CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03416699Updated Jan 31, 2018

Chinese TaTME Registry Collaborative

An observational study in Rectal Cancer, sponsored by Beijing Friendship Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-31.

Sponsored by Beijing Friendship Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard procedure for treating rectal cancer. However, in patients with obesity, prostate hypertrophy, low located tumor or/and pelvic stenosis, the traditional laparoscopic or open surgery is not easy to conduct. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) might serve as a better procedure for these patients, for it might ease the dissection of the low mesorectum. So far, several studies have showed the promising results of TaTME, but the multi-center data in China is still lacking. This nationwide registry study included more than 30 Chinese hospitals, aiming at obtaining data on the safety and efficacy of this procedure in Chinese patients with rectal cancer and encouraging future research in this field.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Transnal Total Mesorectal Excision
  • Rectal Cancer
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients with middle-lower rectal neoplasms who are suitable and willing to accept TaTME procedure and also agree with the registry

Inclusion criteria

  • malignant or benign neoplasms of the rectum
  • the lower edge of the tumor from the anal margin less than 10cm according to MRI or rigid endoscopy
  • tolerable to surgery
  • be able to understand and willing to participate in this registry with signature

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients requiring emergency surgery such as obstruction,perforation and bleeding
  • tumor involving adjacent organs, anal sphincter, or levator ani muscle
  • muti-focal colorectal cancer
  • preoperative poor anal function, anal stenosis, anal injury, or fecal incontinence
  • history of inflammatory bowel disease or familial adenomatous polyposis
  • can not tolerate the surgery
  • history of serious mental illness
  • pregnancy or lactating women
  • preoperative uncontrolled infection
  • the researchers believe the patients should not enrolled in
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Years
Patient registry
Yes
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Positive rate of circumferential resection margin (CRM) of the specimens

    Circumferential resection margin (CRM) is the distance between the deepest point of tumor in the primary cancer and the margin of resection in the retroperitoneum or mesentery by pathological examination. CRM 0-1mm is defined as positive, while \>1mm is negative.

    Time frame: 10 days after surgery

  2. The grade score of the specimens integrity

    shows the quality of the specimens: grade 1 is bad gross specimen which means incomplete mesorectum and pelvic fascia, and muscle layer can be see \>5mm; grade 3 is high quality gross specimen, which means the specimen is cylindrical, mesorectum and pelvic fascia are complete; grade 2 is between 1and 3.

    Time frame: 10 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. local recurrence rate

    show the oncological efficacy by 3-year follow-up according to the NCCN guideline. Participants should report every follow-up examinations which prove tumor recurrence and/or metastasis or not.

    Time frame: 3 years after surgery

  2. disease free survival rate

    show the oncological efficacy by 3-year follow-up according to the NCCN guideline. Participants should report every follow-up examinations which prove tumor recurrence and/or metastasis or not.

    Time frame: 3-year after surgery

  3. overall survival rate

    show the oncological efficacy by 3-year follow-up according to the NCCN guideline. Participants should report every follow-up examinations which prove tumor recurrence and/or metastasis or not.

    Time frame: 3-year after surgery

  4. the incidence of postoperative complications

    the incidence of postoperative complications after transanal total mesorectal excision.

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery

  5. the severity of postoperative complication assessed by Clavien Dindo grade

    the severity of postoperative complication after transanal total mesorectal assessed by Clavien Dindo grade

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery

  6. the grade of anastomotic leakage

    the grade of anastomotic leakage for patients who develop anastomotic leakage after transanal total mesorectal excision assessed by the grading system proposed by International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC).

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital
    Beijing, China
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Li Q, Yang X, Teng Q, Guo Q, Qin L, Lv Z, Zhou D, Ren M. Reasonable Collocation of Two Different Functional 3D Laparoscopes May Improve the Efficiency of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery Using a Synchronous Two-Team Approach? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Feb;33(2):194-199. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0326. Epub 2022 Jul 22. PubMed 35867023 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03416699
Lead sponsor
Beijing Friendship Hospital
Collaborators
Ruijin Hospital, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Shengjing Hospital, Huashan Hospital, Guangdong Dongguan Kanghua Hospital, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Nanchong Central Hospital, Sino-Japanese Friendship Hospital of Jilin University, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Shangdong Linzi District People's Hospital, Peking University People's Hospital, Nantong University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanjing PLA General Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Sichuang Zigong First People's Hospital, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital, Jinhua Central Hospital, Beijing Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, LanZhou University, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Province, First Hospital of China Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Responsible party
Zhongtao Zhang (assistant dean, professor, Beijing Friendship Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 31, 2018
Start date
Nov 15, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 15, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 31, 2018

Study contacts

Hongwei Yao, M.D.
Contact
yaohongwei@ccmu.edu.cn
+8613611015609
Yongbo An, M.D.
Contact
15600682616@163.com
+8615600682616

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion