ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03412747BE SUREUpdated Apr 15, 2026Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Bimekizumab and Adalimumab in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis and Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis, sponsored by UCB Biopharma SRL. Completed at 77 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-15.

Sponsored by UCB Biopharma SRL (part of UCB S.A.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
478
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 20 studies testing bimekizumab in Psoriasis — 4 open to participants now, 5 under way, 3 of them phase 3. bimekizumab · Psoriasis.

Enrollment
3rd of 20
478 · median 161
Started
2018
with 3 others
Phase 3
10 of 20
2 open now
Registered
8th of 20
by date
Lead sponsor
13 of 20
UCB Biopharma SRL

Among the 20 studies testing bimekizumab in Psoriasis, this one is the 3rd largest by enrollment, is one of 4 that started in 2018, is one of 10 in phase 3, and was the 8th registered.

Psoriasis

2,030 studies on the registry are indexed under Psoriasis; 276 are open to participants now.

Browse Psoriasis studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 20 studies testing bimekizumab in Psoriasis are open now, in 12 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 4 open studies →

About bimekizumab

bimekizumab: first FDA approval 2023 (BIMZELX), first EMA approval 2021. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 173 Psoriasis studies recruiting now, 91 (53%) set no upper age limit and 66 (38%) stop at 75 or younger; 25 take children under 18; 40 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 20 studies testing bimekizumab in Psoriasis, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus adalimumab in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO).

03

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
  • Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bimekizumab
  • PSO
  • Psoriasis
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be at least 18 years of age
  • Chronic plaque PSO for at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit
  • Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) >=12 and body surface area (BSA) affected by PSO >=10% and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 on a 5-point scale
  • Subject is a candidate for systemic PSO therapy and/or phototherapy
  • Female subject of child bearing potential must be willing to use highly effective method of

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a known to any of bimekizumab or adalimumab
  • Subject has an active infection (except common cold), a serious infection, or a history of opportunistic or recurrent chronic infections
  • Subject has concurrent acute or chronic viral or C or (HIV) infection
  • Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
  • Subject has any other condition, including medical or psychiatric, which, in the Investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
  • Subject has had previous exposure to adalimumab
  • Presence of active suicidal ideation or positive suicide behavior
  • Presence of moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
  • Subject has any active or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
478 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bimekizumab Arm 1

    Subjects will receive bimekizumab dose regimen 1 for 56 weeks. Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points to maintain the blinding.

    Drug: Bimekizumab · Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Bimekizumab Arm 2

    Subjects will receive bimekizumab dose regimen 1 for 16 weeks and will proceed with bimekizumab dose regimen 2 until week 56. Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points to maintain the blinding.

    Drug: Bimekizumab · Other: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Adalimumab Arm

    Subjects will receive adalimumab for 24 weeks and will then receive bimekizumab dose regimen 1 until week 56. Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points to maintain the blinding.

    Drug: Bimekizumab · Drug: Adalimumab · Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-defined timepoints in dose regimen 1 and/or dose regimen 2.

    Also known as: UCB4940

  • Adalimumab will be administered according to the labeling recommendations.

    Also known as: Humira®

  • OtherPlacebo

    Subjects will receive Placebo at pre-specified time points to maintain the blinding of the Investigational Medicinal Products (IMP).

    Also known as: PBO

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Time frame: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-Category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 16

    The IGA measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] or almost clear \[1\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.

    Time frame: Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 24

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants With an IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 24

    The IGA measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 24.

    Time frame: Week 24

  3. Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4

    The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Time frame: Week 4

  4. Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16

    The PASI100 response assessments are based on a 100% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Time frame: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 24

    The PASI100 response assessments are based on a 100% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Time frame: Week 24

  6. Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 56

    PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head/arms/trunk to groin/and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness/thickness/scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear)-4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0-6 scale. Final PASI=average redness/thickness/scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The min possible PASI score is 0=no disease, max score is 72=maximal disease.

    Time frame: Week 56

  7. Percentage of Participants With an IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 56

    IGA measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0=clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1=almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2=mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3=moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4=severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\]/almost clear \[1\] with at least a 2-category improvement from Baseline at Wk56.

    Time frame: Week 56

  8. Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24

    The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

  9. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24

    The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

  10. Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24

    The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

  11. Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)

    The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)

  12. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)

    The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)

  13. Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)

    The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)

07

Results

Posted Mar 2, 2022

Participant flow

The study started to enroll patients in January 2018 and concluded in February 2020.

Initial Treatment Period: Wk0-Wk16
Participant flow — Initial Treatment Period: Wk0-Wk16
MilestoneBimekizumab 320 Milligrams (mg) Q4W/Q8WBimekizumab 320 mg Q4WAdalimumab
Started161158159
Completed154153150
Not completed759
Withdrew: Adverse event223
Withdrew: Death001
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy001
Withdrew: Protocol violation002
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up021
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject411
Withdrew: Participant moved out of state100
Maintenance Treatment Period: Wk16-Wk24
Participant flow — Maintenance Treatment Period: Wk16-Wk24
MilestoneBimekizumab 320 Milligrams (mg) Q4W/Q8WBimekizumab 320 mg Q4WAdalimumab
Started154153150
Completed149152149
Not completed511
Withdrew: Adverse event310
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100
Maintenance Treatment Period: Wk24-Wk56
Participant flow — Maintenance Treatment Period: Wk24-Wk56
MilestoneBimekizumab 320 Milligrams (mg) Q4W/Q8WBimekizumab 320 mg Q4WAdalimumab
Started149152149
Completed143143133
Not completed6916
Withdrew: Adverse event346
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy011
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up025
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject314
Withdrew: Moving out of town010

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16

The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16
percentage of participantsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Adalimumab (RS)
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 1686.247.2
Statistical analysis
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Risk difference (rd): 39.3 · 95% CI 30.9 to 47.7
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 7.459 · 95% CI 4.709 to 11.816
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-Category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 16

The IGA measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] or almost clear \[1\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-Category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 16
percentage of participantsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Adalimumab (RS)
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-Category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 1685.357.2
Statistical analysis
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Risk difference (rd): 28.2 · 95% CI 19.7 to 36.7
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 4.341 · 95% CI 2.785 to 6.765
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 24

The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 24
percentage of participantsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Adalimumab (RS)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 2485.186.185.651.6
Statistical analysis
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 6.231 · 95% CI 3.515 to 11.046
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 5.750 · 95% CI 3.657 to 9.041
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 24

The IGA measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 24.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 24
percentage of participantsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Adalimumab (RS)
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 2487.086.186.557.9
Statistical analysis
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 4.724 · 95% CI 2.683 to 8.318
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 4.762 · 95% CI 3.014 to 7.523
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4

The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4
percentage of participantsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Adalimumab (RS)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 476.531.4
Statistical analysis
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 7.103 · 95% CI 4.637 to 10.880
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16

The PASI100 response assessments are based on a 100% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16
percentage of participantsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Adalimumab (RS)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 1660.823.9
Statistical analysis
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 4.974 · 95% CI 3.230 to 7.661
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 24

The PASI100 response assessments are based on a 100% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 24
percentage of participantsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Adalimumab (RS)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 2465.867.766.829.6
Statistical analysis
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 5.249 · 95% CI 3.207 to 8.593
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W + Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS) vs Adalimumab (RS) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-values for the comparison of treatment groups were based on the CMH test from the general association.) · Odds ratio (or): 4.974 · 95% CI 3.257 to 7.594
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 56

PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head/arms/trunk to groin/and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness/thickness/scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear)-4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0-6 scale. Final PASI=average redness/thickness/scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The min possible PASI score is 0=no disease, max score is 72=maximal disease.

Time frame:
Week 56
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 56
percentage of participantsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 5682.684.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 56

IGA measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0=clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1=almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2=mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3=moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4=severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\]/almost clear \[1\] with at least a 2-category improvement from Baseline at Wk56.

Time frame:
Week 56
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 56
percentage of participantsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W (RS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least 2-category Improvement Relative to Baseline) at Week 5683.282.3
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24

The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame:
From Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24
no. of new events per 100 subject-yearsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W Through Week 24 (SS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W Through Week 24 (SS)Adalimumab Through Week 24 (SS)
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24310.44 (256.52 to 372.34)300.71 (247.60 to 361.83)297.54 (244.77 to 358.31)
SecondaryNumber of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24

The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame:
From Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24
no. of new events per 100 subject-yearsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W Through Week 24 (SS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W Through Week 24 (SS)Adalimumab Through Week 24 (SS)
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 241.37 (0.03 to 7.66)5.61 (1.53 to 14.38)6.98 (2.27 to 16.30)
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24

The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame:
From Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 24
no. of new events per 100 subject-yearsBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W Through Week 24 (SS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W Through Week 24 (SS)Adalimumab Through Week 24 (SS)
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Week 248.30 (3.05 to 18.07)4.16 (0.86 to 12.17)6.98 (2.27 to 16.29)
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)

The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame:
From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)
Reported as:
Number · no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)
no. of new events per 100 subject-yearsAny Bimekizumab 320 mg Q8W (BKZ Set)Any Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (BKZ Set)
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)231.38 (191.68 to 276.88)262.41 (235.37 to 291.71)
SecondaryNumber of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)

The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame:
From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)
Reported as:
Number · no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)
no. of new events per 100 subject-yearsAny Bimekizumab 320 mg Q8W (BKZ Set)Any Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (BKZ Set)
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)7.03 (3.04 to 13.86)5.34 (3.05 to 8.67)
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)

The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame:
From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)
Reported as:
Number · no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)
no. of new events per 100 subject-yearsAny Bimekizumab 320 mg Q8W (BKZ Set)Any Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (BKZ Set)
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72)4.37 (1.42 to 10.19)4.62 (2.53 to 7.75)

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment-emergent AEs were collected from Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 72). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W Through Week 24 (SS)0/161 (0%)1/161 (0.6%)65/161 (40.4%)
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W Through Week 24 (SS)0/158 (0%)4/158 (2.5%)61/158 (38.6%)
Adalimumab Through Week 24 (SS)1/159 (0.6%)5/159 (3.1%)62/159 (39%)
Any Bimekizumab 320 mg Q8W (BKZ Set)0/154 (0%)8/154 (5.2%)60/154 (39%)
Any Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (BKZ Set)0/468 (0%)16/468 (3.4%)182/468 (38.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 31
Most frequent serious events
EventBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W Through Week 24 (SS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W Through Week 24 (SS)Adalimumab Through Week 24 (SS)Any Bimekizumab 320 mg Q8W (BKZ Set)Any Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (BKZ Set)
Haemorrhagic anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1610/1580/1591/1540/468
Duodenal ulcer haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/1610/1580/1591/1540/468
Umbilical herniaGastrointestinal disorders0/1610/1580/1591/1540/468
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders0/1610/1580/1591/1540/468
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/1610/1580/1591/1540/468
ErysipelasSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1610/1580/1591/1540/468
Hepatic enzyme increasedInvestigations0/1610/1580/1591/1540/468
Colon cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1610/1580/1591/1540/468
HypertensionVascular disorders0/1610/1580/1591/1540/468
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/1610/1580/1590/1543/468
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W Through Week 24 (SS)Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W Through Week 24 (SS)Adalimumab Through Week 24 (SS)Any Bimekizumab 320 mg Q8W (BKZ Set)Any Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (BKZ Set)
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations27/16132/15838/15928/15479/468
Oral candidiasisInfections and infestations19/16115/1580/15917/15466/468
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations12/1617/15815/15913/15430/468
HypertensionVascular disorders9/1616/15813/1594/15419/468
PharyngitisInfections and infestations5/1614/1581/15911/15413/468
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/1618/1584/1595/15414/468

Baseline characteristics

Baseline Characteristics refer to the Randomized Set (RS) which consisted of all randomized study participants.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Bimekizumab 320 Milligrams (mg) Q4W/Q8WBimekizumab 320 mg Q4WAdalimumabTotal Title
<=18 years3025
Between 18 and 65 years145147137429
>=65 years13112044
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Bimekizumab 320 Milligrams (mg) Q4W/Q8WBimekizumab 320 mg Q4WAdalimumabTotal Title
Mean44.0 ± 13.545.3 ± 13.245.5 ± 14.344.9 ± 13.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Bimekizumab 320 Milligrams (mg) Q4W/Q8WBimekizumab 320 mg Q4WAdalimumabTotal Title
Female495645150
Male112102114328
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Bimekizumab 320 Milligrams (mg) Q4W/Q8WBimekizumab 320 mg Q4WAdalimumabTotal Title
Asian13101134
Black or African American2226
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander2103
White140140141421
Other/Mixed45514
08

Study locations

77 sites
  • Ps0008 957
    Glendale, Arizona 85308, United States
  • Ps0008 927
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Ps0008 955
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Ps0008 943
    San Luis Obispo, California 93405, United States
  • Ps0008 967
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Ps0008 939
    Danbury, Connecticut 06810, United States
  • Ps0008 934
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • Ps0008 906
    Boca Raton, Florida 33486, United States
  • Ps0008 936
    Tampa, Florida 33624, United States
  • Ps0008 900
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50265, United States
  • Ps0008 905
    Overland Park, Kansas 66215, United States
  • Ps0008 940
    Beverly, Massachusetts 01844, United States
  • Ps0008 925
    Brighton, Massachusetts 02135, United States
  • Ps0008 917
    Troy, Michigan 48084, United States
  • Ps0008 908
    East Windsor, New Jersey 08520, United States
  • Ps0008 961
    Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804, United States
  • Ps0008 935
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104-35 20, United States
  • Ps0008 932
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • Ps0008 929
    Portland, Oregon 97223, United States
  • Ps0008 945
    Greer, South Carolina 29650, United States
  • Ps0008 931
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Ps0008 924
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • Ps0008 951
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • Ps0008 008
    East Melbourne, Australia
  • Ps0008 004
    Fremantle, Australia
  • Ps0008 007
    Hectorville, Australia
  • Ps0008 010
    Kogarah, Australia
  • Ps0008 005
    Phillip, Australia
  • Ps0008 009
    Woolloongabba, Australia
  • Ps0008 659
    Calgary, Canada
  • Ps0008 663
    Mississauga, Canada
  • Ps0008 660
    Montreal, Canada
  • Ps0008 661
    Peterborough, Canada
  • Ps0008 662
    Toronto, Canada
  • Ps0008 664
    Toronto, Canada
  • Ps0008 657
    Waterloo, Canada
  • Ps0008 669
    Windsor, Canada
  • Ps0008 670
    Windsor, Canada
  • Ps0008 674
    Winnipeg, Canada
  • Ps0008 207
    Berlin, Germany
  • Ps0008 218
    Bonn, Germany
  • Ps0008 203
    Dresden, Germany
  • Ps0008 211
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Ps0008 220
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Ps0008 215
    Lübeck, Germany
  • Ps0008 213
    Mahlow, Germany
  • Ps0008 205
    Osnabrück, Germany
  • Ps0008 217
    Schweinfurt, Germany
  • Ps0008 252
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Ps0008 254
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Ps0008 255
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Ps0008 256
    Debrecen, Hungary
  • Ps0008 251
    Gyula, Hungary
  • Ps0008 260
    Szeged, Hungary
  • Ps0008 355
    Bialystok, Poland
  • Ps0008 362
    Bialystok, Poland
  • Ps0008 371
    Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • Ps0008 352
    Gdansk, Poland
  • Ps0008 359
    Katowice, Poland
  • Ps0008 366
    Katowice, Poland
  • Ps0008 363
    Krakow, Poland
  • Ps0008 360
    Lodz, Poland
  • Ps0008 372
    Lodz, Poland
  • Ps0008 356
    Lublin, Poland
  • Ps0008 364
    Nowa Sól, Poland
  • Ps0008 353
    Szczecin, Poland
  • Ps0008 354
    Warsaw, Poland
  • Ps0008 365
    Wroclaw, Poland
  • Ps0008 367
    Wroclaw, Poland
  • Ps0008 373
    Wroclaw, Poland
  • Ps0008 405
    Saint Petersburg, Russia
  • Ps0008 401
    Saratov, Russia
  • Ps0008 406
    Yaroslavl, Russia
  • Ps0008 702
    Gwangju, South Korea
  • Ps0008 700
    Seoul, South Korea
  • Ps0008 754
    Taipei, Taiwan
  • Ps0008 755
    Taipei, Taiwan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Thaci D, Vender R, de Rie MA, Conrad C, Pariser DM, Strober B, Vanvoorden V, Wang M, Madden C, de Cuyper D, Kimball AB. Safety and efficacy of bimekizumab through 2 years in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: longer-term results from the BE SURE randomized controlled trial and the open-label extension from the BE BRIGHT trial. Br J Dermatol. 2023 Jan 23;188(1):22-31. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac021. PubMed 36689515 ↗
  • Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Stein Gold L, Merola JF, Peterson L, Wixted K, Cross N, Deherder D, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Safety in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Results From Phase 2 and Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jul 1;158(7):735-744. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.1185. PubMed 35544084 ↗
  • Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Rosmarin D, Lebwohl M, Peterson L, Madden C, de Cuyper D, Davies O, Thaci D. Bimekizumab safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled data from up to 3 years of treatment in randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2024 Mar 15;190(4):477-485. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad429. PubMed 37950894 ↗
  • Strober B, Boehncke WH, Krueger JG, Magnolo N, Vender R, Warren RB, Lopez Pinto JM, Kavanagh S, Hoepken B, Gisondi P. Bimekizumab Efficacy in Psoriasis by Subgroups: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3/3b Clinical Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Dec;15(12):3633-3650. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01557-1. Epub 2025 Oct 8. PubMed 41060492 ↗
  • Armstrong A, Papp KA, Lebwohl M, Savage LJ, Yamanaka K, Vlase DE, Warham R, Lambert J, Lopez Pinto JM, Wixted K, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Results from BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, and BE BRIGHT. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jan;16(1):585-603. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01595-9. Epub 2025 Dec 8. PubMed 41359217 ↗
  • Krueger JG, Cutcutache I, Lebwohl M, Gudjonsson JE, Pinter A, Langley RG, Merola J, Tada Y, Skelton A, Rastrick J, Ferecsko AS, Page M, Davies O, Lopez Pinto JM, Warham R, Shaw S, Warren RB. Bimekizumab long-term response in psoriasis: Mechanistic insights into efficacy level and durability. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Apr;157(4):905-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.12.1013. Epub 2026 Jan 22. PubMed 41580158 ↗
  • Gisondi P, Elewski B, Pinter A, Yamaguchi Y, Gooderham M, Kavanagh S, Wixted K, Cross N, Szilagyi B, Merola JF. Bimekizumab efficacy in scalp, nail and palmoplantar psoriasis versus comparators and over 4 years. J Dermatolog Treat. 2026 Dec;37(1):2637344. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2026.2637344. Epub 2026 Mar 9. PubMed 41800601 ↗
  • Merola JF, Warren RB, Thaci D, Gordon KB, Nishida E, Strober B, Conrad C, Kavanagh S, Lopez Pinto JM, Hoepken B, Gisondi P. Bimekizumab Complete Clearance of Both Skin and Nail Psoriasis: Comparative Efficacy in Phase III/IIIb Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Nov;26(6):967-979. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00968-2. Epub 2025 Aug 31. PubMed 40886218 ↗
  • Blauvelt A, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Strober B, Warren RB, Puig L, Morita A, Gordon KB, Fernandez-Penas P, Kavanagh S, Lopez Pinto JM, Lambert J, Hoepken B, Deherder D, Cross N, Thaci D. Bimekizumab durability of efficacy through 196 weeks and safety through 4 years in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the BE BRIGHT open-label extension trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Sep;93(3):644-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.04.038. Epub 2025 Apr 24. PubMed 40286813 ↗
  • Merola JF, Gottlieb AB, Pinter A, Elewski B, Gooderham M, Warren RB, Piaserico S, Wixted K, Cross N, Tilt N, Wiegratz S, Mrowietz U. Bimekizumab Efficacy in High-Impact Areas: Pooled 2-Year Analysis in Scalp, Nail, and Palmoplantar Psoriasis from Phase 3/3b Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;14(12):3291-3306. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01295-w. Epub 2024 Nov 22. PubMed 39578348 ↗
  • Kokolakis G, Warren RB, Strober B, Blauvelt A, Puig L, Morita A, Gooderham M, Korber A, Vanvoorden V, Wang M, de Cuyper D, Madden C, Nunez Gomez N, Lebwohl M. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who switched from adalimumab, ustekinumab or secukinumab: results from phase III/IIIb trials. Br J Dermatol. 2023 Feb 22;188(3):330-340. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac089. PubMed 36751950 ↗
  • Warren RB, Blauvelt A, Bagel J, Papp KA, Yamauchi P, Armstrong A, Langley RG, Vanvoorden V, De Cuyper D, Cioffi C, Peterson L, Cross N, Reich K. Bimekizumab versus Adalimumab in Plaque Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 8;385(2):130-141. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102388. Epub 2021 Apr 23. PubMed 33891379 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.vivli.org

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Feb 2019, 12 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2022, 3 years after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Feb 2020.

Of 217 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Psoriasis, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 26. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 227 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 22, 2018
First posted
Jan 26, 2018
StartActual
Jan 26, 2018
Primary completionActual
Feb 7, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 26, 2020
Results delay requested
Feb 6, 2020
Results first posted
Mar 2, 2022
Last update
Apr 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03412747
Lead sponsor
UCB Biopharma SRL
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2018
Start date
Jan 26, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 7, 2019
Completion
Feb 26, 2020
Results posted
Mar 2, 2022
Last update
Apr 15, 2026

Study contacts

UCB Cares
study director · +1 844 599 2273 (UCB)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bimekizumab

Start the discussion