine, Ocular Surface and Adnexa

    Use of 10% P-I swabstick to sterilize the ocular surface and surrounding lids and eyelashes only, prior to injection. Intervention: bacterial culture swab.

    Biological: Bacterial Culture Swab

Interventions

  • BiologicalBacterial Culture Swab

    Culture swabs will be obtained before application of PI and after injection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Colony-Forming Units

    Median CFUs compared pre- and post-injection

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient's ocular surface symptoms during sterilization with povidone-iodine

    Survey-based

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03420820
Lead sponsor
Matthew Bolton
Responsible party
Matthew Bolton (Ophthalmology Resident, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
Start date
Mar 1, 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 5, 2018

Study contacts

Matthew Bolton, MD
Contact
mbolt3@lsuhsc.edu
504-495-5631
Donald Mazzulla, MD
principal investigator · Ochsner Health System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion