ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03419676Updated Feb 11, 2022

Use of Hemopatch as a Sealant at the Pancreaticojejunostomy After Pancreatoduodenectomy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Hemopatch in Pancreatic Fistula, sponsored by Hospital Miguel Servet. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-11.

Sponsored by Hospital Miguel Servet · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to determine the effect of the sealant patch Hemopatch, compared to current practice without any sealant, on the decrease of the postoperative pancreatic fistula on patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for benign or malignant tumors or other benign process.

Read the detailed description

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the most common surgical procedure to treat pancreatic tumors in the head of the pancreas and periampullary region, as well as benign processes such as chronic pancreatitis. Recent advances in surgical techniques and perioperative treatments have reduced perioperative mortality below 10% in high volume centers. However, PD is associated with considerable morbidity (40-58.5%) like postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, biliary fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, and pulmonary complications.

Several surgical techniques and perioperative care have been described to prevent or reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula after PD, including reconstruction of the digestive tract with pancreaticogastrostomy, duc-to-mucosa reconstruction or pancreaticojejunostomy by intussusception, use of somatostatin and prophylactic analogues, the use of stents in the main pancreatic duct, and use of different sealants.

Although perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with PD have improved significantly over the years, even in high-volume centers, the incidence of postoperative fistula remains at 9.9-28.5%. Therefore, the ideal pancreatic reconstruction technique that prevents fistula is not yet available.

The use of sealants has been one of the approaches taken to try to reduce the rate of fistulas. Some uncontrolled or non-randomized studies have shown that the use of fibrin glue-based adhesives in combinations with felting patches can lead to a B / C grade fistula rate of 0-10%. Only 2 randomized clinical trials have been performed with fibrin glue, with opposite results in terms of significant reduction of pancreatic fistula.

Hemopatch is a patch consisting of a soft, thin and flexible pad of collagen derived from the bovine dermis, coated with NHS-PEG (pentaerythritol polyethylene glycol ether tetra-succinimidyl glutarate). It is intended to be a surgical sealant for procedures in which control of leakage by conventional surgical techniques is ineffective or impractical, making it a plausible option to use during PD in order to decrease postoperative pancreatic fistula.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Fistula

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pancreatoduodenectomy
  • Postoperative pancreatic fistula
  • Sealant
  • Hemopatch
03

In context

Pancreatic Fistula

122 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Fistula; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 110 across 77 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Fistula.

Browse Pancreatic Fistula studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Miguel Servet is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for pancreatoduodenectomy by open approach, depending on the diagnosis/nature of the tumor.
  • \< 4.
  • Male and female patients ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years of age.
  • With the consent form signed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for pancreatoduodenectomy by open approach, depending on the diagnosis/nature of the tumor.
  • \< 4.
  • Male and female patients ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years of age.
  • With the consent form signed.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    No reinforcement.

  • Experimental
    Hemopatch

    Reinforcement with Hemopatch.

    Device: Hemopatch

Interventions

  • DeviceHemopatch

    Collagen patch derived from bovine dermis, coated with NHS-PEG, applied covering the pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy once the anastomosis is completed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative type B and C pancreatic fistula

    Postoperative type B and C pancreatic fistula rate defined according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula criteria, measured by amylases and/or lipases levels in the perianastomotic drainage

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital stay

    Days of duration

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  2. Stay in intensive care unit

    Days of duration

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  3. Total postoperative fistula (including type A, B, and C)

    Percentage of patients

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  4. Reoperations including interventional radiology

    Percentage of patients

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  5. Delayed gastric emptying

    Percentage of patients

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  6. Biliary fistula

    Percentage of patients

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  7. Hemorrhage

    Percentage of patients

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  8. Deep organ space complications

    Deep organ space complications

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  9. Death, irrespective of cause

    Death

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  10. Overall complications (according to Clavien-Dindo classification)

    Percentage of patients

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mario Serradilla Martín
    Zaragoza, 50008, Spain
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 25 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 10, 2017
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
StartActual
May 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2020
CompletionActual
Feb 10, 2022
Last update
Feb 11, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03419676
Lead sponsor
Hospital Miguel Servet
Collaborators
Aragon Health Science Institute
Responsible party
Mario Serradilla, MD, FACS (Professor, Attending Surgeon, Hospital Miguel Servet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
Start date
May 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020
Completion
Feb 10, 2022
Last update
Feb 11, 2022

Study contacts

Mario Serradilla
principal investigator · Hospital Miguel Servet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion