ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03385538CLOGISUpdated Dec 28, 2017

Clopidogrel Response and CYP2C19 Genotype in Ischemic Stroke Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Clopidogrel in Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Zealand University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-28.

Sponsored by Zealand University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2015, registered Aug 2017).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
103
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 18 studies testing clopidogrel in Ischemic Stroke — 5 open to participants now, 5 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Clopidogrel · Ischemic Stroke.

Enrollment
16th of 18
103 · median 725
Started
2015
with 1 other
Phase 4
7 of 18
2 open now
Registered
6th of 18
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 18
Zealand University Hospital

Among the 18 studies testing clopidogrel in Ischemic Stroke, this one is the 16th largest by enrollment, is one of 2 that started in 2015, is one of 7 in phase 4, and was the 6th registered.

Ischemic Stroke

2,617 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 976 are open to participants now.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Open to participants now

5 of the 18 studies testing clopidogrel in Ischemic Stroke are open now, in 2 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 5 open studies →

About clopidogrel

Clopidogrel: first FDA approval 1997 (PLAVIX), first EMA approval 1998. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 661 Ischemic Stroke studies recruiting now, 396 (60%) set no upper age limit and 62 (9%) stop at 75 or younger; 26 take children under 18; 42 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 18 studies testing clopidogrel in Ischemic Stroke, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Personalized therapy as prophylaxis in ischemic stroke patients is not yet an option. From patients with ischemic heart disease, we know that patients with in vitro high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) have an increased risk of stent thrombosis following per-cutaneous coronary intervention. Other studies have shown association of CYP2C19 genotypes with different responses to the anti platelet drug Clopidogrel. We measure HTPR in ischemic stroke patients on increasing doses of clopidogrel and investigate the CYP2C19 genotype for each patient.

Read the detailed description

Background: Clopidogrel (CLO) is a pro-drug metabolized in the liver by the Cytochrom-P450 system to its active component. Studies in acute ischemic stroke (IS) patients have proven that genetic differences in coding of an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of CLO (CYP2C19) results in different response to CLO when tested in the blood. An American study in cardiac patients have shown an association between the genotype and the CLO-response to different dosages of CLO, meaning that patients who are non-responders to low dosages of CLO may be responders to higher CLO dosages. Furthermore, the study showed that patients with a distinct genotype does not gain CLO response even at high CLO dosages (300 mg/day).

Perspective: The study will have an impact on the patient, the relatives and the social economy. The project answers if it is possible to give personalized therapy to IS patients securing the best possible prophylactic treatment for each single patient. Hereby reducing the risk of early death, disability and dependency. The project determines the genetic distribution of CYP2C19 alleles in the Danish IS population and determine the association between genotype and CLO-response in clinically relevant dosages in a Caucasian population of IS patients.

Objective: To determine the correlation between genotype and Clopidogrel response to different CLO dosage and to determine the distribution of different alleles of CYP2C19 genotypes in a Danish IS population.

Hypothesis: CLO response is determined by CYP2C19 genotype, and there is a correlation between drug-response and CYP2C19 genotype.

Method: Systematic recording of data on 103 IS patients receiving prophylactic treatment with CLO 75 mg/day.

Genotype is determined in collaboration with Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Dept. of Diagnostics, Glostrup Hospital determining the CYP2C19 genotype *1(wild-type), *2(Loss Of Function=LOF) and *17(Gain Of Function=GOF). CLO responder status is determined using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assays.

Patients receiving CLO 75 mg/day who are non-responders when testing with VerifyNow P2Y12 assays have a blood sample for genetic testing. Patients carrying the *2 genotype on one or both alleles are CLO responder status tested on increasing doses of CLO, rising 75 mg/day every 14 days (150/225/300 mg) until maximum CLO 300 mg/day. Responder status is tested at the end of every second week, before increasing dosage. If the patient is CLO responder on the tested dose (150/225/300 mg) or non-responder on CLO 300 mg/day, the patient is ended in the study and switched to treatment with ASA in combination with Dipyramidole.

03

Conditions studied

  • Ischemic Stroke

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ischemic stroke diagnosis
  • treatment with clopidogrel 75 mg/day

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • increased risk of bleeding
  • treatment with NOAC, vitamin K antagonist or other antiplatelet drug than clopidogrel
  • unable to give
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
103 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clopidogrel non-responders

    Increasing doses og Clopidogrel depending on PRU values measured on VerifyNow

    Drug: Clopidogrel

Interventions

  • increasing doses of clopidogrel depending on PRU values (75-300 mg)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients who has clopidogrel HTPR

    Clopidogrel responder status measured with VerifyNow

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Number of patients who are carriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles

    Genotyping patients for different loss-of-function CYP2C19 alleeles (\*2, \*3)

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Number of patients who are carriers of P2Y12-receptor loss-of-function alleles

    genotyping patients for different loss-of-function P2Y12 receptor alleeles

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zealand University Hospital, dept of neurology
    Roskilde, 4000, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2015 to primary completion in Jul 2017, 20 months.

Of 76 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Ischemic Stroke, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 42. This study's 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 85 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 21, 2017
First posted
Dec 28, 2017
StartActual
Nov 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
Jul 30, 2017
CompletionActual
Jul 30, 2017
Last update
Dec 28, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03385538
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 28, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2015
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2017
Completion
Jul 30, 2017
Last update
Dec 28, 2017

Study contacts

Charlotte Rath, MD
principal investigator · Zealand University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Clopidogrel

Start the discussion