ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03384693Updated Sep 16, 2021Results posted

Defibrotide TMA Prophylaxis Pilot Trial

A Phase 2 interventional study of Defibrotide in Thrombotic Microangiopathies, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 30 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-16.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a common complication in the stem cell transplant population. Certain populations within the hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) population are at a higher risk than others. Defibrotide is an endothelial stabilizing agent which may prevent the endothelial damage that triggers TMA in HSCT patients. The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of defibrotide prophylaxis in a pediatric transplant population is unknown. Twenty five patients age 0 to 30 years receiving autologous or allogeneic hematopoeitic stem cell transplant who meet TMA high risk criteria will be enrolled. Patients will receive Defibrotide for 28-35 days starting before conditioning, and will be closely monitored for any adverse events up through 6 months post-transplant. The feasibility of administering defibrotide will be evaluated as well as incidence of TMA.

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label, single arm pilot study of defibrotide given as prophylaxis to patients receiving a conditioned stem cell transplant for the purpose of preventing post-transplant microangiopathy. The University of California San Francisco Blood and Marrow Transplant program reviewed all cases of non-relapse related death from 2012 through 2015 and identified a complication of endothelial injury known as transplant associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) as the most common cause of transplant related mortality in its patient population. TMA is a multi-system disease in which widespread endothelial injury leads to microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, intravascular platelet activation and formation of thrombi within the microcirculation. Diagnosis of TMA can be difficult as systemic signs and symptoms of TMA are often similar to other common transplant complications, such as medication induced hypertension and cytopenias. The reported prevalence of TMA is varied likely due to diagnostic uncertainty and transplant center expertise, but large retrospective studies have reported it as 10-39%, with the majority of cases occurring in the first 100 days after transplant. Of the patients who develop TMA, approximately half of them will develop severe disease. Outcomes are poor with a reported 30-50% mortality rate and as high as 80% in patients with severe disease. Furthermore, survivors of TMA may have significant morbidity (e.g. renal failure and need for long-term dialysis, heart failure, and significantly prolonged hospital admission). There is no gold standard of treatment for TMA. Supportive care includes renal support, discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitors, and treatment of infections. Treatment options include plasma exchange, complement cascade blockade, and defibrotide. Early treatment is crucial to decrease morbidity and mortality.

Despite the early recognition and treatment of TMA, poor outcomes occur when patients are treated with complement blockade alone. This suggests that complement activation may trigger a complex cascade of parallel inflammatory mediators that lead to end organ damage independent of the complement pathway. The goal is to prevent TMA whenever possible via augmentation of endothelial repair. Defibrotide is an anticoagulant and fibrinolytic agent that has been shown to be an effective treatment in other endothelial disorders such as hepatic veno-occlusive disease. It is a polydeoxyribonucleotide salt that blocks plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and attenuates the effect of tumor necrosis factor. It also increases prostaglandin E2 and prostacyclin levels which alters the platelet activity adhesion and aggregation and relaxes the smooth muscle of blood vessel walls. All of this likely protects the endothelium from damage. It has been shown that patients with TMA who were treated with defibrotide had a 77% response rate.

The use of defibrotide in the context of veno occlusive disease (VOD) treatment and prevention has been studied extensively, including a landmark report showing that defibrotide given to children during stem cell transplant conditioning is safe and effective in the prevention of veno-occlusive disease. Also, defibrotide showed a 67-77% response rate when used as treatment in patients who developed TMA. However, there has not been a prospective study to show that such prophylaxis is effective in the prevention of TMA in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoetic stem cell transplant (HCT).

Patients will receive Defibrotide 6.25mg/kg via two hour intravenous infusions given every 6 hours. Defibrotide will start the day before conditioning is initiated, and will last for 28 to 35 days. During defibrotide administration, participants will have assessments of administration feasibility, hypersensitivity reaction, and bleeding. All hematopoietic stem cell transplant standard of care evaluations will be conducted, including routine clinical evaluations and laboratory assessments.

Patients will be followed for 6 months post-HSCT, or until death, whichever occurs first. All patients will be evaluated for toxicity from the time of their first treatment with the study drug. The study will use the CTCAE v4.03 for reporting of non-hematologic adverse events and modified criteria for hematologic adverse events. Patients removed from study for unacceptable treatment related adverse event(s) will be followed until resolution or stabilization of all treatment-related adverse events to Grade 2 or lower.

Biomarkers indicative of endothelial damage and TMA activity will be drawn to assess subclinical TMA activity as well as risk for subsequent development of TMA while on defibrotide. These include plasma free hemoglobin, suppression of tumorigenicity, angiopoietin 2, and plasminogen activator inhibitor - 1. Study labs will be assessed at 4 time points prior to Day +21, and at diagnosis of TMA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thrombotic Microangiopathies

Keywords

  • hematopoeitic stem cell transplant
  • prophylactic defibrotide
03

In context

Thrombotic Microangiopathies

52 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombotic Microangiopathies; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 40 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Thrombotic Microangiopathies.

Browse Thrombotic Microangiopathies studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 0-30 years of age
  2. > 6 months
  3. or Performance Status >40
  4. Meets minimum organ function requirements per institutional standard of care guiding clearance for or allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
  5. Patients must meet TMA High-Risk criteria 5A or 5B below:

5A. Patients undergoing tandem autologous transplant with thiotepa in one or more of the conditioning regimens

OR:

5B. . Patients with at least 3 of the following characteristics:

  1. >10 years of age
  2. Non-Caucasian race/ Hispanic ethnicity
  3. Undergoing haploidentical transplant
  4. Minor ABO blood group mismatch

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >30 years
  2. \< 6 months
  3. Known bleeding diathesis or bleeding risk deemed by the treating physician to be a to administration of anticoagulants.
  4. Known reaction to defibrotide
  5. Any patient not meeting TMA High-Risk criteria
  6. Pregnant women are excluded from this study because they will be receiving teratogenic therapy as part of the stem cell transplant.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prophylactic Defibrotide

    6.25mg/kg administered intravenously every 6 hours for 28 to 35 days, starting on the day before conditioning is initiated.

    Drug: Defibrotide

Interventions

  • Defibrotide is an anticoagulant and fibrinolytic agent that has been shown to be an effective treatment in other endothelial disorders such as hepatic veno-occlusive disease.

    Also known as: Defitelio

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Total Doses of Defibrotide That Were Missed [Feasibility]

    Feasibility will be determined with regard to administration concurrently with chemotherapy and supportive medications before, during, and after stem cell infusion.

    Time frame: From first treatment with study drug to day +21 post Transplant

  2. Participants With Reportable Serious Adverse Events [Safety] Per CTACAE v5 Grade 3 or Higher

    Safety was assessed by evaluating drug-related Serious Adverse Events per CTACAE v5 that occur after prophylactic administration of defibrotide. Analyses will be performed for all patients having received at least one dose of study drug.

    Time frame: From first treatment with study drug to 6 months post-transplant

  3. Participants With Clinically Significant Bleeding Requiring Discontinuation of Therapy [Safety]

    Bleeding was assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. (CTCAE). Study drug was permanently discontinued at grade 3 bleeding or higher. Analyses will be performed for all patients having received at least one dose of study drug.

    Time frame: From first treatment with study drug to 6 months post-transplant

  4. Participants With Hypersensitivity Reaction Requiring Discontinuation of Therapy [Safety]

    Hypersensitivity reaction will be assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. For grade 2 hypersensitivity reaction, study drug will be held until it resolves to grade 1 or lower. Study drug will be permanently discontinued at grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction or higher. Analyses will be performed for all patients having received at least one dose of study drug.

    Time frame: From first treatment with study drug to 6 months post-transplant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With TMA Enrolled on the Study

    Evidence of microangiopathy, with either clinical markers/organ dysfunction or presence of biomarkers, or one of the following: 1) presence of schistocytes in peripheral blood; 2) Histologic evidence of microangiopathy on a tissue specimen; 3) Undetectable haptoglobin with increased reticulocyte counts. If there is no evidence of microangiopathy but at least one clinical marker or at least 3 biomarkers, the participant will meet the criteria for TMA incidence. Based on prior analysis at our center, we anticipated an incidence of TA-TMA of 28.2% (95 CI, 17.8-38.6%) in the high-risk patients undergoing allogeneic transplants and 40% (95% CI, 13.9-69.5%) in the neuroblastoma patients undergoing planned tandem HSCT

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  2. Number of Patients With Severe TMA

    Severe TMA is defined as any TMA meeting the criteria in Objective 2 with the following complications: renal dysfunction requiring dialysis, pleural or pericardial effusion requiring any medical or surgical intervention, central nervous system dysfunction including seizure or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, or death.

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of Elevation of Single or Combination of Biomarkers Predictive of Development of TMA

    Values will be analyzed to determine whether any one biomarker or a combination of biomarkers may be predictive of TMA development or severity.

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  2. Incidence of TMA

    Evidence of microangiopathy, with either clinical markers/organ dysfunction or presence of biomarkers, or one of the following: 1) presence of schistocytes in peripheral blood; 2) Histologic evidence of microangiopathy on a tissue specimen; 3) Undetectable haptoglobin with increased reticulocyte counts. If there is no evidence of microangiopathy but at least one clinical marker or at least 3 biomarkers, the participant will meet the criteria for TMA incidence.

    Time frame: Day 30, day 100 and day 180 post-transplant

  3. Non Relapse Mortality

    Deaths which cannot be attributed to disease relapse or progression

    Time frame: Day 100 and day 180 post-transplant

07

Results

Posted Sep 16, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Limitations include: Small single institution non-randomized trial. Combination of two separate patient populations at high-risk for TA-TMA allowed for a more robust study, but smaller numbers of patients in each of the groups limits sub-analysis. Some interesting preliminary findings with study biomarkers but the study is too small to draw definitive conclusions regarding utility. No current CLIA-approved lab measuring ANG-2, limiting applicability of this test to the clinical setting.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneProphylactic Defibrotide
Started25
Completed22
Not completed3
Withdrew: Adverse event3

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent of Total Doses of Defibrotide That Were Missed [Feasibility]

Feasibility will be determined with regard to administration concurrently with chemotherapy and supportive medications before, during, and after stem cell infusion.

Time frame:
From first treatment with study drug to day +21 post Transplant
Reported as:
Median · percentage of missed doses
Percent of Total Doses of Defibrotide That Were Missed [Feasibility]
percentage of missed dosesProphylactic Defibrotide
Percent of Total Doses of Defibrotide That Were Missed [Feasibility]0.7 (0.5 to 2.0)
PrimaryParticipants With Reportable Serious Adverse Events [Safety] Per CTACAE v5 Grade 3 or Higher

Safety was assessed by evaluating drug-related Serious Adverse Events per CTACAE v5 that occur after prophylactic administration of defibrotide. Analyses will be performed for all patients having received at least one dose of study drug.

Time frame:
From first treatment with study drug to 6 months post-transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With Reportable Serious Adverse Events [Safety] Per CTACAE v5 Grade 3 or Higher
ParticipantsProphylactic Defibrotide
Participants With Reportable Serious Adverse Events [Safety] Per CTACAE v5 Grade 3 or Higher3
PrimaryParticipants With Clinically Significant Bleeding Requiring Discontinuation of Therapy [Safety]

Bleeding was assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. (CTCAE). Study drug was permanently discontinued at grade 3 bleeding or higher. Analyses will be performed for all patients having received at least one dose of study drug.

Time frame:
From first treatment with study drug to 6 months post-transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With Clinically Significant Bleeding Requiring Discontinuation of Therapy [Safety]
ParticipantsProphylactic Defibrotide
Participants With Clinically Significant Bleeding Requiring Discontinuation of Therapy [Safety]3
PrimaryParticipants With Hypersensitivity Reaction Requiring Discontinuation of Therapy [Safety]

Hypersensitivity reaction will be assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. For grade 2 hypersensitivity reaction, study drug will be held until it resolves to grade 1 or lower. Study drug will be permanently discontinued at grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction or higher. Analyses will be performed for all patients having received at least one dose of study drug.

Time frame:
From first treatment with study drug to 6 months post-transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With Hypersensitivity Reaction Requiring Discontinuation of Therapy [Safety]
ParticipantsProphylactic Defibrotide
Participants With Hypersensitivity Reaction Requiring Discontinuation of Therapy [Safety]3
SecondaryNumber of Patients With TMA Enrolled on the Study

Evidence of microangiopathy, with either clinical markers/organ dysfunction or presence of biomarkers, or one of the following: 1) presence of schistocytes in peripheral blood; 2) Histologic evidence of microangiopathy on a tissue specimen; 3) Undetectable haptoglobin with increased reticulocyte counts. If there is no evidence of microangiopathy but at least one clinical marker or at least 3 biomarkers, the participant will meet the criteria for TMA incidence. Based on prior analysis at our center, we anticipated an incidence of TA-TMA of 28.2% (95 CI, 17.8-38.6%) in the high-risk patients undergoing allogeneic transplants and 40% (95% CI, 13.9-69.5%) in the neuroblastoma patients undergoing planned tandem HSCT

Time frame:
6 months post-transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With TMA Enrolled on the Study
ParticipantsProphylactic Defibrotide
Number of Patients With TMA Enrolled on the Study1
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Severe TMA

Severe TMA is defined as any TMA meeting the criteria in Objective 2 with the following complications: renal dysfunction requiring dialysis, pleural or pericardial effusion requiring any medical or surgical intervention, central nervous system dysfunction including seizure or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, or death.

Time frame:
6 months post-transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Severe TMA
ParticipantsProphylactic Defibrotide
Number of Patients With Severe TMA0
Other pre-specifiedIncidence of Elevation of Single or Combination of Biomarkers Predictive of Development of TMA

Values will be analyzed to determine whether any one biomarker or a combination of biomarkers may be predictive of TMA development or severity.

Time frame:
6 months post-transplant

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedIncidence of TMA

Evidence of microangiopathy, with either clinical markers/organ dysfunction or presence of biomarkers, or one of the following: 1) presence of schistocytes in peripheral blood; 2) Histologic evidence of microangiopathy on a tissue specimen; 3) Undetectable haptoglobin with increased reticulocyte counts. If there is no evidence of microangiopathy but at least one clinical marker or at least 3 biomarkers, the participant will meet the criteria for TMA incidence.

Time frame:
Day 30, day 100 and day 180 post-transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of TMA
ParticipantsProphylactic Defibrotide
Day 301
day 1000
Day 1800
Other pre-specifiedNon Relapse Mortality

Deaths which cannot be attributed to disease relapse or progression

Time frame:
Day 100 and day 180 post-transplant

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Prophylactic Defibrotide0/25 (0%)3/25 (12%)0/25 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventProphylactic Defibrotide
BleedingGeneral disorders3/25

Baseline characteristics

25 patients who started therapy

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Prophylactic Defibrotide
<=18 years22
Between 18 and 65 years3
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Prophylactic Defibrotide
Female10
Male15
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Prophylactic Defibrotide
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian7
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White15
More than one race2
Unknown or Not Reported0
Diagnosis
Diagnosis(Participants)Prophylactic Defibrotide
Leukemia9
Lymphoma2
Neuroblastoma14
Recipient CMV (cytomegalovirus) serostatus
Recipient CMV (cytomegalovirus) serostatus(Participants)Prophylactic Defibrotide
Positive14
Negative11
Donor type
Donor type(Participants)Prophylactic Defibrotide
Unrelated1
Haploidentical10
N/A (Autologous)14
MIBG (Metaiodobenzylguanidine) therapy prior to transplant
MIBG (Metaiodobenzylguanidine) therapy prior to transplant(Participants)Prophylactic Defibrotide
Yes4
No21
Conditioning backbone
Conditioning backbone(Participants)Prophylactic Defibrotide
TBI based3
Melphalan based6
Busulfan based2
Other (Autologous)14
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Benioff Children's Hospital at UCSF Medical Center
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cho BS, Yahng SA, Lee SE, Eom KS, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Lee S, Min CK, Cho SG, Kim DW, Lee JW, Min WS, Park CW. Validation of recently proposed consensus criteria for thrombotic microangiopathy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2010 Oct 27;90(8):918-26. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181f24e8d. PubMed 20717073 ↗
  • Choi CM, Schmaier AH, Snell MR, Lazarus HM. Thrombotic microangiopathy in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: diagnosis and treatment. Drugs. 2009;69(2):183-98. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969020-00004. PubMed 19228075 ↗
  • Corbacioglu S, Cesaro S, Faraci M, Valteau-Couanet D, Gruhn B, Rovelli A, Boelens JJ, Hewitt A, Schrum J, Schulz AS, Muller I, Stein J, Wynn R, Greil J, Sykora KW, Matthes-Martin S, Fuhrer M, O'Meara A, Toporski J, Sedlacek P, Schlegel PG, Ehlert K, Fasth A, Winiarski J, Arvidson J, Mauz-Korholz C, Ozsahin H, Schrauder A, Bader P, Massaro J, D'Agostino R, Hoyle M, Iacobelli M, Debatin KM, Peters C, Dini G. Defibrotide for prophylaxis of hepatic veno-occlusive disease in paediatric haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1301-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61938-7. Epub 2012 Feb 23. PubMed 22364685 ↗
  • Corti P, Uderzo C, Tagliabue A, Della Volpe A, Annaloro C, Tagliaferri E, Balduzzi A. Defibrotide as a promising treatment for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002 Mar;29(6):542-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703414. No abstract available. PubMed 11960280 ↗
  • Jodele S, Dandoy CE, Myers KC, El-Bietar J, Nelson A, Wallace G, Laskin BL. New approaches in the diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Transfus Apher Sci. 2016 Apr;54(2):181-90. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 Apr 25. PubMed 27156964 ↗
  • Jodele S, Davies SM, Lane A, Khoury J, Dandoy C, Goebel J, Myers K, Grimley M, Bleesing J, El-Bietar J, Wallace G, Chima RS, Paff Z, Laskin BL. Diagnostic and risk criteria for HSCT-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a study in children and young adults. Blood. 2014 Jul 24;124(4):645-53. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-564997. Epub 2014 May 29. PubMed 24876561 ↗
  • Jodele S, Zhang K, Zou F, Laskin B, Dandoy CE, Myers KC, Lane A, Meller J, Medvedovic M, Chen J, Davies SM. The genetic fingerprint of susceptibility for transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Blood. 2016 Feb 25;127(8):989-96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-663435. Epub 2015 Nov 24. PubMed 26603840 ↗
  • Kim SS, Patel M, Yum K, Keyzner A. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: review of pharmacologic treatment options. Transfusion. 2015 Feb;55(2):452-8. doi: 10.1111/trf.12859. Epub 2014 Sep 11. PubMed 25209960 ↗
  • Kojouri K, George JN. Thrombotic microangiopathy following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007 Mar;19(2):148-54. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3280148a2f. PubMed 17272988 ↗
  • Laskin BL, Goebel J, Davies SM, Jodele S. Small vessels, big trouble in the kidneys and beyond: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Blood. 2011 Aug 11;118(6):1452-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-321315. Epub 2011 May 19. PubMed 21596850 ↗
  • Obut F, Kasinath V, Abdi R. Post-bone marrow transplant thrombotic microangiopathy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jul;51(7):891-7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.61. Epub 2016 Mar 14. PubMed 26974272 ↗
  • Richardson PG, Murakami C, Jin Z, Warren D, Momtaz P, Hoppensteadt D, Elias AD, Antin JH, Soiffer R, Spitzer T, Avigan D, Bearman SI, Martin PL, Kurtzberg J, Vredenburgh J, Chen AR, Arai S, Vogelsang G, McDonald GB, Guinan EC. Multi-institutional use of defibrotide in 88 patients after stem cell transplantation with severe veno-occlusive disease and multisystem organ failure: response without significant toxicity in a high-risk population and factors predictive of outcome. Blood. 2002 Dec 15;100(13):4337-43. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1216. Epub 2002 Aug 1. PubMed 12393437 ↗
  • Rosenthal J. Hematopoietic cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Blood Med. 2016 Sep 2;7:181-6. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S102235. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27621680 ↗
  • Uderzo C, Bonanomi S, Busca A, Renoldi M, Ferrari P, Iacobelli M, Morreale G, Lanino E, Annaloro C, Volpe AD, Alessandrino P, Longoni D, Locatelli F, Sangalli H, Rovelli A. Risk factors and severe outcome in thrombotic microangiopathy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2006 Sep 15;82(5):638-44. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000230373.82376.46. PubMed 16969286 ↗
  • Uderzo C, Fumagalli M, De Lorenzo P, Busca A, Vassallo E, Bonanomi S, Lanino E, Dini G, Varotto S, Messina C, Miniero R, Valsecchi MG, Balduzzi A. Impact of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura on leukemic children undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Nov;26(9):1005-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702648. PubMed 11100281 ↗
  • Wingard JR, Majhail NS, Brazauskas R, Wang Z, Sobocinski KA, Jacobsohn D, Sorror ML, Horowitz MM, Bolwell B, Rizzo JD, Socie G. Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2230-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.7212. Epub 2011 Apr 4. PubMed 21464398 ↗
  • Yeates L, Slatter MA, Bonanomi S, Lim FLWI, Ong SY, Dalissier A, Barberi W, Shulz A, Duval M, Heilmann C, Willekens A, Hwang WHY, Uderzo C, Bader P, Gennery AR. Use of defibrotide to treat transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a retrospective study of the Paediatric Diseases and Inborn Errors Working Parties of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 May;52(5):762-764. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.351. Epub 2017 Jan 16. No abstract available. PubMed 28092354 ↗
  • Higham CS, Shimano KA, Melton A, Kharbanda S, Chu J, Dara J, Winestone LE, Hermiston ML, Huang JN, Dvorak CC. A pilot trial of prophylactic defibrotide to prevent serious thrombotic microangiopathy in high-risk pediatric patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 May;69(5):e29641. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29641. Epub 2022 Mar 6. PubMed 35253361 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in scientific journals after de-identification.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication

Access criteria: Researchers can submit a request for access to the study Steering Committee. If the proposal is determined to be methodologically sound, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement prior to gaining access.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2020, 26 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2021, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 11, 2017
First posted
Dec 27, 2017
StartActual
May 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Jul 31, 2020
Results first posted
Sep 16, 2021
Last update
Sep 16, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03384693
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 27, 2017
Start date
May 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2020
Completion
Jul 31, 2020
Results posted
Sep 16, 2021
Last update
Sep 16, 2021

Study contacts

Christine Higham, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Defibrotide

Start the discussion