CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03403270Updated Jan 18, 2018

A Mobile Health App to Reduce Sedentary Time in Inactive Employees

An interventional study of ENCOURAGE App in Physical Activity and Sedentary Lifestyle, sponsored by St. Boniface Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-18.

Sponsored by St. Boniface Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2018), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ENCOURAGE App will use mobile health technology to support employees to reduce their sedentary time and become more physically active. The mobile app has been developed using time management techniques (i.e. Pomodoro technique) as a strategy to provide prompts to encourage users to engage in an activity and break up bouts of prolonged sitting.

Read the detailed description

Sixty percent of Canadian adults are accessible through the workplace. Thus, workplace wellness programs that include physical activity components provide a viable option to encourage employees to reduce sedentary time. Moving forward with the ENCOURAGE health promotion model, we will use mobile health technology to support employees to reduce sitting and become more physically active, while offering employers a solution that can be easily implemented in a variety of contexts.

The public release of the ENCOURAGE App will involve two phases:

  1. The recruitment of up to 300 individuals through the App. Any user will be able to download the ENCOURAGE App through the iTunes Store or Google Play. Note that when participants download the App, they are not automatically enrolled in the study. Participants will be prompted, after downloading the App, with a brief description of the study, as well as a pre-screening tool that will be used to determine eligibility. Users will be asked via a pop-up to determine if they wish to participate in a research project. Users will be asked to participate in a time series quasi-experimental study to determine if the ENCOURAGE App can support participants to increase the number of breaks in sedentary time taken throughout the day, over a 6-month time period. The App can be customized by the users to set prompts at intervals that fit into their schedule. For example, these activities can range from a stretching activity (e.g., a neck stretch), a standing activity (e.g., stand and read), or a physical activity (e.g., fill up the printer with paper, do a squat). Additionally, the App will use Behaviour Change Techniques as a strategy to support participants as they reduce their sedentary behaviour and increase their physical activity levels.
  2. The recruitment of a sub-sample of 60 participants who live in Winnipeg, MB which will be drawn from the larger sample. In addition to completing all the components of the larger research study, the sub-sample will be also asked to wear a physical activity monitor, called an accelerometer.

The objectives of this study are to determine if the final product ENCOURAGE App:

  1. Reduces the number of breaks from sitting;
  2. Reduces total sedentary time;
  3. Increases physical activity levels; and,
  4. Improves self-efficacy for reducing sedentary behaviour.
02

Conditions studied

  • Physical Activity
  • Sedentary Lifestyle

Keywords

  • Mobile App
  • Sedentary Behaviour
  • Workplace Wellness
  • Sitting Time
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

-Specific to sub-sample of 60 participants; live in Winnipeg, MB

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who do not own a personal mobile phone
  • Any physical limitations that would not allow individual to engage in physical activity
  • Any cognitive limitations that would not allow individual to consent for study
  • Specific to sub-sample of 60 participants; live outside Winnipeg, MB
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ENCOURAGE App Intervention

    Users will download the ENCOURAGE mobile app. The App uses a time management technique (i.e. Pomodoro technique) as a strategy to provide prompts for users to engage in an activity. The App can be customized by the users to set prompts at intervals that fit into their schedule. For example, these activities can range from a stretching activity (e.g., a neck stretch), a standing activity (e.g., stand and read), or a physical activity (e.g., fill up the printer with paper, do a squat). Additionally, the App will use Behaviour Change Techniques as a strategy to support participants as they reduce their sedentary behaviour and improve their physical activity levels. The App uses a series of Behavior Change Techniques shown to be effective in promoting a more active lifestyle.

    Other: ENCOURAGE App

Interventions

  • OtherENCOURAGE App

    Users will have an opportunity to engage with the app as described for the duration of the study period.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of breaks from sitting

    This outcome will be assessed by self-report using the Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire.

    Time frame: Change from baseline number of breaks from sitting at 1-month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of breaks from sitting

    This outcome will be assessed by self-report using the Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire in a typical work day

    Time frame: Change from baseline number of breaks from sitting at 1-week, 2-months, 3-months, 4-months, 5-months, and 6-months

  2. Duration of breaks from sitting

    This outcome will be assessed by self-report using the Workplace Sitting Breaks in a typical work day.

    Time frame: Change from baseline duration of breaks from sitting at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  3. Percent time spent sitting at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire over the last 7 days

    Time frame: Change from baseline percent time spent sitting at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  4. Percent time spent standing at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire over the last 7 days

    Time frame: Change from baseline percent time spent standing at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  5. Percent time spent walking at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire over the last 7 days

    Time frame: Change from baseline percent time spent walking at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  6. Percent time spent participating in heavy labour at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity over the last 7 days

    Time frame: Change from baseline percent time spent participating in heavy labour at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  7. Mild physical activity

    This outcome will be assessed by the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire in minutes per week

    Time frame: Change from baseline minutes per week in mild physical activity at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  8. Moderate physical activity

    This outcome will be assessed by the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire in minutes per week

    Time frame: Change from baseline minutes per week in moderate physical activity at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  9. Strenuous physical activity

    This outcome will be assessed by the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire in minutes per week

    Time frame: Change from baseline minutes per week in strenuous physical activity at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  10. Degree of confidence to break up sitting time

    This outcome will be assessed by the Task Self-Efficacy for Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire using a scale from 0 (i.e. not at all confident) to 10 (i.e. completely confident)

    Time frame: Change from baseline degree of confidence to break up sitting time at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  11. Degree of confidence for engaging in self-regulatory actions that would help them reduce their sedentary time

    This outcome will be assessed by the Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire using a scale from 0 (i.e. not at all confident) to 10 (i.e. completely confident)

    Time frame: Change from baseline degree of confidence for engaging in self-regulatory actions that would help them reduce their sedentary time at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  12. Degree of confidence for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when faced with feeling tired at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Managing Barriers Questionnaire using a scale from 10 (i.e. not at all confident) to 100 (i.e. completely confident)

    Time frame: Change from baseline for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when faced with feeling tired at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  13. Degree of confidence for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when faced with feeling comfortable in their seated position at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Managing Barriers Questionnaire using a scale from 10 (i.e. not at all confident) to 100 (i.e. completely confident)

    Time frame: Change from baseline for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when faced with feeling comfortable in their seated position at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  14. Degree of confidence for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when having important tasks to do while seated at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Managing Barriers Questionnaire using a scale from 10 (i.e. not at all confident) to 100 (i.e. completely confident)

    Time frame: Change from baseline for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when having important tasks to do while seated at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  15. Degree of confidence for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when feeling as if they deserve to sit at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Managing Barriers Questionnaire using a scale from 10 (i.e. not at all confident) to 100 (i.e. completely confident)

    Time frame: Change from baseline for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when feeling as if they deserve to sit at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  16. Degree of confidence for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when feeling stressed at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Managing Barriers Questionnaire using a scale from 10 (i.e. not at all confident) to 100 (i.e. completely confident)

    Time frame: Change from baseline for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when feeling stressed at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  17. Degree of confidence for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when feeling down or depressed at work

    This outcome will be assessed by the Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Managing Barriers Questionnaire using a scale from 10 (i.e. not at all confident) to 100 (i.e. completely confident)

    Time frame: Change from baseline for reducing their sedentary behaviours even when feeling down or depressed at work at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  18. Total sedentary time

    Sub-sample of 60 individuals will wear an accelerometer to measure their total sedentary time (hours per day)

    Time frame: Change from baseline total sedentary time at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

  19. Prolonged bouts of sedentary time lasting at least 30 minutes

    Sub-sample of 60 individuals will wear an accelerometer to measure their prolonged bouts of sedentary time lasting at least 30 minutes (number per day)

    Time frame: Change from baseline prolonged bouts of sedentary time lasting at least 30 minutes at 1-week, 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month, 6-month

06

Study locations

1 site
  • St-Boniface Hospital Albrechtsen Research Center
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R2H 2A6, Canada
    • Karen Swanson · Contact · kswanson@sbrc.ca · 204-235-3206
    • Todd A Duhamel · Principal investigator
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Dunstan DW. Screen-based entertainment time, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events: population-based study with ongoing mortality and hospital events follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jan 18;57(3):292-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.065. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Apr 19;57(16):1717. PubMed 21232666 ↗
  • Dunstan DW, Barr EL, Healy GN, Salmon J, Shaw JE, Balkau B, Magliano DJ, Cameron AJ, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation. 2010 Jan 26;121(3):384-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894824. Epub 2010 Jan 11. PubMed 20065160 ↗
  • Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, Davies MJ, Gorely T, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Yates T, Biddle SJ. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012 Nov;55(11):2895-905. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2677-z. Epub 2012 Aug 14. Erratum In: Diabetologia. 2013 Apr;56(4):942-3. PubMed 22890825 ↗
  • Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.004. PubMed 21767729 ↗
  • Proper KI, Singh AS, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.015. PubMed 21238866 ↗
  • van Uffelen JG, Wong J, Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Riphagen I, Gilson ND, Burton NW, Healy GN, Thorp AA, Clark BK, Gardiner PA, Dunstan DW, Bauman A, Owen N, Brown WJ. Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):379-88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.024. PubMed 20837291 ↗
  • Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011 Mar;22(1):7-14. PubMed 21510585 ↗
  • Thorp AA, Healy GN, Winkler E, Clark BK, Gardiner PA, Owen N, Dunstan DW. Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Oct 26;9:128. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-128. PubMed 23101767 ↗
  • Tew GA, Posso MC, Arundel CE, McDaid CM. Systematic review: height-adjustable workstations to reduce sedentary behaviour in office-based workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Jul;65(5):357-66. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv044. Epub 2015 May 1. PubMed 25934982 ↗
  • Neuhaus M, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Eakin EG. Workplace sitting and height-adjustable workstations: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.009. PubMed 24355669 ↗
  • Evans RE, Fawole HO, Sheriff SA, Dall PM, Grant PM, Ryan CG. Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.010. PubMed 22898122 ↗
  • Shrestha N, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, Verbeek JH, Ijaz S, Hermans V, Bhaumik S. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3. PubMed 26984326 ↗
  • Verweij LM, Proper KI, Weel AN, Hulshof CT, van Mechelen W. The application of an occupational health guideline reduces sedentary behaviour and increases fruit intake at work: results from an RCT. Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jul;69(7):500-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100377. Epub 2012 Mar 1. PubMed 22383591 ↗
  • Allen JC, Lewis JB, Tagliaferro AR. Cost-effectiveness of health risk reduction after lifestyle education in the small workplace. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E96. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110169. Epub 2012 May 10. PubMed 22575081 ↗
  • Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, Patel V, Haines A. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362. Epub 2013 Jan 15. PubMed 23349621 ↗
  • Hurling R, Catt M, Boni MD, Fairley BW, Hurst T, Murray P, Richardson A, Sodhi JS. Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007 Apr 27;9(2):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e7. PubMed 17478409 ↗
  • Stephens J, Allen J. Mobile phone interventions to increase physical activity and reduce weight: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):320-9. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318250a3e7. PubMed 22635061 ↗
  • Fanning J, Mullen SP, McAuley E. Increasing physical activity with mobile devices: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 21;14(6):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2171. PubMed 23171838 ↗
  • Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379. PubMed 18624603 ↗
  • Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6. PubMed 23512568 ↗
  • Mohr DC, Cheung K, Schueller SM, Hendricks Brown C, Duan N. Continuous evaluation of evolving behavioral intervention technologies. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Oct;45(4):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.006. PubMed 24050429 ↗
  • Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.022. PubMed 17466815 ↗
  • Kumar S, Nilsen WJ, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, Pavel M, Riley WT, Shar A, Spring B, Spruijt-Metz D, Hedeker D, Honavar V, Kravitz R, Lefebvre RC, Mohr DC, Murphy SA, Quinn C, Shusterman V, Swendeman D. Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017. PubMed 23867031 ↗
  • Williams SL, French DP. What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour--and are they the same? Health Educ Res. 2011 Apr;26(2):308-22. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr005. Epub 2011 Feb 14. PubMed 21321008 ↗
  • Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Dore CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583. PubMed 23295957 ↗
  • Eysenbach G; CONSORT-EHEALTH Group. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923. PubMed 22209829 ↗
  • Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. No abstract available. PubMed 6863699 ↗
  • Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombrowski SU, Bishop A, French DP. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011 Nov;26(11):1479-98. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2010.540664. Epub 2011 Jun 28. PubMed 21678185 ↗
  • Pedisic Z, Bennie JA, Timperio AF, Crawford DA, Dunstan DW, Bauman AE, Salmon J. Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ): an assessment of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 5;14:1249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1249. PubMed 25476788 ↗
  • Maclagan LC, Park J, Sanmartin C, Mathur KR, Roth D, Manuel DG, Gershon A, Booth GL, Bhatia S, Atzema CL, Tu JV. The CANHEART health index: a tool for monitoring the cardiovascular health of the Canadian population. CMAJ. 2014 Feb 18;186(3):180-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131358. Epub 2013 Dec 23. PubMed 24366893 ↗
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. PubMed 11556941 ↗
  • Blumenthal JA. Depression and coronary heart disease: association and implications for treatment. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008 Mar;75 Suppl 2:S48-53. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.75.suppl_2.s48. PubMed 18540147 ↗
  • Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6. PubMed 4053261 ↗
  • Chau JY, Van Der Ploeg HP, Dunn S, Kurko J, Bauman AE. Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1):118-25. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182251060. PubMed 21659903 ↗
  • Rothney MP, Schaefer EV, Neumann MM, Choi L, Chen KY. Validity of physical activity intensity predictions by ActiGraph, Actical, and RT3 accelerometers. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Aug;16(8):1946-52. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.279. Epub 2008 May 29. PubMed 18535553 ↗
  • Colley RC, Tremblay MS. Moderate and vigorous physical activity intensity cut-points for the Actical accelerometer. J Sports Sci. 2011 May;29(8):783-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.557744. PubMed 21424979 ↗
  • Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR Jr. Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Sep;36(9):1637-45. PubMed 15354049 ↗
  • Holmen H, Torbjornsen A, Wahl AK, Jenum AK, Smastuen MC, Arsand E, Ribu L. A Mobile Health Intervention for Self-Management and Lifestyle Change for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 2: One-Year Results From the Norwegian Randomized Controlled Trial RENEWING HEALTH. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Dec 11;2(4):e57. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3882. PubMed 25499872 ↗
  • Kannisto KA, Korhonen J, Adams CE, Koivunen MH, Vahlberg T, Valimaki MA. Factors Associated With Dropout During Recruitment and Follow-Up Periods of a mHealth-Based Randomized Controlled Trial for Mobile.Net to Encourage Treatment Adherence for People With Serious Mental Health Problems. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 21;19(2):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6417. PubMed 28223262 ↗
  • Fukuoka Y, Gay C, Haskell W, Arai S, Vittinghoff E. Identifying Factors Associated With Dropout During Prerandomization Run-in Period From an mHealth Physical Activity Education Study: The mPED Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Apr 13;3(2):e34. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3928. PubMed 25872754 ↗

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 6, 2017
  • Study protocol · Mar 1, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We do not intend to share individual participant data with researchers outside of the principal and co-investigators.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03403270
Lead sponsor
St. Boniface Hospital
Collaborators
Heart and Stroke Foundation Manitoba, Tactica Interactive Winnipeg
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 18, 2018
Start date
Jan 31, 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 18, 2018

Study contacts

Todd A Duhamel, Ph.D.
Contact
TDuhamel@sbrc.ca
(204) 474-8922

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion