ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03410810Updated Apr 10, 2024

Childhood Outcomes of Preterm Brain Abnormalities

An observational study in Premature Birth, Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Brain Development Abnormality, sponsored by Children's Hospital Los Angeles. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 8 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-10.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Los Angeles · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2018; still recruiting 8 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
80
Ages
Up to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 741 studies in Premature Birth with a site in United States — 103 open to participants now, 135 under way, 9 of them phase 3. Premature Birth · United States.

Planned enrollment
120th of 209
80 · median 104
Started
2018
with 39 others
Observational
209 of 741
25 open now
Primary completion
2025-08
later than 27 of 134 live
Registered
475th of 741
by date

Among the 741 studies in Premature Birth with a site in United States, this one is the 120th largest by planned enrollment of the 209 observational ones, is one of 40 that started in 2018, is one of 209 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 27 of the 134 other live ones, and was the 475th registered.

By phase

741 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phase356 · 52 open
Observationalthis study209 · 25 open
Phase 349 · 5 open
Phase 236 · 5 open
Phase 134 · 5 open
Phase 423 · 5 open
Phase 2/317 · 2 open
Phase 1/215 · 4 open
Other kind2 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1987; this study’s year is marked. 40 started in 2018.

Size and results

Median enrollment 86 across the 528 interventional studies, 104 across the 209 observational. Of the 542 that completed or were terminated, 145 (27%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 741 studies in Premature Birth with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Prematurely born children are at higher risk of cognitive impairments and behavioral disorders than full-term children. There is growing evidence of significant volumetric and shape abnormalities in subcortical structures of premature neonates, which may be associated to negative long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. The general objective is to look directly at the long-term neurodevelopmental implications of these neonatal subcortical structures abnormalities. Investigators propose to develop biomarkers of prematurity by comparing the morphological and diffusion properties of subcortical structures between preterm, with and without associated brain injuries, and full-term neonates using brain MRI. By combining subcortical morphological and diffusion properties, investigators hypothesize to be able to: (1) delineate specific correlative relationships between structures regionally and differentially affected by normal maturation and different patterns of white matter injury, and (2) improve the specificity of neuroimaging to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes earlier. The specific aims and general methodology are: 1) Build a new toolbox for neonatal subcortical structures analyses that combine a group lasso-based analysis of significant regions of shape changes, a structural correlation network analysis, a neonatal tractography, and tensor-based analysis on tracts; 2) Ascertain biomarkers of prematurity in neonates with different patterns of abnormalities using correlational and connectivity analysis within and between structures features; 3) Assess the predictive potential of subcortical imaging on neurodevelopmental outcomes by correlating neonatal imaging results with long-term neurodevelopmental scores at 9 and 18 months, and 6-8 years, follow-up. In each of these aims, investigators will use advanced neuroimaging analysis developed by their group and collaborator, including multivariate tensor-based morphometry and multivariate tract-based analysis. This application will provide the first complete subcortical network analysis in both term and preterm neonates. In the first study of its kind for prematurity, investigators will use sparse and multi-task learning to determine which of the biomarkers of prematurity at birth are the best predictors of long-term outcome. Once implemented, these methods will be available to compare subcortical structures for other pathologies in newborns and children.

Read the detailed description

The last months of pregnancy are particularly important for the development of the child's brain, and the consequences of premature birth on its development can be substantial. Prematurely born children are at higher risk of various cognitive impairments and exhibits more behavioral disorders than full-term born children. Thus early detection and management of at risk children are essential. There is growing evidence of significant volumetric abnormalities in subcortical structures of premature neonates, which may be associated to negative long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Understanding these abnormalities could help elucidate the underlying pathophysiology and enable early determination of at-risk patients, both of which would inform the design of novel treatment strategies. However, to date there is still a lack of sensitive, reliable, and accessible algorithms capable of characterizing the influence of prematurity on the anatomy of neonatal brain subcortical structures. In addition, few studies have looked directly at the long-term neurodevelopmental implications of these neonatal subcortical structures abnormalities. Predicting long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes early on - and preferably at neonatal ages - is likely to have a transformative effect on their outcome. Our preliminary data indicate significant morphological differences in the putamen, ventricles, corpus callosum, and thalamus between preterm and term neonates. Investigators propose to develop biomarkers of prematurity by statistically comparing the morphological and diffusion properties of subcortical structures between preterm and term neonates using brain MRI. These results will further be used in a sparse learning framework to predict long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of prematurity. Hypotheses: By combining subcortical morphological and diffusion properties, we will be able to: (1) delineate specific correlative relationships between structures regionally and differentially affected by normal maturation and different patterns of white matter injury, and (2) improve the specificity of neuroimaging to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes earlier. Aim 1: Build a new toolbox for neonatal subcortical structures analyses that combine 1) a group lasso-based analysis of significant regions of shape changes, 2) a structural correlation network analysis, 3) a neonatal tractography, and 4) tensor-based analysis on tracts. Aim 2: Ascertain biomarkers of prematurity in neonates with different patterns of abnormalities. Aim 3: Assess the predictive potential of imaging and clinical features on neurodevelopmental outcomes among premature children at 9 and 18 months and 6-8 years of age. Impact: This application will provide the first complete subcortical network analysis in both term and preterm neonates. In the first study of its kind for prematurity, investigators will use sparse and multi-task learning to determine which of the biomarkers of prematurity at birth are the best predictors of long-term outcome. The expected findings could improve the ability to predict these outcomes and enable the design of early treatments - before years of pathological brain development and symptoms occur.

03

Conditions studied

  • Premature Birth
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Brain Development Abnormality
  • Brain Lesion

Keywords

  • Prematurity
  • Neuroimaging
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Our MRI data will consist of two separate neonatal cohorts. Cohort 1 is an existing dataset of neonates scanned in Pittsburgh as part of a separate completed grant. This cohort was scanned at neonatal equivalent age and will be brought back for childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes at 6-8 years of age. Cohort 2 will be a new prospectively recruited cohort that will be scanned in Los Angeles as part of this proposal and will be brought back for infant neurodevelopmental outcome at 9 and 18 months.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Preterm birth (Gestational Age 21-36 weeks)
  • English or Spanish speaking families
  • PVL and Grade I and II IVH will be considered

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Shunt
  • Intubation, Cpap, Nasal Ventilation
  • Chromosomal/Genetic abnormalities
  • Mitochondrial/Metabolic Diseases
  • Treatment for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
  • Grade III and IV IVH (optional)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Infant Control Group

    The control arm (term born Infants) will receive an MRI at neonatal age and neurodevelopmental follow-up assessments, investigators will then compare significant morphological and diffusion properties within the brain to those of a Preterm brain.

    Diagnostic Test: MRI · Diagnostic Test: Neurodevelopmental/Neuropsychological Assessment

  • Infant Preterm Group

    The experimental group will consist of preterm infants, who will receive an MRI at neonatal age and neurodevelopmental assessments. This groups scans will then be compared to those of the control arm. Significant biomarkers will then be identified.

    Diagnostic Test: MRI · Diagnostic Test: Neurodevelopmental/Neuropsychological Assessment

  • Childhood Control Group

    The experimental group will consist of preterm born children aged 6-8 years, who received an MRI at neonatal age and will be called back for a neuropsychological assessment. This groups scans will then be compared to those of the children control arm. Significant biomarkers will then be identified.

    Diagnostic Test: Neurodevelopmental/Neuropsychological Assessment

  • Childhood Preterm Group

    The experimental group will consist of term born children aged 6-8 years, who received an MRI at neonatal age and will be called back for a neuropsychological assessment. This groups scans will then be compared to those of the children preterm group. Significant biomarkers will then be identified.

    Diagnostic Test: Neurodevelopmental/Neuropsychological Assessment

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMRI

    MRI analysis

  • Diagnostic testNeurodevelopmental/Neuropsychological Assessment

    Standardized Cognitive and Developmental Tests

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Surface Area and Thickness of Subcortical Structures

    Measured in Voxel Size (mm)

    Time frame: 2018 - 2022

  2. Changes in Diffusion values of white matter Tracts

    Measured in mm squared per second

    Time frame: 2018 - 2022

  3. Differences in developmental Quotient / Neuropsychological scores

    Measured using standardized tests (Bayley-III and NIH toolbox)

    Time frame: 2018 - 2022

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Paquette N, Shi J, Wang Y, Lao Y, Ceschin R, Nelson MD, Panigrahy A, Lepore N. Ventricular shape and relative position abnormalities in preterm neonates. Neuroimage Clin. 2017 May 28;15:483-493. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.025. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28649491 ↗
  • Lao Y, Wang Y, Shi J, Ceschin R, Nelson MD, Panigrahy A, Lepore N. Thalamic alterations in preterm neonates and their relation to ventral striatum disturbances revealed by a combined shape and pose analysis. Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Jan;221(1):487-506. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0921-7. Epub 2014 Nov 1. PubMed 25366970 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2025, 89 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 19, 2018
First posted
Jan 25, 2018
StartActual
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Aug 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Aug 1, 2025
Last update
Apr 10, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03410810
Responsible party
Natasha Lepore (Professor of Research Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 25, 2018
Start date
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 10, 2024

Study contacts

Natasha Lepore, Phd
Contact
nlepore@chla.usc.edu
(323) 361-5088
Natacha Paquette, Phd
Contact
npaquette@chla.usc.edu
(323) 361-8726

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion