ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03400059Updated Jan 6, 2025Results posted

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intranasal Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine

An interventional study of Chordate System S211 in treatment mode and Chordate System S211 in placebo mode in Chronic Migraine, sponsored by Chordate Medical. Completed at 10 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-06.

Sponsored by Chordate Medical · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 33 studies in Headache with a site in Germany — 1 open to participants now, 4 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Headache · Germany.

Enrollment
25th of 28
144 · median 456
Started
2018
with 2 others
No phase
5 of 33
none open now
Registered
18th of 33
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 33
Chordate Medical

Among the 33 studies in Headache with a site in Germany, this one is the 25th largest by enrollment of the 28 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 5 with no phase, and was the 18th registered.

Headache

762 studies on the registry are indexed under Headache; 134 are open to participants now.

Browse Headache studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 33 studies in Headache with a site in Germany is open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

A study can be open while its sites in Germany have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Germany →

Who these studies take

Of the 83 Headache studies recruiting now, 30 (36%) set no upper age limit and 44 (53%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 33 studies in Headache with a site in Germany, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The efficacy of intranasal kinetic oscillation stimulation using the Chordate System S211 as a preventative treatment will be examined in patients diagnosed with chronic migraine. The medical device system will be applied in 6 treatments at weekly intervals. The study will examine the effects on monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical investigation of a medical device. The study consists of a 4-week screening period, a 6-week treatment period (2 weeks run-in and a 4-week observation window to assess the treatment effect), and a 4-week follow-up period.

The study primarily aims at evaluating the effect of intranasal kinetic oscillation stimulation using the Chordate System S211 as a preventative treatment on monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity.

03

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Migraine

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prophylaxis, Headache, Preventative Treatment
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The subject is legally competent, has been informed of the nature, the scope and the relevance of the study, voluntarily agrees to participation and the study's provisions, and has duly signed the form (ICF);
  2. Male or female aged between 18 and 65 years (inclusive) at the time of providing informed consent;
  3. Diagnosed as suffering from chronic migraine with or without aura (≥15 headache days per month for more than 3 months before screening including at least 8 migraine days) according to the IHS classification (International Classification of Headache Disorders [ICHD]-III beta);
  4. Migraine onset before the age of 60 years;
  5. Reported history of migraine for at least 1 year before screening;
  6. Reported stable prophylactic migraine medication regimen, if any, during the 3 months prior to screening;
  7. Able and willing to maintain current prophylactic migraine medication regimen (no change in type, frequency or dose) from screening to end of follow-up;
  8. Women of must be willing to use highly effective methods (failure rate \<1% per year when used consistently and correctly) during the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to distinguish between migraine headaches and other headache types;
  2. Treatment with Botox in the head/neck area within 4 months of the screening visit, or planned Botox treatment during the study;
  3. Previous or ongoing treatment with an implanted stimulator or other implanted device in the head and/or neck;
  4. Known pronounced anterior septal deviation, or other known relevant abnormality in the nasal cavity, including bacterial infection and wounds;
  5. History of relevant sinus surgery, transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary or other lesions or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea;
  6. Fitted with a pacemaker/defibrillator;
  7. Previously treated with therapeutic x-ray intervention in the facial region (that could have influenced the nasal mucosa);
  8. Ongoing upper respiratory infection or in the nasal cavity;
  9. History of regular nose bleeding (epistaxis), or concomitant condition or medication that could cause excessive bleeding including treatment with an anticoagulant;
  10. Head injury or open wound that contraindicates use of the Chordate Headband;
  11. Known allergy to polyvinylchloride, a material used in the Chordate Catheter, or medicinal liquid paraffin;
  12. Concurrent condition or risk of non-compliance that, in the investigator's opinion, may affect the interpretation of performance or safety data or which otherwise contraindicates participation in a clinical investigation;
  13. Pregnant and lactating women;
  14. Participation in a clinical investigation within 3 months of enrolment or planned participation at any time during this clinical investigation;
  15. Previous participation in this study;
  16. Employees of the study site or the sponsor directly involved with the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of any such individuals.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
144 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Treatment

    Device: Chordate System S211 in treatment mode

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Treatment

    Device: Chordate System S211 in placebo mode

Interventions

  • DeviceChordate System S211 in treatment mode

    Chordate System S211 in treatment mode

  • DeviceChordate System S211 in placebo mode

    Chordate System S211 in placebo mode

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.

    Least square mean change from Baseline (4-week screening period) in monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity in 4-week performance assessment period.

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine Days

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

  3. Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine Days

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

  4. Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

  5. Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

  6. Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

  7. Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

  8. Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

  9. Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

  10. Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Performance Assessment Period

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

  11. Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Follow-up Period

    Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

  12. Headache Impact Test

    The headache impact test-6 (HIT-6) is a 6-item self-administered questionnaire that evaluates the extent of disability a subject experiences due to headache by measuring the subject's level of pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The final total score is obtained from simple summation of the 6 items. The total score ranges between 36 and 78, with larger scores reflecting greater impact. Reported is the change from Baseline in the final total score at the respective visit.

    Time frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

  13. Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - Restrictive

    The role function-restrictive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines limit daily activities and interactions during the past 4 weeks. It includes 7 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function restrictive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function restrictive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

    Time frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

  14. MSQ - Role Function - Preventive

    The role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines prevent from engaging in daily activities during the past 4 weeks. It includes 4 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function-preventive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

    Time frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

  15. MSQ - Emotional Function

    The emotional function dimension of the MSQ assesses the emotional impact of migraines during the past 4 weeks. It includes 3 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the emotional function dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the emotional function dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

    Time frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

  16. Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

    The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the subject's impression of disease severity. The subjects rated the severity of their condition on a scale from 1 to 4: 1=normal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe

    Time frame: Days -28 (screening), 0 (visit 1), 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (Follow-up)

  17. Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

    n (%) of patients

    Time frame: Days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 70

07

Results

Posted Jan 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Started7569
Randomization7569
Safety analysis set (saf)7668
Full analysis set (fas)7169
Completed6765
Not completed84

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.

Least square mean change from Baseline (4-week screening period) in monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity in 4-week performance assessment period.

Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Reported as:
Least squares mean · change in days
Mean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.
change in daysActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Mean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.-3.45 ± 0.62-1.22 ± 0.62
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · ANCOVA · p = 0.0132 (analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model containing terms for treatment, baseline value and medication overuse. Group-sequential analysis using updated boundaries from interim analysis) · Mean difference (final values): -2.23 · 95% CI -4.11 to -0.49
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Reported as:
Least squares mean · change in days
Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
change in daysActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period-3.15 ± 0.59-0.47 ± 0.59
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · ANCOVA · p = 0.0014 · Mean difference (final values): -2.68 · 95% CI -4.32 to -1.04ANCOVA model containing terms for treatment, baseline value and medication overuse
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine Days
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Reported as:
Least squares mean · change in days
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine Days
change in daysActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine Days-3.57 ± 0.60-1.17 ± 0.60
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · ANCOVA · p = 0.0048 · Mean difference (final values): -2.40 · 95% CI -4.06 to -0.73ANCOVA model containing terms for treatment, baseline value and medication overuse
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine Days
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Reported as:
Least squares mean · change in days
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine Days
change in daysActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine Days-3.72 ± 0.60-0.85 ± 0.60
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · ANCOVA · p = 0.0008 · Mean difference (final values): -2.87 · 95% CI -4.54 to -1.20ANCOVA model containing terms for treatment, baseline value and medication overuse.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Reported as:
Least squares mean · change in days
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities
change in daysActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities-2.88 ± 0.57-1.35 ± 0.58
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · ANCOVA · p = 0.0598 · Mean difference (final values): -1.53 · 95% CI -3.12 to 0.06ANCOVA model containing terms for treatment, baseline value and medication overuse.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Reported as:
Least squares mean · change in days
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities
change in daysActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities-3.65 ± 0.62-1.75 ± 0.62
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · ANCOVA · p = 0.0310 · Mean difference (final values): -1.90 · 95% CI -3.63 to -0.17ANCOVA model containing terms for treatment, baseline value and medication overuse.
SecondaryProportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period
ParticipantsActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period3217
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · Chi-squared · p = 0.0102
SecondaryProportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
ParticipantsActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period2719
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · Chi-squared · p = 0.1615
SecondaryProportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period
ParticipantsActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period2011
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · Chi-squared · p = 0.0798
SecondaryProportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
ParticipantsActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period169
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · Chi-squared · p = 0.1300
SecondaryChange in the Use of Abortive Medication in Performance Assessment Period
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Reported as:
Mean · change in days
Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Performance Assessment Period
change in daysActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Performance Assessment Period-2.016 ± 4.565-0.857 ± 4.721
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · Van-Elteren · p = 0.0660 (posthoc) · Median difference (final values): -1.0
SecondaryChange in the Use of Abortive Medication in Follow-up Period
Time frame:
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · change in days
Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Follow-up Period
change in daysActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Follow-up Period-2.490 ± 4.260-0.660 ± 5.552
Statistical analysis
  • Active Treatment vs Sham Treatment · Van-Elteren · p = 0.0152 (posthoc) · Median difference (final values): -2.0
SecondaryHeadache Impact Test

The headache impact test-6 (HIT-6) is a 6-item self-administered questionnaire that evaluates the extent of disability a subject experiences due to headache by measuring the subject's level of pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The final total score is obtained from simple summation of the 6 items. The total score ranges between 36 and 78, with larger scores reflecting greater impact. Reported is the change from Baseline in the final total score at the respective visit.

Time frame:
Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)
Reported as:
Mean · change in score on a scale from Baseline
Headache Impact Test
change in score on a scale from BaselineActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Visit 3-2.6 ± 5.2-1.5 ± 3.1
Visit 7-4.1 ± 6.8-2.2 ± 4.8
Follow-up visit-3.8 ± 7.4-1.7 ± 5.4
SecondaryMigraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - Restrictive

The role function-restrictive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines limit daily activities and interactions during the past 4 weeks. It includes 7 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function restrictive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function restrictive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

Time frame:
Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)
Reported as:
Mean · change in score on a scale from Baseline
Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - Restrictive
change in score on a scale from BaselineActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Visit 37.4 ± 16.35.4 ± 11.2
Visit 713.3 ± 19.97.5 ± 17.0
Follow-up11.9 ± 21.44.9 ± 19.8
SecondaryMSQ - Role Function - Preventive

The role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines prevent from engaging in daily activities during the past 4 weeks. It includes 4 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function-preventive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

Time frame:
Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)
Reported as:
Mean · change in score on a scale from Baseline
MSQ - Role Function - Preventive
change in score on a scale from BaselineActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Visit 34.2 ± 17.40.7 ± 10.9
Visit 79.2 ± 20.84.8 ± 16.6
Follow-up9.8 ± 22.2-0.7 ± 19.8
SecondaryMSQ - Emotional Function

The emotional function dimension of the MSQ assesses the emotional impact of migraines during the past 4 weeks. It includes 3 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the emotional function dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the emotional function dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

Time frame:
Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)
Reported as:
Mean · change in score on a scale from Baseline
MSQ - Emotional Function
change in score on a scale from BaselineActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Visit 37.0 ± 16.23.0 ± 14.2
Visit 710.2 ± 23.55.8 ± 19.2
Follow-up11.5 ± 25.22.5 ± 24.7
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the subject's impression of disease severity. The subjects rated the severity of their condition on a scale from 1 to 4: 1=normal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe

Time frame:
Days -28 (screening), 0 (visit 1), 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (Follow-up)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
ParticipantsActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Screening — Not done10
Screening — normal1313
Screening — mild74
Screening — moderate2524
Screening — severe2528
Visit 1 — Not done21
Visit 1 — normal2120
Visit 1 — mild56
Visit 1 — moderate2219
Visit 1 — severe2123
Visit 3 — Not done11
Visit 3 — normal2224
Visit 3 — mild139
Visit 3 — moderate2120
Visit 3 — severe1214
Visit 7 — Not done11
Visit 7 — normal2325
Visit 7 — mild1710
Visit 7 — moderate2118
Visit 7 — severe613
Follow-up — Not done00
Follow-up — normal2223
Follow-up — mild179
Follow-up — moderate2018
Follow-up — severe1017
SecondaryIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

n (%) of patients

Time frame:
Days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 70
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsActive TreatmentSham Treatment
Any adverse event4941
Any treatment emergent adverse event4841
any serious treatment emergent adverse event10
Any treatment emergent adverse event related to medical device25
Any treatment emergent adverse event related to procedure1713

Adverse events

Collected over From Day 0 (during and after the first treatment with the investigational medicinal device) to Day 70 (final follow-up visit), i.e, about 10 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Treatment0/76 (0%)1/76 (1.3%)49/76 (64.5%)
Sham Treatment0/68 (0%)0/68 (0%)41/68 (60.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventActive TreatmentSham Treatment
foot fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/76—
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent other events
EventActive TreatmentSham Treatment
DizzinessNervous system disorders7/762/68
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations6/766/68
EpixtaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/764/68
Corona Virus infectionInfections and infestations4/764/68
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/764/68
Neck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/763/68
RhinorrheaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/763/68
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/760/68
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/762/68
Lacrimation increasedEye disorders1/762/68

Baseline characteristics

One subject was randomized to and treated with placebo and was assigned to the placebo group in the FAS, but received active treatment for a short time at Visit 1 and was therefore assigned to the active group in the SAF. Baseline subject demographics are based on the SAF.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Active TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7667143
>=65 years011
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
Median48 (20 to 64)46 (19 to 67)48 (19 to 67)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
Female6557122
Male111122
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Active TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
White7568143
Arabian (Jordan)101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Active TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
Finland252247
Germany514697
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)Active TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
Mean26.3 ± 5.625.3 ± 5.025.9 ± 5.3
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Terveystalo Ruoholahti
    Helsinki, 00180, Finland
  • Helsingin päänsärkykeskus / Aava Itäkeskus
    Helsinki, 00930, Finland
  • Terveystalo Tampere
    Tampere, 33100, Finland
  • Suomen Terveystalo Turku
    Turku, 20100, Finland
  • Lewis Neurologie
    Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg 70178, Germany
  • Neurologie- & Kopfschmerzzentrum
    München, Bayern 80802, Germany
  • Klinikum Großhadern / Neurologische Klinik der Universität München
    München, Bayern 81377, Germany
  • Migräne-Klinik Königstein
    Königstein Im Taunus, Hessen 61462, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin Rostock / Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie
    Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 18147, Germany
  • CTC North am Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20251, Germany
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Due to uncertainties in EU data protection legislation individual deidentified participant data are not shared. The main uncertainty is the concept of what "deidentified" means. It appears not to mean that the data set of a person is simply separated from the person's name. What additional operations have to be done appears to depend on technological capabilities to re-identify the persons associated with the data set. A common perception is that the technological capabilities for re-identification are permanently increasing. This could have the effect that public data sets that are regarded as deidentified now might become re-identifiable data sets in the future. Once this happens, the sponsor is no longer able to make the publication of the data sets un-happen. This could result in punishment by EU data protection authorities. The sponsor wants to avoid this.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Aug 2022, 52 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2025, 2 years 5 months after primary completion.

Of 193 interventional studies with no phase under Headache, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 38. This study's 52 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 9, 2018
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
StartActual
Mar 22, 2018
Primary completionActual
Aug 1, 2022
CompletionActual
Aug 1, 2022
Results first posted
Jan 6, 2025
Last update
Jan 6, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03400059
Lead sponsor
Chordate Medical
Collaborators
Vinnova, FGK Clinical Research GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
Start date
Mar 22, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2022
Completion
Aug 1, 2022
Results posted
Jan 6, 2025
Last update
Jan 6, 2025

Study contacts

Arne May, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion