ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03379090Updated Jul 24, 2018

Neighborhood Influence on Parenting Practices Regarding Youth Outdoor Play

An observational study in Physical Activity, Adolescent Behavior and Parenting, sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-24.

Primary conditionAdolescent BehaviorRegistry: Motor ActivityReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Motor Activity — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Adolescent Behavior
Why
  1. Motor Activity is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Adolescent Behavior.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Parental constraint of outdoor play may be fueling unhealthy emotional and physical development in today's children and adolescents. Time spent outdoors is a key determinant of unstructured play and overall physical activity levels, both of which are crucial to optimal development in youth. Modern barriers - such as crime, poor social ties among neighbors, and unsafe physical environments - constrain parental practices and reduce opportunities for outdoor play in children and youth. Low levels of perceived collective efficacy, a measure of perceived neighborhood cohesion and the collective capacity to solve neighborhood problems, has been proposed as a social environmental factor that constrains outdoor play by parents either attempting to avoid potentially dangerous situations or using defensive behavior by upgrading security measures. Moreover, incivilities in the neighborhood physical environment (e.g. litter, graffiti, blighted property) may influence parents' perceived collective efficacy. Consequently, a child's ability to achieve the recommended minimum of 60 minutes of daily physical activity may be limited by a complex interaction between neighborhood social and physical environmental factors and the extent to which parents respond by constraining offspring outdoor play. The central hypothesis of this research is that modifiable factors in the neighborhood social and physical environment result in parental constraint of offspring outdoor play, which reduces overall physical activity during critical years of development. This research will use qualitative methods to generate a comprehensive understanding of how and which environmental factors play a crucial role in parental constraint of outdoor play and promote low levels of within-neighborhood physical activity. This ancillary study will recruit 32 parents/guardians of participants from the parent study, Translational Investigation of Growth and Everyday Routines in Kids (TIGER Kids) Study (USDA 3092-51000-056-04A), to participate in in-depth interviews. My ultimate goal is to use knowledge gained from this ancillary study to generate community-based interventions that will target neighborhood factors to successfully reduce parental constraints on outdoor play.

02

Conditions studied

  • Physical Activity
  • Adolescent Behavior
  • Parenting

Browse trials for

03

In context

Adolescent Behavior Reclassified

305 studies on the registry are indexed under Adolescent Behavior; 47 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 247 across 40 observational studies indexed under Adolescent Behavior.

Browse Adolescent Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Pennington Biomedical Research Center is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Compared within Adolescent Behavior, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Motor Activity. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

32 parents/guardians of participants from the TIGER Kids parent study will be recruited for this study. All parents/guardians will be recruited after their child has completed the baseline (Y0) TIGER Kids study visit.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

-Child completed baseline measures (Y0) for the parent study, TIGER Kids Study (USDA 3092-51000-056-04A).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child did not complete baseline measures (Y0) of the TIGER Kids Study.
  • Did not report a home address at the baseline (Y0) TIGER Kids study visit.
  • Unwilling or unable to participate in an in-depth interview.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perceptions of how the social environment influences parenting practices related to outdoor play and youth's physical activity.

    Indepth interviews will be used to measure parental perceptions of how the social environment in which they live influences their parenting decisions regarding their child's outdoor play.

    Time frame: One time-point, 1 hour in-depth interview

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is currently no plan to share IPD. Qualitative data may be difficult to prepare to ensure privacy of the participant. Furthermore, we do not see the benefit of sharing IPD from this study as qualitative data cannot be easily reanalyzed to validate study findings, combined with other datasets, and has a high risk of being analyzed using invalid/non-rigorous methods.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03379090
Responsible party
Maura Kepper (Postdoctoral Fellow, Pennington Biomedical Research Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 20, 2017
Start date
Mar 26, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 18, 2018
Completion
Jul 18, 2018
Last update
Jul 24, 2018

Study contacts

Maura Kepper, PhD
principal investigator · Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion