ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03380117eBridgeUpdated Aug 1, 2019

Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students

An interventional study of eBridge Online Counseling in Suicide and Depression, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-01.

Primary conditionDepressionRegistry: SuicideReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Suicide — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Depression
Why
  1. Suicide is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Depression.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2014, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6,241
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 71 studies in Depression by University of Michigan — 10 open to participants now, 11 under way, none of them phase 3. Depression · University of Michigan.

Enrollment
Largest of 67
6,241 · median 70
Started
2014
with 6 others
No phase
59 of 71
8 open now
Registered
27th of 71
by date

Among the 71 studies in Depression by University of Michigan, this one has the largest enrollment of the 67 interventional ones, is one of 7 that started in 2014, is one of 59 with no phase, and was the 27th registered.

By phase

71 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study59 · 8 open
Observational4 · 1 open
Phase 23 · 1 open
Phase 43 · 0 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2005; this study’s year is marked. 7 started in 2014.

Size and results

Median enrollment 70 across the 67 interventional studies, 489 across the 4 observational. Of the 57 that completed or were terminated, 19 (33%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 71 studies in Depression by University of Michigan, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge) is an online intervention that screens students for mental health concerns that include elevated suicide risk and facilitates their linkage to mental health (MH) services. EBridge is designed to work on computers, tablets, and smartphones (iOS, Android) and is easily adaptable to evolving technologies in the future. It incorporates motivational interviewing (MI) principles and draws from health behavior models that emphasize autonomy and self-determination. Following a web-based screen using standardized scales to identify students at elevated risk, eBridge offers students options for personalized feedback (provided online in a conversational format adherent with motivational interviewing) and corresponding online with professionals trained in motivational interviewing and knowledgeable about university and community resources. Ebridge is being conducted at four universities: the University of Michigan, the University of Nevada-Reno, the University of Iowa, and Stanford University.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial will examine the efficacy of the intervention, Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge), in a large-scale, multi-university trial involving students at the University of Michigan, the University of Iowa, the University of Nevada-Reno, and Stanford University. Subject recruitment will take place in the fall academic semester during each year of data collection. All 6-month follow-up assessments will occur 5 to 6 months later and before many students leave campus for a spring or summer break. The study team will send recruitment emails between late September and October, and five to six-month follow-up emails in March or April. Student email addresses will be obtained from the registrar database of each participating university, per the standard Institutional Review Board and administrative process for obtaining such directory information for research studies. Furthermore, this process uses methods to maximize the security and confidentiality of the students' data, such as giving them unique identifiers to log into the web site (rather than identifiers that contain their name or email address) and using state-of-the-art security software to protect the website from having information intercepted. The planned number of student names and email addresses for possible participation will be randomly drawn. The study team will then send emails inviting students into the study, with up to 3 reminders spaced by 3-4 days for those who have yet to respond. The emails will note that students can reply and decline participation (and any further reminders). For those interested in participating, the email will contain a link to a secure web site where they can view the informed consent and decide whether to participate. The eBridge invitation email, screening, and all subsequent contacts via the Internet are confidential.

Personalized Feedback (PF) will be delivered online and provide feedback to students about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. This report is a briefer, modified version of the Personalized Feedback Report used in COMBINE, the multi-site clinical trial conducted to study the efficacy of treatments for alcohol dependence. The report highlights personal data and specifies links between our key screening variables and risk of negative outcomes. In the eBridge condition, PF is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by MI-adherent statements. In addition, students in the eBridge condition have the option of viewing or not viewing their PF, and of choosing to observe their PF in one or more domain.

Students' communications with eBridge counselors (MI-trained mental health professionals) will occur via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure web site. The total duration of the exchanges is expected to be brief, in keeping with MI approaches used in medical settings to consider behavior change and/or treatment recommendations and as found in our R34 study. Students will be able to communicate with eBridge counselors using asynchronized communication (with email notification that response has been posted on secure website) at any time.

Personalized Feedback (PF) will also be delivered online to students in the control condition, providing information to students about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. As for students in the eBridge condition, it will highlight their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students (e.g., www.ulifeline.org). All students in the control condition receive their PF immediately upon completing their screening survey (automatic next screen).

Each student, regardless of study condition, will see a list of campus and community resources for mental health and alcohol/substance abuse treatment, and for crisis services. These will be presented on each webpage of both the screening survey and the PF report. The resource information list has been uploaded to this application as an additional document.

The research team will collect quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data will be collected from subjects using brief questionnaires at baseline, 4 weeks, and six months. A subset of questions from the baseline questionnaire will serve as the screen that determines whether subjects are eligible for randomization. The baseline questionnaire will be programmed such that, once determined that a subject does not meet criteria for randomization, he or she will not be asked any more questions. The measures will be brief, requiring approximately 2-10 minutes for completion (5-6 minutes at 4-weeks), because brevity is a determinant of response rates for Internet surveys.

Students will be assessed at 4 weeks because a subset may derive benefit from the online intervention itself. This assessment occurs following exposure to eBridge, yet before participants are likely to have started using services. This will help to ascertain whether some reduction in risk factors is due to the web-based intervention itself rather than to linkage to services. This brief assessment will consist of the three suicidal ideation/behavior items, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the PHQ-10 (single item), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), mental health service utilization items, and the readiness scale (see below). A full outcome assessment will be conducted at 6 months.

Participants will be remunerated for involvement in the study. A random drawing will take place for all who have received an invitation to participate. In addition a 4-week pre-incentive will be distributed to encourage students to participate. Finally, 4-week and 6-month incentives will be distributed upon completion of each assessment.

03

Conditions studied

  • Suicide
  • Depression

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Suicidal Ideation
  • Suicide Attempt
  • Risk Screening
  • Online Intervention
  • Online Counseling
  • College Students
  • Motivational Interviewing
  • Linkage to Care
04

In context

Depression Reclassified

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6,241 is above the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,506 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 169 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 133 (79%) have results posted.

Compared within Depression, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Suicide. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • at least 18 years old
  • currently enrolled full- or part-time at a participating university

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not currently living in the university community (e.g., completing a study abroad semester)
06

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6,241 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    eBridge Online Counseling

    In the eBridge condition, personalized feedback is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by motivational-interviewing-adherent statements. In this condition, students have the opportunity to engage with eBridge counselors via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure website.

    Behavioral: eBridge Online Counseling

  • No intervention
    Control

    In the control condition, personalized feedback will also be delivered online to students, highlighting their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students.

Interventions

  • BehavioraleBridge Online Counseling

    In eBridge, students take an online screen and receive personalized feedback about their self-reported depression, alcohol/substance use, and level of functioning. Students are randomly assigned to either the eBridge or control condition. In the eBridge condition, personalized feedback is provided in a graphic format that is accompanied by motivational-interviewing-adherent statements. In this condition, students' communications with eBridge counselors will occur via online dialogues, in which students and counselors exchange messages using a secure website. In the control condition, personalized feedback will also be delivered online to students, highlighting their personal data and specify links between key screening variables and negative outcomes. However, in the control condition, this is provided in a straightforward graphic, informational format, which is consistent with standard practice in online screening programs for college students.

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in mental health service utilization

    Change in the number of participants accessing mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  2. Adherence to mental health services, as measured by yes/no response for 4-week period.

    Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Adherence to mental health services, as measured by total # of sessions for 4-week period.

    Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Adherence to mental health services, as measured by yes/no response for 6-month period.

    Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Adherence to mental health services, as measured by total # of sessions for 6-month period.

    Mental health services include psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, or a combination.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in suicidal thoughts

    Assessed using one item from the National Comorbidity Survey asking about serious suicidal thoughts at Baseline, 4-week, and 6-month intervals. "Have you ever felt so low you thought about committing suicide?" (Yes/No)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  2. Change in suicidal thoughts

    Assessed using one item from the National Comorbidity Survey asking about serious suicidal thoughts at Baseline, 4-week, and 6-month intervals. "Has there ever been a period of 2 weeks or more when you felt like you wanted to die?" (Yes/No).

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  3. Change in suicide attempts

    Two items from the National Comorbidity Survey assess number of suicide attempts at Baseline, 4-week, and 6-month intervals. At Baseline, "How many times have you attempted suicide in your lifetime?" (open-text). At 4-week, and 6-month intervals, "In the past month, have you ever attempted suicide" (Yes/No)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  4. Change in depression, as measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item scale based on Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV criteria for a major depressive episode. The instrument asks the respondent to indicate the frequency of various symptoms over the past two weeks and, following standard interpretation algorithms, categorizes participants as screening positive for major depression or not.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  5. Change in substance misuse

    Substance misuse will be assessed using five questions about recent drug use activity, using a list of commonly abused prescription drugs and illegal. The scale response options include never, once or twice, monthly, weekly, daily, or almost daily.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  6. Change in alcohol misuse

    Alcohol misuse will be assessed using the 10-item AUDIT, which asks about frequency of any drinking, average amount per day, and frequency of binge drinking (6 or more drinks on one occasion). It is scored on a 0-12 scale, and a screen cutoff score of 8 is considered optimal to identify students at higher risk.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Academic performance, as measured by grade point average

    Academic performance will be measured by grade point average at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Academic performance, as measured by retention

    Academic performance will be measured by whether or not the participant is still enrolled in the university.

    Time frame: 6 months

08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • University of Iowa
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • University of Nevada-Reno
    Reno, Nevada 89557, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bornheimer LA, Czyz E, Koo HJ, Li Verdugo J, Eisenberg D, Zheng K, Pistorello J, Albucher RC, Coryell W, Favorite T, King CA. Suicide risk profiles and barriers to professional help-seeking among college students with elevated risk for suicide. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Aug;152:305-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jun 18. PubMed 35772258 ↗
  • Horwitz AG, McGuire T, Busby DR, Eisenberg D, Zheng K, Pistorello J, Albucher R, Coryell W, King CA. Sociodemographic differences in barriers to mental health care among college students at elevated suicide risk. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jun 15;271:123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.115. Epub 2020 Apr 18. PubMed 32479307 ↗
  • Horwitz AG, Berona J, Busby DR, Eisenberg D, Zheng K, Pistorello J, Albucher R, Coryell W, Favorite T, Walloch JC, King CA. Variation in Suicide Risk among Subgroups of Sexual and Gender Minority College Students. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Oct;50(5):1041-1053. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12637. Epub 2020 Apr 15. PubMed 32291833 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2014 to primary completion in May 2019, 53 months.

Of 3,468 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's 53 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,566 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 15, 2017
First posted
Dec 20, 2017
StartActual
Nov 11, 2014
Primary completionActual
May 7, 2019
CompletionActual
May 7, 2019
Last update
Aug 1, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03380117
Responsible party
Cheryl A. King (Professor, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 20, 2017
Start date
Nov 11, 2014
Primary completion
May 7, 2019
Completion
May 7, 2019
Last update
Aug 1, 2019

Study contacts

Cheryl King, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion