CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03400748Updated Apr 3, 2024Results posted

ANET Electrosurgery Applicator Pilot Evaluation Study

An interventional study of RF Ablation in Lung Cancer and Lung Cancer Metastatic, sponsored by Olympus Corporation of the Americas. Terminated at 4 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-03.

Sponsored by Olympus Corporation of the Americas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Why this study was terminated
business reason
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluate the preliminary safety and performance of the Electrosurgery Applicator (ANET device) during and after bronchoscopic ablation of a target pulmonary nodule/tumor.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, single arm, single center study that will evaluate the effectiveness of the ANET Electrosurgery Applicator in up to 10 subjects.

Subjects who consent to participate in this study will have a lung tumor that is scheduled to be removed surgically as part of their normal treatment. During the surgical procedure, just prior to resection the subject's tumor will be treated with the ANET device. The ANET device uses a bronchoscope to reach the tumor. Ultrasound on the bronchoscope, CT, and X-rays are used to make sure the ANET device is in the tumor. Once in the tumor, the ANET device uses radio-frequency (RF) ablation to treat the tumor. After standard surgical resection the tumor and surrounding tissue is evaluated to characterize the effect of the ANET.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer
  • Lung Cancer Metastatic

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Electrosurgery
  • RF ablation
  • Minimally invasive
  • Lung cancer
  • Lung metastasis
  • Lung tumor
  • Primary
  • Metastatic
  • Endobronchial ultrasound
  • EBUS
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject with Stage I or Stage II primary lung cancer or metastatic lung tumor
  2. Pathological proof of target nodule/tumor type and malignancy
  3. Target nodule/tumor which can be accessed via EBUS bronchoscopy
  4. Resection/surgical candidate
  5. Participants must be at least 18 years old and able to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Subjects in whom flexible bronchoscopy is contraindicated
  2. Target nodule \< 1.0 cm
  3. Prior radiation or neo adjuvant chemotherapy of the target nodule/tumor
  4. Any comorbidity that the investigator feels would interfere with the safety of the subject or the evaluation of study objectives
  5. Pacemaker, implantable cardioverter, or other electronic implantable device
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RF Ablation

    Single-arm study where subjects receive RF ablation prior to a scheduled surgical resection.

    Device: RF Ablation

Interventions

  • DeviceRF Ablation

    The intervention consists of a bronchoscopic approach to ablate lung tumors with radio-frequency energy.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ANET Related Peri-procedural Adverse Events

    The incidence of reported adverse events and serious adverse events related to the ANET device or procedure

    Time frame: Day 0

06

Results

Posted Sep 27, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRF Ablation
Started6
Completed6
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryANET Related Peri-procedural Adverse Events

The incidence of reported adverse events and serious adverse events related to the ANET device or procedure

Time frame:
Day 0
Reported as:
Number · Adverse Event
ANET Related Peri-procedural Adverse Events
Adverse EventRF Ablation
ANET Related Peri-procedural Adverse Events0

Adverse events

Collected over Day 0. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
RF Ablation0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)RF Ablation
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years2
>=65 years4
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)RF Ablation
Mean71 (51 to 81)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)RF Ablation
Female3
Male3
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)RF Ablation
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian2
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White4
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)RF Ablation
Canada5
United States1
07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Toronto General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 1, 2020
  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 11, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03400748
Lead sponsor
Olympus Corporation of the Americas
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
Start date
Apr 23, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 18, 2020
Completion
Nov 18, 2020
Results posted
Sep 27, 2021
Last update
Apr 3, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion