ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03380026MIDASUpdated Sep 4, 2026Results posted

Mechlorethamine Induced Contact Dermatitis Avoidance Study

A Phase 2 interventional study of Triamcinolone and Valchlor 0.016 % Topical Gel in Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma Stage I and Mycosis Fungoides, sponsored by Rochester Skin Lymphoma Medical Group, PLLC. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.

Primary conditionMycosis FungoidesRegistry: Lymphoma, T-Cell, CutaneousReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Mycosis Fungoides
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Mycosis Fungoides, a narrower term within Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Rochester Skin Lymphoma Medical Group, PLLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a two-arm, open-label study that aims to compare the incidence and severity of the most common adverse reactions, particularly contact dermatitis, when Valchlor is used alone or in conjunction with triamcinolone ointment 0.1% in early stage MF subjects (Stage IA and IB) for a period of 4 months.

Read the detailed description

Mechlorethamine hydrochloride, or most commonly known as nitrogen nitrogen mustard, was approved by the FDA in 2013 for the treatment of IA and IB Mycosis Fungoides. The most common side effect of Valchlor is a skin rash, which is routinely ameliorated with the application of topical corticosteroids, such as topical Triamcinolone. The main purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of Triamcinolone in reducing side effects cause by Valchlor and further understand the nature of this skin rash.

This is a split-face study, meaning that subjects will receive both therapies, but limit use to designated areas. Treatment lasts 4 months with follow ups at 5 and 12 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
  • Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma Stage I
  • Mycosis Fungoides
  • Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides
  • Granulomatous Slack Skin
  • Syringotropic Mycosis Fungoides
  • Mycosis Fungoides Variant
  • Transformed Mycosis Fungoides

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • CTCL
  • topical mechlorethamine
  • Valchlor
  • contact dermatitis
  • triamcinolone
  • MF
  • Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
03

In context

Mycosis Fungoides Reclassified

447 studies on the registry are indexed under Mycosis Fungoides; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 34 across 321 interventional studies indexed under Mycosis Fungoides.

Browse Mycosis Fungoides studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Rochester Skin Lymphoma Medical Group, PLLC as lead sponsor.

Compared within Mycosis Fungoides, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be eligible to receive Valchlor therapy.
  • Be at least of 18 years of age and ability to give
  • Have stage IA or IB CTCL
  • Subjects with histologic variants of Mycosis Fungoides such as folliculotropic, granulomatous slack skin, syringotropic MF, or large cell transformation ARE eligible.
  • A skin within the last 60 days before start of treatment. In cases with equivocal histological features, the diagnosis may be confirmed with clinicopathologic and/or genetic testing consistent with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for Mycosis Fungoides. If sufficient tissue is not available to perform genetic testing, a new biopsy will be performed even if the subject has had a biopsy within 60 days of start of treatment.
  • Females of child bearing potential must agree to use two highly effective methods of (strongly recommended that one of the two forms of contraception be non-hormonal such as condom plus spermicide, condom plus diaphragm with spermicide, or have a vasectomized partner) or use an intrauterine device until 30 days after the last day of drug administration. Perimenopausal women must be amenorrhoeic for at least 12 months to be considered of nonchildbearing potential.
  • Males with female partners of child bearing potential must agree to sexual abstinence or use two reliable forms of effective contraception simultaneously (strongly recommended that one of the two forms should be non-hormonal as described above) during the entire treatment period and 30 days after the last dose.
  • Must be able to comply with the study instructions, apply the study medication as directed, and attend all visits.
  • Willingness to avoid sun exposure and ultraviolet B light in areas to be treated.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have been treated with topical mechlorethamine within 6 months in lesions followed during this study.
  • Have received any topical therapy directed against MF within 2 weeks of start of treatment in areas intended to be treated in this study.
  • Have received any systemic therapy (oral or injectables) within 3 weeks of start of treatment.
  • Not have any intercurrent illness or infection that would interfere with study participation
  • Known to mechlorethamine or triamcinolone.
  • Breastfeeding, pregnancy, or intention to become pregnant.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Valchlor 0.016% Topical Gel

    0.016% w/w topical mechlorethamine gel applied over a minimum of 8 cm2, nightly, over a period of 4 months.

    Drug: Valchlor 0.016 % Topical Gel

  • Active comparator
    Valchlor plus Triamcinolone

    0.016% w/w topical mechlorethamine gel (once, nightly) and Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment (up to three times daily) applied in over a minimum of 8 cm2, over a period of 4 months.

    Drug: Triamcinolone · Drug: Valchlor 0.016 % Topical Gel

Interventions

  • Apply up to three times daily on select lesions.

    Also known as: triamcinolone acetonide, Triamcinolone 0.1% ointment

  • DrugValchlor 0.016 % Topical Gel

    Drug page: Mechlorethamine

    Apply valchlor nightly on select lesions.

    Also known as: topical nitrogen mustard, mechlorethamine hydrochloride, mechlorethamine gel

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Moderate to Severe Contact Dermatitis by SCORD Scoring

    Incidence of moderate to severe contact dermatitis in patients treated concurrently with Triamcinolone 0.1% ointment versus those that are not. Dermatitis will be defined as a finding of cutaneous inflammatory reaction occurring as a result of treatment. This will be assessed by the SCORD (SCORing Dermatitis) tool and may be confirmed by biopsy of the specimen. Moderate to Severe Contact dermatitis is defined as \>25 by SCORD. A total of 26 participants had evaluable SCORD data available at 4 months for both treatment sides and were included in this analysis. While 28 participants enrolled and 27 had at least one post-baseline assessment, 2 participants withdrew prior to completing the 4-month SCORD evaluation, leaving 26 evaluable subjects.

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nature of Contact Dermatitis (Allergic Versus Irritant)

    The presence of allergic versus irritant dermatitis was characterized through skin biopsies sent for pathological review and patch testing. Subjects were evaluated at Screening, Month 1, month 2, month 3, and month 4 visits for incidence of dermatitis. Subjects presenting to the clinic with dermatitis underwent patch testing to determine the presence of allergic vs. Irritant contact dermatitis, and at each case a biopsy sample was taken of the affected area to confirm the diagnosis. Patch testing was assessed by the investigator according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group scale, using the following for possible outcomes : ?+ indicates a doubtful reaction, 1+ indicates a weak reaction, 2+ represents a strong reaction, 3+ indicates an extreme reaction, and IR indicates an Irritant reaction. A higher score would indicate a worse outcome. For patch testing, a 1-3+ reaction at the 96hr reading post-application was considered positive for allergic contact dermatitis.

    Time frame: Subjects were evaluated for dermatitis at each visit over the 4-month duration of the trial. Monthly study visits at Months 1, 2, 3, and 4. 27 participants had at least one post-baseline measurement and were included in the overall study assessment.

Other outcomes

  1. Severity of Dermatitis

    Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) differences between lesions treated with Valchlor and Triamcinolone versus lesions treated with Valchlor only. SCORAD measures the extent and severity of dermatitis. The percentage of total body surface area (0-100) covered by a lesion is measured by an investigator, and this number corresponds to score "A." The intensity criteria are met by scoring erythema, edema/papulation, oozing/crusting, excoriation, xerosis, and thickness on a scale of 0-3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe). These values are summed to give a total score, "B." Subjective symptoms of pruritus and insomnia are then scored using visual analogue scales ranging from 0-10 (0=none, 10=worst imaginable), and the result of each is summed to give score "C". The final score is then calculated by the formula A/5 + 7B/2 + C. The lowest possible score is 0, and the highest possible score is 103. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. A lower score would be a better outcome.

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. Efficacy of Valchlor vs Valchlor Plus Triamcinolone

    CAILS (Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity) is calculated per target lesion. Each component (erythema, scaling, plaque elevation, hypo/hyperpigmentation, and surface area) is graded on a scale of 0 to 8. Total CAILS scores range from 0 to 24 per lesion, where a score of 0 represents complete clearing (best outcome) and 24 represents maximum severe disease (worst outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 4

07

Results

Posted Nov 24, 2021

Participant flow

Patients presenting to medical clinic eligible for mechlorethamine topical therapy.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Participants
Started28
Half of body assigned to treatment with valchlor only28
Half of body assigned to treatment with valchlor and triamcinolone acetonide28
Completed25
Not completed3

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence of Moderate to Severe Contact Dermatitis by SCORD Scoring

Incidence of moderate to severe contact dermatitis in patients treated concurrently with Triamcinolone 0.1% ointment versus those that are not. Dermatitis will be defined as a finding of cutaneous inflammatory reaction occurring as a result of treatment. This will be assessed by the SCORD (SCORing Dermatitis) tool and may be confirmed by biopsy of the specimen. Moderate to Severe Contact dermatitis is defined as \>25 by SCORD. A total of 26 participants had evaluable SCORD data available at 4 months for both treatment sides and were included in this analysis. While 28 participants enrolled and 27 had at least one post-baseline assessment, 2 participants withdrew prior to completing the 4-month SCORD evaluation, leaving 26 evaluable subjects.

Time frame:
4 months
Reported as:
Number · patients
Incidence of Moderate to Severe Contact Dermatitis by SCORD Scoring
patientsValchlor 0.016% Topical GelValchlor Plus Triamcinolone
Incidence of Moderate to Severe Contact Dermatitis by SCORD Scoring1611
SecondaryNature of Contact Dermatitis (Allergic Versus Irritant)

The presence of allergic versus irritant dermatitis was characterized through skin biopsies sent for pathological review and patch testing. Subjects were evaluated at Screening, Month 1, month 2, month 3, and month 4 visits for incidence of dermatitis. Subjects presenting to the clinic with dermatitis underwent patch testing to determine the presence of allergic vs. Irritant contact dermatitis, and at each case a biopsy sample was taken of the affected area to confirm the diagnosis. Patch testing was assessed by the investigator according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group scale, using the following for possible outcomes : ?+ indicates a doubtful reaction, 1+ indicates a weak reaction, 2+ represents a strong reaction, 3+ indicates an extreme reaction, and IR indicates an Irritant reaction. A higher score would indicate a worse outcome. For patch testing, a 1-3+ reaction at the 96hr reading post-application was considered positive for allergic contact dermatitis.

Time frame:
Subjects were evaluated for dermatitis at each visit over the 4-month duration of the trial. Monthly study visits at Months 1, 2, 3, and 4. 27 participants had at least one post-baseline measurement and were included in the overall study assessment.
Reported as:
Count of units · Incidents of dermatitis
Nature of Contact Dermatitis (Allergic Versus Irritant)
Incidents of dermatitisAll Participants
Incidents of Contact Dermatitis2
Incidents of Allergic Dermatitis10
Other pre-specifiedSeverity of Dermatitis

Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) differences between lesions treated with Valchlor and Triamcinolone versus lesions treated with Valchlor only. SCORAD measures the extent and severity of dermatitis. The percentage of total body surface area (0-100) covered by a lesion is measured by an investigator, and this number corresponds to score "A." The intensity criteria are met by scoring erythema, edema/papulation, oozing/crusting, excoriation, xerosis, and thickness on a scale of 0-3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe). These values are summed to give a total score, "B." Subjective symptoms of pruritus and insomnia are then scored using visual analogue scales ranging from 0-10 (0=none, 10=worst imaginable), and the result of each is summed to give score "C". The final score is then calculated by the formula A/5 + 7B/2 + C. The lowest possible score is 0, and the highest possible score is 103. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. A lower score would be a better outcome.

Time frame:
4 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Severity of Dermatitis
score on a scaleValchlor 0.016% Topical GelValchlor Plus Triamcinolone
Severity of Dermatitis24.8 ± 21.812.7 ± 13.5
Other pre-specifiedEfficacy of Valchlor vs Valchlor Plus Triamcinolone

CAILS (Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity) is calculated per target lesion. Each component (erythema, scaling, plaque elevation, hypo/hyperpigmentation, and surface area) is graded on a scale of 0 to 8. Total CAILS scores range from 0 to 24 per lesion, where a score of 0 represents complete clearing (best outcome) and 24 represents maximum severe disease (worst outcome).

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 4
Reported as:
Mean · CAILS score
Efficacy of Valchlor vs Valchlor Plus Triamcinolone
CAILS scoreValchlor 0.016% Topical GelValchlor Plus Triamcinolone
Average CAILS score at Baseline8.6 ± 4.27.0 ± 5.1
Average CAILS score at Month 411.4 ± 4.912.0 ± 4.85

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Valchlor 0.016% Topical Gel0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)16/28 (57.1%)
Valchlor Plus Triamcinolone0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)11/28 (39.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventValchlor 0.016% Topical GelValchlor Plus Triamcinolone
Contact DermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders16/2811/28

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)All Participants
21-302
31-401
41-502
51-606
61-707
71-807
81-903
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Participants
Female10
Male18
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White25
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Rochester Skin Lymphoma Medical Group, PLLC
    Fairport, New York 14450, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lessin SR, Duvic M, Guitart J, Pandya AG, Strober BE, Olsen EA, Hull CM, Knobler EH, Rook AH, Kim EJ, Naylor MF, Adelson DM, Kimball AB, Wood GS, Sundram U, Wu H, Kim YH. Topical chemotherapy in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: positive results of a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial testing the efficacy and safety of a novel mechlorethamine, 0.02%, gel in mycosis fungoides. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jan;149(1):25-32. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamadermatol.541. PubMed 23069814 ↗
  • Alexander-Savino CV, Chung CG, Gilmore ES, Carroll SM, Poligone B. Randomized Mechlorethamine/Chlormethine Induced Dermatitis Assessment Study (MIDAS) Establishes Benefit of Topical Triamcinolone 0.1% Ointment Cotreatment in Mycosis Fungoides. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Mar;12(3):643-654. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00681-6. Epub 2022 Feb 5. PubMed 35122614 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be embargoed until the study site has fully examined it. Expected embargo would be one year from study completion. Study data that is de-identified will be maintained at the study site. As this field is rapidly changing, if a database is available for safe, public upload at the end of study embargo, it will be uploaded to a national database. Otherwise requests for use of the study data will be accepted at the study site and shared with investigators whose proposed use of data has been approved by an independent institutional review board. Contact addresses and phone numbers will be presented on all publications to assist in this study sharing.

Supporting information: Clinical study report

Time frame: Expected embargo would be one year from study completion. De-identified data will be maintained at the study site for 2 years after the study ends. Contact addresses and phone numbers will be presented on all publications to assist in this study sharing.

Access criteria: Data will be shared with investigators whose proposed use of data has been approved by an independent institutional review board.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2020, 31 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2021, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

Of 33 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Mycosis Fungoides, half reached primary completion within 64 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 40 and three quarters within 119. This study's 31 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 42 studies reached it within 64 months; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 111.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 12, 2017
First posted
Dec 20, 2017
StartActual
Dec 13, 2017
Primary completionActual
Aug 3, 2020
CompletionActual
Dec 13, 2020
Results first posted
Nov 24, 2021
Last update
Sep 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03380026
Lead sponsor
Rochester Skin Lymphoma Medical Group, PLLC
Collaborators
Rochester General Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 20, 2017
Start date
Dec 13, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 3, 2020
Completion
Dec 13, 2020
Results posted
Nov 24, 2021
Last update
Sep 4, 2026

Study contacts

Brian Poligone, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Rochester Skin Lymphoma Medical Group, PLLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mechlorethamine

Start the discussion