ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03399370ORION-10Updated Oct 5, 2020Results posted

Inclisiran for Participants With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

A Phase 3 interventional study of Inclisiran Sodium and Placebo in ASCVD and Elevated Cholesterol, sponsored by The Medicines Company. Completed at 145 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-05.

Sponsored by The Medicines Company (part of Novartis) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,561
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 24 studies testing inclisiran in Hypercholesterolemia — 6 open to participants now, 10 under way, 5 of them phase 3. inclisiran · Hypercholesterolemia.

Enrollment
7th of 24
1,561 · median 375
Started
2017
with 2 others
Phase 3
13 of 24
2 open now
Registered
3rd of 24
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 24
The Medicines Company

Among the 24 studies testing inclisiran in Hypercholesterolemia, this one is the 7th largest by enrollment, is one of 3 that started in 2017, is one of 13 in phase 3, and was the 3rd registered.

Hypercholesterolemia

1,177 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypercholesterolemia; 95 are open to participants now.

Browse Hypercholesterolemia studies →

Open to participants now

6 of the 24 studies testing inclisiran in Hypercholesterolemia are open now, in 12 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 6 open studies →

About inclisiran

inclisiran: first FDA approval 2021 (LEQVIO), first EMA approval 2020. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 55 Hypercholesterolemia studies recruiting now, 23 (42%) set no upper age limit and 20 (36%) stop at 75 or younger; 9 take children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 24 studies testing inclisiran in Hypercholesterolemia, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a Phase III, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study in participants with ASCVD and elevated LDL-C despite maximum tolerated dose of LDL-C lowering therapies to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) inclisiran injection(s). The study will be a multicenter study in the United States.

03

Conditions studied

  • ASCVD
  • Elevated Cholesterol

Keywords

  • Inclisiran sodium
  • ASCVD
  • LDL-C
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female participants ≥18 years of age.
  2. History of ASCVD (coronary heart disease [CHD], cardiovascular disease [CVD], or peripheral arterial disease [PAD]).
  3. Serum LDL-C ≥1.8 millimole (mmol)/liter (L) (≥70 mg/dL).
  4. Fasting triglyceride \<4.52 mmol/L (\<400 mg/dL) at screening.
  5. Participants on statins should be receiving a maximally tolerated dose.
  6. Participants not receiving statins must have documented evidence of intolerance to all doses of at least 2 different statins.
  7. Subjects on lipid-lower therapies (such as a statin and/or ezetimibe) should be on a stable dose for ≥30 days before screening with no planned medication or dose change during study participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. (NYHA) class IV heart failure.
  2. Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia
  3. Uncontrolled severe hypertension
  4. Active liver disease
  5. Females who are pregnant or nursing, or who are of and unwilling to use at least 2 methods of highly effective (failure rate less than 1% per year) (for example, combined oral contraceptives, barrier methods, approved contraceptive implant, long-term injectable contraception, or intrauterine device) for the entire duration of the study. Exemptions from this criterion:

    1. Women >2 years (defined as 1 year or longer since last menstrual period) and more than 55 years of age.
    2. Postmenopausal women (as defined above) and less than 55 years of age with a negative pregnancy test within 24 hours of randomization.
    3. Women who are surgically sterilized at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
  6. Males who are unwilling to use an acceptable method of birth control during the entire study period (such as condom with spermicide).
  7. Treatment with other products or devices within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the screening visit, whichever is longer.
  8. Treatment (within 90 days of screening) with monoclonal antibodies directed towards PCSK9

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
1,561 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Inclisiran

    Inclisiran sodium 300 milligrams (mg) will be administered as a SC injection on Day 1, Day 90, then every 6 months.

    Drug: Inclisiran Sodium

  • Placebo comparator
    Saline Solution

    Placebo will be administered as a SC injection of saline solution on Day 1, Day 90, then every 6 months.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Inclisiran is a small interfering ribonucleic acid (RNA) that inhibits PCSK9 synthesis.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be supplied as sterile normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride in water for injection).

    Also known as: Saline Solution

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Day 510

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 510

  2. Time-adjusted Percentage Change in LDL-C Levels From Baseline After Day 90 and up to Day 540

    Assessments performed at Baseline, Day 90, Day 540, time-adjusted percent change at Day 540 reported

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 90 to Day 540

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Day 510

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 510

  2. Time-adjusted Absolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline After Day 90 and up to Day 540

    Assessments performed at Baseline, Day 90, Day 540, time-adjusted percent change at Day 540 reported

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 90 to Day 540

  3. Percentage Change in Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) From Baseline to Day 510

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 510

  4. Percentage Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 510

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 510

  5. Percentage Change in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) From Baseline to Day 510

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 510

  6. Percentage Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Day 510

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 510

07

Results

Posted Oct 5, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInclisiranSaline Solution
Started781780
Completed721694
Not completed6086

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Day 510
Time frame:
Baseline, Day 510
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percentage Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Day 510
percent changeInclisiranPlacebo
Percentage Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Day 510-56.34 (-58.35 to -54.34)1.30 (-1.24 to 3.83)
Statistical analysis
  • Inclisiran vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <.0001 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was \<0.05) · Mean difference (final values): -57.64 · 95% CI -60.86 to -54.43Represents the least squares mean difference from Placebo
PrimaryTime-adjusted Percentage Change in LDL-C Levels From Baseline After Day 90 and up to Day 540

Assessments performed at Baseline, Day 90, Day 540, time-adjusted percent change at Day 540 reported

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 90 to Day 540
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Time-adjusted Percentage Change in LDL-C Levels From Baseline After Day 90 and up to Day 540
percent changeInclisiranPlacebo
Time-adjusted Percentage Change in LDL-C Levels From Baseline After Day 90 and up to Day 540-51.27 (-53.00 to -49.54)2.51 (0.77 to 4.25)
Statistical analysis
  • Inclisiran vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was \<0.05) · Mean difference (final values): -53.78 · 95% CI -56.23 to -51.33Represents the least squares mean difference from Placebo
SecondaryAbsolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Day 510
Time frame:
Baseline, Day 510
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
Absolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Day 510
mg/dLInclisiranPlacebo
Absolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Day 510-56.18 (-58.47 to -53.90)-2.06 (-4.36 to 0.24)
Statistical analysis
  • Inclisiran vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was \<0.05) · Mean difference (final values): -54.12 · 95% CI -57.37 to -50.88Represents the least squares mean difference from Placebo
SecondaryTime-adjusted Absolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline After Day 90 and up to Day 540

Assessments performed at Baseline, Day 90, Day 540, time-adjusted percent change at Day 540 reported

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 90 to Day 540
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
Time-adjusted Absolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline After Day 90 and up to Day 540
mg/dLInclisiranPlacebo
Time-adjusted Absolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline After Day 90 and up to Day 540-53.66 (-55.41 to -51.92)-0.39 (-2.14 to 1.37)
Statistical analysis
  • Inclisiran vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was \<0.05) · Mean difference (final values): -53.28 · 95% CI -55.75 to -50.80Represents the least squares mean difference from Placebo
SecondaryPercentage Change in Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) From Baseline to Day 510
Time frame:
Baseline, Day 510
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percentage Change in Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) From Baseline to Day 510
percent changeInclisiranPlacebo
Percentage Change in Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) From Baseline to Day 510-69.78 (-73.88 to -65.67)13.52 (9.28 to 17.77)
Statistical analysis
  • Inclisiran vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was \<0.05) · Mean difference (final values): -83.80 · 95% CI -89.25 to -77.34Represents the least squares mean difference from Placebo
SecondaryPercentage Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 510
Time frame:
Baseline, Day 510
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percentage Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 510
percent changeInclisiranPlacebo
Percentage Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 510-33.56 (-35.09 to -32.03)-0.42 (-1.95 to 1.11)
Statistical analysis
  • Inclisiran vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was \<0.05) · Mean difference (final values): -33.13 · 95% CI -35.30 to -30.97Represents the least squares mean difference from Placebo
SecondaryPercentage Change in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) From Baseline to Day 510
Time frame:
Baseline, Day 510
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percentage Change in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) From Baseline to Day 510
percent changeInclisiranPlacebo
Percentage Change in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) From Baseline to Day 510-44.81 (-46.52 to -43.10)-1.72 (-3.46 to 0.02)
Statistical analysis
  • Inclisiran vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <.0001 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was \<0.05) · Mean difference (final values): -43.09 · 95% CI -45.50 to -40.67Represents the least squares mean difference from Placebo
SecondaryPercentage Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Day 510
Time frame:
Baseline, Day 510
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percentage Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Day 510
percent changeInclisiranPlacebo
Percentage Change in Non-HDL-C From Baseline to Day 510-47.41 (-49.44 to -45.38)-0.05 (-2.08 to 1.99)
Statistical analysis
  • Inclisiran vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was \<0.05) · Mean difference (final values): -47.36 · 95% CI -50.25 to -44.47Represents the least squares mean difference from Placebo

Adverse events

Collected over 18 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Inclisiran12/781 (1.5%)175/781 (22.4%)247/781 (31.6%)
Saline Solution11/778 (1.4%)205/778 (26.3%)219/778 (28.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 234
Most frequent serious events
EventInclisiranSaline Solution
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders15/78122/778
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders7/78120/778
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders14/78112/778
PneumoniaInfections and infestations11/7819/778
Angina unstableCardiac disorders4/78110/778
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders10/7818/778
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders10/7819/778
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders6/7817/778
SyncopeNervous system disorders4/7817/778
Ischaemic strokeNervous system disorders7/7814/778
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventInclisiranSaline Solution
Diabetes mellitusMetabolism and nutrition disorders120/781108/778
BronchitisInfections and infestations46/78130/778
HypertensionVascular disorders42/78142/778
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders39/78139/778

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)InclisiranPlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years297333630
>=65 years484447931
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)InclisiranPlaceboTotal
Mean66.4 ± 8.9065.7 ± 8.8966.0 ± 8.90
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)InclisiranPlaceboTotal
Female246232478
Male5355481083
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)InclisiranPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native246
Asian9110
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander7310
Black or African American11087197
White6536851338
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)InclisiranPlaceboTotal
United States7817801561
08

Study locations

145 sites
  • Research Site 10001-015
    Birmingham, Alabama 35211, United States
  • Research Site 10001-138
    Foley, Alabama 36535, United States
  • Research Site 10001-113
    Huntsville, Alabama 35801, United States
  • Research Site 10001-058
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Research Site 10001-037
    Montgomery, Alabama 36117, United States
  • Research Site 10001-076
    Saraland, Alabama 36571, United States
  • Research Site 10001-013
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Research Site 10001-077
    Mesa, Arizona 85213, United States
  • Research Site 10001-136
    Phoenix, Arizona 85014, United States
  • Research Site 10001-051
    Surprise, Arizona 85374, United States
  • Research Site 10001-019
    Tucson, Arizona 85712, United States
  • Research Site 10001-004
    Tucson, Arizona 85741, United States
  • Research Site 10001-132
    Tucson, Arizona 85745, United States
  • Research Site 10001-073
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • Research Site 10001-050
    Canoga Park, California 91303, United States
  • Research Site 10001-011
    Carlsbad, California 92008, United States
  • Research Site 10001-065
    El Cajon, California 92020, United States
  • Research Site 10001-150
    Los Angeles, California 90022, United States
  • Research Site 10001-043
    Northridge, California 91324, United States
  • Research Site 10001-022
    Northridge, California 91325, United States
  • Research Site 10001-033
    Sacramento, California 95821-2134, United States
  • Research Site 10001-105
    San Ramon, California 94582, United States
  • Research Site 10001-008
    Santa Rosa, California 95405, United States
  • Research Site 10001-153
    Spring Valley, California 91978, United States
  • Research Site 10001-044
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • Research Site 10001-047
    Boca Raton, Florida 33434, United States
  • Research Site 10001-084
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Research Site 10001-155
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Research Site 10001-099
    Clearwater, Florida 33761, United States
  • Research Site 10001-127
    Daytona Beach, Florida 32117, United States
  • Research Site 10001-119
    Fleming Island, Florida 32003, United States
  • Research Site 10001-070
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308, United States
  • Research Site 10001-067
    Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • Research Site 10001-139
    Jacksonville, Florida 32204, United States
  • Research Site 10001-039
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Research Site 10001-098
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Research Site 10001-080
    Miami Springs, Florida 33166, United States
  • Research Site 10001-081
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Research Site 10001-140
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Research Site 10001-142
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Research Site 10001-030
    Miami, Florida 33165, United States
  • Research Site 10001-089
    Miami, Florida 33173, United States
  • Research Site 10001-116
    Miami, Florida 33183, United States
  • Research Site 10001-027
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33024, United States
  • Research Site 10001-115
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33027, United States
  • Research Site 10001-048
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33029, United States
  • Research Site 10001-147
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33029, United States
  • Research Site 10001-003
    Pinellas Park, Florida 33781, United States
  • Research Site 10001-104
    Ponte Vedra, Florida 32081, United States
  • Research Site 10001-090
    Saint Augustine, Florida 32086, United States
  • Research Site 10001-102
    Saint Petersburg, Florida 33713, United States
  • Research Site 10001-123
    Sarasota, Florida 34239-3513, United States
  • Research Site 10001-038
    Tampa, Florida 33607, United States
  • Research Site 10001-143
    Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • Research Site 10001-069
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Research Site 10001-137
    Dunwoody, Georgia 30338, United States
  • Research Site 10001-092
    Macon, Georgia 31210, United States
  • Research Site 10001-059
    Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005, United States
  • Research Site 10001-158
    Chicago, Illinois 60602, United States
  • Research Site 10001-035
    Chicago, Illinois 60616, United States
  • Research Site 10001-036
    Evanston, Illinois 60201, United States
  • Research Site 10001-082
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • Research Site 1001-020
    Sellersburg, Indiana 47172, United States
  • Research Site 10001-040
    Valparaiso, Indiana 46383, United States
  • Research Site 10001-074
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50266, United States
  • Research Site 10001-028
    Hutchinson, Kansas 67502, United States
  • Research Site 10001-125
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • Research Site 10001-108
    Lexington, Kentucky 40504, United States
  • Research Site 10001-107
    Owensboro, Kentucky 42303, United States
  • Research Site 10001-144
    Crowley, Louisiana 70526, United States
  • Research Site 10001-041
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, United States
  • Research Site 10001-101
    Monroe, Louisiana 71201, United States
  • Research Site 10001-024
    Flint, Michigan 48504, United States
  • Research Site 10001-095
    Grandville, Michigan 49418, United States
  • Research Site 10001-078
    Sterling Heights, Michigan 48310, United States
  • Research Site 10001-034
    Troy, Michigan 48098, United States
  • Research Site 10001-018
    Edina, Minnesota 55435, United States
  • Research Site 10001-056
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102, United States
  • Research Site 10001-156
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63136, United States
  • Research Site 10001-007
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Research Site 10001-053
    Omaha, Nebraska 68134, United States
  • Research Site 10001-021
    Omaha, Nebraska 68144, United States
  • Research Site 10001-112
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, United States
  • Research Site 10001-124
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89121, United States
  • Research Site 10001-060
    Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807, United States
  • Research Site 10001-055
    Raritan, New Jersey 08869, United States
  • Research Site 10001-054
    Albany, New York 12206, United States
  • Research Site 10001-122
    Binghamton, New York 13901, United States
  • Research Site 10001-128
    Endwell, New York 13760, United States
  • Research Site 10001-042
    New Windsor, New York 12553, United States
  • Research Site 10001-129
    Poughkeepsie, New York 12601, United States
  • Research Site 10001-110
    Williamsville, New York 14221, United States
  • Research Site 10001-063
    Cary, North Carolina 27518, United States
  • Research Site 10001-064
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27401, United States
  • Research Site 10001-145
    Mooresville, North Carolina 28117, United States
  • Research Site 10001-046
    Shelby, North Carolina 28150, United States
  • Research Site 10001-016
    Akron, Ohio 443311, United States
  • Research Site 10001-120
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • Research Site 10001-154
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45227, United States
  • Research Site 10001-010
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45236, United States

Showing the first 100 of 145 sites. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ray KK, Wright RS, Kallend D, Koenig W, Leiter LA, Raal FJ, Bisch JA, Richardson T, Jaros M, Wijngaard PLJ, Kastelein JJP; ORION-10 and ORION-11 Investigators. Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1507-1519. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912387. Epub 2020 Mar 18. PubMed 32187462 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2019, 20 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2020, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 122 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Hypercholesterolemia, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 26. This study's 20 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 125 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 3, 2018
First posted
Jan 16, 2018
StartActual
Dec 21, 2017
Primary completionActual
Sep 10, 2019
CompletionActual
Sep 17, 2019
Results first posted
Oct 5, 2020
Last update
Oct 5, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03399370
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 16, 2018
Start date
Dec 21, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 10, 2019
Completion
Sep 17, 2019
Results posted
Oct 5, 2020
Last update
Oct 5, 2020

Study contacts

Scott Wright, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Inclisiran

Start the discussion