A Phase 1 interventional study of Regorafenib and Nivolumab in Advanced and Metastatic Solid Tumor, sponsored by Kohei Shitara. Completed at 1 site in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-24.
Sponsored by Kohei Shitara · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
the efficacy and safety ofhe use of regorafenib in combination with nivolumab
The present trial consists of a dose-escalation cohort to verify the tolerability of nivolumab and regorafenib when used in combination for patients with solid tumors, and to examine the clinical recommended dose(RD). The trial also consists of an expansion cohort to examine the safety and efficacy when the clinical RD is administered for several advanced solid tumors.
In the dose-escalation cohort, three patients with solid tumors will be administered 3.0 mg/kg of nivolumab once every 2 weeks and regorafenib daily for 21days, with a 1-week washout period at dose of 80 mg (level 1), 120 mg (level 2), or 160 mg (level 3). As a general rule, one cycle will last 28 days (day 1-29); however, in the event of treatment prolongation, the cycle period will be extended. The Dose Limiting Toxicity(DLT) evaluation period will be 28 days. Furthermore, for each level, three additional subjects will be added depending on the state of DLT.
In the expansion cohort, the target subject sample will consist of approximately 30 patients who will be administered 3.0 mg/kg of nivolumab once every 2 weeks, and the clinical RD of regorafenib will be determined in the dose-escalation cohort.
3,562 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 875 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 54 across 2,800 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.
Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →This is the only study on the registry with Kohei Shitara as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Dose-escalation cohort: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
Expansion cohort: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumors (gastric, colorectal, or hepatocellular cancer).
Patients with adequate organ function at the time of enrollment as defined below:
For men, patients agreeing to double contraceptive for at least 7 months from the time of starting investigational drug administration to the final investigational drug administration.
Note 1): A woman who is likely to become pregnant is a woman who has experienced menarche and is not undergoing sterilization surgery (such as hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo ligation or bilateral oophorectomy), a woman without menopause Everything is included. The definition after menopause shall be amenorrhea continuously for 12 months or more even though there is no noteworthy reason. Women who are using oral contraceptives or mechanical contraceptive methods (such as intrauterine contraceptive devices or barrier methods) are considered to be pregnant.
Note 2): With regard to contraception, it is necessary to use two of the vasectomy or condom of a male patient or male male, the uterine tube ligation of a female patient or the other woman, a contraceptive pessary, an intrauterine contraceptive device or an oral contraceptive I need to agree to heavy contraception.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who test positive for either anti-HIV-1 antibodies, anti-HIV-2 antibodies, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies*
*Patients who test positive for either anti-Hepatitis B surface(HBs) or anti- Hepatitis B core(HBc) antibodies, and those who have hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA measurements greater than the detection sensitivity will also be excluded.
(However, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the expansion cohort will not be excluded even if they test positive for HBsAg and anti-HCV antibodies.)
Definition of DLT:
In principle, a DLT was any of the following Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) observed during Cycle 1 (28 days), which was the DLT evaluation period, and was finally determined after discussion in the coordinating committee. According to need, the opinion of the data and safety monitoring committee was to be sought.
Non-hematological toxicity. Grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity. However, non-hematological toxicities meeting any of the following criteria are classified as DLTs only when the investigator determines it impossible to continue the study even with supportive therapy.
Patients evaluated for DLT:
At least 3 patients were enrolled at each dose level, and the presence or absence of a DLT was evaluated during the DLT evaluation period.
When there were patients not patient to the assessment for proceeding to the next dose level, additional patients were to be enrolled to allow the DLT evaluation specified in Section "6.1.3 Definition of DLT." Patients enrolled who met any of the following criteria were excluded from the DLT analysis set.
Whether to include the following patients in the DLT analysis set was determined by discussion in the coordinating committee: patients who had treatment interruption with regorafenib and nivolumab during Cycle 1 for reasons other than Adverse Events (AEs) or patients who were not allowed to initiate Cycle 2 due to toxicities other than DLT.
Regorafenib: Oral administration at a dose of 80 mg given once per day for 21 consecutive days, with a 1-week washout period. Nivolumab: Given once every 2 weeks at a dose of 3.0 mg/kg via an intravenous infusion. When it is deemed that there is no problem with safety at the doses described above, tolerability will be verified at the level-2 dosages described below.
Drug: Regorafenib · Drug: Nivolumab
Regorafenib: Oral administration at a dose of 120 mg/day for 21 consecutive days, with a 1-week washout period. Nivolumab: Given once every 2 weeks at a dose of 3.0 mg/kg. When it is deemed that there is no problem with safety at the doses described above, tolerability will be verified at the level-3 dosages described below.
Drug: Regorafenib · Drug: Nivolumab
Regorafenib: Oral administration at a dose of 160 mg/day for 21 consecutive days, with a 1-week washout period. Nivolumab: Given once every 2 weeks at a dose of 3.0 mg/kg. After starting the trial, three cases are registered at level 1, and temporary case registration is suspended until safety evaluation of the first course is completed in all cases. If there are cases in which evaluation of DLT can not be performed properly, such as being canceled due to reasons other than safety during the course of the first course, the necessary number of cases is appropriately added to the administration level.
Drug: Regorafenib · Drug: Nivolumab
After completion of the final DLT evaluation period of the subjects in the dose escalating cohort, the decision to move the subjects into the expansion cohort will be determined once it is decided, upon deliberation between the sponsor and the principal investigator, that there are no problems associated with moving on. Furthermore, the opinion of the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) can be sought as required . Regarding the review of RD in the expansion cohort, please refer to "Analysis Population Description" in Primary Outcome Measures.
Drug: Regorafenib · Drug: Nivolumab
One course will last 28 days. Oral administration for 21 consecutive days, with a 1-week washout period. As for the expansion cohort, implemented using the RD estimated in the dose-escalation cohort.
Also known as: Identification code of the investigational drug; BAY73-4506
One course will last 28 days. Given once every 2 weeks at a dose of 3.0 mg/kg.
Also known as: Identification code of the investigational drug; BMS-936558, MDX1106, ONO-4538
The Number of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) for RD Determination
The procedure for DLT assessment was as follows: 1. When DLT is observed in 1 out of 3 cases, 3 additional cases are added to the administration level. 2. When DLT is observed in more than 2 of 3 cases, it is judged that the administration level exceeds Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). 3. If the number of DLT is 1 case or less in 6 cases, shift to the next level. 4. If MTD is exceeded, shift to the next lower level. At the relevant dose, if only 3 people are evaluating DLT, add 3 cases. When the number of DLT is 1 or less out of 6, the dose is defined as MTD and RD. If it is judged that Level 1 exceeds the MTD, review the dose or consider stopping the trial. 5. MTD should be the highest dose level of DLT expression less than 1 in 6 cases. - After the RD was determined and the patient moved to the expansion cohort, G3 skin toxicity occurred, so based on the recommendation of the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee, the RD was reduced by one level and the trial was resumed.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
\*Objective Response Rate is defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response, as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline version 1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), is either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).
Time frame: 2year
Progression-Free Survival(PFS)
\*PFS is defined as the time from the enrollment date to either the date when disease progression is determined or the date of death from any cause, whichever came earlier. The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.
Time frame: 6 months
Overall Survival(OS)
\*OS is defined as the period from the date of enrollment to the date of death from any cause. Surviving patients are censored on the last confirmation date of survival (confirmation of survival by telephone is permitted; the fact that survival is confirmed is to be recorded in the medical record, etc.). Patients lost to follow-up are censored on the last date on which their survival is confirmed before being lost to follow-up. The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.
Time frame: 2year
Disease Control Rate(DCR)
\*DCR is defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response assessed based on the RECIST guideline version 1.1 and irRECIST is any of CR, PR, or Stable Disease (SD). The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.
Time frame: 2year
Adverse-Events
* The occurrences rate of each AE of the worst grade occurring in this study was evaluated based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 throughout the entire cycles will be calculated. Additionally, this study included a special note regarding abnormal laboratory values. If clinical signs and symptoms observed in this study were induced, the diagnosis and associated data were collected based on whether or not they were due to abnormal laboratory values. Therefore, for example, results of grading regarding liver dysfunction may differ between non-hematologic toxicity and laboratory values. * Adverse-Events occurrences means "prevalence proportion" of any undesirable occurrence based on investigator's medical decision in this study.
Time frame: 2 year
* 25January2018: First subject enrollment * 23October2018: Last subject enrollment * This study was conducted at second site in Japan. * The number of 'completers' and 'non-completers' in dose escalation cohorts will be determined by whether DLT criteria are met or not. * The number of cases in Expansion cohort and Dose escalation cohort who received the same dose were combined for analysis of this study.
| Milestone | Regorafenib 80mg/Day | Regorafenib 120mg/Day | Regorafenib 160mg/Day |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Completed | 3 | 6 | 3 |
| Not completed | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Dlt assesment cancellation** | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Milestone | Regorafenib 80mg/Day | Regorafenib 120mg/Day | Regorafenib 160mg/Day |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 22 | 25 | 3 |
| Completed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 22 | 25 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Completion of 54 doses of nivolumab | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Progression of primary disease | 17 | 22 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Physician decision | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Death | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 0 | 0 | 1 |
The procedure for DLT assessment was as follows: 1. When DLT is observed in 1 out of 3 cases, 3 additional cases are added to the administration level. 2. When DLT is observed in more than 2 of 3 cases, it is judged that the administration level exceeds Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). 3. If the number of DLT is 1 case or less in 6 cases, shift to the next level. 4. If MTD is exceeded, shift to the next lower level. At the relevant dose, if only 3 people are evaluating DLT, add 3 cases. When the number of DLT is 1 or less out of 6, the dose is defined as MTD and RD. If it is judged that Level 1 exceeds the MTD, review the dose or consider stopping the trial. 5. MTD should be the highest dose level of DLT expression less than 1 in 6 cases. - After the RD was determined and the patient moved to the expansion cohort, G3 skin toxicity occurred, so based on the recommendation of the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee, the RD was reduced by one level and the trial was resumed.
| Participants | Dose Escalation Cohort Regorafenib 80mg | Dose Escalation Cohort Regorafenib 120mg | Dose Escalation Cohort Regorafenib 160mg | Expansion Cohort : Regorafenib 120mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Number of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) for RD Determination | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
\*Objective Response Rate is defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response, as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline version 1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), is either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).
| percentage of participants | Final Analysis |
|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 42.0 (28.2 to 56.8) |
\*PFS is defined as the time from the enrollment date to either the date when disease progression is determined or the date of death from any cause, whichever came earlier. The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.
| months | Final Analysis |
|---|---|
| Progression-Free Survival(PFS) | 6.3 (3.9 to 10.4) |
\*OS is defined as the period from the date of enrollment to the date of death from any cause. Surviving patients are censored on the last confirmation date of survival (confirmation of survival by telephone is permitted; the fact that survival is confirmed is to be recorded in the medical record, etc.). Patients lost to follow-up are censored on the last date on which their survival is confirmed before being lost to follow-up. The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.
| median of months | Final Analysis |
|---|---|
| Overall Survival(OS) | 14.4 (9.8 to 21.7) |
\*DCR is defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response assessed based on the RECIST guideline version 1.1 and irRECIST is any of CR, PR, or Stable Disease (SD). The data were compiled according to the analysis plan outlined in the protocol. No analysis was conducted to determine efficacy by cancer type or dose level.
| percentage of participants | Final Analysis |
|---|---|
| Disease Control Rate(DCR) | 86.0 (73.3 to 94.2) |
* The occurrences rate of each AE of the worst grade occurring in this study was evaluated based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 throughout the entire cycles will be calculated. Additionally, this study included a special note regarding abnormal laboratory values. If clinical signs and symptoms observed in this study were induced, the diagnosis and associated data were collected based on whether or not they were due to abnormal laboratory values. Therefore, for example, results of grading regarding liver dysfunction may differ between non-hematologic toxicity and laboratory values. * Adverse-Events occurrences means "prevalence proportion" of any undesirable occurrence based on investigator's medical decision in this study.
| Participants | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adverse-Events | 22 | 25 | 3 |
Collected over 2 year, 2months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/Day | 0/22 (0%) | 4/22 (18.2%) | 22/22 (100%) |
| Final Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/Day | 1/25 (4%) | 5/25 (20%) | 25/25 (100%) |
| Final Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg | 0/3 (0%) | 2/3 (66.7%) | 3/3 (100%) |
| Event | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg |
|---|---|---|---|
| rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 0/22 | 2/25 | 1/3 |
| large intestine perforationGastrointestinal disorders | 1/22 | 0/25 | 1/3 |
| interstitial lung diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/22 | 0/25 | 1/3 |
| hypopituitarismEndocrine disorders | 1/22 | 0/25 | 0/3 |
| Guillain-Barre syndromeNervous system disorders | 1/22 | 0/25 | 0/3 |
| malaiseGeneral disorders | 1/22 | 0/25 | 0/3 |
| hyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 1/22 | 0/25 | 0/3 |
| deathGeneral disorders | 0/22 | 1/25 | 0/3 |
| erythema multiformeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 0/22 | 1/25 | 0/3 |
| diarrheaGastrointestinal disorders | 0/22 | 1/25 | 0/3 |
| Event | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg |
|---|---|---|---|
| palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndromeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 13/22 | 20/25 | 2/3 |
| malaiseGeneral disorders | 11/22 | 10/25 | 2/3 |
| proteinuriaRenal and urinary disorders | 6/22 | 9/25 | 2/3 |
| stomatitisGastrointestinal disorders | 4/22 | 6/25 | 2/3 |
| diarrheaGastrointestinal disorders | 6/22 | 4/25 | 2/3 |
| hypertensionVascular disorders | 11/22 | 14/25 | 0/3 |
| feverGeneral disorders | 10/22 | 10/25 | 1/3 |
| decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 6/22 | 7/25 | 1/3 |
| maculo-papular rashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 3/22 | 8/25 | 1/3 |
| platelet count decreasedInvestigations | 1/22 | 5/25 | 1/3 |
* This clinical trial was divided into a dose-escalation cohort to determine RD based on the number of DLTs, and an expansion cohort to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this regimen based on RD. Patient Background data were combined from both cohorts and presented as final analysis data. * Stastical analyses by tumor were not performed, because this clinical trial did not use a randomized design.
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg/Day | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 12 | 17 | 2 | 31 |
| >=65 years | 10 | 8 | 1 | 19 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg/Day | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 5 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| Male | 17 | 21 | 2 | 40 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg/Day | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | — | — | — | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 80mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 120mg/Day | Final Analysis: Regorafenib 160mg/Day | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | 22 | 25 | 3 | 50 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drugs tested here: Regorafenib · Nivolumab