ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03404089MON4STRATUpdated Jan 19, 2023

Bedside Therapeutic Monitoring of β-Lactam Levels in Newborns, Children and Adolescents Admitted to Intensive Care.

An interventional study of pharmacokinetic device and pharmacokinetic device in Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, sponsored by University Hospital, Lille. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-19.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Lille · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
insufficient inclusions
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 47 studies in Cross Infection with a site in France — 9 open to participants now, 9 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Cross Infection · France.

Enrollment
22nd of 23
13 · median 244
Started
2018
with 2 others
No phase
14 of 47
3 open now
Registered
22nd of 47
by date
Lead sponsor
4 of 47
University Hospital, Lille

Among the 47 studies in Cross Infection with a site in France, this one is the 22nd largest by enrollment of the 23 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 14 with no phase, and was the 22nd registered.

Cross Infection

285 studies on the registry are indexed under Cross Infection; 48 are open to participants now.

Browse Cross Infection studies →

Open to participants now

9 of the 47 studies in Cross Infection with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

4 more — sign in →

All 9 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 27 Cross Infection studies recruiting now, 22 (81%) set no upper age limit and 3 (11%) stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; 6 take healthy volunteers.

This study: Up to 18 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 47 studies in Cross Infection with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study evaluate the capacity of the MON4STRAT device for drug monitoring of β- lactam antibiotic concentrations in newborns, children, and adolescents admitted in intensive care units with a health care-associated infection.

03

Conditions studied

  • Intensive Care Unit Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • device drug monitoring
  • β-lactam antibiotic
  • health care-associated infection
  • MON4STRAT
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age younger than 18 years
  • Newborns (preterm or not) in neonatal intensive care
  • Infants, children, and adolescents in pediatric intensive care
  • Clinically suspected or microbiologically proven sepsis that might be associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia or otherwise associated with health care
  • Need for antibiotic treatment by piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, or meropenem of intermittent administration
  • form signed by parents/guardian
  • Informed consent form signed by patients old enough to understand.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Process for active limitation of treatment underway
  • Suspected or known to studied beta-lactams
  • Renal failure, defined as serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl or urine production \< 0.3 ml/kg for 24 h or anuria for 12 h.
  • Co-administration of two β-lactam antibiotics
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • No national health insurance coverage in French center
  • Family unable to understand study-related information due to language or other communication issues
  • No consent obtained
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    pharmacokinetic device

    MON4STRAT system

    Device: pharmacokinetic device

Interventions

  • Devicepharmacokinetic device

    MON4STRAT system: bed-side pharmacokinetic device for drug concentration measurement

  • Devicepharmacokinetic device

    High performance liquid chromatography, (HPLC), the reference methods HLPC tandem mass spectrometry or Ultraviolet are using

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation between the β-lactam dosage measured by the MON4STRAT method and the β-lactam dosage measured by the HPLC-MS-MS (the reference method).

    Time frame: at 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. User's questionnaire

    The feasibility of the MON4STRAT method will be evaluated by a questionnaire to be completed by the users of the method, that is, the nurses caring for these patients.

    Time frame: at 3 days

  2. Minimum concentration of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Pharmacokinetic of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Time frame: before antibiotic infusion at day 3 and 2/3 hours after the end of antibiotic infusion

  3. Maximum concentration (CMax) of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Pharmacokinetic of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Time frame: before antibiotic infusion at day 3 and 2/3 hours after the end of antibiotic infusion

  4. Clearance (Cl) of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Pharmacokinetic of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Time frame: before antibiotic infusion at day 3 and 2/3 hours after the end of antibiotic infusion

  5. Volume of distribution of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Pharmacokinetic of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Time frame: before antibiotic infusion at day 3 and 2/3 hours after the end of antibiotic infusion

  6. Half-life (t1/2) of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Pharmacokinetic of beta-lactams antibiotics

    Time frame: before antibiotic infusion at day 3 and 2/3 hours after the end of antibiotic infusion

  7. Assessment of the course of infection of children who had a β-lactam assay (by the reference method) at the usual levels and those who appeared to receiving inadequate β-lactam doses.

    Antimicrobial doses, serum concentration of β- lactams and minimum inhibitory concentration of microorganisms, if available, will be used to assess the potential usefulness of this bedside method

    Time frame: at 17 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU
    Lille, France
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2019, 14 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 28, 2017
First posted
Jan 19, 2018
StartActual
Apr 18, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2019
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2019
Last update
Jan 19, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03404089
Collaborators
European Commission
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 19, 2018
Start date
Apr 18, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2019
Last update
Jan 19, 2023

Study contacts

François DUBOS, MD,PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Lille

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion