ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03406871REGONIVOUpdated Jan 24, 2025Results posted

Regorafenib and Nivolumab Simultaneous Combination Therapy

A Phase 1 interventional study of Regorafenib and Nivolumab in Advanced and Metastatic Solid Tumor, sponsored by Kohei Shitara. Completed at 1 site in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-24.

Sponsored by Kohei Shitara · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

the efficacy and safety ofhe use of regorafenib in combination with nivolumab

Read the detailed description

The present trial consists of a dose-escalation cohort to verify the tolerability of nivolumab and regorafenib when used in combination for patients with solid tumors, and to examine the clinical recommended dose(RD). The trial also consists of an expansion cohort to examine the safety and efficacy when the clinical RD is administered for several advanced solid tumors.

In the dose-escalation cohort, three patients with solid tumors will be administered 3.0 mg/kg of nivolumab once every 2 weeks and regorafenib daily for 21days, with a 1-week washout period at dose of 80 mg (level 1), 120 mg (level 2), or 160 mg (level 3). As a general rule, one cycle will last 28 days (day 1-29); however, in the event of treatment prolongation, the cycle period will be extended. The Dose Limiting Toxicity(DLT) evaluation period will be 28 days. Furthermore, for each level, three additional subjects will be added depending on the state of DLT.

In the expansion cohort, the target subject sample will consist of approximately 30 patients who will be administered 3.0 mg/kg of nivolumab once every 2 weeks, and the clinical RD of regorafenib will be determined in the dose-escalation cohort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced and Metastatic Solid Tumor

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Regorafenib
  • Nivolumab
  • Phase I clinical trial
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

3,562 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 875 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 54 across 2,800 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Kohei Shitara as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients who provided written informed consent to be subjects in this trial
  2. Patients at least 20 years of age on the day of providing consent
  3. Dose-escalation cohort: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

    Expansion cohort: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumors (gastric, colorectal, or hepatocellular cancer).

  4. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1
  5. Patients capable of taking oral medication
  6. Patients with evaluable or measurable lesions as per RECIST version 1.1
  7. Patients with adequate organ function at the time of enrollment as defined below:

    • Neutrophil count ≥1500mm3
    • Platelet count ≥10.0 × 104/mm3
    • Hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 9 g/dL,
    • aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤100 U/L (≤100 U/L in patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma, ≤250 U/L in patients with liver metastasis)
    • Total bilirubin ≤1.5-mg /dL
    • Creatinine ≤1.5--mg /dL
    • Lipase ≤ 80 IU/L
    • Urinary protein: It satisfies one of the following (if any of the inspection criteria are satisfied, other examination may not be carried out) (i) urinary protein (test paper method) is 2+ or less (ii) Urine Protein Creatinine(UPC) ratio \<3.5 (iii) 24-hour urine protein was measured, urinary protein ≦ 3500 mg
    • Prothrombin time (PT)- International normalized ratio(INR): ≤ 1.5 (≦ 3.0 in case of anticoagulant administration)
  8. For women who are likely to become pregnant (including those without menstruation due to medical reasons such as chemical menopause) Note 1, we agreed to double contraceptive Note 2 for at least 5 months from consent acquisition patient to the final administration of the investigational product. Also, patients who agreed not to breast feeding for at least 5 months from acquiring consent to the final investigational drug administration.

For men, patients agreeing to double contraceptive for at least 7 months from the time of starting investigational drug administration to the final investigational drug administration.

Note 1): A woman who is likely to become pregnant is a woman who has experienced menarche and is not undergoing sterilization surgery (such as hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo ligation or bilateral oophorectomy), a woman without menopause Everything is included. The definition after menopause shall be amenorrhea continuously for 12 months or more even though there is no noteworthy reason. Women who are using oral contraceptives or mechanical contraceptive methods (such as intrauterine contraceptive devices or barrier methods) are considered to be pregnant.

Note 2): With regard to contraception, it is necessary to use two of the vasectomy or condom of a male patient or male male, the uterine tube ligation of a female patient or the other woman, a contraceptive pessary, an intrauterine contraceptive device or an oral contraceptive I need to agree to heavy contraception.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have undergone systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, hormone therapy, or immunotherapy \<2 weeks before enrollment. Immune checkpoint blockade as pretreatment is permitted.
  2. Patients with a history of taking regorafenib.
  3. Patients with hypertension that is difficult to control (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) despite treatment with several hypotensive agents
  4. Patients with acute coronary syndrome (including myocardial infarction and unstable angina), and with a history of coronary angioplasty or stent placement performed within 6 months before enrollment
  5. Patients with a large amount of pleural effusion or ascites requiring drainage.
  6. Patients with a ≥grade 3 active infection according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.03
  7. Patients with symptomatic brain metastasis
  8. Patients with partial or complete gastrointestinal obstruction
  9. Patients with interstitial lung disease with symptoms or signs of activity
  10. Patients who test positive for either anti-HIV-1 antibodies, anti-HIV-2 antibodies, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies*

    *Patients who test positive for either anti-Hepatitis B surface(HBs) or anti- Hepatitis B core(HBc) antibodies, and those who have hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA measurements greater than the detection sensitivity will also be excluded.

    (However, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the expansion cohort will not be excluded even if they test positive for HBsAg and anti-HCV antibodies.)

  11. Patients with concurrent autoimmune disease, or a history of chronic or recurrent autoimmune disease
  12. Patients who require systemic corticosteroids (excluding temporary usage for tests, prophylactic administration for allergic reactions, or to alleviate swelling associated with radiotherapy) or immunosuppressants, or who have received such a therapy \<14 days before enrollment in the present study
  13. Patients with a history or findings of ≥grade III congestive heart failure according to the New York Heart Association functional classification
  14. Patients with a seizure disorder who require pharmacotherapy
  15. Patients who had grade 3 or higher bleeding during 4 weeks before enrollment
  16. Patients undergoing major surgery (thoracotomy or laparotomy, etc.), laparotomy biopsy, trauma within 28 days before registration. The same day of the week before 4 weeks can be registered (However, in case of an artificial anastomosis without intestinal resection, it shall be within 14 days before registration).
  17. Patients with non-healing wound, non-healing ulcer, or non-healing bone fracture.
  18. Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs, similar drugs, or excipients.
  19. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or with the potential for pregnancy.

Definition of DLT:

In principle, a DLT was any of the following Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) observed during Cycle 1 (28 days), which was the DLT evaluation period, and was finally determined after discussion in the coordinating committee. According to need, the opinion of the data and safety monitoring committee was to be sought.

  • Hematological toxicity Grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 7 days. Neutrophil count of \<1000/mm3 with a fever of ≥38.0°C. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or thrombocytopenia with bleeding requiring platelet transfusion. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding.
  • Non-hematological toxicity. Grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity. However, non-hematological toxicities meeting any of the following criteria are classified as DLTs only when the investigator determines it impossible to continue the study even with supportive therapy.

    • Grade 3 diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, or anorexia lasting for at least 5 days.
    • Grade 3 or higher electrolyte abnormality lasting for at least 7 days.
    • Grade 3 or higher skin toxicity lasting for at least 7 days.
    • AST or ALT increased ≥5 to 8 times the upper limit of the institutional reference range that does not improve to ≤5 times the upper limit of the institutional reference range within 7 days, with T-Bil increased ≤2 times the upper limit of the institutional reference range.
    • AST or ALT increased ≥5 to 8 times the upper limit of the institutional reference range, with T-Bil increased ≥2 times the upper limit of the institutional reference range.
    • AST or ALT increased ≥8 times the upper limit of the institutional reference range.
    • T-Bil increased ≥3 times the upper limit of the institutional reference range.
    • Grade 3 or higher immune-related AEs lasting for at least 8 days even with steroid therapy.
  • Overall The case in which 70% of the planned dose of regorafenib was not administered due to toxicities during the DLT evaluation period, or the case in which the specified number of nivolumab doses was not administered.

Patients evaluated for DLT:

At least 3 patients were enrolled at each dose level, and the presence or absence of a DLT was evaluated during the DLT evaluation period.

When there were patients not patient to the assessment for proceeding to the next dose level, additional patients were to be enrolled to allow the DLT evaluation specified in Section "6.1.3 Definition of DLT." Patients enrolled who met any of the following criteria were excluded from the DLT analysis set.

  1. Patients in whom regorafenib was not administered for 10 days or longer during Cycle 1 for reasons other than toxicity.
  2. Patients in whom no dose of nivolumab was administered during Cycle 1 for reasons other than toxicity.
  3. Patients in whom adequate data for DLT evaluation were not obtained due to missing essential testing or other reasons.

Whether to include the following patients in the DLT analysis set was determined by discussion in the coordinating committee: patients who had treatment interruption with regorafenib and nivolumab during Cycle 1 for reasons other than Adverse Events (AEs) or patients who were not allowed to initiate Cycle 2 due to toxicities other than DLT.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Level 1

    Regorafenib: Oral administration at a dose of 80 mg given once per day for 21 consecutive days, with a 1-week washout period. Nivolumab: Given once every 2 weeks at a dose of 3.0 mg/kg via an intravenous infusion. When it is deemed that there is no problem with safety at the doses described above, tolerability will be verified at the level-2 dosages described below.

    Drug: Regorafenib · Drug: Nivolumab

  • Active comparator
    Level 2

    Regorafenib: Oral administration at a dose of 120 mg/day for 21 consecutive days, with a 1-week washout period. Nivolumab: Given once every 2 weeks at a dose of 3.0 mg/kg. When it is deemed that there is no problem with safety at the doses described above, tolerability will be verified at the level-3 dosages described below.

    Drug: Regorafenib · Drug: Nivolumab

  • Active comparator
    Level 3

    Regorafenib: Oral administration at a dose of 160 mg/day for 21 consecutive days, with a 1-week washout period. Nivolumab: Given once every 2 weeks at a dose of 3.0 mg/kg. After starting the trial, three cases are registered at level 1, and temporary case registration is suspended until safety evaluation of the first course is completed in all cases. If there are cases in which evaluation of DLT can not be performed properly, such as being canceled due to reasons other than safety during the course of the first course, the necessary number of cases is appropriately added to the administration level.

    Drug: Regorafenib · Drug: Nivolumab

  • Active comparator
    Expansion cohort

    After completion of the final DLT evaluation period of the subjects in the dose escalating cohort, the decision to move the subjects into the expansion cohort will be determined once it is decided, upon deliberation between the sponsor and the principal investigator, that there are no problems associated with moving on. Furthermore, the opinion of the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) can be sought as required . Regarding the review of RD in the expansion cohort, please refer to "Analysis Population Description" in Primary Outcome Measures.

    Drug: Regorafenib · Drug: Nivolumab

Interventions

  • One course will last 28 days. Oral administration for 21 consecutive days, with a 1-week washout period. As for the expansion cohort, implemented using the RD estimated in the dose-escalation cohort.

    Also known as: Identification code of the investigational drug; BAY73-4506

  • One course will last 28 days. Given once every 2 weeks at a dose of 3.0 mg/kg.

    Also known as: Identification code of the investigational drug; BMS-936558, MDX1106, ONO-4538

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Number of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) for RD Determination

    The procedure for DLT assessment was as follows: 1. When DLT is observed in 1 out of 3 cases, 3 additional cases are added to the administration level. 2. When DLT is observed in more than 2 of 3 cases, it is judged that the administration level exceeds Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). 3. If the number of DLT is 1 case or less in 6 cases, shift to the next level. 4. If MTD is exceeded, shift to the next lower level. At the relevant dose, if only 3 people are evaluating DLT, add 3 cases. When the number of DLT is 1 or less out of 6, the dose is defined as MTD and RD. If it is judged that Level 1 exceeds the MTD, review the dose or consider stopping the trial. 5. MTD should be the highest dose level of DLT expression less than 1 in 6 cases. - After the RD was determined and the patient moved to the expansion cohort, G3 skin toxicity occurred, so based on the recommendation of the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee, the RD was reduced by one level and the trial was resumed.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    \*Objective Response Rate is defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response, as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline version 1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), is either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).

    Time frame: 2year

  2. Progression-Free Survival(PFS)

    \*PFS is defined as the time from the enrollment date to either the date when disease progression is determined or the date of death from any cause, whichever came earlier. The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Overall Survival(OS)

    \*OS is defined as the period from the date of enrollment to the date of death from any cause. Surviving patients are censored on the last confirmation date of survival (confirmation of survival by telephone is permitted; the fact that survival is confirmed is to be recorded in the medical record, etc.). Patients lost to follow-up are censored on the last date on which their survival is confirmed before being lost to follow-up. The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.

    Time frame: 2year

  4. Disease Control Rate(DCR)

    \*DCR is defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response assessed based on the RECIST guideline version 1.1 and irRECIST is any of CR, PR, or Stable Disease (SD). The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.

    Time frame: 2year

  5. Adverse-Events

    * The occurrences rate of each AE of the worst grade occurring in this study was evaluated based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 throughout the entire cycles will be calculated. Additionally, this study included a special note regarding abnormal laboratory values. If clinical signs and symptoms observed in this study were induced, the diagnosis and associated data were collected based on whether or not they were due to abnormal laboratory values. Therefore, for example, results of grading regarding liver dysfunction may differ between non-hematologic toxicity and laboratory values. * Adverse-Events occurrences means "prevalence proportion" of any undesirable occurrence based on investigator's medical decision in this study.

    Time frame: 2 year

07

Results

Posted Jan 24, 2025

Participant flow

* 25January2018: First subject enrollment * 23October2018: Last subject enrollment * This study was conducted at second site in Japan. * The number of 'completers' and 'non-completers' in dose escalation cohorts will be determined by whether DLT criteria are met or not. * The number of cases in Expansion cohort and Dose escalation cohort who received the same dose were combined for analysis of this study.

Dose Escalation Cohort
Participant flow — Dose Escalation Cohort
MilestoneRegorafenib 80mg/DayRegorafenib 120mg/DayRegorafenib 160mg/Day
Started473
Completed363
Not completed110
Withdrew: Dlt assesment cancellation**110
Expansion Cohort(Final Analysis)
Participant flow — Expansion Cohort(Final Analysis)
MilestoneRegorafenib 80mg/DayRegorafenib 120mg/DayRegorafenib 160mg/Day
Started22253
Completed000
Not completed22253
Withdrew: Completion of 54 doses of nivolumab421
Withdrew: Progression of primary disease17221
Withdrew: Physician decision100
Withdrew: Death010
Withdrew: Adverse event001

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Number of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) for RD Determination

The procedure for DLT assessment was as follows: 1. When DLT is observed in 1 out of 3 cases, 3 additional cases are added to the administration level. 2. When DLT is observed in more than 2 of 3 cases, it is judged that the administration level exceeds Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). 3. If the number of DLT is 1 case or less in 6 cases, shift to the next level. 4. If MTD is exceeded, shift to the next lower level. At the relevant dose, if only 3 people are evaluating DLT, add 3 cases. When the number of DLT is 1 or less out of 6, the dose is defined as MTD and RD. If it is judged that Level 1 exceeds the MTD, review the dose or consider stopping the trial. 5. MTD should be the highest dose level of DLT expression less than 1 in 6 cases. - After the RD was determined and the patient moved to the expansion cohort, G3 skin toxicity occurred, so based on the recommendation of the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee, the RD was reduced by one level and the trial was resumed.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) for RD Determination
ParticipantsDose Escalation Cohort Regorafenib 80mgDose Escalation Cohort Regorafenib 120mgDose Escalation Cohort Regorafenib 160mgExpansion Cohort : Regorafenib 120mg
The Number of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) for RD Determination0035
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)

\*Objective Response Rate is defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response, as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline version 1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), is either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).

Time frame:
2year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
percentage of participantsFinal Analysis
Objective Response Rate (ORR)42.0 (28.2 to 56.8)
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival(PFS)

\*PFS is defined as the time from the enrollment date to either the date when disease progression is determined or the date of death from any cause, whichever came earlier. The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-Free Survival(PFS)
monthsFinal Analysis
Progression-Free Survival(PFS)6.3 (3.9 to 10.4)
SecondaryOverall Survival(OS)

\*OS is defined as the period from the date of enrollment to the date of death from any cause. Surviving patients are censored on the last confirmation date of survival (confirmation of survival by telephone is permitted; the fact that survival is confirmed is to be recorded in the medical record, etc.). Patients lost to follow-up are censored on the last date on which their survival is confirmed before being lost to follow-up. The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.

Time frame:
2year
Reported as:
Median · median of months
Overall Survival(OS)
median of monthsFinal Analysis
Overall Survival(OS)14.4 (9.8 to 21.7)
SecondaryDisease Control Rate(DCR)

\*DCR is defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response assessed based on the RECIST guideline version 1.1 and irRECIST is any of CR, PR, or Stable Disease (SD). The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.

Time frame:
2year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate(DCR)
percentage of participantsFinal Analysis
Disease Control Rate(DCR)86.0 (73.3 to 94.2)
SecondaryAdverse-Events

* The occurrences rate of each AE of the worst grade occurring in this study was evaluated based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 throughout the entire cycles will be calculated. Additionally, this study included a special note regarding abnormal laboratory values. If clinical signs and symptoms observed in this study were induced, the diagnosis and associated data were collected based on whether or not they were due to abnormal laboratory values. Therefore, for example, results of grading regarding liver dysfunction may differ between non-hematologic toxicity and laboratory values. * Adverse-Events occurrences means "prevalence proportion" of any undesirable occurrence based on investigator's medical decision in this study.

Time frame:
2 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adverse-Events
ParticipantsFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 80mgFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 120mgFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg
Adverse-Events22253

Adverse events

Collected over 2 year, 2months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/Day0/22 (0%)4/22 (18.2%)22/22 (100%)
Final Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/Day1/25 (4%)5/25 (20%)25/25 (100%)
Final Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg0/3 (0%)2/3 (66.7%)3/3 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent serious events
EventFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg
rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/222/251/3
large intestine perforationGastrointestinal disorders1/220/251/3
interstitial lung diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/220/251/3
hypopituitarismEndocrine disorders1/220/250/3
Guillain-Barre syndromeNervous system disorders1/220/250/3
malaiseGeneral disorders1/220/250/3
hyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/220/250/3
deathGeneral disorders0/221/250/3
erythema multiformeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/221/250/3
diarrheaGastrointestinal disorders0/221/250/3
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 29
Most frequent other events
EventFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg
palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndromeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders13/2220/252/3
malaiseGeneral disorders11/2210/252/3
proteinuriaRenal and urinary disorders6/229/252/3
stomatitisGastrointestinal disorders4/226/252/3
diarrheaGastrointestinal disorders6/224/252/3
hypertensionVascular disorders11/2214/250/3
feverGeneral disorders10/2210/251/3
decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders6/227/251/3
maculo-papular rashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/228/251/3
platelet count decreasedInvestigations1/225/251/3

Baseline characteristics

* This clinical trial was divided into a dose-escalation cohort to determine RD based on the number of DLTs, and an expansion cohort to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this regimen based on RD. Patient Background data were combined from both cohorts and presented as final analysis data. * Stastical analyses by tumor were not performed, because this clinical trial did not use a randomized design.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg/DayTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years1217231
>=65 years108119
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg/DayTotal
Female54110
Male1721240
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg/DayTotal
Count of participants———0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/DayFinal Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg/DayTotal
Japan2225350
08

Study locations

1 site
  • NationalCCHE
    Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fukuoka S, Hara H, Takahashi N, Kojima T, Kawazoe A, Asayama M, Yoshii T, Kotani D, Tamura H, Mikamoto Y, Hirano N, Wakabayashi M, Nomura S, Sato A, Kuwata T, Togashi Y, Nishikawa H, Shitara K. Regorafenib Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Gastric or Colorectal Cancer: An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, and Dose-Expansion Phase Ib Trial (REGONIVO, EPOC1603). J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun 20;38(18):2053-2061. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03296. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PubMed 32343640 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 20, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03406871
Lead sponsor
Kohei Shitara
Collaborators
Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.
Responsible party
Kohei Shitara (Assistant Chief of Gastrointestinal Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 23, 2018
Start date
Jan 15, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2020
Completion
Dec 15, 2020
Results posted
Jan 24, 2025
Last update
Jan 24, 2025

Study contacts

Kohei Shitara, Dr
study chair · National Cancer Center Hospital East

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Regorafenib · Nivolumab

Start the discussion