CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03415152DIAPAsOnUpdated Oct 12, 2020Results posted

A Prospective Observational Program Using Digital Technology Tools to Enhance Patient Adherence to Omacor Therapy

An observational study in History of Myocardial Infarction and Hypertriglyceridemia, sponsored by Abbott. Completed at 93 sites in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-12.

Sponsored by Abbott · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective observational program using digital technology tools to enhance patient adherence to Omacor therapy

Read the detailed description

It is known that only 50% of patients with chronic diseases adhere to medical recommendations; at the same time, high patient adherence significantly improve the survival of patients with chronic diseases. The treatment duration required to achieve a significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular complications is the subject of discussion, but studies demonstrate that long-term therapy for 5 years or more gives the greatest effect. Today, during the era of technological progress, there is a possibility to freely apply information and telecommunication technologies (e.g. cell phones, computer) in different fields, including medicine. Remote monitoring of patients by means of phone calls using structured questionnaires can also significantly improve clinical outcomes (mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations) by 38%. Unfortunately, in the case of a long-term, usually lifetime, treatment, the use of such methods is still very limited on a large scale.

This prospective observational program will help to explore the use of digital technologies and evaluate their effectiveness to increase patient adherence using an example of patients whose treatment scheme includes Omacor. Physicians and patients will be granted a personal access to the electronic data capture system. The physician will enter data about patients who signed the informed consent into the electronic system. At Visit 1 the patient will be given a card providing the personal access to his/her account in the electronic system. In addition to visits to the physician, the program specifies remote completion of the electronic form by the patient. Additional objective of the program includes raising patients' awareness about the disease due to familiarization with educational materials available in patient personal account in the electronic system.

This study is a prospective observational program within the frames of which Omacor (Omega-3 triglycerides [EPA/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) = 1.2/1 - 90%]) is prescribed to patients with a history of myocardial infarction within a routine procedure as a part of the combination therapy (in combination with statins, antiaggregants, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE)) and/or to patients with hypertriglyceridemia. The population of observed patients will be limited to those who were prescribed Omacor for the first time or not earlier than 3 months after the last dose of Omacor and course of administration is at least 6 months. Discontinuation of the drug product administration by the patient is not the reason for exclusion of the patient from the study. For outcome measures which are applicable, further analysis will be performed in subgroups of patients with the different medication adherence rate: \<0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3. Adherence rate will be calculated as the sum of days when patient taken the full prescribed dose of Omacor in period divided by the number of days in period.

02

Conditions studied

  • History of Myocardial Infarction
  • Hypertriglyceridemia

Keywords

  • Omacor
  • Omega-3-acid ethyl esters
  • patient adherence
  • patient reported outcomes
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with myocardial infarction in anamnesis and/or diagnosis of hypertriglyceridemia who are under medical supervision in healthcare institutions of Russia and receive Omacor

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women ≥ 18 years of age
  • Patients with history of myocardial infarction not earlier than 6 months ago. AND/OR Patients with diagnosis of hypertriglyceridemia
  • Patients having been prescribed Omacor (Omega-3 triglycerides [EPA/DHA = 1.2/1 - 90%]) for at least 6 months AND who have been taking Omacor no more than 14 days at the time of enrollment into the program.
  • Patients who can, in the opinion of the Investigator, himself or through immediate relatives's help complete electronic system of data collection through mobile application or web-browser
  • Patients who have signed the consent to participate in this program before entering their data in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) and who understand their right to discontinue the program at any time

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients taken medicines (except for Omacor) or nutrition supplements containing omega-3 in any proportions at the time of enrollment into the program OR it has been less than 3 months since last dose of medicines or nutrition supplements containing omega-3 taken.
  • Female patients during pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Patients with increased sensitivity to the active substance, excipients, and soy
  • Patients with exogenous hypertriglyceridemia (type I hyperchylomicronemia)
  • Participation in any other clinical or non-clinical study/program at present or within the latest 30 days
  • Patients with any other clinical states that make him/her ineligible for the program on the study doctor's opinion based on clinical assessment
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Omacor (Omega-3-acid ethyl esters)

    Adult patients with history of myocardial infarction not earlier than 6 months ago and/or with diagnosis of hypertriglyceridemia who having been prescribed Omacor for at least 6 months.

    Drug: Omacor (Omega-3-acid ethyl esters)

Interventions

  • DrugOmacor (Omega-3-acid ethyl esters)

    Observational study without intervention, Omacor is prescribed in routine manner in accordance with clinical practice and the valid Instruction for Medical Use regarding the dose, duration of therapy, patient population, and therapeutic indication.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)

    Mean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)

    The average score for the National questionnaire on therapy compliance for all study duration Visit 1 - Visit 3. The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy Termination

    The percentage of patients (%) who have chosen each of the suggested reason for therapy termination.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)

    Mean difference of the average score on each of 8 scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 quality of life questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 versus the baseline. 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) taps eight health concepts. Each of 36 items is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively, so that a high score defines a more favorable health state.

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

  4. Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)

    Mean difference of lipid profile parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

  5. Number of Hospitalizations Due to Cardio-vascular Reasons During 6 Months of the Program

    Percentage of patients with hospitalizations due to cardiovascular disease

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Number of New Cases of Stenocardia During 6 Months of the Program

    Percentage of patients with new cases of stenocardia

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Number of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Cases During 6 Months of the Program

    Percentage of patients with non-fatal myocardial infarction cases

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Number of Cases of Cardio-vascular Death During 6 Months of the Program

    Percentage of patients dead due to cardio-vascular death

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Mean Adherence Rate at Visit 2

    Mean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Change of Mean Adherence Rate by End of the Study (Visit 3) Versus Visit 2

    Mean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

  11. The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3

    The percentage of patients with adherence rate \<0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

  12. Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 1, Visit 2

    The average score for the National questionnaire on therapy compliance at Visit 1, Visit 2. The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance

    Time frame: 0 months, 3 months

  13. Change of Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 2 and Visit 3 Versus Baseline (Visit 1)

    The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

06

Results

Posted Oct 12, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Score on the "G. Health" of the SF-36 scale should not be taken into account due to a technical error occurred at the stage of transferring the scale to the electronic case report form and which affected the results, changing the patient's responses

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Started3000
Completed1975
Not completed1025

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)

Mean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · proportion of days
Mean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)
proportion of daysOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Mean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)0.37 ± 0.38
SecondaryMean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)

The average score for the National questionnaire on therapy compliance for all study duration Visit 1 - Visit 3. The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)
score on a scaleOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)12.9 ± 2.99
SecondaryThe Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy Termination

The percentage of patients (%) who have chosen each of the suggested reason for therapy termination.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy Termination
percentage of participantsOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Adverse drug reactions0
Lack of efficacy0.08
Inconvenience of use0.43
Absence at the pharmacy0.23
Other reason1.94
Total2.68
SecondaryThe Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)

Mean difference of the average score on each of 8 scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 quality of life questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 versus the baseline. 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) taps eight health concepts. Each of 36 items is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively, so that a high score defines a more favorable health state.

Time frame:
3 months, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)
score on a scaleOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Physical functioning (V2-V1,3 m)7.63 ± 13.4
Role limitations due to physical health (V2-V1,3m)32.86 ± 48.42
Role limitations due to emotional problems (V2-V1,25.71 ± 32.42
Energy/fatique (V2-V1,3m)20.81 ± 14.12
Emotional wellbeing (V2-V1,3m)22.66 ± 14.69
Social functioning (V2-V1,3m)26.43 ± 25.68
Pain (V2-V1,3m)8.43 ± 14.12
General health (V2-V1,3m)-6.14 ± 10.22
Physical functioning (V3-V1,6m)6.69 ± 10.08
Role limitations due to physical health (V3-V1,6m)29.55 ± 43.39
Role limitations due to emotional problems (V3-V1,18.18 ± 30.39
Energy/fatique (V3-V1,6m)18.18 ± 13.59
Emotional wellbeing (V3-V1,6m)25 ± 14.56
Social functioning (V3-V1,6m)16.48 ± 25.41
Pain (V3-V1,6m)0.11 ± 0.53
General Health (V3-V1,6m)-9.83 ± 12.08
SecondaryChange of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)

Mean difference of lipid profile parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)

Time frame:
3 months, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)
mmol/LOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
total serum cholesterol (TSC) (V2-V1,3m)-1 ± 1.09
triglycerides (TG) (V2-V1,3m)-0.98 ± 1
low-density lipoproteins (LDLP) (V2-V1,3m)-0.77 ± 0.92
high-density lipoproteins (HDLP) (V2-V1,3m)0.15 ± 0.45
total serum cholesterol (TSC) (V3-V1,6m)-1.32 ± 1.28
triglycerides (TG) (V3-V1,6m)-1.32 ± 1.15
low-density lipoproteins (LDLP) (V3-V1,6m)-1.02 ± 1.02
high-density lipoproteins (HDLP) (V3-V1,6m)0.2 ± 0.53
SecondaryNumber of Hospitalizations Due to Cardio-vascular Reasons During 6 Months of the Program

Percentage of patients with hospitalizations due to cardiovascular disease

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Number of Hospitalizations Due to Cardio-vascular Reasons During 6 Months of the Program
percentage of participantsOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
The presence of hospitalizations0.74
The absence of hospitalizations99.26
SecondaryNumber of New Cases of Stenocardia During 6 Months of the Program

Percentage of patients with new cases of stenocardia

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Number of New Cases of Stenocardia During 6 Months of the Program
percentage of participantsOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
The presence of new cases of angina pectoris0.97
The absence of new cases of angina pectoris99.03
SecondaryNumber of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Cases During 6 Months of the Program

Percentage of patients with non-fatal myocardial infarction cases

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Number of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Cases During 6 Months of the Program
percentage of participantsOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Presence of cases of non-fatal myocardial infarcti0.04
Absence of cases of nonfatal myocardial infarctio99.96
SecondaryNumber of Cases of Cardio-vascular Death During 6 Months of the Program

Percentage of patients dead due to cardio-vascular death

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Number of Cases of Cardio-vascular Death During 6 Months of the Program
percentage of participantsOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Number of Cases of Cardio-vascular Death During 6 Months of the Program0.04
SecondaryMean Adherence Rate at Visit 2

Mean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · proportion of days
Mean Adherence Rate at Visit 2
proportion of daysOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Mean Adherence Rate at Visit 20.48 ± 0.4
SecondaryChange of Mean Adherence Rate by End of the Study (Visit 3) Versus Visit 2

Mean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

Time frame:
3 months, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · proportion of days
Change of Mean Adherence Rate by End of the Study (Visit 3) Versus Visit 2
proportion of daysOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Change of Mean Adherence Rate by End of the Study (Visit 3) Versus Visit 20.24 ± 0.4
SecondaryThe Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3

The percentage of patients with adherence rate \<0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3

Time frame:
3 months, 6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3
percentage of participantsOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Low (<0.5) (V2, 3 m)50
Moderate (0.5 - 0.7) (V2, 3 m)15.56
High (≥0.8) (V2, 3 m)34.44
Low (<0.5) (V3, 6 m)75
Moderate (0.5 - 0.7) (V3, 6 m)4.44
High (≥0.8) (V3, 6 m)20.56
SecondaryMean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 1, Visit 2

The average score for the National questionnaire on therapy compliance at Visit 1, Visit 2. The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance

Time frame:
0 months, 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 1, Visit 2
score on a scaleOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Mean score (V 1, 0 m)12.55 ± 3.11
Mean score (V 2, 3 m)12.99 ± 2.88
SecondaryChange of Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 2 and Visit 3 Versus Baseline (Visit 1)

The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change of Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 2 and Visit 3 Versus Baseline (Visit 1)
score on a scaleOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Mean difference (V 2-V 1, 3 m)0.47 ± 2.46
Mean difference (V 3-V 1, 6 m)0.44 ± 2.52

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months Adverse drug reactions, serious adverse drug reactions and other safety-related information are reported to sponsor from the inclusion of the patient in the program during Visit 1 until Visit 3.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)4/3,000 (0.1%)0/3,000 (0%)4/3,000 (0.1%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
EructationGastrointestinal disorders1/3000
Abnormal faecesGastrointestinal disorders1/3000
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/3000
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations1/3000

Baseline characteristics

A total of 3000 patients signed informed consent and were included in the program. Data of Visit 1 were available for 2572 (85.7%) patients, 1975 patients (65.8% of all who signed informed consent) completed the program per protocol.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years1600
>=65 years972
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Female1182
Male1390
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian48
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American3
White2518
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported3
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Russia2572
07

Study locations

93 sites
  • Gbuz Amokb Jsc
    Astrakhan, 414056, Russian Federation
  • polyclinic GKB №21
    Bashkortostan, 450071, Russian Federation
  • GAUZ "BKDTs"
    Bryansk, 241050, Russian Federation
  • GP # 1
    Chelyabinsk, 454000, Russian Federation
  • GKB №3
    Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russian Federation
  • Federal State Budgetary Institution "Research Institute of Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases"
    Kemerovo, 650002, Russian Federation
  • GBUZ Polyclinic of City Clinical Hospital № 10
    Khabarovsk, 680000, Russian Federation
  • GP #2
    Krasnodar, 350000, Russian Federation
  • MBUZ GP number 11
    Krasnodar, 350000, Russian Federation
  • Gbuz Kkb #2
    Krasnodar, 350012, Russian Federation
  • GBUZ Regional clinical hospital № 2
    Krasnodar, 350012, Russian Federation
  • Yablonovskaya polyclinic
    Krasnodar, 350049, Russian Federation
  • KKB #1
    Krasnodar, 350059, Russian Federation
  • City Polyclinic №27
    Krasnodar, 350061, Russian Federation
  • GP №27
    Krasnodar, 350061, Russian Federation
  • Llc "Auris"
    Krasnodar, 350061, Russian Federation
  • City Polyclinic №7
    Krasnodar, 350063, Russian Federation
  • Clinic Mamme
    Krasnodar, 350075, Russian Federation
  • GP №15
    Krasnodar, 350075, Russian Federation
  • GP №17
    Krasnodar, 350080, Russian Federation
  • Mbuz Gp #17
    Krasnodar, 350080, Russian Federation
  • Gbuz Nii Kkb №1
    Krasnodar, 350086, Russian Federation
  • Gbuz "Nii-Kkb №1"
    Krasnodar, 350087, Russian Federation
  • GP №25
    Krasnodar, 350089, Russian Federation
  • MBUZ City Polyclinic #11
    Krasnodar, 350910, Russian Federation
  • Municipal budgetary health institution "City Polyclinic # 11"
    Krasnodar, 350911, Russian Federation
  • Mbuz Gkb №1
    Krasnodar, 350915, Russian Federation
  • MC Ultramed
    Krasnodar, 350915, Russian Federation
  • MUZ Polyclinic TsRB Poltava
    Krasnodar, 353800, Russian Federation
  • Medical Center "Modern Cardiology"
    Krasnodar, 353925, Russian Federation
  • Clinic "Medicine for All"
    Krasnodar, 385141, Russian Federation
  • Policlinic № 1
    Krasnoyarsk, 660021, Russian Federation
  • Maikop City Polyclinic №1
    Maykop, 385018, Russian Federation
  • Polyclinic №52 branch №1
    Moscow, 115404, Russian Federation
  • ГП № 210 branch 2
    Moscow, 115408, Russian Federation
  • FGBU Federal Clinical Research Centre of Russia's Federal Medical-Biological Agency
    Moscow, 115682, Russian Federation
  • Gbuz "Gp #22 Dzm"
    Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation
  • Fsbi Enc Mz Rf
    Moscow, 117292, Russian Federation
  • City polyclinic № 22
    Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation
  • GP number 176
    Moscow, 117463, Russian Federation
  • Diagnostic Clinical Center №1
    Moscow, 117647, Russian Federation
  • OOO "Lechebnii center"
    Moscow, 119034, Russian Federation
  • City polyclinic № 195
    Moscow, 121609, Russian Federation
  • Outpatient center of CDC #4
    Moscow, 121609, Russian Federation
  • GP №45
    Moscow, 12517, Russian Federation
  • GBUZ City polyclinic # 43 DZM filial #3
    Moscow, 125446, Russian Federation
  • GP №219 branch №4
    Moscow, 125466, Russian Federation
  • Branch №1 DGP #94
    Moscow, 125480, Russian Federation
  • MSU #169
    Moscow, 127410, Russian Federation
  • Medical Center "Health"
    Moscow, 141021, Russian Federation
  • Noginsk Central District Hospital
    Moscow, 142400, Russian Federation
  • Hospital SCC RAS in Chernogolovka
    Moscow, 142432, Russian Federation
  • Polyclinic of the National Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Chernogolovka
    Moscow, 142432, Russian Federation
  • GBUZ NO Pavlovsk CRH
    Nizhny Novgorod, 600100, Russian Federation
  • Llc "Healthy Little Healer"
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603024, Russian Federation
  • MC "Sadko"
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603074, Russian Federation
  • MC Sadko
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603074, Russian Federation
  • MC Dobrii doctor
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603076, Russian Federation
  • Cst on St.Nizhny Novgorod Oao Rzd
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603140, Russian Federation
  • Polyclinic №7 branch 2
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603163, Russian Federation
  • GP #2
    Nizhny Novgorod, 606039, Russian Federation
  • Gauz Nso Gkp #1
    Novosibirsk, 630099, Russian Federation
  • City Polyclinic № 2
    Omsk, 644009, Russian Federation
  • BUZOO "GP number 12"
    Omsk, 644070, Russian Federation
  • MBUZ CRB Myasnitskogo region
    Rostov-on-Don, 346803, Russian Federation
  • Consultative clinic, Regional clinical hospital #2 Rostov region
    Rostov, 344000, Russian Federation
  • GP №16
    Rostov, 344000, Russian Federation
  • Polyclinic GB №7
    Rostov, 34410, Russian Federation
  • NUZ Road Clinical Hospital at the station Rostov-Glavnii JSC "Russian Railways"
    Rostov, 346880, Russian Federation
  • Gbou Vpo Pspbgmu Im. I.P. Pavlova Ministry of Health of Russia
    Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation
  • Fsbi "Szfmits Im. Va Almazova" Ministry of Health of Russia
    Saint Petersburg, 197341, Russian Federation
  • GP №121
    Saint Petersburg, 197372, Russian Federation
  • Non-State Healthcare Institution "Road Clinical Hospital at Samara Station JSC "Russian Railways"
    Samara, 443041, Russian Federation
  • Gbuz Sb Sgb #10
    Samara, 443065, Russian Federation
  • GBUZ SO "Samara City Hospital 6"
    Samara, 443074, Russian Federation
  • Gbuz Co "Volga Crh"
    Samara, 443528, Russian Federation
  • Medical Center on Tupolev
    Samara, 445040, Russian Federation
  • Zhigulevskaya polyclinic
    Samara, 445350, Russian Federation
  • City polyclinic № 2
    Saratov, 410005, Russian Federation
  • OGBUZ Polyclinic №3
    Smolensk, 214019, Russian Federation
  • Gbuz Sk Skkkd
    Stavropol', 355017, Russian Federation
  • Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary
    Stavropol', 355026, Russian Federation
  • GBUZ SK "Pyatigorsk GKB № 2"
    Stavropol', 357538, Russian Federation
  • Gaus Mkdts
    Tatarstan, 420101, Russian Federation
  • GUZ Citi hospital №13
    Tula, 300004, Russian Federation
  • Guz Gb №13
    Tula, 300004, Russian Federation
  • TOKB KDC
    Tula, 300035, Russian Federation
  • First Cardiac Clinic
    Tyumen, 625048, Russian Federation
  • GBUZ RB Polyclinic № 46
    Ufa, 450074, Russian Federation
  • GBUZ IN city Polyclinic №1
    Vladimir, 600005, Russian Federation
  • Guz "Polyclinic № 5"
    Volgograd, 400067, Russian Federation
  • Volgograd Regional Clinical Cardiology Center
    Volgograd, 400069, Russian Federation
  • BUZ IN "Voronezh city clinical polyclinic #7"
    Voronezh, 394051, Russian Federation
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arutyunov GP, Arutyunov AG, Ageev FT, Fofanova TV. Use of Digital Technology Tools to Characterize Adherence to Prescription-Grade Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Therapy in Postmyocardial or Hypertriglyceridemic Patients in the DIAPAsOn Study: Prospective Observational Study. JMIR Cardio. 2022 Jul 25;6(2):e37490. doi: 10.2196/37490. PubMed 35877173 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 21, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03415152
Lead sponsor
Abbott
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 30, 2018
Start date
Jan 24, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2019
Completion
Jul 1, 2019
Results posted
Oct 12, 2020
Last update
Oct 12, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion