ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03398070Updated Aug 29, 2023Results posted

Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Prognosis in Motor Functional Neurological Disorders

An observational study in Conversion Disorder, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-29.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Functional Neurological Disorder (FND/ Conversion Disorder) is a highly prevalent and disabling neuropsychiatric condition. Motor FND symptoms include Nonepileptic Seizures, Functional Movement Disorders and Functional Weakness. Clinical research across these motor FND subtypes, including research studies from the candidate's laboratory, suggest that these populations share many clinical and phenotypic similarities that warrant increased research integration. Furthermore, despite the prevalence of motor FND, little is known about the underlying pathophysiology of this condition, which is a prerequisite for the development of biologically informed prognostic and treatment response biomarkers. Across 3 published neurobiologically focused articles, the candidate proposed a framework through which to conceptualize motor FND. It is suggested that motor FND develops in the context of structural and functional alterations in neurocircuits mediating emotion awareness/expression, bodily awareness, viscerosomatic processing and behavioral regulation. The overall goal of this project is to comprehensively investigate structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of prognosis across motor FND. Multimodal structural and functional MRI techniques (including voxel-based morphometry, cortical thickness, resting-state functional connectivity and diffusion tensor imaging tractography) will be used to systemically probe brain-prognosis relationships. Novel aspects of this proposal include the study of the full spectrum of motor FND, consistent with a trans-diagnostic approach.

Read the detailed description

Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) (Conversion Disorder) is a poorly understood and prevalent somatoform disorder, making up 16% of outpatient neurology referrals. Patients with motor FND (mFND) are difficult to treat, result in major morbidity, and are costly to the US. An estimated $256 billion is spent annually treating this population. mFND includes Nonepileptic Seizures (NES), Functional Movement Disorders (FMD) and Functional Weakness (FW). An impediment to managing mFND is the lack of a neurobiological understanding for this disorder. The diagnosis of mFND is currently based on qualitative aspects of behaviors, which may be difficult to interpret, and the absence of findings characteristic of other neuropsychiatric disorders on laboratory studies such as electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

A major step forward would be the identification of neuroimaging biomarkers for mFND. mFND is understudied compared to other disorders, but recent studies point to distributed neurocircuit alterations associated with mFND. This project aims to advance our biological understanding of mFND by investigating neuroimaging biomarkers linked to prognosis. An improved understanding of the pathophysiology of mFND will provide a critical step in elucidating diagnostic, prognostic and treatment response biomarkers.

Aim:

Identify structural and functional biomarkers of prognosis at 6-months in patients with motor functional neurological disorders receiving an updated standard of care.

H1: Favorable mFND prognosis at 6 months post initial evaluation will be predicted by the degree of preserved baseline gray matter in limbic-paralimbic regions, particularly those part of the salience network.

H2: Favorable mFND prognosis at 6 months post initial evaluation will be predicted by the degree of preserved baseline resting-state functional connectivity in limbic/paralimbic areas, particularly those part of the salience network.

H3: Favorable mFND prognosis at 6 months will correlate with the degree of preserved baseline cingulum bundle and cingulum-insular tract integrity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Conversion Disorder

Keywords

  • Functional Neurological Disorder
  • Functional Movement Disorder
  • Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures
  • Functional Limb Weakness
03

In context

Conversion Disorder

102 studies on the registry are indexed under Conversion Disorder; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 42 observational studies indexed under Conversion Disorder.

Browse Conversion Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,582 studies on the registry; 451 are open to participants now.

Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Recruitment will occur from patients receiving care in the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Functional Neurological Disorders Clinic

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • clinically established motor functional neurological disorder, including individuals with functional movement disorders, functional limb weakness and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active suicidality
  • major medical/neurological comorbidities with known central nervous system (CNS) consequences
  • active drug use or alcohol dependence
  • known history of a primary psychotic disorder
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Motor Functional Neurological Disorder.

    The cohort will consist of patients with clinically established motor functional neurological disorder, which includes individuals with functional movement disorders, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and functional limb weakness. Patients will be receiving the standard of care within the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Functional Neurological Disorders Clinic. The updated standard of care that patient's receive in the MGH Functional Neurological Disorders Clinic includes the following: 1. Delivery of a positive "rule-in" diagnosis of functional neurological disorder 2. Individuals are provided with educational materials on functional neurological disorders 3. Referred to physical therapy and/or occupational therapy as clinically indicated 4. FND related cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) referral when appropriate 5. Psychotropic medication management based on standard psychiatric care

    Other: Standard of Care

Interventions

  • OtherStandard of Care

    The standard of care interventions for Functional Neurological Disorders (FND) include: 1. delivery of a rule-in diagnosis 2. providing educational materials 3. referring to physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT) as clinically indicated 4. referring to FND-related cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) 5. psychotropic medication management based on standard psychiatric care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gray Matter Volume Biomarkers of 6 Month Prognosis as Measured by Voxel Based Morphometry - Within Group Comparison

    Correcting for multiple comparisons in structural analyses, baseline structural grey matter volumes in limbic/paralimbic regions (particularly those affiliated with the salience network), would relate to clinical outcome in individuals receiving the standard of care at 6 months. Analyses reported refer to change in either mental health or physical health scores and baseline gray matter volume. The number presented is the peak voxel z-score as also reported in Supplementary Table 4 of the published manuscript. Z-scores are presented in absolute values (with the lowest value being 0). A higher z-score represents a stronger correlation between a given gray matter volume value (at the peak voxel) and the measure of interest (in case mental health or physical health scores). The entry under "row title" specifies if the association is a "positive" vs a "negative" association.

    Time frame: baseline and 6 months

  2. Resting State Functional Connectivity Strength Biomarkers of 6 Month Prognosis - Within Group Comparison

    Correcting for multiple comparisons in resting state connectivity analyses, baseline functional connectivity strength (t-statistic scores) across limbic/paralimbic regions (particularly those affiliated with the salience network), would relate to clinical outcome in individuals receiving the standard of care at 6 months. Here, we tested if link-step connectivity from primary motor areas or amygdala nuclei related to change in clinical outcome. Specifically, we are providing the t-statistic for the connectivity strength between left centromedial amygdala to right anterior insula. Functional connectivity strength is based on the correlation of low frequency brain oscillations measured at rest. A large t-statistic value reflects greater connectivity between brain voxels.

    Time frame: baseline and 6 months

  3. The Integrity of Specific White Matter Tracts (Fractional Anisotropy) as Measured by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Tractography Will Relate to 6-month Prognosis

    Baseline integrity of the cingulum bundle and cingulate-insular tracts, as measured by fractional anisotropy, would relate to 6 month prognosis in patients with Functional Neurological Disorders (FND) receiving the standard of care. Outcome was not assessed - no time to analyze data given prior challenges with the pandemic. Unable to report data in any table as the white matter images have not been analyzed.

    Time frame: baseline and 6 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 29, 2023
Limitations and caveats
Limitations include a modest sample size, patient heterogeneity, medication use, reliance on self-report measures and that management was not restricted to one institution.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMotor Functional Neurological Disorder.
Started30
Completed22
Not completed8

Outcome measures

PrimaryGray Matter Volume Biomarkers of 6 Month Prognosis as Measured by Voxel Based Morphometry - Within Group Comparison

Correcting for multiple comparisons in structural analyses, baseline structural grey matter volumes in limbic/paralimbic regions (particularly those affiliated with the salience network), would relate to clinical outcome in individuals receiving the standard of care at 6 months. Analyses reported refer to change in either mental health or physical health scores and baseline gray matter volume. The number presented is the peak voxel z-score as also reported in Supplementary Table 4 of the published manuscript. Z-scores are presented in absolute values (with the lowest value being 0). A higher z-score represents a stronger correlation between a given gray matter volume value (at the peak voxel) and the measure of interest (in case mental health or physical health scores). The entry under "row title" specifies if the association is a "positive" vs a "negative" association.

Time frame:
baseline and 6 months
Reported as:
Number · peak voxel z-score
Gray Matter Volume Biomarkers of 6 Month Prognosis as Measured by Voxel Based Morphometry - Within Group Comparison
peak voxel z-scoreMotor Functional Neurological Disorder.
∆SF-36 Mental Health Positive Associations: R supplementary motor area (6): 10mm, -16mm, 75mm4.18
∆SF-36 Mental Health Positive Associations: R superior frontal gyrus (6): 18mm, -7mm, 72mm3.27
∆SF-36 Mental Health Positive Associations: R middle cingulate gyrus (24): 3mm, 12mm, 43mm3.85
∆SF-36 Mental Health Positive Associations: L anterior hippocampus: -34mm, -16mm, -15mm3.76
∆SF-36 Mental Health Positive Associations: L middle frontal gyrus (46): -33mm, 26mm, 40mm3.61
∆SF-36 Physical Health Positive Associations: R frontopolar cortex (10): 10mm, 62mm, 4mm3.90
∆SF-36 Physical Health Negative Associations: R superior/middle frontal gyrus (9): 22mm, 24mm, 37mm4.40
∆SF-36 Physical Health Negative Associations: L superior occipital gyrus (19): -10mm, -82mm, 45mm3.80
∆SF-36 Physical Health Negative Associations: L superior occipital gyrus (19): -18mm, -78mm, 42mm3.70
PrimaryResting State Functional Connectivity Strength Biomarkers of 6 Month Prognosis - Within Group Comparison

Correcting for multiple comparisons in resting state connectivity analyses, baseline functional connectivity strength (t-statistic scores) across limbic/paralimbic regions (particularly those affiliated with the salience network), would relate to clinical outcome in individuals receiving the standard of care at 6 months. Here, we tested if link-step connectivity from primary motor areas or amygdala nuclei related to change in clinical outcome. Specifically, we are providing the t-statistic for the connectivity strength between left centromedial amygdala to right anterior insula. Functional connectivity strength is based on the correlation of low frequency brain oscillations measured at rest. A large t-statistic value reflects greater connectivity between brain voxels.

Time frame:
baseline and 6 months
Reported as:
Number · t-statistic
Resting State Functional Connectivity Strength Biomarkers of 6 Month Prognosis - Within Group Comparison
t-statisticMotor Functional Neurological Disorder.
Resting State Functional Connectivity Strength Biomarkers of 6 Month Prognosis - Within Group Comparison4.58
PrimaryThe Integrity of Specific White Matter Tracts (Fractional Anisotropy) as Measured by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Tractography Will Relate to 6-month Prognosis

Baseline integrity of the cingulum bundle and cingulate-insular tracts, as measured by fractional anisotropy, would relate to 6 month prognosis in patients with Functional Neurological Disorders (FND) receiving the standard of care. Outcome was not assessed - no time to analyze data given prior challenges with the pandemic. Unable to report data in any table as the white matter images have not been analyzed.

Time frame:
baseline and 6 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 5 years of research funding. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Motor Functional Neurological Disorder.0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Motor Functional Neurological Disorder.
Mean41.7 ± 11.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Motor Functional Neurological Disorder.
Female19
Male3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Motor Functional Neurological Disorder.
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino0
Unknown or Not Reported22
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Motor Functional Neurological Disorder.
United States22
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Diez I, Ortiz-Teran L, Williams B, Jalilianhasanpour R, Ospina JP, Dickerson BC, Keshavan MS, LaFrance WC Jr, Sepulcre J, Perez DL. Corticolimbic fast-tracking: enhanced multimodal integration in functional neurological disorder. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;90(8):929-938. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319657. Epub 2019 Mar 8. PubMed 30850473 ↗
  • Perez DL, Williams B, Matin N, Mello J, Dickerson BC, LaFrance WC Jr, Keshavan MS. Anterior hippocampal grey matter predicts mental health outcome in functional neurological disorders: an exploratory pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;89(11):1221-1224. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317305. Epub 2018 Jan 11. No abstract available. PubMed 29326291 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 1, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2023, 64 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2023, 7 months after primary completion.

Of 19 observational studies under Conversion Disorder, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 55. This study's 64 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 15, 2017
First posted
Jan 12, 2018
StartActual
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 20, 2023
CompletionActual
Jan 20, 2023
Results first posted
Aug 29, 2023
Last update
Aug 29, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03398070
Responsible party
David Lewis Perez (Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 12, 2018
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 20, 2023
Completion
Jan 20, 2023
Results posted
Aug 29, 2023
Last update
Aug 29, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion